“Argo” Is a Very Well Made Movie that Ultimately Left Me Cold

We went to see Argo last night, the new movie starring Ben Affleck that is based on Antonio Mendez’ book about his mission to rescue six Americans during the Iranian hostage crisis in 1979-1980. I went expecting to see a Hollywood thriller, and I was not disappointed. I was also pleased that there was no Iran-bashing in the film. If you haven’t seen it, here’s the trailer:

Ultimately, however, while the movie is very well-made, it left me cold, and not just because I knew the ending. (I have a vague memory of watching TV when the announcement was made that the six Americans had gotten out safely.)

I have both a personal and a professional interest in how Iran is represented in American culture. My wife is from Iran, which means my son is half Iranian, and so I care very deeply that the portrayal is accurate, that however it may be slanted politically–because all portrayals are slanted politically–it does not do an injustice to Iranian anything. Also, I am a translator of classical Persian poetry and so the question of how to present the history, culture and ideas of another nation, another people is one that I think about quite a lot. As I said above, I was happy that Argo did not engage in the Iran- and Muslim-bashing that is all too common in the United States these days, but I was very disappointed in the prologue that is supposed to provide a historical and political context for the film.

Granted, the movie is a fictionalized version of actual events, not a documentary, and so it is not fair to expect a nuanced account of what caused the Iranian Revolution. Still, there was one moment in the prologue, which is given as a series of storyboards, that I found truly disturbing. The prologue sets up the events of the movie by presenting, more or less, the Islamic Republic’s version of why the revolution happened. Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi is described as a corrupt and decadent ruler, completely detached from the suffering of his people. The narrator of the prologue talks about the meals he had flown in from Europe, for example, and also about how it was rumored that his wife, Farah Diba, bathed herself in milk. Whether or not this is true, the storyboard accompanying this rumor is a prime example of orientalism at its worst. The queen is shown in profile, beautiful and naked, standing in a tub full of milk, while her serving women, all wearing head scarves, wait on her. The image epitomizes every sexualized stereotype about the Muslim world that you can name and, to the degree that it is supposed to provide context for the film’s narrative, it does an injustice, frankly, to both pre- and post-revolutionary Iran. The image made me angry, but it was pretty much the only misstep in portraying Iran that I saw.

What left me cold about the movie, ultimately, is that it was nothing more than a suspense-filled version of a story I already knew the ending to. Aside from learning details of what happened that I could not have known at the time–and I have no idea which parts of the movie are true to the facts and which are not–I did not learn why I should care about this story other than that Antonio Mendez saved the lives of these six people. It is, of course, wonderful that he did, but the situation in which they found themselves was, and frankly still is, so full of opportunities for deepening our understanding of Iran and of ourselves, that I though it was a shame the movie stayed on the surface of the narrative the way it did. The Iranians in the film are not much more than two-dimensional characters, foils for Mendez’ ingenuity in executing his scheme; and with the exception of one brief scene, the Westerners in Iran engage in no introspection about the revolution that is happening around them and what their role, as representatives of this country, might have been in bringing it about. Obviously, this was not the movie Affleck wanted to make, which is fine; but the movie he did make is not one that I will carry with me as anything other than a wonderfully made, but essentially mindless entertainment.

Posted in Iran | 5 Comments

Privilege Lists’ Achilles Heel

A lot of the discussion I have seen on privilege, including some of this discussion, seems to proceed from a faulty understanding of the term itself: that “privilege” is a shorthand way of saying “who has it better”.

In that context, it makes perfect sense for people to argue that while certainly men have advantages in certain specifiable ways, women also have advantages in other specifiable (often complementary) ways, and so therefore this whole “privilege” thing is just a fancy term for a set of scales, where you can finely dice and measure all the various ways in which this group or that group has it better.

But that’s not what privilege means. Privilege is the ways in which the social system hands you an advantage because of a characteristic you have which you did little or nothing to earn.

