Ohio Passes School and College Trans Bathroom Ban

My alma mater Oberlin, and all schools and colleges in Ohio (private schools and colleges included) is going to be forced to ban trans students from using bathrooms aligned with their gender.

The Ohio legislature just passed House Bill 183, a ban on colleges allowing trans students to use bathrooms designated for their gender – that is, trans women can’t legally use women’s rooms, and trans men can’t legally use men’s rooms.

The Ohio legislature has successfully overturned vetos on anti-trans bills before, so it’s unlikely the governor can successfully veto this. (And he might not want to.)

Making the bill even more spiteful, it also bans multi-gender or “anyone can use” bathrooms.

The only loophole this leaves for Oberlin, as far as I can tell, is that building “family” bathrooms that aren’t multi-occupancy (which I think means, they can only have one toilet) is still permitted.

But even if Oberlin and other colleges build plentiful “family bathrooms” so trans students always have a nearby bathroom to use – and most colleges won’t do that, I suspect – it’s still an assault on trans people’s dignity, just like having segregated bathrooms was an assault on Black people’s dignity.

This entry was posted in Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Trans and Queer issues. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Ohio Passes School and College Trans Bathroom Ban

  1. Dianne says:

    To quote a well known cartoonist: Well, this sucks!

  2. Jacqueline Squid Onassis says:

    It’s a ban on trans students using the correct bathroom at ALL SCHOOLS in the state, public or private, not just colleges if my quick scan of the bill is correct.

  3. Ampersand says:

    Yes, you’re right.

  4. Jacqueline Squid Onassis says:

    I wonder how this can be limited to schools and pass legal muster. Like, could they make the same law but only for gas stations? Would that be legal?

  5. Elusis says:

    @JSO – it almost certainly has to do with funding sources. “Receives funding from the state education budget” or the like. Or with licensing – “provides services subject to the state Dept of Education regulations” yadda yadda.

  6. Jacqueline Squid Onassis says:

    @Elusis,

    Here’s the bill. I didn’t spot anything that said “receives funding from…” what I saw was “all schools.” But my brain isn’t what it used to be and I very well might have missed that. If anyone’s curious, here’s the pdf of the bill.

  7. Pingback: Mike's Blog Roundup ... from Crooks & Liars Steve in Manhattan - Tom Bettenhausen's

  8. bcb says:

    I think the real reason is that they just want to attack schools. They view private (non-Christian, at least) schools as part of the Woke Education System, whereas private gas stations are part of the Koch Brothers’ virtuous free market business.

  9. Pingback: Mike's blogoverzicht - kegeln

  10. Daniel J Becker says:

    Obviously they have not thought this through. What happens as trans people walk into a bathroom of their birth gender dressed as they see themselves? Oh no, there’s a woman in the men’s room, there’s a man in the women’s room.

    Of course, there will be those who will immediately start in on these people while in the bathroom.

    This is some real nasty uploading to society by these really nasty, selfish, ignorant people.

  11. bruce.desertrat says:

    Making the bill even more spiteful, it also bans multi-gender or “anyone can use” bathrooms.

    Hear that Ohioans? You gotta designate the “womens” and “mens” bathrooms in your homes now!

    Sucks if you have just one!

  12. Megalodon says:

    Obviously they have not thought this through. What happens as trans people walk into a bathroom of their birth gender dressed as they see themselves?

    They get shamed, excluded, bullied, attacked, punished, terrorized, or prosecuted for not conforming to gender expectations (at least more so than already is the case).

    I think the people passing this law have “thought this through.” All the cruel horrific potential outcomes entailed by this law are a feature, not a bug.

  13. Megalodon says:

    And now the Republicans want the same for the Capitol restrooms.

    After Delaware elected the first ever openly transgender member of Congress earlier this month, a Republican introduced a bill to ban her from using the bathroom that corresponds with her gender identity.

    The South Carolina Republican Nancy Mace introduced the bill, which comes a little less than two months before Sarah McBride is due to be sworn in as the first openly transgender member of Congress. The measure would charge the House sergeant at arms with enforcing the bill, though it is unclear exactly how, according to the Hill.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/19/sarah-mcbride-congress-bathroom-bill-transgender

  14. Jacqueline Squid Onassis says:

    @Megalodon: They’ve made it clear that their first target is trans Americans. They’ll get to that mass deportation stuff when they’ve actually taken over the Executive. I don’t doubt that we’ll see another racist act like the “Muslim Ban” of 2017 immediately after January 20th, either.

  15. Kate says:

    Great response to the Mace bill by AOC (video at link).

  16. Jacqueline Squid Onassis says:

    I’m pretty sure they would have overridden his veto anyway but, yeah, there’s no question who they’re coming after first. We can use all the help resisting that we can get.

  17. Megalodon says:

    I’m pretty sure they would have overridden his veto anyway

    You’re probably right. But the fact that DeWine just signed it anyway seems like a signal that he doesn’t think this is worth even token resistance anymore and is just business as usual now.

    And it looks like the right-wing majority on the supreme court is ready and eager to uphold trans healthcare bans.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-tackles-state-bans-treatments-transgender-youth-rcna182517

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/12/04/supreme-court-transgender-rights-case/

    https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/scotus-transgender-care-ban-12-04-24/index.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *