Jack Balkin points out that if Alito gets confirmed, the person replacing O’Connor as the most frequent swing vote will be Justice Kennedy. So what will Justice Kennedy – the new most powerful Justice in the country – decide?
…To understand what Alito’s appointment means for constitutional doctrine, instead of focusing on Alito’s views (which one assumes are reliably conservative), one needs to focus on Kennedy’s. We know that the new median Justice supports abortion rights claims a little less than O’Connor (Kennedy voted to uphold restrictions on partial birth abortion), supports gay rights claims a bit more than O’Connor (Kennedy wrote the opinion in Lawrence), thinks affirmative action is largely unconstitutional (Kennedy dissented in Grutter), thinks most campaign finance regulation is unconstitutional (Kennedy dissented (in part) in McConnell) and has been more likely to permit government endorsements of religion and state financial support for religion than O’Connor (Kennedy dissented in Mccreary County v. ACLU and joined Mitchell v. Helms). On federalism, it’s a mixed bag: Kennedy joined Raich v. Ashcroft but dissented in the two most recent section five cases, Tennesee v. Lane and Hibbs. Note that this will all probably be true even if Alito’s appointment is defeated and Bush needs to appoint someone else; there’s simply no way that Bush, with a Republican majority in the Senate, will nominate someone to Kennedy’s left. Don’t get me wrong; I hope Democrats will do whatever they can to defeat the Alito nomination, for a few reasons: * No one who thinks husband-notification laws are constitutional is fit for the Supreme Court; * If the Democrats do defeat Alito, that would be another black eye for Bush, perhaps limiting how much damage he does in his three remaining years; * And even if they can’t defeat Alito, the Democrats desperately need to begin having principles that they stand up for. But no matter what happens to Alito, I think Jack is probably right about the immediate direction the Supreme Court will take. It’s Kennedy’s Court now.
Recent Comments
Cartoon: Deux Ex Machina, Suckers!
Cartoon: Free Speech on Campus
Cartoon: Unions Have Always Done The Impossible!
Cartoon: It's All About Caring, Fatsos
Cartoon: The Measure of Intelligence
Cartoon: Hey did you hear? Biden is old!
- Link Love | Grumpy Rumblings (of the formerly untenured) { […] Cartoon: Hey did you hear? Biden is old! […] }
- Ampersand on Apr 5, 2024 at 12:09 pm
- Avvaaa on Apr 4, 2024 at 10:27 pm
- Ampersand on Apr 4, 2024 at 6:09 pm
Cartoon: The Celestial Politics of Trans Bans
- Older »
Most Recent Open Thread
The most recent open thread can always be found at the top of this page. When older posts have closed comments, please respond to them on the most recent open thread.Alas, a Blogroll
- Lawyers Guns and Money
Is Our Media Learning?
4 hours ago - Female Gazing
Every time I run away
16 hours ago - Election Law Blog
“Arizona Republicans Set Up a Ballot Measure to Squash Future Ballot Measures”
17 hours ago - The Incidental Economist
- Family Inequality
The definitive US baby name popularity and androgyny update for 2023
5 days ago
- Lawyers Guns and Money
Barry’s BlueSky
- Untitled May 18, 2024The Biggest Crisis A #PoliCartoon by me and Becky Hawkins.
- Untitled May 17, 2024#PoliCartoon: Fat Patients, Fat Patience #FatAcceptance
- Untitled May 17, 2024Thinking of that time that Degas painted the actress Ellen Andree sitting and looking pensive in a cafe, and Monet saw Degas' painting and decided to find the same actress and get her to pose in the same cafe so he could do his own version.
- Untitled May 17, 2024Copyright claims often go too far, crushing free speech and not allowing for the way artists are influenced by, repurpose, and even coincidentally echo, other art. Not this time, though! Jeff Dieschburg is a straight-up tracer who adds NOTHING original when he paints his copies of photos. [contains quote post or other embedded content]
- Untitled May 17, 2024#PoliCartoon: Defending Free Speech
- Untitled May 16, 2024The Existence of Trains Debate #PoliCartoon #Climate #ClimateChange #GlobalWarming
- Untitled May 18, 2024
Alas, A Subscription Service
Archives
Categories
Pingback: Alas, a blog » Blog Archive » Even with Alito, reproductive rights are not doomed
I thought it interesting how prophetic this is. In the first real significant case of the post O’Conner era – Gonzales v Oregon – (I know SDO was involved but she really is a lame duck now) it seems quite an interesting coincidence (or maybe not) that Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion for the majority. Furthermore, assuming Alito were on the court and would have sided with the dissenters, Kennedy would surely be considered the “swing” vote in what would have then been a 5-4 decision. (BTW did you read Scalia’s dissent? – Very Alito-like analysis, albeit with Scalia-like sarcasm and disdain)
I think the Court got it right on that one. Not that I buy off on physician-assisted suicide, but I do buy off that it’s the province of the State legislatures, not the Federal courts.