{"id":2304,"date":"2006-04-30T12:15:42","date_gmt":"2006-04-30T19:15:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/archives\/2006\/04\/30\/grouping-people-together-the-problems-and-prospects-of-panethnic-language\/"},"modified":"2006-04-30T12:15:42","modified_gmt":"2006-04-30T19:15:42","slug":"grouping-people-together-the-problems-and-prospects-of-panethnic-language","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=2304","title":{"rendered":"Grouping People Together: The Problems and Prospects of Panethnic Language"},"content":{"rendered":"

Some people may wonder what the terms panethnic or panethnicity mean. My first exposure comes from this book<\/a> by Yen Le Espiritu. Here is the description of the book: <\/p>\n

With different histories, cultures, languages, and identities, most Americans of Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Korean, and Vietnamese origin are lumped together and viewed by other Americans simply as Asian Americans. Since the mid 1960s, however, these different Asian American groups have come together to promote and protect both their individual and their united interests. The first book to examine this particular subject, Asian American Panethnicity is a highly detailed case study of how, and with what success, diverse national-origin groups can come together as a new, enlarged panethnic group.
\nYen Le Espiritu explores the construction of large-scale affiliations, in which previously unrelated groups submerge their differences and assume a common identity. Making use of extensive interviews and statistical data, she examines how Asian panethnicity protects the rights and interests of all Asian American groups, including those, like the Vietnamese and Cambodians, which are less powerful and prominent than the Chinese and Japanese. By citing specific examples…educational discrimination, legal redress, anti-Asian violence, the development of Asian American Studies programs, social services, and affirmative action…the author demonstrates how Asian Americans came to understand that only by cooperating with each other would they succeed in fighting the racism they all faced.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

So a panethnic category takes many diverse groups of people and groups them together as one group. Terms like European American, African American, Latino\/a, American Indian, and Asian American are all panethnic labels that take diverse groups of people and lump them into larger categories.<\/p>\n

I have mixed feeling about panethnic labels. Espiritu argues the advantage of such labels is that they can consolidate diverse groups with diverse histories to help them organize for social change. The power of the groups and their ability to create change is much greater because the panethnic label leads to greater numbers, which clearly has political implications in a democratic society.
\nWhile the terms Asian American was created as an organizing tool in the 1960s, the panethnic labels for African Americans, and European Americans were created at a much earlier. Let me start by saying I don’t think the term European Americans is a very popular term; most people just use the term Whites. What is fascinating about the category of Whiteness is that it started out fairly narrow…British and a few northern European groups were included. Later the Irish were included into the Whiteness category, and Italians and eastern Europeans were the last to be included into this category (I’m sure others are to come.). The creation of a White panracial category was designed to integrate European immigrants, while simultaneously keeping these immigrants from forming alliances between the indigenous people and enslaved Africans. See the various European groups did not see them selves as aligned with each other, but the creation of the White race (or a panracial identity) allied these groups and allowed them to squash their differences.<\/p>\n

Enslaved Africans were forced to develop a panracial identity, because they were not allowed to engage in the customs associated with their ethnic groups. This was forbidden by slave owners; moreover, these Africans came from very diverse ethnic groups, which made communication very difficult. African American panethnic identity formed in part because it was forced upon Africans by Whites and in part as a means of survival under conditions of slavery.<\/p>\n

American Indians also come from very diverse origins. In some cases early settlers allied with various American Indian ethnic groups against other ethnic groups. It wasn’t until somewhat later through Census enumeration and the legal system that the notion of a panethnic American Indian group was established and to a large extent forced upon indigenous people. However, some American Indians later saw panethnic alliances (for example the Lakota and the Cheyenne at Little Big Horn).as a means of fending off Whites.<\/p>\n

Panethnic labels can and do unite diverse groups of people, but I think the greater question is to what end. If people are united to oppress (as is the case with the Irish becoming White), or if people are united to fight for the survival of their ethnic group and their way of life as in the case of Little Big Horn, then the more important issue is not whether or not diverse groups are united under one umbrella, but why they are united and what can be done about it.<\/p>\n

One down side of Panethnic labels is that tend to become racial terms. While ethnic labels group people based on culture, racial labels tend to group people based on perceived physical characteristics, thus, many people come to the conclusion that these groups are groups of people who are similar “physically, genetically, and culturally.”\u009d While race is not about genes our culture constructs it in this way, and thus, very diverse groups such as east Indians and Japanese or Somalians and Nigerians are groups together. Ironically, people in these groups don’t typically look alike they have been geographically and culturally isolated from each other, but they all get lumped together under a label and people tend to group them as a race..<\/p>\n

