{"id":3333,"date":"2007-04-30T07:09:57","date_gmt":"2007-04-30T14:29:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/archives\/2007\/04\/30\/after-this-we-can-talk-welfare-reform\/"},"modified":"2007-04-30T07:09:57","modified_gmt":"2007-04-30T14:29:45","slug":"after-this-we-can-talk-welfare-reform","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=3333","title":{"rendered":"After This We Can Talk Welfare Reform"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There are lots of things I don&#8217;t understand about this world, many of which are the number of intelligent, awesome, analytical feminists who support the Democrats.  From <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thenation.com\/doc\/20070514\/pollitt\">Katha Pollit<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>So now you know. It really does matter who&#8217;s President and which party controls Congress. A Democratic-controlled Congress would never have passed the Partial-Birth Abortion Act, which banned intact dilation and extraction abortions and, in flagrant violation of Roe v. Wade, lacked an exception to preserve the health of the woman. A Democratic President would never have signed such a bill. Nor would he have nominated the extremely conservative antichoicers John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, which on April 18 upheld, in Gonzales v. Carhart by a 5-to-4 vote (Roberts, Alito, Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas&#8211;all GOP nominees), a ban essentially identical to one rejected 5 to 4 in Stenberg v. Carhart seven years ago, when Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor was on the bench.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>A Democratic president may have never signed this particular bill, but that doesn&#8217;t make them staunch upholders of abortion rights.  Poor women&#8217;s right to abortion were extinguished with the 1976 Hyde Amendment. The Democrats controlled both the House and the Senate, when the Hyde Amendment was passed. Then Democratic Presidential candidate Jimmy Carter indicated that he would support the amendment, and this support was one of the reasons Ford backed-down on his threat to veto the legislation.    In 1980 the supreme court ruled on the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment; at this time there were two justices who had been appointed by Democratic presidents.  If both of those justices had supported poor women&#8217;s rights to abortion then the Hyde Amendment would have been ruled unconstitutional, but they did not.<\/p>\n<p>I am not meaning to downplay the seriousness of the latest decision when I say that the effect it will have on women&#8217;s lives is extremely limited, when compared to the effect of the Hyde Amendment. The most serious attack on American women&#8217;s right to an abortion was a bipartisan effort, and the Democrats more than played their part.<\/p>\n<p><b>Updated<\/b> Since writing this post I have learned that the Hyde Amendment (which needs to be authorised every year, so has been supported by every democratic controlled house and senate, and every democratic president since 1977) was debated in 1994.  At this stage the democratic controlled house and senate upheld the ban.  They added rape and incest exceptions (the original amendment already had a life of the mother clause), but did not add a health of the mother exception.  The Democrats support of the Hyde Amendment is not history.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are lots of things I don&#8217;t understand about this world, many of which are the number of intelligent, awesome, analytical feminists who support the Democrats. From Katha Pollit: So now you know. It really does matter who&#8217;s President and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=3333\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[109,3,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-partial-birth-abortion","category-abortion-reproductive-rights","category-elections-and-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3333"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3333\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}