{"id":1312,"date":"2005-01-18T09:51:44","date_gmt":"2005-01-18T17:51:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/archives\/2005\/01\/18\/does-ohios-anti-ssm-amendment-protect-girlfriend-beaters\/"},"modified":"2005-01-18T09:51:44","modified_gmt":"2005-01-18T17:51:44","slug":"does-ohios-anti-ssm-amendment-protect-girlfriend-beaters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=1312","title":{"rendered":"Does Ohio&#039;s anti-SSM amendment protect girlfriend-beaters?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This is twisted. From the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cleveland.com\/printer\/printer.ssf?\/base\/cuyahoga\/1105785144152810.xml\">Cleveland Plain Dealer<\/a><\/em>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Ohio&#8217;s quarter-century-old domestic-violence law gives special criminal status to an assault by a family or household member and establishes unique protections for the victim. Courts also have consistently applied it to homosexual couples.<\/p>\n<p>It is one of only two criminal offenses &#8211; along with menacing by stalking &#8211; that automatically gives the victim access to a protective order to keep the defendant away, and police are obligated to enforce it. Further, a violation of the protective order, or any second offense, &#8220;accelerates&#8221; misdemeanor domestic-violence charges to a felony.<\/p>\n<p>The law treats anyone &#8220;living as a spouse&#8221; the same as a spouse when it comes to domestic violence: It defines domestic violence as an attack, or attempted or threatened attack, against a household member, and includes unmarried couples &#8211; so-called cohabitants.<\/p>\n<p>Therein lies the rub, the public defender&#8217;s office motions contend. The new amendment forbids any state or local law that would &#8220;create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design . . . of marriage.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Yet, that is exactly what the domestic-violence law does for unmarried couples living together, says Lazarus, a third-year law student who drew up the boilerplate motion to dismiss. The law, he wrote, &#8220;clearly creates a legal relationship between unmarried individuals.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, that&#8217;s twisted.<\/p>\n<p>And <em>this <\/em>is even more twisted: Lazarus is doing this because he&#8217;s a gay rights activist.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Yet the public defender&#8217;s tactic gives hope for opponents of Issue 1, which Ohio voters approved in November. Some lawyers who oppose the amendment say if a judge sides with the public defender&#8217;s reasoning, the court could declare the amendment a violation of the U.S. Constitution&#8217;s 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law. Specifically, a married victim of domestic violence would have more protection than an unmarried neighbor beaten by a live-in lover, and married and unmarried defendants would be treated differently as well.<\/p>\n<p>Alexandria Ruden, a Legal Aid Society domestic-violence lawyer and battered-women&#8217;s advocate, said she hopes that instead of having the unintended consequence of undermining part of the domestic-violence law, Issue 1&#8217;s unintended consequence will be its own self-destruction.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Hopefully, instead of the [domestic-violence] statute, it will blow out the constitutional amendment,&#8221; said Ruden, who co-authored a leading legal text on Ohio&#8217;s domestic-violence law.<\/p>\n<p>That, Lazarus acknowledged, is exactly why he concocted the public defender&#8217;s line of attack.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Personally, when I was brainstorming this, it was with an eye toward, &#8216;How could we make this amendment look not so good?&#8217; &#8221; he said Wednesday.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s very few actions I <em>won&#8217;t<\/em> support in favor of full equality for lesbians and gays. And I guess that Lazarus could claim that he&#8217;s not attacking victims of DV, he&#8217;s just making it explicit that measure 1 attacks victims of DV. I don&#8217;t want to rush to judgment about a plan that Ms Ruden, who sounds like a very substantive advocate of DV victims, doesn&#8217;t sound hell-bent against. Maybe learning more will make me change my mind on this one.<\/p>\n<p>But that all tastes sourly of rationalization. Full marriage equality is an important goal, but it&#8217;s not the <em>only <\/em>important goal.  Nor is this strategy the <em>only <\/em>way of fighting measure 1.<\/p>\n<p>Domestic violence victims are not tools to be used instrumentally to advance other people&#8217;s rights, but that&#8217;s how Lazarus is treating them.  To attack the legal rights of domestic violence victims for political purposes is disgusting, no matter <em>what <\/em>your political purpose is.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is twisted. From the Cleveland Plain Dealer: Ohio&#8217;s quarter-century-old domestic-violence law gives special criminal status to an assault by a family or household member and establishes unique protections for the victim. Courts also have consistently applied it to homosexual &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=1312\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[96,112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-rape-intimate-violence-related-issues","category-same-sex-marriage"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1312"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1312\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}