{"id":9579,"date":"2010-02-07T14:15:21","date_gmt":"2010-02-07T21:15:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=9579"},"modified":"2010-02-07T14:15:21","modified_gmt":"2010-02-07T21:15:21","slug":"if-senators-represented-demographics-instead-of-states","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=9579","title":{"rendered":"If Senators Represented Demographics Instead of States"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/02\/05\/AR2010020501446.html\"> Annie Lowrey in the Washington Post<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But what if the 100-member Senate were designed to mirror the overall U.S. population &#8212; and were based on statistics rather than state lines?<\/p>\n<p>Imagine a chamber in which senators were elected by different income brackets &#8212; with two senators representing the poorest 2 percent of the electorate, two senators representing the richest 2 percent and so on.<\/p>\n<p>Based on Census Bureau data, five senators would represent Americans earning between $100,000 and $1 million individually per year, with a single senator working on behalf of the millionaires (technically, it would be two-tenths of a senator). Eight senators would represent Americans with no income. Sixteen would represent Americans who make less than $10,000 a year, an amount well below the federal poverty line for families. The bulk of the senators would work on behalf of the middle class, with 34 representing Americans making $30,000 to $80,000 per year.<\/p>\n<p>Imagine trying to convince someone &#8212; Michael Bloomberg, perhaps? &#8212; to be the lonely senator representing the richest percentile. And what if the senators were apportioned according to jobs figures? This year, the unemployed would have gained two seats. Think of the deals that would be made to attract that bloc!<\/p>\n<p>Or how about if senators represented particular demographic groups, based on gender and race? White women would elect the biggest group of senators &#8212; 37 of them, though only 38 women have ever served in the Senate, with 17 currently in office. White men would have 36 seats. Black women, Hispanic women and Hispanic men would have six each; black men five; and Asian women and men two each. Women voters would control a steady and permanent majority &#8212; making, say, discriminatory health-care measures such as the Stupak Amendment and the horrible dearth of child-care options for working mothers seem untenable. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So in total, there would be 51 female Senators in this made-up world, compared to 38 who have ever been in the Senate in reality, or the 17 current female senators.<\/p>\n<p>One thing that Lowrey didn&#8217;t bring up: religious representation. There would be fewer Jews in the Senate, alas &#8212; 2 (rounding up) rather than the current <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org\/jsource\/US-Israel\/senrec.html\">13<\/a>. About 50 senators would be Protestant, and 25 would be Catholic. 1 would be Muslim.  About 15 Senators wouldn&#8217;t identify with any organized religion at all; I&#8217;m not sure how many of those would be openly atheist, or openly agnostic. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.religioustolerance.org\/chr_prac2.htm\">Source<\/a>).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Annie Lowrey in the Washington Post: But what if the 100-member Senate were designed to mirror the overall U.S. population &#8212; and were based on statistics rather than state lines? Imagine a chamber in which senators were elected by different &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=9579\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31,93],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9579","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-feminism-sexism-etc","category-race-racism-and-related-issues"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9579"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9579\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}