{"id":6973,"date":"2009-03-06T12:44:19","date_gmt":"2009-03-06T20:04:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=6973"},"modified":"2009-03-06T12:44:19","modified_gmt":"2009-03-06T20:04:07","slug":"single-payer-health-care-shut-out-of-media-discussion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=6973","title":{"rendered":"Single Payer Health Care Shut Out Of Media Discussion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fair.org\/index.php?page=3733\">FAIR<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span class=\"published-content-body\">Major newspaper, broadcast and cable stories mentioning healthcare reform in the week leading up to President Barack Obama&#8217;s March 5 healthcare summit rarely mentioned the idea of a single-payer national health insurance program, according to a new FAIR study. And advocates of such a system&#8211;two of whom participated in yesterday&#8217;s summit&#8211;were almost entirely shut out, FAIR found.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Single-payer&#8211;a model in which healthcare delivery would remain largely private, but would be paid for by a single federal health insurance fund (much like Medicare provides for seniors, and comparable to Canada&#8217;s current system)&#8211;polls well with the public, who preferred it two-to-one over a privatized system in a recent survey (<strong>New York Times<\/strong>\/<span class=\"media_outlet\">CBS<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pollingreport.com\/health.htm\" target=\"_self\">1\/11-15\/09<\/a>). But a media consumer in the week leading up to the summit was more likely to read about single-payer from the hostile perspective of conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer than see an op-ed by a single-payer advocate in a major U.S. newspaper.<\/p>\n<p>Over the past week, hundreds of stories in major newspapers and on <span class=\"media_outlet\">NBC News<\/span>, <span class=\"media_outlet\">ABC News<\/span>, <span class=\"media_outlet\">CBS News<\/span>, <span class=\"media_outlet\">Fox News<\/span>, <span class=\"media_outlet\">CNN<\/span>, <span class=\"media_outlet\">MSNBC<\/span>, <span class=\"media_outlet\">NPR<\/span> and <span class=\"media_outlet\">PBS<\/span>&#8216;s <span class=\"media_outlet\">NewsHour With Jim Lehrer<\/span> mentioned healthcare reform, according to a search of the Nexis database (2\/25\/09-3\/4\/09). Yet all but 18 of these stories made no mention of &#8220;single-payer&#8221; (or synonyms commonly used by its proponents, such as &#8220;Medicare for all,&#8221; or the proposed single-payer bill, H.R. 676), and only five included the views of advocates of single-payer&#8211;none of which appeared on television. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"published-content-body\">Though more than 60 lawmakers have co-sponsored <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fatrights.org\/\">H.R. 676<\/a>, the single-payer bill in Congress, Obama has not expressed support for single-payer; both the idea and its advocates were marginalized in yesterday&#8217;s healthcare forum. But given the high level of popular support the policy enjoys, that&#8217;s all the more reason media should include it in the public debate about the future of healthcare. <\/span> <!-- BEGIN on_screen_only_block --><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I understand that single-payer has no chance in the current political situation &#8212; but that becomes a self-fufilling prophecy, not just for now but for the future, when the media refuses to discuss any policy that isn&#8217;t currently politically viable, regardless of its support among much of the general public and among many experts. I don&#8217;t want the media to go along with the political elites&#8217; decision to ignore the public&#8217;s preference; I want the media to push against the political elite&#8217;s arbitrary boundaries of which policies are and aren&#8217;t worth discussing.<\/p>\n<p>I think what this comes down to what journalism professor <a href=\"http:\/\/journalism.nyu.edu\/pubzone\/weblogs\/pressthink\/\">Jay Rosen<\/a> says in this <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/opinion\/greenwald\/radio\/2009\/01\/16\/rosen\/index1.html\">interview<\/a>: &#8220;Savviness is the real idealogy of Washington journalism.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>it&#8217;s this notion that that might be a good argument, but that&#8217;s not what the committee is going to do, you know? And this kind of religion of &#8211; I call it a religion because it&#8217;s a faith &#8211; that if you&#8217;re savvy, that you are realistic, and again, you are vulnerable to irresponsible elites when you do that. You can cut yourself off from your naturally constituency which isn&#8217;t them, but an informed and engaged public.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Scholarship and public opinion both say that single-payer is a health care option that deserves serious consideration. But treating single payer seriously might make a journalist look naive &#8212; so they don&#8217;t.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From FAIR: Major newspaper, broadcast and cable stories mentioning healthcare reform in the week leading up to President Barack Obama&#8217;s March 5 healthcare summit rarely mentioned the idea of a single-payer national health insurance program, according to a new FAIR &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=6973\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media-criticism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6973"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6973\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}