Using Photoshop To Alter A Photo Isn’t Deceptive If There’s Full Disclosure. Also, “Reverse Sexism” Raises Its Annoying Ugly Head

So Nancy Pelosi, wanting to commemorate the record-breaking 61 female members of the Democratic House Caucus, had the above photos taken. But four women were not present for the photo, and so were Photoshopped into the back row (and rather badly Photoshopped, I might add). Pelosi then posted the photo on her Flickr and (I assume) released it to the press, without explaining that the photo was actually a digital composite.

Jack at Ethics Alarms, with his usual restraint, writes:

A digitally altered photograph that misrepresents an event by inserting individuals who were not present is ethically indistinguishable from the old Soviet Union practice of excising the images of purged officials from official photographs. It is a lie.

What bugs me about Pelosi’s altered photo (other than how poorly done the Photoshop job was) is that the digital alteration wasn’t announced when the photo was posted.

If Pelosi had posted the exact same (altered) photo, accompanied by a caption identifying the four figures that had been inserted digitally, then it would have been fine with me. They wanted an illustration to commemorate their new record, and I don’t see anything wrong with using digital means to make an illustration, as long as there’s full disclosure.

I said so at Jack’s blog, and Jack responded:

I think the deception makes the conduct a lot worse, yes. The digital manipulation still changes the photo from what purports to be a record of what really occurred to something else. You can’t say: and here we have a historic photo of all the women in the house (oh, by the way, the following 17 images–or one–are of people who really weren’t there.) What’s preventing the explanation from being separated from the photo 100 years from now?

Jack’s argument is an argument for never printing or posting any photo, since any photo could be distorted by later reproducers. Let’s say I take a photo of Obama and Romney together at a charity event; what’s to prevent the photo from being cropped to make it seem one wasn’t present, a hundred years from now? Should we therefore not print the photo?

An honest report is an honest report. A digitally altered photograph with full disclosure of how it was made is honest; an unaltered photo is also honest.

Both digitally composed photos and unaltered photos are subject to having their context snipped out by later reproductions. If (as Jack claims) the hypothetical possibility of having important context removed makes a photograph unethical, then it logically must do so for both kinds of photo, not just for digitally altered photos.

Jack also thought that Pelosi’s photo is sexist:

I believe that a gender-segregated photo of female legislators is sexist, prejudicial and hypocritical. Every one of these women would scream if, for example, Republican House members posed for a photo excluding the women in their number.

Many of these women are now in their 60s and 70s, and the near-total exclusion of women from Congress is something they experienced firsthand, and that they themselves have been part of reversing. Nothing wrong with a photo commemorating that achievement.

Since there has, in fact, been no exclusion of men from Congress to be painstakingly overcome, Jack’s “what if they excluded the women from an all-male photo” reversal is idiotic. An all-male photo such as Jack suggests would not commemorate overcoming a prejudice; it would be, if anything, object to that prejudice being overcome. That’s a huge contextual difference.

What next, complaining that if Black people celebrate African-American progress in the last century, that’s racist against White people? Such a complaint would be exactly as groundless and foolish as Jack’s complaint in this post. It would, in fact, be the same complaint.

Finally, descending into right-wing tropes, Jack wrote:

Voters shouldn’t vote on the basis of race and gender, but this is the whole strategy of one major party—tactical divisiveness and one-way bigotry.

Ironically, Jack intended that as a dig at the Democrats, not at the GOP.

Posted in Elections and politics, Feminism, sexism, etc, In the news | 16 Comments

Learning How to Talk to Iran Means Learning to Understand Iranian Culture

This is from a recent op-ed in the New York Times, “How to Talk to Iran,” by Seyed Hossein Mousavian and Mohammad Ali Shabani:

For thousands of years, Persian culture has been distinguished by customs that revolve around honor and esteem. Preserving one’s aberu [saving face] is tantamount to maintaining one’s dignity. There are almost no instances in modern Iranian history when maslahat [expediency] has trumped aberu. The West has poorly understood these concepts. This was particularly true under President Bush, who rewarded Iran’s tacit acceptance of the American invasion of Afghanistan by labeling Iran a member of an “axis of evil.”

Following the 2003 allied invasion of Iraq, the Swiss ambassador to Iran reached out to Washington with an unofficial outline for a “grand bargain” with Tehran that would cover everything from Iran’s nuclear program to its support for militant groups in the region. Despite this bold step, Iran was left out in the cold. Vice President Dick Cheney is said to have dismissed the initiative, reportedly asserting that “we don’t talk to evil.”