Like many things which are real, privilege cannot be directly measured, but its presence and nature can be imperfectly inferred from the ways it acts on other things. If you could take two essentially identical human beings, different only in the unearned characteristic you are comparing, and drop them into the same circumstance, the difference in outcome would be a perfect manifestation of privilege. Practically, this is difficult, but it has been done to a limited extent.

Lists of examples of privilege are very useful, but this is their Achilles’ heel. When you try to describe privilege abstractly, people quite reasonably say, “Can you give some examples?” So we come up with examples. But put enough examples together and to some people with privilege it starts to read like an indictment. (And for some people, “enough” is “one or two”.) They get defensive, and they start to say, “Well, but that’s not fair” and to think of ways to redress the balance… and miss the point entirely.

Yeah, that’s true. It’s not fair. That’s inherent in the nature of privilege. Like the closet, privilege hurts everyone involved; it just gives bigger helpings of hurt to the people with less of it.

Grace

Posted in Uncategorized | 27 Comments

Open Thread and Link Farm: Chip Kidd Looks Sharp Edition

  1. Religious exemption at some Florida children’s homes shields prying eyes. Reading this article both infuriated me and made me want to cry. (Major child abuse trigger warning.) Religious people are not morally superior to everyone else, and the illusion that they are is no excuse for adding loopholes to anti-child abuse laws. Aaargh.
  2. Now something to cheer you up, after you’ve read that previous story: “We left the boxes in the village. Closed. Taped shut. No instruction, no human being. I thought, the kids will play with the boxes! Within four minutes, one kid not only opened the box, but found the on/off switch. He’d never seen an on/off switch. He powered it up. Within five days, they were using 47 apps per child per day. Within two weeks, they were singing ABC songs [in English] in the village. And within five months, they had hacked Android.”
  3. Occupy: Jubilee. Occupy folks are buying up distressed credit and cancelling the debts. This is an awesome idea, which I hope flourishes. Although of course, if it becomes huge, that will have the inadvertent side effect of raising the price of distressed credit, making the project itself less viable.
  4. The writer of “Little Miss Sunshine” and “Toy Story 3” will write the screenplay for Star Wars: Episode VII
  5. If we hadn’t had waves of suffrage, and only white men were allowed to vote, then Romney would have won in 45 states. (Happily, my state – Oregon – is one of the five).
  6. “”Vote NO On Woman Suffrage… BECAUSE 80% of the women eligible to vote are married and can only double or annul their husbands’ votes.” Fannie discusses anti-suffrage arguments.
  7. Vintage Anti-Suffrage Postcards
  8. Contraceptives are an economic policy issue: The pill boosts earnings.
  9. Republican Pressure Leads to Withdrawal of Fact-Based Report by Nonpartisan CRS
  10. Is listening to conservative news media – with its insistence that all other news media is corrupt and full of lies – actually becoming a strategic disadvantage for Republicans? Conor Friedersdorf thinks so.
  11. Related: Apparently the folks running Romney’s campaign, including Romney himself, were shocked that they lost, because they had bought into the Conservative bubble’s “Romney is way ahead once you eliminate the MSM bias” spin on polling. I find that really surprising, and a bit distressing; I had always supposed that Romney and his closest advisers knew better than to live entirely within the right-wing bubble (just as I assume Obama et al don’t rely on The Nation and Daily Kos for all their info).
  12. I watched this Ted Talk by the excellent book designer Chip Kidd, but was distracted by envy of the way Chip Kidd dresses and presents himself. I want that jacket in my size. (Via).
  13. Can I Buy You A Coffee? | Ferrett Steinmetz This is such a great post. There’s a nice twist, so I don’t want to describe it, but I really enjoyed reading it. (I forgot who recommended it in comments, and I’m too lazy to go look, but whoever it was, thank you!).
  14. NOM’s Victim Spokesperson Calls President Obama The ‘Terrorist-In-Chief’ | ThinkProgress
  15. Creepshots And Consent In Cosplay. Why are there so many fans who say things like “she should have expected that if she dresses like that” – which is to say, fans who want to spread attitudes that, if they become universal, will make conventions and fan culture in general suck?
  16. I find this sort of controversy fascinating. NCsoft, a company that creates online roleplaying games, is discontinuing their superhero game “City of Heroes,” which was reportedly not losing money but also not making gobs of cash, to put more resources into their new game Blade and Soul, which seems to be much more about “hey! Look! Boobs!” than City of Heroes was, which is really saying something considering what superheroes wear. You can read the blog post linked above, and also this discussion on the City of Heroes forum. It really brings up contradictions with doing a group-creation project in which only a tiny percentage of contributing creators are actually owners of their work.
  17. There Is No Economic Basis for Holding Middle-Class Tax Cuts Hostage to Tax Cuts for Wealthy
  18. If you’re a fan of Dave Sim’s drawing, then you’ll enjoy this big gallery of Cerebus head sketches.
  19. Hawks vs. scolds: How ‘reverse tribalism’ affects climate communication | Grist
  20. A gallery of photographs of children smoking, by Frieka Janssens. Obviously a subject matter that some people will reflexively object to but the photos themselves are so freaking beautiful.
  21. Ending Rape Illiteracy | The Nation Really good article by Jessica Valenti, with a lot of really infuriating (and potentially triggering) examples.
  22. » “Violation: Rape In Gaming” is Out NOW! Edited by friend-of-Alas Clarisse Thorne, this looks like a really interesting collection. Even if you’re not going to buy a copy, click on over so you can look at the stunning cover illustration.
  23. I really want to see “The Other Son,” about a Palestinian and an Israeli who discover that they were switched at birth in the hospital. I seem to have an affinity for “Switched At Birth” tales – I’ve been really enjoying the teen soap show “Switched At Birth,” which is about a 16-year-old Deaf girl and a 16-year-old hearing girl who find out they were, er, switched at birth, and which has by far the best depiction of Deaf characters I’ve ever seen on TV.
  24. My friend Amberite makes handcrafted jewelry, collage art, and other items, and is currently trying to raise some funds. Please go check out her work.

