Your Grandmother's and Cleopatra's contraception

According to this Women’s eNews article, there’s a new museum in Cleveland, Ohio called the History of Contraception that displays contraceptive devices and remedies used back in the good ole days and ancient times. Ironically, the museum opened right when the Ohio Legislature was trying to push anti-choice/anti-contraceptive measures into law. Very clever.

A new mini-museum in Cleveland puts the history of contraception–from crocodile dung to the pill–on display. Launched quietly in March, it emerges as the new federal budget threatens the access of millions of women to contraceptive services.

CLEVELAND (WOMENSENEWS)–Sheep intestines fashioned into a condom; crocodile dung with acidic properties for vaginal insertion; and hundreds of metal and plastic swirls, squiggles, loops and bows that form various intrauterine devices are some of the artifacts in the 11 display cases in the History of Contraception Museum in Cleveland, the nation’s only museum dedicated to the world of birth control.

The museum was quietly inaugurated into the Dittrick Medical History Center of Case Western Reserve University with a March opening reception. The museum had been under consideration as a site since 2003.

[...]

The contraceptive exhibit was donated by Percy Skuy, past president of Ortho Pharmaceutical (Canada), maker of contraceptive products and pills, who began building the collection 40 years ago as what began as a trade show novelty.

Now retired and living in Toronto, Skuy is still on the lookout for new items to add to the display.

While called a museum, the contraception collection is contained in 11 handsomely-designed cabinets that, at present, snake around in an oval, allowing viewers to circulate around and view its contents, including a video, artifacts and minimal textual explanations. Contained within the 1920s university building that houses the medical museum, a separate room is being fitted to house the contraception display in an area adjacent to a re-created 1930 pharmacy and an 1870 doctor’s office, complete with a skeleton in a closet.

Not Yet a Major Attraction
So far, the museum is hardly a tourist attraction to rival the Rock ‘n Roll Hall of Fame and Museum, which is a mere five miles away.

“I’ve never heard of such a thing,” said an operator for 10 years at the Convention and Visitors Bureau of Greater Cleveland.

The collection of ingenious products to prevent pregnancy extends to cervical caps, diaphragms, sponges, amulets and condoms of all sorts, from the manufactured to the homemade candy wrapper and saran wrap.

[...]

The exhibit and its 650 artifacts–ranging from beaver-testical tea believed to prevent pregnancy to tiny pills in circle packaging–may serve as a reminder to U.S. politicians that the 93 percent of U.S. women who are at risk of pregnancy and who use contraception have plenty of historical precedent.

“Some of the American political debate comes from an absence of appreciation of this long, long history of contraception practice across the globe,” said Andrea Tone, a professor in the social studies of medicine at McGill University in Montreal and an advisor to the museum. She also has written a book about contraception, “Devices and Desires,” published in 2001. “American society still has to come to terms with sexuality and women’s sexuality and the possibilities of a society that doesn’t think twice about their rights to safe, quality and affordable birth control.”

Skuy added: “If people think no one should use contraception, they are entitled to their opinion. But this is the history, this is what people did.”

The history, he said, shows not only technique and motivation, but attitude. “The political struggle manifests itself,” he says. “When we consider how this has now become an everyday item, the answers should come through better education, better use of the products, not negative legislation.”

Controversial Times
The museum emerges in a time of intense controversy over contraception.

In March, the same month that the museum opened, the Alan Guttmacher Institute, which researches reproductive health issues, reported a high level of hostility to reproductive health rights in Congress and state legislatures and potential harm to contraceptive services from proposed cuts in Medicaid.

“You can count on some attack on family planning in Congress and something you didn’t expect,” Adam Sonfield, a public policy associate with the Institute’s Washington, D.C., office, said.

The Guttmacher Institute estimates that 16 million sexually active women rely upon two publicly funded programs–Medicaid or Title X of the Public Health Service Act–for contraceptive services. These include nearly 700,000 in Ohio alone.

Medicaid funding could take the brunt of a $20 billion cut in domestic programs in the budget plan submitted by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives in April. Even a 1 percent loss in family planning funding would affect tens of thousands of women, reported Guttmacher.

Although Senate Democrats are countering with a proposal to add $100 million for family planning programs, Guttmacher’s Sonfield considers its passage unlikely.

[...]

Advice from Casanova
Casanova, the famous Italian 18th century libertine, reportedly recommended that his lovers insert a half-lemon with the juice extracted as a cervix cover.

Text dating to 1580 B.C. suggests grinding dates, acacia and honey to coat the vulva. The Biblical description of “spilling seed,” or withdrawal, has its place as do items for trying to find the rhythm in the method of measuring safe periods for copulation without conception.

The pill, now 44 years old, is featured in a case of its own, showing its dial-a-pill and other formulations.

[...]

Skuy says he has never encountered protests to the exhibit during his years of displaying them at pharmaceutical conventions.

Tone, however, reports that the late curator of a Smithsonian exhibit in Washington received hundreds of complaining letters only five years ago about the mere inclusion of the birth control pill among 20th century inventions.

Permanent placement of the museum in Cleveland arrives just in time for the 40th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut. Faced with state laws making it a crime to use or dispense contraception, the court in 1965 ruled for the first time that a right to privacy prevents arrests for the use of contraception.

The National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, a Washington-D.C. advocacy association of family planning clinics, will mark the occasion with a forum on legal access to birth control on Capitol Hill on June 6.

We’ve come along way since using dung and sheep entrails. But how long will we enjoy our advances in contraception if the vehemently anti-choice/anti-contraception forces have it their way in the Legislature? Do we really want to go back to dung and jamming lemons inside of us? Hopefully this museum will create more dialogue and appreciation for the very long history of contraception.

This entry posted in Abortion & reproductive rights, Anti-Contraceptives/EC zaniness, Feminism, sexism, etc, Whatever. Bookmark the permalink. 

One Response to Your Grandmother's and Cleopatra's contraception

  1. 1
    Kevin T. Keith says:

    We’ve come along way since using dung and sheep entrails.

    Not that far: “lambskin” condoms are still available (though not as effective as synthetics, and not recommended for protection against STDs). Dung seems to have fallen out of favor, though.