We now know, thanks to a recent memoir by the former Iranian nuclear negotiator Hassan Rowhani, that the Bush administration reached out to Tehran a year after dismissing the proposal. Not surprisingly, partly because of the blow to its pride, the Iranian government rejected the offer of direct, high-level talks as insincere. In the nine years since, Iran’s nuclear program — a major symbol of prestige for Iranians — has grown immensely. Things have gotten a lot more complicated.

I don’t care what you think personally about Iran, Iranians, Shiite Islam (the dominant form of Islam that is practiced in Iran), Ahmadinejad’s antisemitism, or anything else Iranian for that matter, if your goal is to reduce tensions surrounding Iran’s nuclear program, while at the same time reducing tensions in the region and specifically between our two nations, then you have a responsibility not to assume that the Iranians will negotiate on your cultural terms alone. You need to be able to  talk and respond to them in ways that respect who they are and where they come from–just as you would expect them to do with you. It’s worth reading the entire op-ed.

Cross posted.

Posted in Iran | 3 Comments

Grace’s Trans 101: An Introduction to Transsexuality and Some Answers to Frequently Asked Questions

Introduction

Hello, world!

I am a transsexual woman. Now that I am past most of the public-disclosure stage of my transition, I am gradually making available as resources some of the documents I wrote to help people process my transition. I was going to do this in essentially chronological order, but I’m moving this one to the head of the queue because so many people have asked my wife and me for introductory Trans material, and since I’m picky enough to write my own, I’m also cussed enough to want to refer people to my own. Other people’s, of course, remain available via Google.

This first installment is based on what I handed out to key administrators in my workplace and at my children’s schools. However, because the audience for this is less focused, I have added information and elaboration, and made some jargon more generic. I reserve the right to edit this for clarity and in response to concerns, so that it is a living resource.

I give permission to trans people and allies to use this content as they see fit to aid someone’s transition or to educate. If you quote it directly, I would appreciate attribution. Thanks.

-Grace.


Grace’s Transsexuality 101: An Introduction to Transsexuality and Some Answers to Frequently Asked Questions

This presents my experience of my own transsexuality, and my current understanding of transsexuality in general. Others’ experiences will differ from mine in important and valid ways. Also, because this is introductory material it necessarily elides some finer points.

The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance — it is the illusion of knowledge.

–Daniel J. Boorstin

Transsexuality is…

…not well-understood by almost anyone, though almost everyone feels free to offer an opinion.

Transsexuality is when the gender you were assigned at birth does not match your own mental and psychological experience of yourself, and that causes you enough discomfort that you must physically modify your body to address that discomfort. The discomfort is called “gender dysphoria”. For instance, a person who is outwardly male may experience herself as female. If such a person transitions from living publicly as male to living publicly as female, she is transsexual. A broader term, which includes any gender-variant people, is “transgender”.

Transgender or trans – [adj] … a person whose gender is not universally considered valid.

gender is like underwear: if it fits ya don’t notice. If it doesn’t you can’t avoid noticing

–LaughrioTgirl, via Twitter

Cissexuality is when your experience of yourself matches what you were assigned at birth. ((This term is new, and still sometimes hotly debated. Many trans people like it because it normalizes “transsexuality”; without it, there is “transsexual” and “normal majority which needs no label”. Imagine if we had the words “gay” and “homosexual”, but not the words “straight” and “heterosexual”. Some people object to being labelled “cissexual”, and most of those do it from a position of privilege. At least one person whose thinking and writing I respect very much dislikes “cis” as a descriptor for herself, though I don’t recall if she draws the same line with the more particular “cissexual” and “cisgender”. Note also that there is arguably room for people to be neither transsexual nor cissexual, but that discussion is beyond the scope of this document.))

Transgender is an umbrella term for all gender-variant individuals, including transsexual people but encompassing others, too. ((There is a strident minority of transsexual people who object to being classified in any way whatsoever with anyone other than people who are transsexual by their own definition, which is usually carefully calibrated to include themselves and omit as many others as possible. These people have a curious and irritating inability to understand the concept of a Venn diagram.)) ((I did not include transgender in the original document, exactly because I did not want to get into the fight over terminology or the fight over crossdressers. I am perfectly willing to discuss these topics elsewhere, but in this introductory document I could not give the topics the attention they deserve, and as I am not a crossdresser the fight was not directly relevant to my transition situation.))