Posted in Link farms | 16 Comments

Hereville 2 Premiere Event, Thursday the 15th in Portland!

What: Hereville: How Mirka Met a Meteorite book premiere.
When: Thursday, November 15, 7:30pm.
Where: Powell’s on Hawthorne, Portland, Oregon

For those of you in or near Portland, Oregon, please come join me at Powell’s on Hawthorne, 7:30pm on Thursday.

I’ll be there to sign books, answer questions, and show a slideshow (including a super-cool animated film of my drawing process). There will be a reading from one of the Hereville books. For the first time ever at a Hereville event, long-suffering Hereville colorist Jake Richmond will on hand to answer questions and sign books.

About Hereville: How Mirka Met A Meteorite

Hereville: How Mirka Met a Meteorite is a sequel to Barry Deutsch’s cult hit kid’s graphic novel (is there such a thing as a cult kid’s graphic novel) about “yet another monster-fighting 11-year-old Orthodox Jewish Girl.” It’s published by Abrams Books, through its Amulet imprint, and features writing and art by Barry Deutsch and colors by Jake Richmond.

Story: Mirka thinks she’s ready to be a sword-fighting hero – but she’s totally unprepared for having to save the town from a meteorite strike! But things get even more complex when the meteorite is turned into an exact duplicate of Mirka – except “stronger, faster and prettier,” as the Meteorite would be the first to say. Action and adventure gets mixed with an identity crisis turned to flesh, and Mirka must not only be brave but also make a leap into empathy to make things come out right.

Reviews:

Kirkus (starred review):

Watching Mirka fight the seemingly perfect version of herself is riveting. Deutsch has created a wonderful world in Mirka’s insulated Orthodox village and continues to capture it adroitly—though he has left himself enough room to blast Mirka out to space without readers batting an eye. Mirka is unflinchingly likable because she is so tempestuous and inexact, and really, who can’t relate to that?

This truly clever series is lots of fun.

School Library Journal (starred review):

The endlessly creative panel and perspective work adds visual interest and gives experienced graphic-novel readers plenty to savor. A well-crafted addition to a truly distinctive series.

