- Cash/Consent: The War on Sex Work | by Lorelei Lee
This essay is excellent – resisting simplistic narratives about sex work from both anti-sex work crusaders and pro-sex work liberals.
- NYC restaurant industry is thriving after $15 minimum wage – Business Insider
Thanks to Grace for the link!
- Northern snakehead: This invasive species can live on land and breathe air. Authorities suggest you kill them on sight. – The Washington Post (And an alternative link.)
They’re not dangerous to humans (although they do sometimes eat mice), but in the U.S. they’re an invasive species.
- These Machines Can Put You in Jail. Don’t Trust Them. – The New York Times (And an alternate link).
“Alcohol breath tests, a linchpin of the criminal justice system, are often unreliable…”
- Did Emma Sulkowicz Get Redpilled?
It sounds like the answer may be “no, but she’s got new libertarian friends and she was never actually all that political anyway.”
- The Adults In The Room: Deadspin
“A metastasizing swath of media is controlled by private-equity vultures and capricious billionaires and other people who genuinely believe that they are rich because they are smart and that they are smart because they are rich, and that anyone less rich is by definition less smart. They know what they know, and they don’t need to know anything else.”
- The Bernie vs. Warren Debate We Need by Eric Levitz.
This is the best article on the “Warren or Bernie?” debate I’ve read. Even if people don’t agree with the conclusions (and really, Levitz doesn’t come to a conclusion), these are the kinds of questions leftists need to be thinking about.
- How online allies joined a trans artist’s street art war
TERFs and LGBT folks in Oxford fight each other through the medium of anonymous stickers.
- No, Obama is Not a Member of the Intellectual Dark Web
- Twitter hates me. The Des Moines Register fired me. Here’s what really happened. – Columbia Journalism Review
This was the reporter who was (unfairly) fired for reporting on some guy’s racist teenage tweets. (Read the story for why I think his firing was unfair). What’s oddest is that the reporter is one of the clearest-cut cases of someone being fired due to outrage on social media – and yet he denies that he was “cancelled.”
- If 2020 Democrats Are Going to Be Serious About Climate, They Need to Cut Out Congress – Mother Jones
What the President can do without Congress’ approval.
- How ‘Slings & Arrows’ on Acorn TV made a Shakespeare fest a cult hit – Los Angeles Times
This decades-old TV show is one of my favorite TV shows ever. But the reason I’m including this in the link farm is that the article mentions that the Slings and Arrows creators are shopping around a prequel to the series. Fingers very much crossed!
- The Straw Hat Riot of 1922 – Wikipedia
In which a relatively harmless tradition of hat-snatching goes overboard.
- This 195-Gigapixel Photo of Shanghai Has To Be Seen To Be Believed | IFLScience
That’s an article about the photo; here’s the photo. I spent a couple of hours just exploring the photo.
- One year after Kavanaugh, I can’t go back to SCOTUS.
A short piece by Dahlia Lithwick. “That is the problem with power: It incentivizes forgiveness and forgetting.”
- A Comprehensive Defense of Trans People : musicotic
A very impressive list of references and links.
- James Dean Reborn in CGI for Vietnam War Action-Drama (Exclusive) | Hollywood Reporter
The movie will co-star a CGI recreation of Dean; all the other parts will be played by living actors. “‘This opens up a whole new opportunity for many of our clients who are no longer with us,’ said Mark Roesler, CEO of CMG Worldwide, which represents Dean’s family alongside more than 1,700 entertainment, sports, music and historical personalities, including the likes of Burt Reynolds, Christopher Reeve, Ingrid Bergman, Neil Armstrong, Bette Davis and Jack Lemmon.”
- Disney Is Quietly Placing Classic Fox Movies Into Its Vault, and That’s Worrying
- Trump’s Justice Dept. Wants to get rid of old antitrust rules that keep major film studios in check – The Atlantic
It’s hard to see what possible benefit consumers could get from this. I think the question is not if Disney will buy a major movie theater chain, but when.
- Rats learned how to drive tiny cars and it reduced their stress, researchers say – The Washington Post
“Beyond the adorableness, it has real scientific value” sounds like a New Yorker cartoon caption to me.