A trans woman is an adult who identifies as a woman but who was assigned as male at birth. ((The term is deliberately vague as to whether the person it identifies is transsexual or transgender. Many of us are tired of that fight, and sidestep it thus.))

A trans man is an adult who identifies as a man but who was assigned as female at birth. ((The term is deliberately vague as to whether the person it identifies is transsexual or transgender. Many of us are tired of that fight, and sidestep it thus.))

Transsexuality is more common than most people think. A good estimate of the lowest possible rate is 1 in 2000, and it’s more probable that the rate is 1 in 500 (which equals 4 in 2000). That means that in a city with a population around 14,000, there would be around 28 transsexual residents.

There are a lot of us around. Even if you know you’ve met transsexual people, you’ve also interacted with us many times without knowing it.

Transsexuality is NOT…

… sexual orientation. A transsexual person can have any sexual orientation.

It’s is not about whom you want to go to bed with; it’s about whom you want to live as.

Transsexuality is ALSO NOT…

… a mental illness or psychological disorder. It is a medical condition. For most transsexual people the main problem is not within ourselves – the problem is how people treat us.

[Gender dysphoria] is not a mental illness. It’s in the [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV] — but if you smoke, that’s nicotine dependence, and you’re in the book, too. There are a lot of things in the DSM-IV that aren’t really mental illnesses.

–Dr. Frederick Peterson

Because current medical protocols reference the DSM ((The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The current edition is IV, and 5 is about to be published. In 5, the have renamed “Gender Identity Disorder” as “Gender Dysphoria”. This is a step in the right direction.)), gender dysphoria must remain in the DSM in some form. Otherwise, transsexual people would be denied necessary medical care. If not for that, gender dysphoria would probably be removed from the DSM entirely.

Gender dysphoria is a condition that can be treated rather easily. You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to take care of a transgender patient.

–Dr. Norman Spack, endocrinologist

Transsexuality is CERTAINLY NOT…

…pedophilia, bestiality, or any other immoral sexual attraction. People who believe it is are misinformed, to put it as charitably as possible. Trans people are as offended and outraged by assumptions like these as anyone else would be.

So you are experiencing gender dysphoria.
What do you DO with that?

Sometimes the dysphoria is not sufficiently intense, and the person chooses to live with it rather than take on the very real risks of transition. ((Most people would say that such a person is not transsexual. However, note that some people can adapt for a period of time, but then find that they must transition, so they turn out to be transsexual after all. Other people may be transsexual but did not have a chance to transition in their particular circumstances. Some people are fond of labelling other people as trans enough or not trans enough without consulting the people they are labelling, and that can be very damaging. That’s not what I’m doing here, in providing general definitions.)) If the dysphoria is intense enough to indicate medical intervention, then there is a standard protocol.

It starts with talk therapy. Talk therapy won’t make the mind and body match, but it can be very helpful in unravelling and healing the caustic effects Western society has on people growing up and living with gender dysphoria.

I think it does something to people, to grow up transgendered in this world. It does something to grow up knowing you are considered expendable if not an abomination, that crimes committed against you don’t matter, that laws aren’t for you, that futures aren’t. It does something knowing that in most places the best you can hope for is to be a punchline, and the worst a pulped, shattered, ragged statistic.

little light, blogger and trans woman

Talk therapy can also help people with minimal dysphoria adapt to it and live with it, as the lesser of two evils, because transition is expensive, involves medical risks, and can cost you your job or your life. But people with more dysphoria will need to take further steps.

Those next steps may include cross-hormone therapy and surgery. Most transsexual women need estrogen, and often androgen inhibitors. Eliminating facial hair requires several hundred hours of electrolysis. ((I am at over 200 hours, and counting – pretty close to done. Some people with very dense, tough facial hair have required upwards of 400 hours.)) Cross-hormone therapy will cause the development of secondary sex characteristics for the target gender. For transsexual women, that includes development of breasts, fat redistribution, diminution of body hair (but not facial hair), less upper-body strength, and partial reversal of male-pattern baldness. For transsexual men, that includes a dropping voice, development of facial hair, possible development of male-pattern baldness, and increased muscle mass. Unfortunately, cross-hormone therapy does not UNdevelop secondary sex characteristics which have already developed. Transsexual women must deal with male skeletal structure, facial hair, and deeper voice. Transsexual men must deal with breasts, shorter average stature, wider hips and narrower shoulders. Many transsexual women undergo facial feminization surgery to be able to present as female socially. Transsexual women have to work hard to learn to speak with a female voice.

