{"id":1221,"date":"2004-11-05T06:29:50","date_gmt":"2004-11-05T14:29:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/archives\/2004\/11\/05\/how-did-anti-ssm-folks-frame-their-case\/"},"modified":"2004-11-05T06:29:50","modified_gmt":"2004-11-05T14:29:50","slug":"how-did-anti-ssm-folks-frame-their-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=1221","title":{"rendered":"How did anti-SSM folks frame their case?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.marriagedebate.com\/mdblog\/2004_10_31_mdblog_archive.htm#109952884286567244\">Marriage Debate<\/a>, Eve disagrees with Michael Triplett&#8217;s claim that &#8220;anti-gay marriage initiative campaigns were not waged on a &#8216;we need to save fragile marriage&#8217; platform&#8221;:<\/p>\n<div class=\"snip\">I really don&#8217;t agree about the way the issues were framed. Admittedly, I live in DC, so I saw virtually no campaign TV ads. But I&#8217;ve been doing Nexis searches for &#8220;gay marriage&#8221; and &#8220;same-sex marriage&#8221; daily for months now, so I&#8217;ve read about six quadrillion op-eds from supporters and opponents of the marriage amendments, from the New York Times to the Anytown Clarion-Pantagraph. And the overwhelming majority of the pro-amendment pieces focused on <i>marriage<\/i>, on what children need and which cultural messages promote strong families.<\/div>\n<p>I don&#8217;t want to spend much time rehashing the election. Eve&#8217;s allies won, my allies lost. <i>Maziltov <\/i>to you, Eve. But let&#8217;s remember that the vast majority of voters are not doing a daily Nexis search of the papers; they did not see what Eve saw.<\/p>\n<p>What the majority of Oregon voters <i>did <\/i>see is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/archives\/2004\/10\/28\/does-senator-smith-believe-theyll-be-teaching-gay-sex-in-schools\/\">flyers like this one<\/a>, which claimed that if they didn&#8217;t support Measure 36, &#8220;gay and lesbian sex will be taught in Oregon schools.&#8221; A similar message was given to all Oregonians via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/archives\/2004\/10\/19\/push-polling-from-gaybashers\/\">push polling<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The same thing was true in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/archives\/2004\/10\/18\/reply-to-joshua-baker\/\">voter&#8217;s ballot <\/a>delivered to the home of every Oregon voter &#8211; a theme repeated again and again by Measure 36&#8217;s advocates is that this was a vote about what children will be taught in schools.<\/p>\n<p>To be fair, the &#8220;Yes on 36&#8221; crowd also distributed a flyer saying &#8220;children do better with a mom and dad&#8221; (along with the usual anti-SSM lies about what social science research says), which by Eve&#8217;s standards possibly qualifies as being &#8220;focused on <i>marriage<\/i>.&#8221; I disagree; since same-sex couples will raise children regardless of Measure 36, logically the issue of &#8220;shall same-sex couples be permitted to raise children&#8221; is distinct from the issue of SSM&#8217;s legal status. In essence, SSM opponents are performing a bait-and-switch; they&#8217;re promising to do something about providing all kids &#8220;a mom and dad,&#8221; when actually their proposed policy does no such thing.<\/p>\n<p>Could they have won this election without the &#8220;faggots will teach your kids gay sex&#8221; boogieman? I don&#8217;t know. Clearly, <i>they <\/i>didn&#8217;t think they could win without bringing up such nonsensical claims (in Oregon, anyway).<\/p>\n<p>However, they did win &#8211; and they won by telling virtually every Oregonian, in multiple ways, that the alternative to their ballot measure was teaching children gay sex in public schools. By doing so, I think that they (and their fellow-travelers) have given up the ability to reasonably claim that this was an election &#8220;focused on marriage.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><b>UPDATE<\/b>: <a href=\"http:\/\/resipsa.typepad.com\/my_weblog\/2004\/11\/marriage_was_no.html\">Michael Triplett <\/a>replies to Eve as well.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over on Marriage Debate, Eve disagrees with Michael Triplett&#8217;s claim that &#8220;anti-gay marriage initiative campaigns were not waged on a &#8216;we need to save fragile marriage&#8217; platform&#8221;: I really don&#8217;t agree about the way the issues were framed. Admittedly, I &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=1221\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-same-sex-marriage"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}