Something's missing, but not surprising that it is…..

When it comes to all of these international meetings of powerful heads of State such as the recent G8 Summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, one issue in particular seems to be always left out or rarely acknowledged. Access to reproductive health care in relation to poverty, is an issue these very influential leaders apparently pay little or no attention to at all when it comes to these highly publicized gatherings. I suppose because it mostly effects women and girls it’s “unimportant” or too inconvenient to discuss.

Via Planned Parenthood

[…]One issue is missing, though, and it’s not being talked about by Brad Pitt or Bono, let alone President Bush or Great Britain’s Prime Minister Blair: access to reproductive health care.

Access to reproductive health care can be scarce in the developing world, and without it women, in particular, are trapped in poverty.

They cannot avoid unintended pregnancies, which keep them out of the work force, create more mouths to feed, and present constant physical risks to their health.

And without access to reproductive health care, women cannot protect themselves from HIV/AIDS. Once infected, they can rarely afford anti-retroviral medication, so not only do they usually die, but they often leave their children orphaned, meaning their oldest daughters must then take over raising the remaining children.

Governments around the world must prioritize reproductive health care as a means of poverty reduction. The United States should be in the lead on this, but unfortunately our government is far from a leader.

That’s for damn sure.

While on the domestic front our government is cutting Medicaid, restricting access to abortion, and pushing abstinence-only sex education, on the global front it is cutting international family planning funding, restricting access to abortion overseas, and pushing medically unsound abstinence-only sex education as a way of preventing HIV/AIDS around the world.

And we can thank Dubya’s good ole Global Gag Rule for this. I’m also aware that the knee-jerk and very ignorant response to the dilemma of women in Developing Nations who keep having repeated unintentional pregnancies after another and being infected with HIV, is to ‘stop having sex.’ However in these countries, women can be raped into submission by their husbands or other men who feel entitled to penetrating their bodies. And this is usually either legal or not acknowledged, or dealt with (if so, then rarely) by ruling governments these countries.

Poverty can be crippling, but it can also be overcome. Access to family planning and reproductive health can help women and families everywhere escape poverty and better their lives.

No, world leaders can’t help women in this particular sphere. Helping women and ensuring and promoting their reproductive rights is considered to be a “special interest” issue, and so unimportant. Lest we forget, it’s simply too “emasculating” for our heads of State here and around the world to do this anyway. Besides, if you want to keep your country’s womenfolk from getting too uppity, just deny them their reproductive rights and make them even more vulnerable to poverty. And though it may seem this serious lack of reproductive rights and health care only takes place in Developing Nations such as within Africa, under this administration’s politics and Congress, our nation is *slowly* but beginning to emulate the very same extremist anti-reproductive-rights/health-care policies we see in the Developing World. If Roe is overturned, Griswold will be next, and Bush’s Global Gag Rule reigns even at here. American women and girls are not immune from this. However, no woman or girl, regardless of what nation they hail from, should suffer under a government that has contempt for their sex having control over their reproductive destinies and choices.

This entry posted in Abortion & reproductive rights, Anti-Contraceptives/EC zaniness, Conservative zaniness, right-wingers, etc., Elections and politics, Gender and the Economy, International issues. Bookmark the permalink. 

4 Responses to Something's missing, but not surprising that it is…..

  1. 1
    Kyra says:

    At least half the population of people the G8 summit is trying (sorta) to help, happens to be female. Why isn’t half the population of the G8 summit female?

    And what kind of idiots and/or sadistic misogynists do people have to be to tout abstinence as the only answer when half the population is essentially denied the right to say no?!

  2. 2
    Josh Jasper says:

    I think by staying neutral on the birth control issue, Bono has been able to get access to a lot of Republicans, and actualy change minds about debt relief and emergency aid.

    For some reason, the press ahs decided that bitching about him and Live8 is hip. It pisses me off.

  3. 3
    dryad says:

    However in these countries, women can be raped into submission by their husbands or other men who feel entitled to penetrating their bodies.

    My understanding is that one of the most common ways for poor African women to become infected with HIV is by their husbands, who, due to financial necessity, often spend most of their time working in urban areas away from their families. There, the men have sex with infected prostitutes, become infected themselves, and transmit the infection to their wives, who are obligated to have sex with their husbands when the men do come home.

    So not only does the lack of reproductive health care contribute to poverty, but poverty also exacerbates the lack of reproductive health care. Breaking this cycle would dramatically change the face of the world, but the flip side is that the problem is so vast and complex, and its potential solutions therefore so inherently unsexy and long-term, that there’s really not much personal gain to be had for any politician or leader who might tackle it.

    It’s also problematic that reproductive health is pigeonholed as “just” a women’s issue (like it somehow doesn’t affect all of us) with all of the political partisanship that women’s issues engender. And let’s pause to consider the disturbing implications of the fact that women’s health issues are even considered grounds for ideological debate in the first place, like there’s some legitimate moral quandary involved in providing women with the tools to care for and control their own bodies.

  4. 4
    AndiF says:

    One positive thing we can all do is to donate money to organizations that address health problems in developing countries. Here’s a couple to consider:

    Women for Women International

    34 Million Friends