But I knew, like a lot of trans partners know, that trans people are not crazy, that they’re sometimes confused — as are we all — and sometimes they’re depressed — as are we all — and sometimes they’re angry — as are we all. And they had their reasons, and in fact were astonishingly rational considering the hand of cards they’d been dealt.

Helen Boyd, author and trans partner

Many transsexual people opt for genital surgery, but not all. People tend to fixate on “the surgery”, by which they always mean genital surgery ((Also called SRS (Sex Reassignment Surgery), GRS (Gender Reassignment Surgery), or, rarely, GCS (Gender Confirmation Surgery). )), and believe that it is the essential step. For most transsexual people it is not the essential step, though it is often a very important step. Many never have genital surgery at all. Transsexual men have no really good surgeries available, and the existing surgeries are expensive. Many transsexual women cannot afford genital surgery. Genital surgery is not covered by most medical care plans because it is commonly regarded incorrectly as cosmetic surgery, and insurance companies working to compete in the marketplace will limit payouts in any way they can. Some transsexual people have other medical problems which make surgery too dangerous or impossible, but that doesn’t make them not transsexual. In the end, for social transition, genital surgery is the least important step; there are very few situations where other people see your genitals.

Aren’t all of these physical changes drastic?
Why not just treat it with talk therapy alone?

How many hours of therapy do you think it would take to get you to identify, sincerely and happily, as a different gender?

Do you think it could be done at all?

Talk therapy can’t change gender identity. It has been tried with many thousands of people, for decades, and the success rate is essentially zero. The methods involved are essentially the same as the methods used for “reparative therapy” of gay and lesbian people, which are so ineffective that they are now classified as unethical by the American Psychological Association.

Many people who do not understand transsexuality assume that a transsexual person needs therapy. After all, you can look right at them and see what sex they are, right? If, for some reason, they can’t figure it out for themselves, well, they’re obviously confused and we should send them to a psychologist until they see what we see. We all judge people by what we can see. And when you look at a transsexual woman who has not transitioned, you’ll probably assign her a male gender. To you, the outside observer, that has more reality than what the person tells you. You can see that. You can touch that. You believe the evidence of your senses.

But every human being is more than what people can see when they look at her. Every human being has thoughts, desires, and experiences which no one else knows, and which she couldn’t articulate if she tried.

Which is more important, the body, or the mind, the soul?

Which defines what a person is, at their most essential?

You don’t have a Soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.

–C. S. Lewis

For a person who is born missing a hand, the best treatment could be to give her one (if she wanted one). We cannot create fully-functional limbs, so we do the best we can with prostheses.

What we do not do is say to that person, “Look, you have one hand. It can’t be changed. You’re just going to have to learn to accept it, no matter how difficult that is. Here’s a therapist who will help you to understand that.” And yet, that is what some people want transsexual people to do: we should seek therapy and learn to be happy in the bodies we have.

We’ve tried. How we’ve tried. Every transsexual person out there has tried to adapt to society’s dictates, and found that he or she couldn’t. That’s what dysphoria is.

If someone’s legs are not the same length, which leg is “wrong”? The problem is not the lengths; it is the mismatch. The most practical solution is to alter whichever leg can be treated most effectively. So we lengthen the short leg with a shoe insert. We don’t cut the long one short.

For transsexual people, the body is like the shorter leg. There is no way to change gender identity, but we have some very effective methods for changing bodies.

So, a transsexual person is faced with an intolerable conflict between how she knows she is at her deepest core, and how she looks on the outside and presents in society. She cannot reliably change her core, however much she tries. But she can alter her body and make it a better fit for her mind.

Small wonder that she might choose to do so.

…from the standpoint of people who reject the gender they were assigned at birth, transition and its related activities can be seen as taking what has been inside and bringing it out into the world for others to experience. The brain is ordered, it is simply that the brain’s orderliness is obscured for others by the screen of our bodies. In this sense, transition isn’t changing so much as revealing.

