{"id":959,"date":"2004-07-12T13:09:51","date_gmt":"2004-07-12T21:09:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.amptoons.com\/blog\/archives\/2004\/07\/12\/andrew-sullivan-on-the-anti-marriage-amendment\/"},"modified":"2004-07-12T13:09:51","modified_gmt":"2004-07-12T21:09:51","slug":"andrew-sullivan-on-the-anti-marriage-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=959","title":{"rendered":"Andrew Sullivan on the Anti-Marriage Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>My impression is that relatively few &#8220;Alas&#8221; readers &#8211; lefties that we are &#8211; read Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s blog often. But I think we should all read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.andrewsullivan.com\/index.php?dish_inc=archives\/2004_07_11_dish_archive.html#108960042062193736\">his discussion of the Federal Marriage Amendment<\/a>, so I&#8217;m taking the liberty of quoting it here:<\/p>\n<div class=\"snip\">Meanwhile, there&#8217;s only one thing you really need to know about this week&#8217;s Senate vote on the amendment. And that is its backers would rather lose votes than propose a simple one-line amendment reserving marriage for heterosexuals. More tolerant alternatives &#8211; that would have simply said &#8220;Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman,&#8221; or that would have constitutionalized DOMA, or that would have merely restricted courts &#8211; all these have been ruled out in favor of an amendment whose second sentence reads:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Neither this Constitution, nor the Constitution of any State or Federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status <i>or the legal incidents thereof<\/i> be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups. (My italics)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If you removed the italicized phrase, you&#8217;d have a reiteration of the first sentence. But that phrase is critical to the religious right. On its face, it would ban any court-prompted civil unions, domestic partnerships or indeed any protections or &#8220;legal incidents&#8221; for gay couples short of marriage. That means the end of civil unions in Massachusetts and Vermont, for starters. This is not, and never has been, about &#8220;protecting&#8221; marriage. If it were, the amendment would need just one sentence, and would stand a far better chance of passing. The amendment is about ensuring the second class citizenship of an entire minority. The timing is designed to exploit fear of that unmentionable minority into a winning strategy for president Bush&#8217;s re-election. Because of those two things, it is one of the most disgusting measures ever introduced into the U.S. Senate.<\/p><\/div>\n<p><a style=\"text-decoration:none\" href=\"\/index.php?p=cialis-oral-jelly-price-safeway\">.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My impression is that relatively few &#8220;Alas&#8221; readers &#8211; lefties that we are &#8211; read Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s blog often. But I think we should all read his discussion of the Federal Marriage Amendment, so I&#8217;m taking the liberty of quoting &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/?p=959\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-same-sex-marriage"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=959"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/959\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amptoons.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}