Horn Book:

Deutsch again melds fantasy, realism, and a whopping dose of imagination, incorporating both the particularities of traditional Judaism and the universal foibles of a girl who dreams big but forgets to plan ahead.

Comics Worth Reading:

Deutsch has become even more accomplished in his story construction, clearly and cleverly setting up later plot points through small, funny scenes early on. His facility with expression continues to be a high point, with Mirka’s reactions, and those around her, entertaining and involving.

Booklist:

Deutsch continues his delightful and unique series featuring a modern Orthodox Jewish girl who is often bolder and braver than most 11-year-olds (boy or girl) might be…. Deutsch is a masterful storyteller.

Starburst Magazine:

…Magical, scary, funny and deeply emotional. Here is a book that is asking your children ‘what sort of person do you want to be?’ In a culture so caught up with cheap reality television and tabloid sensation, this is a little reassuring voice in the crowd. Its central message is all about being the better version of yourself, and perhaps not in the way we expect.

If you have a young daughter into which you’d like to instill a deep and profound love of graphic novels you could do worse than slipping How Mirka Met a Meteorite into their stocking this Christmas.

About the Author

Cartoonist Barry Deutsch lives in Portland, Oregon, in a bright blue house with bubble-gum pink trim. His 2010 graphic novel Hereville: How Mirka Got Her Sword was the first graphic novel ever to win the prestigious Sydney Taylor Award, and was also nominated for Eisner, Harvey, Ignatz, and Nebula awards. Deutsch won the national Charles M. Schulz Award for best college cartoonist in 2000 and was nominated for Comic-Con’s Russ Manning Award for Promising Newcomer in 2008. He is currently working on a third Hereville graphic novel.

Barry speaks at a previous Powells event.

Posted in Syndicated feeds | 4 Comments

Big Diabetes Study Ended Because Exercise And Diet Didn’t Do Squat

The New York Times reports:

The study randomly assigned 5,145 overweight or obese people with Type 2 diabetes to either a rigorous diet and exercise regimen or to sessions in which they got general health information. The diet involved 1,200 to 1,500 calories a day for those weighing less than 250 pounds and 1,500 to 1,800 calories a day for those weighing more. The exercise program was at least 175 minutes a week of moderate exercise.

But 11 years after the study began, researchers concluded it was futile to continue — the two groups had nearly identical rates of heart attacks, strokes and cardiovascular deaths.[…]

The study participants assigned to the intensive exercise and diet program did lose about 5 percent of their weight and managed to keep it off during the study.

I’m impressed they did an 11-year study; it’s rare to see any weight-loss based study continue beyond six months, frankly, which is to say that most weight-loss studies are completely useless.

The next thing that occurred to me is that five percent weight loss isn’t really what the diet and exercise advocates promise, is it? Paul Campos had the same thought:

Note that, perhaps out of necessity, the study defined “significant long-term weight loss” quite modestly, since on average this intensive lifestyle intervention produced a little less than a 5 percent reduction in body mass (i.e., a 160-pound “overweight” woman in the program weighed, on average, 152 pounds after four years of participation). In other words, what the study proved yet again is that lifestyle interventions don’t produce much, if anything, in the way of long-term weight loss.

My third fault is wondering what this means to me, as a person with type two diabetes? I’m on the medication, and don’t find it unpleasant (I just seem to be a lucky person who doesn’t get side effects from Metformin). I kind of like exercise; even if it doesn’t make me live longer, it’s somewhat enjoyable and makes me feel better, and may offer benefits as I get older like extending my mobility. But is trying to watch what I eat worthwhile at all? Because I gotta tell you, it’s not fun.

Via.