–Diana Powe, retired police officer and trans woman

Well, this isn’t something I would choose to do, but…

Of course not. You’re not transsexual.

I didn’t choose to be transsexual. I am choosing, in a sense, to transition…

We cannot change the cards we’re dealt — just how we play the hand.

–Randy Pausch, diagnosed with pancreatic cancer at 45 and dead at 46

Gender dysphoria is a matter of constant discomfort. For some of us, the discomfort is enough that we have to transition.

It’s a bit like a degenerating joint. If your shoulder is painful and is getting progressively worse, you can get by for awhile. Your limit your activities and range of motion. You take pain meds. On any given day, you can get by for another day. But if it’s getting more painful every day, eventually you opt for surgery, even though surgery has risks and even though surgery and physical therapy are also painful and limiting for awhile.

Did you choose surgery? In a sense, yes. You could have gone another day. But also in a sense, no: for some people, the pain grows to make them so miserable, or becomes so debilitating, that they opt for surgery.

Someone with a degenerating shoulder didn’t choose to be arthritic, but they can choose surgery to address it.

The same is true of gender dysphoria.

How is your wife with this?

She is fine with it. Our marriage has always been strong, and never stronger than in the last few years, as I have started to transition. She was my editor for this document. ((Transition strains marriages, for many reasons beyond the scope of this post. Most don’t survive, though some do, and it is becoming more common. The best online resource I have found to help trans people and trans partners with their relationships is the My Husband Betty discussion boards.))

How are your kids with this?

They’re fine with it. They’ve known since they were very young. When we came to understand that I would be transitioning someday, my wife and I discussed the alternatives we faced: we could model living with something difficult, or we could model lying to our closest, most beloved family members. We chose not to lie to them. We have worked with their community of faith and are now working with their teachers to ensure that they have broad support.

Our kids have known since they were 3-5 years old. Here is how you explain this in age-appropriate language: You know that most people have a boy body or a girl body. Some people also have a boy spirit or a girl spirit. Most people with boy spirits have a boy body, and most people with girl spirits have a girl body, but a few people with a boy spirit have a girl body, and a few people with a girl spirit have a boy body. Some of those people find out that in order to be happy, they have to change their bodies to match their spirits.

After that, we simply answered their questions as they asked them. ((My wife intends to write a more comprehensive post on this topic for later in this series.))

How are your friends with this?

My friends have been great. Not a single one has rejected me. One of my closest friends, not long after I came out to him, asked me to stand up with him at his wedding, and I did.


The above paragraph was what went in the Trans 101 document we handed out. It was true. (And, even if it were not true, I would not dwell on the haters in my Trans 101 document, where I’m trying to model acceptance.) As of this writing, it is still true. However, my experience in this regard is so opposite to the general lived experience of other trans people as to be genuinely bizarre. Many of the trans people who advised me prior to transition, or whose experiences I read about, recommended that I be ready to lose everything: job, all family, all friends. I’m going to try to explore why I think this didn’t happen to me, but it’s outside the scope of this post.

For this post, let me suggest some support resources which have been helpful to me:

The My Husband Betty boards. Helen Boyd is a fantastic thinker and writer, author of My Husband Betty and She’s Not The Man I Married. (If you want insightful personal experience from a trans ally, coupled with academic rigor, these books are for you.) She and her spouse, Rachel Crow, founded and run an online forum which is open to both trans people and their partners. The level of discussion is consistently high, and often scathingly honest. This is not your pink fuzzy cheerleading support group; it’s your challenging, engaging, thought-provoking support group. Trans men and their partners are welcome, but in practice seldom seen on these boards.

TCOPS-International. I’m a police officer. Historically, trans people have suffered a lot at the hands of police officers who were acting out their own bigotries or enacting the institutional and cultural bigotries they were given. This suffering is real. At the same time, there are many honorable police officers out there who have not done such things or who have learned not to do them and repudiated them. These officers, in trans circles, can run into blowback in trans communities, which makes it difficult to get support. TCOPS is an organization of trans-identified police officers and police support personnel, and Words cannot express how important it was for me to be able to talk to people who understood BOTH what it’s like to be a cop and what it’s like to be trans.

( TEMS-Fire. There is also a Fire/EMS equivalent group, run by the same good people. I technically qualify, but my credentials were in a box somewhere and I never joined. It looks like it might be moribund, but sometimes all it takes is a new member to get things moving again.)


What causes transsexuality?

