New York creates Gay Public High School

From CNN

NEW YORK (AP) — New York City is creating the nation’s first public high school for gays, bisexuals and transgender students.

The Harvey Milk High School will enroll about 100 students and open in a newly renovated building in the fall. It is named after San Francisco’s first openly gay city supervisor, who was assassinated in 1978.

“I think everybody feels that it’s a good idea because some of the kids who are gays and lesbians have been constantly harassed and beaten in other schools,” Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Monday. “It lets them get an education without having to worry.”

Story found via Crescat Sententia.

UPDATE: The Fifty Minute Hour is discussing this.

UPDATE 2: Peter Northup of Crescat Sententia has posted an excellent defense of the idea of HMHS. (Link may not work in Opera)..

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff | 21 Comments

It turns out I'm a logical positivist

Every once in a while, I’ll read a discussion of David Hume and think “that’s exactly right, I agree entirely. I should really make some time to read this Hume fellow.” Of course, I never do.

Which brings me to Will Baude’s ” Magnum Opus on Moral Relativism” over at Crescat Sententia (if you’re in Opera, you may have to switch to another browser to get the link to work):

Logical Positivism is a philosophy derived from the teachings of David Hume that holds, in a nutshell, that propositions are either: empirical statements about the world, tautological statements whose truth or falsity depends entirely on the definitions of the words involved, or nonsense. One consequence of this system of belief is that it holds that moral statements, while very important, are not “true” or “false” in the same empirical sense that “my apple is red” or “Sir Walter Scott wrote Waverly” are. Rather, moral statements fall into the category of “persuasive defintions.” When I say that slavery is wrong, I’m not making a testable claim. There’s no way you can go out and look at and poke some slaves looking for their wrongness or rightness; you have to bring your own sense of rightness and wrongness to the table.

I thought the quote at the bottom from A.J. Ayer – arguing that we never really argue about moral standards, but instead argue about facts – was particualrly interesting.

This may seem, at first sight, to be a very paradoxical assertion. For we certainly do engage in disputes which are ordinarily regarded as disputes about questions of value. But, in all such cases, we find, if we consider the matter closely, that the dispute is not really about a question of value, but about a question of fact….we attempt to show that he is mistaken about the facts of the case. We argue that he has misconceived the agent’s motive: or that he has misjudged the effects of the action, or its probable effects in view of the agent’s knkowledge… or else we employ more general arguments about the effects which actions of a certain type tend to produce, or the qualities which are usually manifested in their performance. We do this in the hope that we have only to get our opponent to agree with us about the nature of the empirical facts for him to adopt the same moral attitude towards them as we do. And as the people with whom we argue have generally received the same moral education as ourselves, and live in the same social order, our expectation is usually justified. But if our opponent happens to have undergone a different process of moral “conditioning” from ourselves, so that, even when he acknowledges all the facts, he still disagrees with us about the moral value of the actions under discussion, then we abandon the attempt to convince him by argument. We say that it is impossible to argue with him because he has a distorted or underdeveloped moral sense. . . in short, we find that argument is possible on moral questions only if some system of values is presupposed.

Go ahead and read the whole post..

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff | 29 Comments

Friends: the only thing we all have in common

I think Friends is the best bland sit-com on TV right now. It’s got a funny cast, and good writers. But fundamentally, it is a bland show; it has no ambition beyond being a slightly naughty sit-com full of pretty people. There are dozens more just like Friends, except not as well-done.

The best thing about Friends, I think, is that it’s a possible topic of conversation with almost any TV-owning American – even folks who despise Friends have inevitably caught an episode (or a hundred). What else is that true of nowadays? Even the best-selling books haven’t been read by that many people, and many folks consider discussing religion, politics, sex and money (the four things we all have in common) rude or even distressing.

I was once stuck in a raft with a Christian sport hunter from rural Oregon; since he preferred not to debate politics or religion, and (beyond both of us being carbon-based life forms) we had absolutely nothing in common, conversation could have been a tad on the dead side. But instead, we discussed Friends. It’s the common narrative all Americans share..

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff | 37 Comments

Bill Maher on the Davis Recall

This post is shamelessly swiped from Pacific Views (formerly known as The Watch, which itself was formerly known as Mars or Bust).

On the troubled California economy Davis is being blamed for: “The dotcom bubble burst, just as Gray Davis ordered. …We went off to two foreign wars, playing right into Davis’ hands. …Enron ripped the state off for billions. So you can see the problem, Gray Davis.”