- The A.V. Club’s 100 best TV shows of the 2010s
- Making Sense of Autogynephilia Debates – Julia Serano – Medium
A readable guide to what Ray Blanchard’s autogynephilia theory is, and why Blanchard is wrong. It’s long, but also well-divided into sections, so you can read just the first section for a basic overview or continue if you want more.
- Actually, The SUV-Defeating Rock Is Good
“It has made it its purpose to demonstrate that a great deal of SUV drivers have no fucking clue what they’re doing and cannot be trusted to drive in public.”
- How Rich Would Bill Gates Be Without His Copyright on Windows? | Op-Eds & Columns | CEPR
- Why Black Voters Prefer Establishment Candidates Over Liberal Alternatives | FiveThirtyEight
This article is from early October, before “the squad” endorsed Bernie, but I think it’s still worth reading.
- Five Reasons the Diet Soda Myth Won’t Die – The New York Times (Alternate link.)
I think that at a fundamental level, the idea that diet soda is secretly poisoning us is too good a story, too intuitively correct, for us to drop it merely because it’s not true.
- On Race, Genetics, and Pseudoscience – Violent metaphors
“Describing race as a social construct does not undermine its existence, nor its importance; it merely points out that there is no fundamental biological basis for race.”
- OK boomer: The psychology of why baby boomers complain about millenials and Gen Z – VoxMemories are not accurate, and generational personality differences are like astrology.
- Hesitant hitmen jailed over botched assassination in China – BBC News
The case involves a chain of five hitmen, each of whom (but the last one) tried to subcontract the hit to another hitman.
- The Art of Power: How Louis XIV Ruled France … With Ballet | Mental Floss
A French classical musician I sat next to on a plane told me this story, and I had to google it once I got home to make sure he wasn’t pulling my jambe.
- This animated gif shows the difference between the “red vs blue” map as it’s currently often presented – showing red counties (i.e., counties where there were more Republican than Democratic votes for President) – versus a map that shows how many actual votes are represented, rather than land mass. I’m not describing it well, but if you look at it, it’s pretty clear.
- Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%. – The New York Times (Alternate link.)Including about 20,000 voters from a heavily Democratic area who were purged because there was no record of them voting in upcoming elections.
- Stephen King’s Maine Home to Become a Museum and writer’s retreat | Mental Floss
- According to a new paper, 43% of white students at Harvard are “ALDC”: athletes, legacy, donors’ kids, or children of faculty. (Sci-hub link.)
In comparison, only 16% of non-white students at Harvard are ALDC. 70% of ALDC students wouldn’t have gotten in without ALDC preferences. Without ALDC preferences, there would be as many or more Asians, Blacks, and Latinx students, but fewer white students.
- Painting “Zebra Stripes” on Cows Wards Off Biting Flies | RealClearScience
Small sample size and not yet replicated, but interesting nonetheless. Also, loved that whoever created the photo illustration decided that it made sense to label the “body” and the “leg,” preventing me from mixing up those body parts. (Okay, probably there’s some sensible reason for that if one reads the study…).
- “You and a super intelligent snail both get 1 million dollars, and you both become immortal, however you die if the snail touches you. It always knows where you are and slowly crawls toward you. What’s your plan?”
I really enjoyed reading the answer that got the most “upvotes” (right at the top of the thread).
- The backlash against Impossible and Beyond Meat burgers going mainstream – Vox
Foodies were in favor of the faux-meat burgers until they started being served in fast food restaurants.
- Florida GOP leaders finally utter ‘sea level rise,’ lament ‘lost decade’ | Miami Herald
It’s not so much “we lost” as “we deliberately threw it away.” And more like three decades.
- 20 Years Later, and the Women of Angel Still Deserve More | TV Guide
“With the deaths of Darla, Cordelia, and Fred, Angel says that a woman is a person until she gets pregnant, and that’s the end of her story.” On her Twitter, the woman who played Cordelia praised this article, saying it made her feel seen.
- The art at the bottom and top of this post is by French artist Levalet. Check out Levalet’s website. I love their work, which nicely combines whimsical humor with really strong rendering skills.
Cartoon: Rationing Health Care
Cartoon: Media-Man To The Rescue!
Cartoon: The Transphobe Bait and Switch (aka The Transphobe Motte and Bailey)
Cartoon: Being Foxy About Vaccines
Link Farm and Open Thread, T Rex Lips Edition
Cartoon: Radical Feminism Has Changed
- Older »
Most Recent Open ThreadThe most recent open thread can always be found at the top of this page. When older posts have closed comments, please respond to them on the most recent open thread.