I will address this question in detail in a later post. ((In my original packet, there was a section on the science, but I am breaking that out into a separate post.)) Bottom line: the question itself is gravely problematical, and we don’t know the answer, but there is enough scientific evidence to suggest that (a) transsexuality, like cissexuality, is within normal human variation and (b) gender identity arises, or can arise, physiologically.

So you’re transsexual! That’s pretty funny!

Yes, there are parts of it which are funny, and sometimes I have to laugh. There are also parts of it which are no fun at all, mainly due to how a lot of people treat transsexual people. If you feel compelled to joke about it, I’ll do my best to be a good sport, but please keep an eye on how I’m taking it. Thanks.

Hey, have you heard the one about the tranny who…

Stop. Yes. I’ve probably heard it. I don’t want to hear it again.

Also, please be aware that the word “tranny” is offensive to many transsexual people, similar to how the “n-word” is offensive to many people of color. If you use it after this point, I’m probably going to be offended.

So what happens next?

[Note: I drafted this section, but we did not use it. Instead, we included this information in a “Letter to Coworkers”, which I will post later in the series. However, some of my editors thought that this section should be included for people who are going to use this as a model or guide, so I present it here, too.]

For the last several years, I’ve transitioned in private, and I’ve gone as far as that will take me. The next steps will have to be visible. I’ve been working with our administration to do this in the most professional way possible, to minimize disruption. I have spent an enormous amount of time and effort to make this work smoothly for everyone. I am committed to making this work. For instance, I have been on cross-hormone therapy for almost three years, which means that the levels of testosterone and estrogens in my body have been female-normal for almost that long. That makes it a lot harder to maintain or gain upper body strength. Despite that, during those years, I have passed my physical evaluations. It hasn’t been easy, but I’ve put in the hard work to make it happen.

With your help and the help of our coworkers, everyone will process this for awhile and then we’ll all go back to more important things. I just need you to accept me and work with me.

In the near future, I’ll start presenting full-time as a woman, including at work. This will involves logistics which we are still working on. One of these is that I should be referred to with female pronouns, and called by my soon-to-be-legally-recognized name, Grace. There will be awkward moments, and at times I will make mistakes. You probably will, too, but as long as you’re trying I’ll be happy.

I still don’t get it.

That’s okay. It’s not an easy topic, and at the most visceral level, it’s probably impossible to understand it without being trans yourself. If you want to grapple with it, I would suggest that you identify those areas which seem strangest, at first blush, and try to answer the questions which pop to mind first. As long as you are willing to examine that sort of thing closely, you’ll probably do fine.

The role of gender in society is the most complicated thing I’ve ever spent a lot of time learning about, and I’ve spent a lot of time learning about quantum mechanics.

Randall Munroe, of XKCD.com

The main thing: I’m a contributing member of our community. I want to be judged by my actions and my job performance, not by something in my background which I can’t change.

And so it is those we live with and should know who elude us. But we can still love them — we can love completely without complete understanding.

–Norman Maclean, in A River Runs Through It



Comments rules for this series:

1. In this series, I am not going to debate my right to exist or my sanity. Comments which do that to me or to any other trans people will probably be deleted, and get the poster banned. If you cannot control this impulse, vent it somewhere else on the Internet. This is your only warning. I will not debate this. If you feel insulted by this or do not understand why I must be so emphatic about it, know that you have enjoyed a sheltered life, at least in this respect.

2. Do not comment until you have read all the comments, or the first two hundred, whichever comes first. By the time there are that many comments, it is almost certain that someone has already said what you are about to say, and better.


Posted in Grace's Trans Resource Series, Transsexual and Transgender related issues | 21 Comments

Happy 2013 (open thread)

Happy 2013! My life is in many ways as good going into 2013 as it’s ever been; I’ve got two books in print and am working on book 3, I live in a nice house, have a decent number of friends. I’m feeling optimistic about everything but politics and my ability to update Alas as frequently as I’d wish. :-)

How are you doing? Any hopes for 2013? My big one is to finish this book before 2014.

Use this as an open thread. (Thanks for the prod, G&W!)

Posted in Link farms | 116 Comments

Trend Forecast 2013

comic about 2013 trendsNot about fiscal cliffery, as I had an early deadline for the holiday. But you’re sick of that nonsense, right?