“So you can see the solution, a Viennese weight lifter. Arnold Schwarzenegger: Finally, a public official who can explain the administration’s social policies in the original German.”

.

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff | 18 Comments

Blogathon 2003! Plus, your chance to own an original Ampersand drawing!

I’m sponsering three bloggers for Blogathon 2003.

And here’s a special offer – any reader of this blog who’d like an original drawing from me, go ahead and sponsor any of the above bloggers, and then let me know via email or the comments. If you sponsor (singly or in combination) for at least $15, I’ll send you an original bighead pencil sketch (like the ones in the sidebar here) or a high-quality, signed print of any of my political cartoons – your choice. (These are the same prints that I charge $40 for in galleries, so this is a good buy!)

If you sponsor for at least $40, I’ll send you the original artwork to one of my political cartoons (your choice which one). Or, if you prefer, I’ll mail you an original, pen-and-ink bighead drawing.

Go ahead and make a pledge (or three!), but please do it soon – as I understand it, they’ll each be blogging for 24 hours straight starting Saturday morning, so there’s not much time left to make a pledge..

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff | 12 Comments

It's cartoon time!

Hey, the new Dollars and Sense is out – which means I’m allowed to show y’all my cartoon from this issue!

babysitters.jpg
.

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff | 18 Comments

The Insurance Industry under oath

Via Calpundit, this interesting article from the Florida Sun-Sentinal.

The state Senate, in a rare state of alertness, held two days of hearings with the unusual proviso that witnesses testify under oath.

….What happened after that “was pretty scary,” said Sen. Ron Klein, D-Boca Raton, the Senate minority leader.

“People who had testified before us on previous occasions got up there and told us different things.”

The president of the state’s largest malpractice-insurance company said no, insurers didn’t need a cap on jury awards to be profitable. A state regulator said no, there hasn’t been an explosion of frivolous lawsuits.

A state insurance regulator surprised senators by saying he often depended on insurance companies’ information when deciding whether to raise rates. “So you rely on the fox to guard the henhouse,” grumbled Sen. Walter “Skip” Campbell, D-Fort Lauderdale.

And guess what? Contrary to stories of doctors quitting the business, the number of licensed doctors is increasing. A Health Department official said new applications for new medical licenses in Florida rose from 2,261 in fiscal 2000 to 2,658 in fiscal 2003.

As Kevin says, “legislatures ought to make testifying under oath standard practice.”.

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff | 10 Comments

Some notable women from American history

Bean and I weren’t invited to participate in the Right Wing News “20 greatest Americans” survey (see my previous post for more info on that).

If I had been, I definitely would have included Alice Paul on my list. Alice Paul was a suffragist – possibly the most famous suffragist in the world in her heyday, although today she’s not remembered very much compared to Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony. But Paul was probably the single most important activist working for the 19th Amendment; while Stanton and Anthony concentrated on getting women the vote at the state level, Paul focused unerringly on the grand prize of a constitutional amendment emancipating all women, nationwide.

Paul is also a hero of mine because of her considerable courage. To shame President Wilson and other Democrats into supporting suffrage, she staged protest after protest, including hunger strikes – actions that might seem extreme, but that kept the issue in the front pages and on the minds of American voters. She was arrested three times, held without any contact to friends, family or even a lawyer; she was isolated, force-fed rancid, worm-ridden food, sometimes beaten. But she was never deterred.

Intellectually, Paul is also an important foremother to modern feminist thought. While other suffragists argued that women deserved the vote because of women’s special feminine nature – women were inherently more honest, would vote unselfishly and thus clean up government, etc etc – Paul insisted that women deserved the vote because women were equal as human beings, not better or worse.

My second choice would probably have been Ella Baker – a woman who, despite being virtually unknown to the larger American public, may have the most important person in the civil rights movement. While Martin Luther King Jr. was out being a spokesman for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), Baker stayed out of the limelight and organized the SCLC – despite the sexism that made many male civil rights leaders object to a woman in charge.

Although her backstage work was essential to the SCLC’s success, Baker objected to the “top-down” approach to activism the SCLC practiced; Baker felt that grass-roots organizing to build stronger communities was a better long-term strategy. Baker went on to be a vital organizer of the SNCC.

A few other women I would have had to consider including on my list (in no particular order):

  • Betty Friedan. I’m not sure that it’s possible to point to any single figure and say “she was the most responsible for starting the modern feminist movement” – but if there is such a figure, it would be Betty Friedan. Friedan not only wrote the book that kick-started the second wave, The Feminine Mystique, she co-founded NOW and NARAL.
  • Charlotte Perkins Gilman. There’s been a recent wave of feminist books pointing out that economic equality between men and women is probably impossible until the institution of motherhood is re-examined. What few of those books point out is that it was all said by Gilman over a century ago – and that’s just a tiny portion of Gilman’s work. Most famous now for her short story The Yellow Wallpaper, Gilman – as a suffragist, lecturer, novelist, and social scientist – may have been the most important female intellectual in American history.
  • Do you personally know anyone who died in childbirth? A century ago, most Americans would have answered “yes”; now, most say “no.” That’s an astonishing change – and the person most responsible for it was Margaret Sanger. Every American who has ever had heterosexual sex should thank Margaret Sanger – her work in favor of birth control made sex safer, enabling women to control their reproductive health more than ever before. Sanger was involved on every level – health policy, political campaigning, lawsuits, even securing funding to help develop the pill – and her work revolutionized American reproductive life. Towards the end of her life, Sanger concentrated more on international reproductive health, and continuing her work remains vital today.
  • Kate Mullaney, who organized the first women’s labor union in US history.
  • Jane Addams What can you say about someone for whom helping to found the ACLU was the least of her accomplishments? In the first third of the 20th century, there was virtually no progressive movement that Addams didn’t play an important role in.
  • Harriet Tubman. Anti-slavery activist, women’s rights activist, smuggler of slaves to freedom, spy for the North during the civil war, builder of housing for the elderly… It’s hard to believe how much Tubman did in only a single lifetime.
  • Victoria Woodhull – one of the nation’s first female stock brokers, the very first female candidate for the US Presidency (she ran in 1872; her vice-presidential candidate was Frederick Douglass), and an important suffragist.
  • Frances Wright was at least a century ahead of her time. While other white anti-slavery activists were too-often arguing that blacks were of course not equal but should be freed anyway, Wright argued for absolute equality – including sexual equality and mixing between the races, a position that made her widely hated. Wright was also involved in the Workingman’s movement of the 19th century and the women’s movement.
  • And some better-known folks who would honor any list: Susan B. Anthony, Sojourner Truth, and Eleanor Roosevelt.

Of course, there are many, many more notable women in American history… (and much more to be said about the few women listed here), but these are the women who came to mind first for me..

Posted in Feminism, sexism, etc | 36 Comments

Sexism in blogtopia

There’s a bit of a scuffle going on in conservative neighborhoods of blogtopia. It seems the blog Right Wing News surveyed 40 (mostly conservative) bloggers regarding “the twenty greatest figures from American History.” (Aside: Right Wing News uses Superman’s old catchphrase “truth, justice and the American way” as its motto; I wonder if the blogger realizes that Superman was a leftist in his original appearances?).

But when the survey results came out, Meryl Yourish commented, “…There is definitely a boys’ club in the blogosphere, and this list is entered into evidence as Exhibit A. There are a lot of bloggers on that list who have some pretty thoughtful, well-researched posts. But they couldn’t see fit to include a single woman?” Meryl’s criticism of blogotopian sexism led to something of a firestorm, with people posting both in support of and opposed to (but mostly opposed to) Meryl’s comments. My favorite was this supportive post from Electric Venom, a right-wing blogger:

Revisionism looks at accomplishments and brave deeds performed by women and dismisses them with a snap of the fingers because – now that we’ve reaped the benefits of those acts – they somehow seem less courageous.

Revisionism sneers at the steps that brought half of our country’s population out of the dark, dim shadows of history.

Shame on you for taking for granted the import of what those women accomplished. Shame on you for thinking their deeds less noteworthy, less relevant, less influential. You see I – a mere woman – know better.

I know that were it not for Susan and Gloria and others equally brave, Ann Coulter would be meekly waiting tables and keeping her mouth shut. Without Rosa Parks, where would Condi Rice be?

That’s just a sample; do go read the whole thing, it’s totally kick-ass..

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff | 7 Comments

Shorter Judge Alex Kozinski

Since I know not everyone has time to read 26-page pdf files, I thought I’d save Alas readers a bit of time.

Shorter Judge Alex Kozinski reviews Bjørn Lomborg’s The Skeptical Environmentalist.

  1. Our world’s environment is the best world environment in the best of all possible worlds.
  2. Lomberg’s opinion on the environment is unconventional. You can tell it’s unconventional because it is shared by myself and tens of thousands of other libertarians.
  3. Environmentalists are dweebs.

.

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff | 7 Comments