Posted in Fat, fat and more fat | 27 Comments

Finding Sheikh Saadi Shirazi on Twitter

Sheikh Saadi of Shiraz

I recently completed Dan Blank’s Build Your Author Platform online course (which I recommend, by the way, to anyone who wants to understand better how to treat her or his writing career as a business), and one of the things I learned was the importance of being on Twitter. I’ve had a Twitter account for quite some time now (you can follow me @richardjnewman) but I had never really understood how to use it in a meaningful way. In any event, one day, while I was playing around, trying to figure out whom to follow, what threads to pay attention to, what to retweet, what to tweet and so on, I had the brainstorm to look for hashtags for the names of the classical Persian poets I have translated, and I found one for Saadi of Shiraz (#Saadi). I read through his tweets for a few minutes–and was quite impressed by the number of people who seemed to be retweeting them–when something about the language started to sound familiar. So I opened up the PDF of my translation of Saadi’s Gulistan, entered a phrase from one of the tweets and, sure enough, it turns out that, whoever Saadi of Shiraz is, he or she has been tweeting my translations! Here are a couple:

 

Reading these brief excerpts outside the context of the book in which I published them made them new again, and I was reminded of just how much wisdom there is in Saadi’s work. More than that, though, when I first discovered that this man or woman has been tweeting my translations and that they have been making their way around the world–because Saadi of Shiraz’ followers are, as far as I can tell, flung pretty far and wide geographically–well, I was so moved, so humbled, really, that, at first, I could not say a word about it. Now it just makes me happy.

 

Posted in Writing | 1 Comment

Democracy in Akron

I was supposed to be doing this somewhere warmer, like Las Vegas.

Every election cycle, there are organizations that send out lawyers to act as poll monitors in battleground states, observing the voting process and making sure there are no shenanigans. This time, I let the AAJ’s email blitz talk to me into it. They coordinated with the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, which coordinated with other groups in ways that are opaque to me, which ended up with my contact information being handed off to the Obama campaign. After confirming through e-mail how to get in touch with me and that I still wanted to do this, I got a call asking whether I wanted to go to Colorado or Nevada. Either would be fine, I said, but I’m closer to Nevada. They called back again: Reno or Las Vegas? That was a no-brainer.

I went through a brief training on Nevada election law and what to do and not to do (short version: you’re there to help people vote, if anything gets weird, report it to the hotline) and was told in a couple of days I’d get an assignment and be told where to show up on Election Day. In a couple of days, I got a phone call from Election Protection, but it wasn’t about Nevada. It was a tired-sounding woman from the Ohio campaign. She had my name in their database, she said, and she knew it was a really long shot and didn’t expect me to say yes, but was there any chance I might be able to come help out in Ohio? They really needed bodies.

Several phone calls later and after panic and last-minute regrouping from my husband and mother-in-law, who spent most of the last few weeks of the election like this and were convinced Romney was going to steal the election, and I was on a plane to Cleveland.

The training in Ohio was about the same in substance, but a lot more intense: there’d been actual dirty tricks going on, the margin of error was smaller, the ground game more intense. The Secretary of State had been changing rules at the last minute and trying to defy court orders. The training packet was twice as thick as what I’d been given for Las Vegas. We were warned about specific instances of harassment and fraud that had gone on; it was our job, we were reminded over and over, to make sure that everybody got the opportunity to vote if they were registered to do so. Yes, people who said they wanted to vote for Romney. Everybody. Some of this was of course self-serving – we were told that for every Republican voter kept away by voter-suppression efforts, there were three Democratic voters blocked – but there was also a strong sense that however we may have felt about people voting for The Other Side, their right to exercise that choice was more important than whether we agreed with their choice.

On my way back to Akron, where I was to be stationed, I drove through a heavily black neighborhood in Cleveland. The large church I passed on my way to I-77 had a sign out front, the kind where you can change the letters around to inform people of the schedule every week. This one read:

SUNDAY

10:00 WORSHIP

1:00-4:00 DRIVE TO POLLS

The polling site was a middle school in a quiet neighborhood, not far off the highway. I had been told to arrive no later than 6:00 a.m., as polls opened at 6:30. When I pulled up about ten minutes early, the sky was just starting to lighten. I had my bag of shelf-stable things to eat, a bottle of water and a box of Starbucks coffee for the poll workers. (It was traditional for the senior poll observer to bring donuts, we’d been told, as a goodwill gesture, to the point that poll workers were surprised if we didn’t; I assumed that whoever was the precinct captain would handle that, and besides, I had no idea where the nearest decent donut shop was. But it’s never that hard to find a Starbucks.)