In the weeks leading up to Christmas, I noticed a mini-flurry of authors of books about presidents on the Daily Show and Colbert Report. Apparently books (and movies) about presidents are hot now. Especially Lincoln. He is the bacon of presidents.

Posted in Syndicated feeds | Comments Off on Trend Forecast 2013

Up to 49,000 Florida Voters Kept From Voting By Long Lines

Note that the 49,000 number seems to be an upper bound.

Like Jordan, as many as 49,000 people across Central Florida were discouraged from voting because of long lines on Election Day, according to a researcher at Ohio State University who analyzed election data compiled by the Orlando Sentinel.

About 30,000 of those discouraged voters — most of them in Orange and Osceola counties — likely would have backed Democratic President Barack Obama, according to Theodore Allen, an associate professor of industrial engineering at OSU.

About 19,000 voters would have likely backed Republican Mitt Romney, Allen said.

This suggests that Obama’s margin over Romney in Florida could have been roughly 11,000 votes higher than it was, based just on Central Florida results. Obama carried the state by 74,309 votes out of more than 8.4 million cast. […]

Democratic activists such as Orlando’s David Rucker said he saw a fierce devotion among voters to weather long lines to counter efforts by Republicans to limit early voting.

“They had to stay in those lines,” Rucker said.

But many Central Florida voters faced unyielding work schedules, child-care issues or other demands. They could not wait out lines that sometimes stretched around blocks.

So does this matter? That all depends on if you think there’s a chance that an election in Florida could come down to a margin of 11,000 voters or less.

Another article speculates about what made the areas with the worst lines different. One major cause seems to be Florida’s overly difficult process for casting provisional ballots when someone has moved. Each provisional ballot, in that circumstance, apparently requires its own phone call to the supervisor of elections, slowing lines to a crawl. Of course, lower-income voters and college students – both of whom trend Democratic – are more likely to have moved recently. It’s not plausible that the Republicans who rewrote the provisional ballot regulations in 2011 were unaware of the partisan benefit of their new law.

There are a lot of reforms that can make the lines move faster – but we all know that the GOP will do everything it can to block those reforms, because they want to win the next election that’s decided by less than 11,000 votes.

For that reason, the most important reform would be to move the detailed rule-making out of the hands of politicians and into the hands of an appointed expert committee (perhaps made of retired judges appointed by both parties). The conflict of interest involved in having elected politicians set the rules is too large.

Posted in Elections and politics | 26 Comments

Two Recommended New Blogs In The Wake Of The Good Men Project’s Fail

Just wanted to link to them:

The Bad Men Project, a new blog by Figleaf of Figleaf’s Real Adult Sex.

And Ozy Frantz’s Blog, by Ozy, formerly of No Really What About The Menz.

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

2012 Wrap-Up: Stuff I Did This Year

Hard to believe it’s time to change the copyright date on my cartoons again, but alas, here we are. I’m both humbled and happy to report that 2012 was my best year yet as a Cartooning Professional. Thanks to all those publications that made it possible by using my comics and freelance illustrations, and thanks to readers who lent their support through print orders, donations, and thoughtful comments here and elsewhere.

Some highlights of 2012:

In March, I found out I was this year’s Herblock Prize Finalist. With my prize money, I purchased an emerald-encrusted mechanical pencil with a burled walnut barrel and deluxe boar leather handgrip. OK, maybe I didn’t.

In May, I flew to Vegas for the National Cartoonists Society annual gathering. There, I mingled with a number of the nation’s comic strip artists amidst the constant presence of cocktails. I felt briefly fancy, then returned home with a suitcase full of dirty laundry and no longer felt fancy.

Road trip Arizona

Road trippin'

Shortly afterward, Mr. Slowpoke and I began an epic road trip from the Northwest to Austin, TX. During the drive, while we were somewhere in the middle of Utah,  Kaiser Health News posted my comic about freelancers and health insurance (“An Open Letter to the Supreme Court About Health Insurance“), which blew up and became one of KHN’s most-read stories ever. (Clearly the SCOTUS decision upholding the Affordable Care Act was all thanks to me. You’re welcome.)

In June, I attended Netroots Nation in Providence, RI, where I was on a panel with fellow Daily Kos cartoonists Tom Tomorrow and Matt Bors. As an added bonus, Paul Krugman showed up in the audience while I was at the podium. Fortunately, I realized this after I sat down.