Alas, a Blogroll
- Lawyers Guns and Money
- Spherical Bullshit
- Language: A Feminist Guide
The new imitation game
10 hours ago
- Election Law Blog
UVA Law Professors Mike Gilbert and Debbie Hellman on Political Corruption
11 hours ago
- We Hunted the Mammoth
“Pride Month Is A Cynical Exercise In State-Enforced Homosexuality” declares Federalist writer who doesn’t know what words mean
- Ann Leckie's Blog
Translation State Release Schedule
3 days ago
- The Incidental Economist
Is ChatGPT Nicer than Your Doctor?
5 days ago
- Asking The Wrong Questions
Recent Reading: All These Worlds: Reviews and Essays by Niall Harrison
5 days ago
- A Feminist Challenging Transphobia
- Family Inequality
- This Is So Gay
Let's Go, Bunnies!
4 weeks ago
- Beepy Boopy Veronica
Green Energy And Your Family: Things You Should Consider
6 weeks ago
Texas takes another step into the abyss
2 months ago
- Whipping Girl
more evidence that Lisa Marchiano invented "transgender social contagion"
3 months ago
- Scott Wood Makes Lists
Review: Down and Out in Paradise: The Life of Anthony Bourdain
3 months ago
- Echidne of the Snakes
Happy 2023 To All Of You
4 months ago
Alas, A Subscription Service
Amp on TwitterMy Tweets
The “The A.V. Club’s 100 best TV shows of the 2010s” link in #21 just links to a Good Place picture, which is accurate, as the Good Place ought to be all 100 best shows.
The link I think you were looking for is here.
Thanks, Celeste! I’ve fixed the link. :-)
I never understood why the snail would want to kill you. It’s super-intelligent. Surely you could come to some agreement.
Why is there no plan to keep their immortality secret? Do they want to be a test subject forever?
this made me laugh alot, you will laugh alot too i think?
holidays got you stressed? ok then: https://youtu.be/LAO6-rkpYCY
I liked #5. Every other angle on this young woman paints her as a one-dimensional embodiment of what they were already talking about.
I thought along the same lines as Ben. All the careful arrangements to get the snail as far away as possible and keep it there, the threats and barriers and Wile-E-Coyote schematics…they seem to presume the snail benefits from killing you. Why not just set the snail up in a comfortable home in New Zealand, send it really good adaptive computer equipment, and stay north of the equator? Everybody can be happy? If this is the only hyperintelligent snail, it’s probably lonely. It probably wants somebody to talk to, and might want to help make other intelligent snails and adaptive equipment to use tools without hands and feet.
I believe that the snail is not super intelligent. If it were super intelligent, why does it keep moving towards you? That’s the sign of a force, like gravity, or pure instinct.
This works so much better if we eliminate “super intelligent” from the description. Then it becomes a lot more like It Follows, and that’s a lot more interesting.
re link #37 –
I’ve had the Beyond Burger at a fast food joint and it was… okay.
I’ve had the Impossible Burger at a fast food joint and it was… okay.
I’ve had the Impossible Burger at an upscale sports bar and it was… amazing! I was really worried that I’d been given a meat burger and that I’d be sick as hell in the coming hours.
It looks like in the hands of fast food joints, the new plant based burgers are acceptable but not good, while an actual cook preparing them makes them fantastic.
I probably wouldn’t have either of them again given other options, but I’ve been a vegetarian so long, I’m not particularly interested in eating something that tastes like and feels like meat. But I encourage meat eaters to give them a try. At a real restaurant or in their own home. Do not eat these things at fast food stores – that’s an expensive waste.
Regarding the immortal and the snail: Lots of literature suggests that immortality would be a drag. Someday that snail might be your best friend, as the only exit you’ve got. Ultimately the hyper-intelligent snail might begrudge the fact that you can’t return the favor.
While humans haven’t yet achieved immortality, the Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker reports the following average life expediencies for 2017:
Japan: 84.1 years and rising
France: 82.4 and rising
Industrialized nations overall: 82.2 years and rising
Canada: 81.9 and rising
US: 78.9–and falling
But wait–it gets worse: I’m lying. The US reached average life expectancy of 78.9 years back in 2014–and has been DECLINING EVER SINCE, now falling to 78.6. American exceptionalism on display.