My assignment was to be an outside poll observer. In Ohio, to be an inside poll observer – to be actually present in the voting area with the poll workers – one must be a registered Ohio voter, which I am not. My job was to keep an eye on the lines, to make sure no electioneering was going on within a certain distance of the polls, and to assist any voters who were having trouble getting in and getting to vote. I had crammed on Ohio’s voter ID requirements and forms of acceptable ID and my phone had the voter-protection and information hotlines set on Favorites.

It was at or below freezing most of the time, and I periodically had to run inside to warm up or huddle in my car until I could feel my toes again, and lunch was a handful of snacks or canned tuna when I thought the stream of voters had slacked off a bit, and it’s going to be a few days before my lungs stop being mad at me: but it was one of the most amazing things I’ve ever done.

First, the voters. They showed up before the polls opened and never stopped coming. We had a huge influx of people before the sun came up that didn’t slow down until almost 9 am – probably people trying to vote on their way in to work. Many of them were in wheelchairs or on walkers or canes. Many people brought babies or little children. They drove up in work trucks and vans and old cars with plastic taped over missing windows. They waited in lines that, I was told, stretched up to two hours at one point. (I called the inside observer, who made some phone calls; but there’s only so much you can do when an elderly poll worker has to take a bit of time to check names for the right precinct. As one of the roving precinct captains told me, “I hope I move as fast as they do when I’m eighty.”) They held doors for  each other, chatted, let one gentleman on a cane go to the front of the line because he couldn’t stand for very long and wouldn’t have been able to vote if he’d had to wait. They called the voter hotline to find their precinct and drove home to get a utility bill because their ID was expired, and they absolutely wanted to vote.

Every so often a car or a van would pull up to the curb instead of parking. Nine times out of ten, this would be an elderly gentleman dropping off his wife right at the door while he went to park the car. (Did I mention that, with the wind chill, it rarely got above freezing most of the day? And that the parking lot was so cracked and full of misaligned asphalt that it was a trip-and-fall lawsuit waiting to happen?)

Second was being able to help people vote. I didn’t wear any election gear; I didn’t campaign. I greeted people coming in. If they had questions about whether they were in the right precinct, I directed them to the poll workers’ assistance table and offered to call the hotline for them. I explained to confused voters what ID they could use to vote: do you have a cell-phone bill at home, or a utility bill, or a student ID? One woman wasn’t sure and had to leave for work while she was still on hold with the state voter hotline; I called my group, got her precinct and address and texted it to her. (Thank you, she texted back.) I asked voters who didn’t have “I  [Ohio] Voting” stickers on their coats if they were able to cast their ballot; if they said yes, I thanked them for voting, and if not, I tried to find out what the problem was. Sometimes it was just a lack of time, and I could tell them they only needed to be in the line by 7:30 and encourage them to come back. Almost all of them were very friendly. A couple asked me what I was doing there, but they smiled when they realized I was there to help them vote, not to hit them with one more election message.

One man walked out of the polling place, threw back his head and howled “THANK GOD, IT’S OVER!”

Fourteen hours after I arrived, it was indeed over, at least our little piece of it. The poll workers had printed the results from each of the four machines and taped them up on the doors to the school, facing out, where anyone could review them. (Mike, the inside observer, dutifully reported the presidential and senatorial results to the war room; roughly 2-1 in favor of the Democratic candidates, not surprising in a heavily blue-collar and African-American precinct.) We were supposed to wait around until every last paper had been put away, but as Mike said, did we think these nice old ladies were going to go back and sabotage the memory cards? No, we did not. We thanked them for their service and left, in my case to go find dinner that was warmer than room temperature and didn’t come out of a Zip-Seal package. There was a victory party planned somewhere in Cleveland, but a cold beer was absolutely the last thing I needed.

