-

an absolute inability to string a sentence together in a meaningful way This is not only untrue, it's a deranged…
Yes, it seemed like a personal attack on Jane. It also seemed a little illogical, but that's hardly unusual in…
In effect if not intent, you lied to me to avoid moderation. (That you said you were sincere at the…
"I’m not banning you from the thread... because other people are discussing things with you and I don’t like cutting…
-

Category Archives: Families structures, divorce, etc
Donor conception – should it be legal for straight couples only?
And yet more from that “Family Scholars” thread: Marty, attempting to explain why he feels compassion for straight, married, infertile couples who want children – but not same-sex couples or single women – writes: A married man and a married … Continue reading
Government Bans Aren't a Legitimate Way of Avoiding Birth Defects
During that same Family Scholars discussion of D.C. (donor contraception), “Johnny Moral” wrote: But I’m up for banning it anyway. It is 10 times more likely to cause birth defects. Unless Johnny is saying that disabled people have so much … Continue reading
Is Adoption Voluntary?
I have several more comments relating to the Family Scholars thread I linked to on Monday. In the comments, “L.L.,” wanting to distinguish between D.C. (donor conception) and adoption, wrote: …the natural parents of adopted children don’t impose adoption on … Continue reading
Posted in Families structures, divorce, etc
6 Comments
The Mother Drive-By
Getupgrrl at Chez Miscarriage has been doing an amazing series of posts on what she terms “mother drive-bys.” It began with this post, a totally excellent, kick-ass feminist critique of Judith Warner’s are-we-mothering-too-much book Perfect Madness. That post generated a … Continue reading
Should anonymous egg and sperm donation be legal?
In a comment on Family Scholars Blog, Narelle (who, I gather, was never given the opportunity to know who her biological father is) writes: I am not saying that DC [Donor Conception] should be banned, but if it is to … Continue reading
Posted in Families structures, divorce, etc
91 Comments
Low blue-state teen pregnancy and divorce rates are not red herrings!
Tom at Family Scholars Blog links approvingly to this New Republic piece by Jeffrey Friedman: We’ve heard a lot recently about how red-state residents favor smaller government while benefiting disproportionately from federal largesse; and how they value the sanctity of … Continue reading
I wuz wrong: Kansas and TANF
In an earlier post, I complained that the Kansas Healthy Marriage Institute seemed unduly interested in diverting TANF money away from proven anti-poverty programs and towards experimental marriage initiatives. As Sara Butler at the Family Scholars Blog points out, I … Continue reading
Posted in Families structures, divorce, etc
3 Comments
A bit more on Scott Coltrane
In a previous post, I criticized Tom’s comments about sociologist Scott Coltrane. Tom explains that his comment was tongue-in-cheek. So I misinterpreted Tom’s statement; sorry about that, Tom. Tom also refered to an article by Scott Coltrane, which he said … Continue reading
Posted in Families structures, divorce, etc
Comments Off on A bit more on Scott Coltrane
Links
Guess the Dictator or Sit-Com Character. I haven’t come up with one it can’t guess. It’s darn good at guessing Buffy characters, too. The Council on Contemporary Families argues that marriage is not a cure-all for poverty. They would rather … Continue reading
Cosco, could you please clarify which female candidate ran "nonstop ads pointing out that the male candidate" is sexist, and…