Still, striking a blow for national solidarity, we can report that life expectancy is declining for men, women, white, black, Hispanic, and Native American/Alaskan Native populations simultaneously. In Tom Lehrer’s immortal mortal words, we truly all go together when we go.
Who wants to regress data on rates of life expectancy decline on voting patterns? Are voters who swing to Trump disproportionately likely to live in places where life expectancy is declining fastest?
And who wants to run a regression to determine What. The. Fuck?
No, we do not. The life expectancy for incomes over $2,000,000 were still rising 2014-1026, in the US, and I expect still are. It’s all a consequence of rising income inequality. Even the women/men life expectancy gap closes, when the incomes get high enough, from seven years to about one.
Lets face it, the American exceptionalism is in the fact that resources, not just life, have been shrinking for the majority – in most of the developed world the rising tide raises most ships.
To clarify, real median household income seems to have risen uniformly since 2014–although I expect it has risen at a slower pace than for more affluent households.
But perhaps an analysis of the majority misses the mark. Depressed circumstances for a large minority might suffice to drive down aggregate life expectancy.
Or maybe the decline in life expectancy is a lagging variable? Real median household income fell by more than 10% from 2000 to 2012. The cumulative stress over that period might just now be becoming lethal.
Alternatively, perhaps the relevant variables are not about REAL income, but about RELATIVE income. But can status consciousness drive mortality rates?
That is a very plausible theory… but then, why did life expectancy not fall all over the world? The 2008 crisis affected more than just the US.
And, without falling too much into conspiracy theorizing, I do not get how ‘real income’ works. I have been in the US for about thirty years. The US government lists the inflation for last 28 years as 102.5%.
Medical insurance, student tuition, rent in the states I would live – all of these have tripled or more. Whole wheat bread, five+ cultures yogurt by the half gallon, dry salami, fruit with a taste, a dozen eggs, lasting clothes – all of these have gone up by more than 100%, as well. And which is worse, the new stuff (tools, power tools, clothing, shoes, consumer electronics) lasts months where it used to last years.
Sure, the new stuff is cheaper, but to get what used to be the reasonable balance between price and cost, now you need to pay luxury prices. I have been wearing the exact same Rockport shoes, Levi’s jeans and L.L.Bean tropical shirts for 30 years. In my college years, those were sensible purchases because they lasted forever, and you could buy them everywhere. Today you can find cheap alternatives, but the real thing costs three to four times more. Brands even play with the model names. The Euro Walkers that cost $25 in Boston in 1992 are not the 50$ Eureka Walkers of today. They are the $100 (on sale) World Tour.
I can buy more horsepower for my car, and more flops for my computer, but the 300hp Toyota Supra of 1992 was not the same as the 300hp Toyota Camry of today. The former was a hot sports car that carried some prestige in certain circles, the latter is a drab family sedan. The 2020 Supra? It costs about twice what the 1992 did, sure, but it puts out a measly 10% more horse power than the bloody Camry. To buy the car that stands up, performance and prestige wise, to the Supra of yore, you will need to get a $150,000 luxury exotic.
So, forgive me for not believing that the household with $150,000 income of today is as financially solid as the $75,000 household of 1992.
Maybe my views are skewed by the fact that I am approaching 60 instead of being in my 30s. But the seniors in my wife’s class sound a lot less hopeful about the future than my class sounded in the 90s.
I can definitely buy that, but not before I have discarded the much more plausible theory that health care with higher RELATIVE premiums and deductibles and less REAL benefits leads to worse health outcomes.
Why has California not experienced the life expectancy drop? Could it be because of things like better post-natal care legislation that makes it the one place in the US where new mothers die less frequently than those in developing countries?
A more interesting question is why whichever state goes by WY, or was it WI, doesn’t report a life expectancy decrease, either?
(Yes, I know which state it is, no, I cannot answer the question)
Yup. Health insurance costs are way up, deductibles are up 10 x or more, and out of pocket expenses are way, way up. If you live long enough, you or a member of your family will probably bankrupt you for their medical care. USA! USA!
I remember seeing somewhere that the opioid epedemic has played a significant role in the lowering of life expectancy in the U.S..
