The New Zealand government has announced some changes to its benefit system, and while I haven’t gone through the details yet I wanted to use it as an opportunity to discuss issues around work and disability.<\/p>\n
In New Zealand the sickness benefit is available for people who are unable to work due to sickness, injury, disability or pregnancy. The invalids benefit is available for people who are permanently and severely restricted in their capacity for work because of a sickness, injury or disability (why the difference? I don’t know. Although it’s made even more pointed by the fact that the Invalids benefit is paid more. I’m lying I do know that it’s a nasty sort of moralistic division between really deserving, and possibly shirking poor).<\/p>\n
The Ministry of Social Welfare has announced that more ‘services’ will be offered to people on sickness or invalids benefit, to help them get jobs. The ‘services’ currently provided by Social Welfare focus on teaching people how to look for a job and matching up people and jobs (I’m being very generous with my description here). By making such a big deal of offering these services to people on the sickness and invalid\u2019s benefits (and later forcing people to use them) the government is saying that they think the main things people on the invalids and sickness benefits need to get into jobs is access to these services.<\/p>\n
I say bullshit.* I’m going to explore the actual barriers that stop people who are sick, injured, disabled and pregant from getting a job.<\/p>\n
The most obvious barrier is the sickness, injury, disability, or pregnancy. To get on the sickness or invalids benefit you have to have a doctor sign off saying that you are unable to work, so it’s not just a barrier – it’s a medically certified barrier.<\/p>\n
There are all sorts of things that the government as a whole could do to ensure that people who are sick, injured, disabled or pregnant can participate fully in society. For example<\/a>, many health conditions are exacerbated by living in low-quality housing that isn’t properly heated (read most NZ houses). The government could do something about this, both by providing more, warmer, state houses, and by instituting better building standards.<\/p>\n What about stress? Many (most?) chornic healthy conditions are exacerbated by stress. Poverty is stressful (and anyone who is on these benefits is poor). Dealing with social welfare is stressful (I’ve known people suffer from serious health relapses due to the stress of trying to deal with WINZ). There are many thing that the government as a whole, and WINZ in particular could do to improve the health of many people who are sick, injured or disabled. Why aren’t they starting there?<\/p>\n Lets move away from the sickness, injury, disability or pregnancy for a bit. After all to focus on those is still to imply that it’s a problem with the person that they are not currently employed, and that’s not what I believe. There is a huge amount of unreasonable prejudice against hiring people who are sick, disabled, or injured. Everyone I know who has fitted in those categories has had a much harder time finding a job than similarly qualified and capable people who don’t. Why not start by working on the people with the prejudice, rather than ask people who are discriminated against to jump through more hoops?<\/p>\n That’s only the start though, because it’s not just the unreasonable prejudice that is the problem, it’s the prejudice that is considered totally reasonable. For example, if someone had a chronic health condition that didn’t stop them working a forty hour week most of the time, but that flared up a few times a year and the worker required a couple of weeks off a time, then it would be considered perfectly reasonable not to hire them. Or if someone had a full-time job and then developed a health condition which meant that they could only work three days a week, it’d be perfectly legal to fire them.<\/p>\n WINZ is obsessed with work as the be all and end all of people’s contribution to society. But we only get to contribute to society on employer’s times. Employers don’t have to (and generally don’t) take on workers whose health allows them to work some of the time.<\/p>\n This is ridiculous. Why do we let our economic system dictate our participation in society, rather than organise an economic system that allows everyone to participate? Almost everyone can do some useful and meaningful work, if they’re allowed to do it on their terms. The fact that it doesn’t work like that, that we aren’t all able to contribute according to our ability is not the problem of individual people, who have sicknesses, injuries, or disabilities, which don’t fit employer’s wants.<\/p>\n * For the sake of clarity I also want to emphasise that these \u2018services\u2019 are generally not what unemployed people need to get jobs either. I think changing the Reserve Bank Act would do more to lower unemployment than all the ‘work4u’ seminars in the universe.<\/p>\n Also posted on Capitalism Bad; Tree Pretty<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The New Zealand government has announced some changes to its benefit system, and while I haven’t gone through the details yet I wanted to use it as an opportunity to discuss issues around work and disability. In New Zealand the … Continue reading