{"id":1883,"date":"2005-10-12T06:09:50","date_gmt":"2005-10-12T13:09:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/archives\/2005\/10\/12\/im-not-just-an-incubator\/"},"modified":"2005-10-12T06:09:50","modified_gmt":"2005-10-12T13:09:50","slug":"im-not-just-an-incubator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=1883","title":{"rendered":"I&#039;m not just an incubator"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the booklet <i>Listen: your baby&#8217;s life before birth<\/i>, which I received as part of a pack of free samples from various companies, there&#8217;s a page devoted to the way hormones cross the placenta, allowing the unborn child to experience, in its own way, the mother&#8217;s emotional reactions.  It goes on to warn:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Repeated maternal stress should always be avoided during pregnancy, as it may alter the baby&#8217;s patterns of sleep and activity on a permanent basis.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That passive construction makes me suspicious.  Who&#8217;s responsible for avoiding maternal stress?  Is it simply saying that we should, as a society, avoid putting pregnant women under too much stress?  I could heartily endorse that position.  Or is it suggesting that pregnant women, along with everything else we expect of them, have a responsibility to their unborn babies not to get stressed out?<\/p>\n<p>The second half of the sentence isn&#8217;t promising either.  In my experience of repeated maternal stress, the baby&#8217;s sleep patterns are the smallest problem.  Stress can make a pregnant women vulnerable to all kinds of health niggles, some of which can turn into serious health problems if they&#8217;re not picked up.  Stress can lead to depression, to lack of interest in preparations for the baby&#8217;s arrival, to dark thoughts of whether it&#8217;s too late for abortion.  Repeated maternal stress should be avoided because it&#8217;s bad for the <b>mother<\/b>, not just because it could be bad for the baby.<\/p>\n<p>Before I was pregnant, I thought &#8220;woman, what woman?&#8221; was an attitude held only by fairly extreme pro-lifers who had never come into contact with a pregnant woman in all their sheltered lives.  But to my surprise, I keep seeing a very similar attitude from people who provide health care to pregnant women on a daily basis.  They talk to me, they look me in the eye, they ask me how I am, but under the surface, I get a distinct impression that they see me as an incubator.  The baby is all that matters.<\/p>\n<p>My health visitor &#8211; a trained midwife charged with making sure new families have all the support they need &#8211; asked me during a routine check-up whether I was eating well. I replied that I was doing my best &#8211; a flared-up infection had left me with a low fever, aching joints and no desire to do anything but sleep, and had disrupted my eating patterns for a few days &#8211; and got a lecture about how my best wasn&#8217;t good enough.  I had to eat a perfectly healthy diet at all times because the baby needs nutrients.<\/p>\n<p>A pregnant woman needs to eat well for her own sake, not just the baby&#8217;s.  Iron-deficiency anaemia is especially common in pregnancy, and makes any tired, lethargic feelings even worse.  More seriously, if her diet doesn&#8217;t supply enough calcium for her needs and the baby&#8217;s, Mother Nature harshly dictates that the baby comes first.  If the price of strong bones for the little one is erosion of the mother&#8217;s teeth, too bad for the mother&#8217;s teeth.<\/p>\n<p>Why didn&#8217;t my health visitor remind me of these health issues?  Why did she concentrate instead on the harm an inadequate diet could do my baby?  I think the answer lies in a belief that goes deep in our society: a pregnant woman is a womb first and a human being second.  Because I&#8217;ve chosen to have this baby, many people assume I&#8217;ve also chosen to put my personality to one side for at least nine months and think about nothing but the baby, all day and all night.<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes I do put the baby&#8217;s needs before my own wishes &#8211; when I switch to orange juice after the first beer rather than run the risk of damaging the baby with my pre-pregnancy alcohol consumption, for instance.  And sometimes, knowing I&#8217;m helping my baby as well as myself gives me the courage to stand up for things I wouldn&#8217;t otherwise stand up for.  But other times, I&#8217;m just myself; the same self I was before I was pregnant.  I oversleep and skip breakfast.  I walk a couple of miles to take in a football match.  I grieve for the bits of my past that didn&#8217;t stop hurting just because I have a new life inside me.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m unusual in any of this.  I guess most women who are pregnant by choice and looking forward to having the baby will want to do the best they can for their child, but I don&#8217;t imagine anyone can support nine months of being nothing but an incubator.  We all have to balance the baby&#8217;s needs against our own &#8211; &#8220;Yes, it&#8217;s better for the baby if I eat wholesome, home-cooked meals, but tonight I&#8217;m too shattered to do anything but shove a frozen pizza in the oven&#8221; &#8211; and sometimes the balance we strike won&#8217;t be easy for onlookers to understand.<\/p>\n<p>Women&#8217;s choices &#8211; especially when it comes to motherhood &#8211; come under intense scrutiny from society.  I feel as if I need to defend myself against the charges of skipping breakfast, thereby depriving my baby of vital nutrients; of letting myself get stressed, thereby disrupting my baby&#8217;s sleep patterns; of being unfit to be pregnant in the first place, thereby forcing my baby to develop in a sub-standard womb.  The world throws advice at me from all sides, and I have neither the experience nor the confidence to sort out the vital from the trivial.  I defer to the greater experience of medical professionals, but they invariably err on the side of protecting the baby from every possible harm.<\/p>\n<p>In the early days of my pregnancy, I became concerned that the vitamin C tablets I was taking for my own health and comfort had an advisory on the packaging that they shouldn&#8217;t be taken during pregnancy without medical advice.  I checked with my doctor; he told me not to take them.  He couldn&#8217;t point to any specific danger to the baby, but there was &#8220;no point&#8221; in taking them.  He could have informed me of the risks and allowed me to decide for myself whether the benefits outweighed them, but he didn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>Treating pregnant women as incubators with no needs or wishes of their own isn&#8217;t just anti-feminist, it&#8217;s probably also counter-productive.  If the medical establishment doesn&#8217;t seem interested in meeting my needs, I&#8217;m going to start trusting it less.  This is fine if I can simultaneously develop my own robust sense of what risks are acceptable &#8211; like my mother, who by her fourth child had a very good idea of how much alcohol she could safely consume during pregnancy &#8211; but I could all too easily come to dangerously wrong conclusions.  Disregarding the advice that there&#8217;s no point taking vitamin C probably won&#8217;t do much harm; disregarding the advice that headaches and blurred vision are grounds for an immediate trip to the hospital could be fatal to mother and child.<\/p>\n<p>Pregnant women are as capable of making their own decisions as any other segment of the population.  We know what&#8217;s right for us, and if we&#8217;re given enough information, we can co-ordinate that with what&#8217;s right for our babies and strike a balance.  But society &#8211; and given my defensiveness I&#8217;m inclined to consider myself part of the problem &#8211; needs to stop brushing our needs aside as trivial and start trusting us to make those decisions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the booklet Listen: your baby&#8217;s life before birth, which I received as part of a pack of free samples from various companies, there&#8217;s a page devoted to the way hormones cross the placenta, allowing the unborn child to experience, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=1883\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abortion-reproductive-rights","category-feminism-sexism-etc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1883\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}