Our for-profit healthcare system contributed to that through both over prescription of drugs and under funding mental health services for people who do need opiods but also need help processing a traumatic accident, living with a condition that includes chronic pain, etc..
In some cases, it is also a way in which reaction to lower relative income might prove deadly.
Funny you should say that (Funny in the “hmmmm” sense, not the “ha ha” sense): Amp’s blogroll just posted a link to the Incidental Economist post noting that, because black people in rural America get less medical care, they received less opioids–and this may have saved 14,000 black lives!
“[N]ew prescription opioids were marketed more aggressively in white rural areas, where pain drug prescriptions were already high. African-Americans received fewer opioid prescriptions, some researchers think, because doctors believed, contrary to fact, that black people 1) were more likely to become addicted to the drugs 2) would be more likely to sell the drugs and 3) had a higher pain threshold than white people because they were biologically different.
A fourth possibility is that some white doctors were more empathetic to the pain of people who were like them, and less empathetic to those who weren’t.”
Remember Gordon Sondland (one of the “Three Amigos” in charge of Ukraine policy)? Now he’s been accused of sexual harassment:
Random link: Twin studies usually assume that twins are (quasi-) randomly scattered throughout the population; here’s a careful study showing that’s not true. Basically, it seems that less healthy mothers are more likely to miscarry twins, so mothers of twins are healthier than the average pregnant population–and with all the correlates that implies (education level, SES, etc). Across multiple countries and stuff. Nifty! https://twitter.com/restatjournal/status/1209134293215260674?s=19
Well, this seems like a good thing.
This is very disturbing:
It’s important to read the whole thread.
This thing here is just wonderful. I hope all the other awful celebrities take note and follow the same formula to protect their legacies.
Thanks for that link, Jake. I needed that today.
Yes, T.S. Eliot wrote a letter seeking to minimize the thousand love letters he had sent to Emily Hale–letters that he learned she had donated to Princeton, and therefore would eventually become public. Yes, Eliot’s effort seems contrived and he sounds like a dick. But a bit of context may be in order.
Eliot had just married Esmé Valerie Fletcher, a woman 38 years his junior. He had every reason to be concerned about how SHE would might read these letters, and about how others would regard HER if the letter were to become public during her lifetime. Thus, it’s possible to read Eliot’s remarks not as an exercise in defending his own ego, but as an effort to defend HERS.
(Valerie Eliot died in 2012, so presumably never saw the letters.)
Well, nobody.really, he could have just told his new wife and his closest friends. Or, even better, he could have told the most recent Mrs. TS Eliot that he had been in love with Ms. Hale for 40 years, but that had ended as soon as he met the new Mrs Eliot. His close friends would have/should have told him not to leave that for public consumption. Nope. Eliot believed he was right and would be commonly seen that way, for he was a great man and the women in his life were just supposed to worship and obey him. For he was a great poet and a great man, he would be believed unquestioningly.
I have a hard time reading it any other way.
Thank you for this, Richard.
So. This is an email that I just sent…
So we have a payroll system that commits wage theft. That seems less than optimal. Unless we’re Taco Bell…
I keep waiting to see the redeeming features of [WORST PAYROLL SYSTEM I’VE EVER SEEN] and I’m beginning to think I’ll be waiting for a very long time. I never thought I’d long for ADP’s payroll system, but life is just full of surprises. 😊
If you take PTO (paid time off) in the pay period during which your anniversary date occurs, it subtracts those hours from the hours you’ve rolled over. Essentially, you get paid for 8 hours of PTO but debited for 16 hours of PTO. Wage theft, unless somebody takes the time to review each of the 1000 + employees at their anniversary and credits those hours back. It seems corporate was aware of this problem, but they couldn’t be bothered to inform us. This job just keeps getting better and better, tra-la-la-la-la.
Any idea why corporate wants a payroll system that could get them in trouble for wage theft? Is it just that they WANT the wage theft, to save money?
Afaict, the awful payroll system is significantly cheaper than well designed and functional alternatives. Cutting costs is the sin qua non of modern business, damn the consequences.
The absolute best part? HR has put responsibility for catching and notifying on the employees! I see a class action suit in the parent company’s future.
Well, if they lose a class action suit, I’m sure you’ll be heartbroken over it. :-)
And one day I’ll tell you all about the attendance policy they unveiled. I call it the, “Oh my god! We’re so desperate for warehouse workers we won’t penalize you for nearly anything. I mean, oh my God, we are so desperate, that you aren’t in danger of losing your job unless you tell us you want us to fire you.”
