-

...every Presidential candidate who runs for the Democrats is villified as “hard left/far left” by the Republicans Fair enough. Republican…
I did, pardon me. I admit I often mix them up.
And people like Corso would not only swallow this propaganda, Since Corso hasn't participated in this thread so far, I…
"She’s only coded “too far left” because she’s a black woman from California. " That is true, but it's also…
-

Category Archives: George: What is Marriage
A Civil Discussion: Should SSM Opponents Lose Their Children?
I think that as our understanding of what it means to be a parent evolves and our understanding of how damaging homophobia is evolves, we must consider the possibility that opponents of Same Sex Marriage are, by teaching their children … Continue reading
Reply to George: XIV. Justify Your Love
[This post is part of a series analyzing Robert George’s widely-read article, “What is Marriage“, which appeared on pages 245-286 of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. You can view all posts in the series here.] Robert George has … Continue reading
Posted in George: What is Marriage
13 Comments
Reply to George: XIII. Marriage Equality Threatens Religious Freedom
[This post is part of a series analyzing Robert George’s widely-read article, “What is Marriage“, which appeared on pages 245-286 of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. You can view all posts in the series here.] Pages 263-265: In … Continue reading
Posted in George: What is Marriage
4 Comments
Reply to George: XII. The Dishonest Truth about Same-Sex Parenting
[This post is part of a series analyzing Robert George’s widely-read article, “What is Marriage“, which appeared on pages 245-286 of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. You can view all posts in the series here.] Pages 257-259 and … Continue reading
Posted in George: What is Marriage
15 Comments
Reply to George: XI. Gay Marriages Will Destroy Straight Marriages
[This post is part of a series analyzing Robert George’s widely-read article, “What is Marriage“, which appeared on pages 245-286 of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. You can view all posts in the series here.] Pages 260-262: In … Continue reading
Posted in George: What is Marriage
10 Comments
Reply to George: X. Why Infertile Straights Get to Marry
[This post is part of a series analyzing Robert George’s widely-read article, “What is Marriage“, which appeared on pages 245-286 of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. You can view all posts in the series here.] Pages 256-257, and … Continue reading
Posted in George: What is Marriage
9 Comments
Reply to George: IX. Polygamy and Incest
[This post is part of a series analyzing Robert George’s widely-read article, “What is Marriage“, which appeared on pages 245-286 of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. You can view all posts in the series here.] Page 259 (and … Continue reading
Posted in George: What is Marriage
12 Comments
Reply to George: VIII. No “Real” Marriage Until You’re Dead!
[This post is part of a series analyzing Robert George’s widely-read article, “What is Marriage“, which appeared on pages 245-286 of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. You can view all posts in the series here.] Page 259: In … Continue reading
Posted in George: What is Marriage
3 Comments
Reply to George: VII. Is Marriage About the Children? Not for George.
[This post is part of a series analyzing Robert George’s widely-read article, “What is Marriage“, which appeared on pages 245-286 of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. You can view all posts in the series here.] Pages 255-259: In … Continue reading
Posted in George: What is Marriage
6 Comments
Reply to George: VI. Marriage = Man + Woman
[This post is part of a series analyzing Robert George’s widely-read article, “What is Marriage“, which appeared on pages 245-286 of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. You can view all posts in the series here.] This is it. … Continue reading
Posted in George: What is Marriage
5 Comments
"But, people didn’t buy it about Biden in 2020. That’s part of the reason why he won." Yes, nor did…