I’ve seen arguments that something is lost when we turn voting into a mail-in affair, and convenient though vote-by-mail is – I do it by default, since I never know if I’ll be home on Election Day – I am now even more convinced that it is true, that setting aside an official day for people to go to a polling place and cast their vote is a kind of civic religion, that there is value in creating a space where people can step into a voting booth, in private, and add their voice to the democratic process of deciding and our leaders and our laws.

I’m humbled and honored that the people of Ohio let me help them exercise their right to make those choices.

 

Posted in Elections and politics | 16 Comments

Election Debriefing Thread: Seven random thoughts.

So the elections over (give or take). And it was unquestionably a good election for Democrats, and perhaps even for liberals.

So what effects will it have?

1) So: Four more years. On the bright side, Obama starts his second term with an economy on the way up, and with our war commitments on the way down. On the dim side, Obama starts his second term with Republicans in congress dedicated to obstructionism above all else.

2) Speaking of which: Filibuster reform? Will it happen?

3) Ezra argues that merely by being reelected, Obama has achieved (or, rather, secured) some major goals.

4) Screw Obama. The most exciting election result of the night may have been pot legalization in Colorado and Washington. This seems huge, and I can’t even begin to predict how it’ll play out (except that I’m sure that I’ll be furious at the Obama administration before it’s through). But for the first time in my life, I feel hope that things can improve in this area, that we’re not just doomed to have more and more lives destroyed by the anti-drug zealots.

5) Another possible effect: “Legalisation could, in short, deal a blow to Mexico’s traffickers of a magnitude that no current policy has got close to achieving.”

6) America’s voting system is a disgrace.

7) Any chance that the US Government will start treating global warming like a serious and urgent issue?

So those are my initial thoughts. Yours?

Posted in Elections and politics | 46 Comments

THE AGE OF MIRACLES: Marriage Equality Wins Popular Vote in Maine, Maryland and Minnesota; Washington win expected

As of 11:54pm Pacific Time, voters have come down in favor of marriage equality in Maine, Maryland, and Minnesota. It hasn’t yet been called in Washington State, but marriage equality is in the lead so far. It’s looking increasingly likely that marriage equality will be four-for-four in the popular vote tonight.

For years, same-sex marriage opponents have been saying that SSM has never won a popular vote. Those days are over, folks.

Final update of the night: Washington State probably won’t be called until tomorrow, but since marriage equality is currently ahead, and most of the votes yet to be counted come from the Seattle area, it will be shocking if marriage equality loses.

So in four separate popular votes tonight, marriage equality has won. I think this is the most important single date for marriage equality in the USA since 9 years, 4 months, and 19 days ago, when the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the right to marriage could not be denied to same-sex couples.

At the time, same-sex marriage opponents claimed that judges, not being an elected legislature, had no democratic legitimacy. Of course, once legislatures began voting for marriage equality, SSM opponents declared that only a popular vote can confer legitimacy. So it goes; I’m sure a new definition of legitimacy will be forthcoming from NOM shortly. Same-sex couples will never be good enough to marry, in NOM’s view, and hurdling their arbitrary thresholds has never been what matters.

Many SSM proponents say that it’s an insult to queer people’s dignity for their rights to have to be voted on at all. I agree with that. And yet… I see it as a necessary and unavoidable insult. I don’t believe in natural rights. Rather, I believe that we have the rights that our governments recognize and are willing to enforce. Which means, in a democracy, that we have the rights we’re able to persuade our fellow citizens that we have.

So although I recognize that it is, it absolutely is, an insult to dignity that rights are voted on, I also recognize that the heart of this system is persuasion. We were in a horrible country in which queers were almost always reviled, and queer rights nonexistent. How do we make that into a better country? I can’t imagine a better system for change than persuasion, even thought it’s wrong that queers had to ask for rights at all. As Churchill famously said, “Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried.”

The four victories tonight don’t matter because of what SSM opponents say. They matter because they are the result of the truest, most reliable source of rights: the recognition of those rights by the society.

When I was a kid, it was widely accepted that homosexuals were sick at best and perverted and predatory at worse. I remember how Billy Crystal’s gay character on the sitcom “Soap” seemed shocking – sure, he was written apologetically, and the writers couldn’t wait to turn him straight, but that he was presented sympathetically at all was revolutionary.