When panethnic labels become popular there is a tendency for people to forget the diversity and variety that goes into the groups that make up the panethnic categories. For example, people frequently talk about “Asian culture”\u009d or “African Culture”\u009d which is problematic because there are many cultures in Asian or Africa and they are often in conflict with each other. The same could be said for Native Americans, Latino\/as, Europeans, and so on. At times panethnic labels become short cuts that allow us to be very lazy in thinking about the complexity and diversity of various groups. For example, Puerto Ricans and Chicanos (Mexican Americans) are situated very differently on the issue of immigration simply because Puerto Rico is a US territory. In fact, in my own community, my sense is that the local Black\/West Indian population and the local Mexican American\/Chicano population have much more in common with each other, but that often gets lost in the media and the larger culture since one group is put under the label Black\/African American and the other is put under the label Latino\/Hispanic.<\/p>\n

Some people lament panethnic categories because they believe that it leads to the loss of cultures, languages, and customs. Once groups are combined together whether by force or by choice people worry that some traditions will necessarily disappear as a new panethnic culture and identity emerges. This attitude comes up frequently in discussions about intermarriage<\/a>. Many people who oppose interethnic and interracial marriage do so out of a concern that the hybridization of cultures will lead to the loss of traditions and language. I have mixed feelings about this because my sense is that global capitalism and the modern communication and transportation technology will inevitably lead to a mishmash of cultures (what Kwame Anthony Appiah calls the new Cosmopolitanism<\/a>) In fact, one of the ideas that comes up frequently is the notion that a “mixed” ethnic identity inherently involves the loss of some traits from either side. Personally, I am skeptical of that argument because I think a much larger force is at work–global capitalism and the one world culture that it encourages. Given the trend toward a global culture dominated by capitalist superpowers like the US, the creation of panethnic categories can in fact be a way to retain aspects of cultures that are being over run by western countries (put more simply for those who might be losing me…if local ethnic groups can unite they stand a greater chance of keeping their traditions in the face of corporations like McDonalds. Corporations are some powerful that small ethnic and regional groups can’t do much to keep them out, but by uniting diverse groups, they stand a chance.). Here, there seems to be a tension between humanism and identity based politics. Humanism emphasizes universal human rights, while coalitions along panethnic lines represent one of the last bastion of unique, traditional cultural identities. (Here<\/a> is an interesting essay on this subject I should forewarn everybody that it is written in the typical post modern academic language, so it is really hard to follow if you are unfamiliar with the jargon.) The irony here is that both the new cosmopolitanism and panethnic identities lead to a flattening of culture. The unique traits of groups are going to be lost under both ideas. The question is just a matter of how much local culture will be lost and how fast it will be lost.<\/p>\n

The potential for organizing groups around panethnic identities has upsides and downsides. On the upside, it can consolidate political power and help underrepresented groups gain a voice. On the down side, it has a tendency to encourage some people to forget the diversity and variety subsumed under the panethnic label. I think the increasing popularity of panethnic labels is both a reaction to and a product of the larger trend toward becoming a global culture. Humanism and global capitalism seek to squash difference…humanist would say we’re all people, and capitalists would say we’re all profit maximizers. On the contrary, panethnic organizers would say we are people competing over scarce resources. The only way for oppressed groups to fight back is under by uniting various groups (many would go beyond ethnicity, to class, sexuality, gender, and so on). The alliances that this leads to are very unusually and do not fit neatly into political lines…both conservatives and liberals ideologies are promoted by panethnic politics, and both conservative and liberal ideologies are part of the humanist\/capitalist perspectives on identity. Panethnic categories seem to be a bridge between modern ideas of identity and post modern ideas of identity.<\/p>\n

(PS…I know this is a very jargony piece for those who are accustomed to reading most of my posts. Sorry in advance if people have no idea what the hell I’m talking about. LOL!! I promise to get back to some more simplistic stuff later in the week.)<\/p>\n

This post can also be found over at my Rachel’s Tavern.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Some people may wonder what the terms panethnic or panethnicity mean. My first exposure comes from this book by Yen Le Espiritu. Here is the description of the book: With different histories, cultures, languages, and identities, most Americans of Chinese, … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[93],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2304","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-race-racism-and-related-issues"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2304"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2304\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}