I’m really tired of media depicting atheists as joyless, grouchy people whose lives are characterized by a lack of human connection, and a disdain for other people’s happiness.
Some of us laugh and are silly and enjoy being social.
I’m really tired of media depicting atheists as joyless, grouchy people whose lives are characterized by a lack of human connection, and a disdain for other people’s happiness.
Some of us laugh and are silly and enjoy being social.
LGM Film Club, Part 410: The Beast
10 hours ago
Election Deniers on the Ballot as State Chief Election Officers
13 hours ago
Good fact checking
22 hours ago
Why Do Americans Pay SO Much More for Prescription Drugs?
6 days ago
JD Vance says, “aggressively attack the universities in this country,” promotes my new book
2 weeks ago
© 2024 - Alas, a Blog
|
Proudly powered by WordPress.
2010 Weaver by WPWeaver.info
|
Not me! HELL nos!
Well, Cameron is also atheist.
At least they don’t present the theists super well, either? House might be unhappy but most of the time he’s the one being logical, and the one we’re supposed to end up agreeing with.
But yeah, if someone is openly atheist, they’re usually deeply unhappy and it’s so annoying.
i enjoy laughing at others. does that count?
Yeah, but that’s just a cover for our joylessness, grouchiness, lack of human connection, and disdain for other people’s happiness.
. . . and some of us atheists are introverts, who are doublely characterized as “joyless, grouchy people whose lives are characterized by a lack of human connection, and a disdain for other people’s happiness” as well as being characterized as the people who go on shooting sprees in schoolyards.
I say there’s nothing wrong with being an introverted atheist (although no one will believe me).
Um, how are you establishing an equation between “introverted” and “joyless, grochy, and disdaining other people?” That’s a really unfair thing to accuse me of having said.
As usual, the TV Tropes Wiki says it all.
Mandolin, I think that was more in respone to Jake Squid’s comment directly above marmalade’s
Doug S. beat me to it, but I’d like to add that the list does have a few exceptions to the trope.
The true root of the problem, I believe, is that stories have a profound and immutable difference from the real world. In the real world, things are not always fair, and nobody is making sure that the whole mess makes sense. In stories, there is an indisputably involved god watching over the characters, the universe is suffused with intention and purpose–it’s called “The Plot”, and it’s simply the instrument through which the Author-God interacts with their reality. Because of this, characters in the story are fools to doubt, and belief in such a higher power is something only someone driven mad with grief could fail to find.
The real problem, of course, is that the Hollywood Atheists are somehow seen as representatives of the rest of us out here in meatspace.
See Chris Mooney’s musings on the “skeptic conversion” narrative; in short, when you combine the nature of the world that skeptics in stories inhabit with a culture that doesn’t like them or care to understand them, you get the same stupid conversion meme, played out ad nauseum.
Hell, if you fiddle with the setting enough, you can justify anything. Warhammer 40K is a setting where the best hope for the survival of humanity is a theocratic dictatorship which will punish any deviation from orthodoxy with measures ranging from torture and execution up to sterilizing the whole planet. (It also has chainswords. Chainswords!) As Belle Waring put it, “if you let me put my thumb on the utilitarian scales, I can get you to agree that you have an affirmative moral duty to torture a three-year-old child to death.”