There’s a zillion battles left to fight, but: Look how we’ve changed. Look at how queer children were once taught that they were fundamentally disgusting and unworthy of love, which is, I am convinced, absolutely the cruelest thing to do to any person, a wound that festers in people for decades, or lifetimes, and a wound that can easily be mortal. That still happens, but more and more that model has been replaced. Look at how parents were once taught to be ashamed of their queer children, and to be ashamed of themselves for their alleged parenting failure. Look at all the queer adults who had to live their entire lives in secret for fear of being fired, or hated, or attacked, or just out of misplaced shame.

Look at how radically all that has changed, just in my lifetime.

Look at how today, voters in four states overcame their fear of the new, and overcame the nightmarish predictions of SSM opponents, and overcame the historical weight of decades of bigotry, to vote for equality. Equal laws, not separate and unequal. Equal citizenship, not second-rate citizenship. Equal rights.

When I think of the world for queer children when I was born, and compare it to the world queer children are born into now, it amazes me that things have gotten so much better in such a short time. I am an atheist, and still I tell you, it is the most miraculous thing I have ever witnessed.

*********************************************************

With 46% of the vote counted, it appears that Maine’s Question 1 has passed, and same-sex marriage will be legal in Maine.

The other three marriage measures (in Maryland, Minnesota and Washington) are still too early to call, but currently same-sex marriage is winning in all three states. I’ll update this post as further states are called.

UPDATE: Marriage equality wins in Maryland! According to MSNBC. Congratulations to the voters of Maryland.

UPDATE: Marriage equality wins in Minnesota! The AP has called it! Minnesota’s anti-SSM amendment has lost. Congratulations to the voters of Minnesota.

UPDATE: The Bangor Daily News still hasn’t called it. This post may have been premature… Secondary update: AP confirms it (among many other news organizations). Equal marriage has won in Maine!

UPDATE: Oh, also, Tammy Balwin has won the race to be Wisconsin’s next Senator. She will be the first openly gay Senator in US history.

UPDATE: Not totally on-topic, but both women running to Represent New Hampshire in the House of Representatives won. Since both New Hampshire’s Senators are women, this makes New Hampshire congressional delegation the first entirely female Congressional delegation in US history.

UPDATE: Iowa voters retain Judge David Wiggins. Judge Wiggins, who as a member of the Iowa Supreme Court was one of seven justices who ruled for marriage equality, had been targeted for removal by anti-SSM activists.

UPDATE: I suppose I should mention, for the sake of completeness, President Obama’s reelection. Obama is the first American President to endorse marriage equality while in office, and it doesn’t appear that NOM’s prediction that his stand would cost him votes came to fruition.

Posted in Elections and politics, Same-Sex Marriage | 6 Comments

Half of us are about to collide rudely with reality. I hope it’s not my half.

All the Democrats and lefties I know are pretty confident that Obama will win the election on Tuesday, just from watching the polls.

At the same time, many Republicans seem awfully confident that Romney will win. My friend Jack at Ethics Alarms, in comments, wrote:

[Obama’s not] going to be elected to a second term. […] I am sure. I have my own formula and parameters, just like Nate Silver. The difference is that I know what I’m talking about.

I’m pretty certain that Jack, in fact, knows a lot less about probability and polling than Nate Silver does. But Jack would presumably feel certain I’m wrong.

Jack’s view is shared by many on the right. Check out this reader poll at Battleground Watch (click on “view results”), or look at what folks like Michael Barone, George Will and Dick Morris are saying.

If Romney wins in a close race, that won’t blow my mind. But if he wins by a landslide, as some conservatives are predicting….

Anyhow, feel free to use this thread to discuss anything elections-related.

UPDATE: Ted Frank has the best argument for thinking that the polls are overstating Obama’s chances, that I’ve seen.

And at Ethics Alarms, Jack explains why he thinks Romney has it in the bag: It all comes down to Strong! Leadership! My response: Oy.

Posted in Elections and politics | 57 Comments