Which is weird, because we’re really not that desperate.
You don’t realize how important management is to a workplace environment until you witness a change as drastic as we’ve gone through.
So whatever happened to poetry? I know that for many years poetry was a vital branch of English and then American literature and then … what? I can’t name a living poet. The last one that I can remember is Robert Frost, but then I was born in Massachusetts and attended school there when he was alive. Poetry is still vital in some cultures, but not here. I guess in our culture poetry only survives if someone can set it to music. Which, if you read the lyrics, means that a lot of bad poetry gets circulated because it’s set to good music (and sometimes lousy music …).
Sure you can.
RonF, have you considered that we just got old, and the world no longer carters to our tastes? That the recent poets, who yes, are set to music, are only bad because we do not like what they have to say?
I have the same problem with modern authors, moviemakers, politicians, etc.
I read more than I ever have. I have not discovered someone I really love who is not over the age of fifty. New favorite authors, yes. New young ones? No.
It’s most obvious in military SciFi. Everyone born after the 60s I’ve picked up lately happens to be at least one, usually more, of the following:
– too ignorant of how soldiers think (of any rank)
– too ignorant of science (technology or basic physics)
– too eager to push a political agenda (one that I find unpalatable)
– too ignorant of history (maybe the same as being ignorant of psychology)
But you are right about poetry being alive in other cultures. Mocking each other in verse is still very much in vogue at our parties (Eastern Europeans and Middle Easterners) Except that those who can handle a guitar set it too music, and thus obtain an unfair advantage. The bastards.
It’s hard to know how to respond to this, Ron. First, and I mean this without snark though it may sound a little bit snarky, most people only read poetry when they are in school, so–unless you are still reading poetry for pleasure and just happen not to be reading contemporary poets–it’s not surprising that you can’t name a single living one. Second, if you don’t read poetry on a regular basis, on what basis do you make the claim that poetry is no longer “a vital branch of English and then American literature?” And if you do continue to read poetry, why would the fact that you are, willfully apparently, not reading contemporary poets make your suggestion that poetry is no longer “a vital branch of English and then American literature” anything other than specious?
In my own classes, students have read–in addition to work by Frost, cummings, Eliot, Stevens, Moore and other names you would probably be familiar with from your college years (which are, I think, a little bit before mine)–books of poetry by Jericho Brown, January Gill O’Neil, Joseph Legaspi, Sharon Olds, as well as selections of poetry by a host of contemporary poets whose work is indeed vital and having a profound influence on American literature. The Guardian has a regular column that covers poetry, and there are other places where you will find this work discussed outside the halls of academia as having a significant impact on people’s lives.
I don’t have time to hunt down the links to what I’ve mentioned, but, if you choose to look–and if you look more with more breadth and depth than what I have listed–I think you will find that poetry is still vital and that there are poets who speak to you as profoundly, if differently, than someone like Frost might have—though I grant, as Petar suggests, that it is not as vital here in the broad cultural sense that it is in other cultures.
The question of whether song lyrics are poetry–and whether Bob Dylan should be counted as a poet and therefore worthy of the Nobel–is an interesting one, though that tack it takes will depend on whether you want to talk solely about popular appeal/accessibility/etc or you are also willing to talk about the history of the art form and craft.
I am in the process of prepping for the new semester, which starts tomorrow, so I don’t have much time to engage this discussion further. So, if you respond, don’t think I am ignoring you if I don’t.
Actually, the answer to your question is contained in your first point. When I read poetry in school (actually junior high and high school, I took exactly two humanities classes in college, and only because I was required to do so) I was led to believe that reading poetry was fairly common for the literate classes. I consider myself fairly literate, but as you correctly surmise I don’t read poetry on a regular basis and I don’t know anyone who does so. You excepted, I suppose.
I don’t mean to disdain poetry. It’s kind of like my attitude towards certain kinds of music, or Mexican food; just because I don’t like or am not moved by something doesn’t mean it’s objectively bad, it just means it doesn’t speak to me in particular. So, by “vital”, I meant “read by a lot of people and having an influence on popular culture”. Which was perhaps not the best word to use to mean that.
Actually Mexican food does move me. So to speak. That’s part of the problem….