Jen at Big Nazo

Making new friends at Big Nazo in Providence, RI

Also in June, I found out that I won the 2012 Association of Alternative Newsweeklies Awards for Best Cartoon. Huzzah!

In September, I covered the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte for the Austin Chronicle and C-VILLE Weekly. I can now say I saw the Foo Fighters live.

Me with the entire Obama family

A few days later, I was off to Washington, DC for the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists convention, where I gave a few presentations. I participated in the cartoon version of a “Literary Death Match,” in which I was narrowly defeated in the final round by Keith Knight, who drew better blindfolded than I did (I’m sure he cheated).

Clay Bennett, Tom Tomorrow, Jen Sorensen at AAEC

With Clay Bennett and Tom Tomorrow at AAEC. Photo by Bruce Guthrie

My travel season finally over, the fall brought an abundant harvest of freelance work, most notably a series of WPA-style posters for the National Women’s Law Center. This gave me a chance to admire the incredible handiwork that went into the old WWII posters, and to spend way too much time thinking about fonts.

Around this time, the Center for Cartoon Studies unveiled a tribute poster to Matt Groening’s “Life in Hell.” I was flattered to ask to participate. My contribution was published on Slate.

The year was rounded out with a pleasant interview with Tom Racine of “Tall Tale Radio.”

Whew, I’m exhausted just thinking about all that stuff. Here’s hoping 2013 is similarly righteous. I’ll be unleashing a completely revamped website in the new year, so stay tuned for that. Cheers!

Posted in Syndicated feeds | Tagged | Comments Off on 2012 Wrap-Up: Stuff I Did This Year

US Oil Drilling Has No Effect on Gas Prices

From the AP (via ThinkProgress):

U.S. oil production is back to the same level it was in March 2003, when gas cost $2.10 per gallon when adjusted for inflation. But that’s not what prices are now.

That’s because oil is a global commodity and U.S. production has only a tiny influence on supply. Factors far beyond the control of a nation or a president dictate the price of gasoline.

When you put the inflation-adjusted price of gas on the same chart as U.S. oil production since 1976, the numbers sometimes go in the same direction, sometimes in opposite directions. If drilling for more oil meant lower prices, the lines on the chart would consistently go in opposite directions. A basic statistical measure of correlation found no link between the two, and outside statistical experts confirmed those calculations.

Posted in Environmental issues | 11 Comments

Review of “Nomad of Salt and Hard Water,” by Cynthia Dewi Oka

PastedGraphic-2012-12-29-12-06.png

I think it was Eavan Boland who wrote the essay I kept thinking about while reading Cynthia Dewi Oka’s first book of poetry, Nomad of Salt and Hard Water, published this year by Dinah Press. I don’t remember the essay’s title, or even when I read it, but it was about how the proliferation of first-book poetry contests has changed the nature of what it means for a poet to publish a first book, and for a press to make a commitment to that poet. Boland’s point, if I remember it correctly—if not, I guess I’ve now made it mine—was that the manuscripts which win those contests aren’t really first books anymore. Rather, because they have been so thoroughly revised as their authors resubmit them year after year after year, they are more like second or even third books, with all the roughness and spontaneity, the experiments and inevitable failures that characterize any first attempt at anything pretty much polished out of them.

Boland saw this as a loss, as do I, which made reading Oka’s book a refreshing pleasure. I could not help but feel as I read her work that knowing she has said what she has to say and that whomever she has said it to has listened, and listened well, means a lot more to her than any praise a reader might have for how technically accomplished a poet she is, and she is technically accomplished. Nonetheless, I’ll start by talking about some of the missteps in her book. I don’t, for example, understand why “advice for the young nomad” is even a poem:

all you need
for the journey
toothpaste, sandals, grit

As well, the pop psychology of “ain’t got no degree in psychology” is plain and simple unworthy of the depth and breadth of emotional and psychological insight Oka is capable of:

but honey, I damn well know
shame can be the loveliest smile
in a room: it can save you
from living.

These whole poems aside, Oka more commonly stumbles because she tries to push a good thing too far. Here are the first six lines from “to know beauty,” the last three of which are completely unnecessary:

Each year on your birthday, I see stars gather
they robes like queens at the seams of a black sea,
whispering to each other in a vernacular of light,
without sound, but with all the understanding
of the leaf, which blooms, sings and withers
according to the needs of each season.

It’s not just that “whispering…without sound” is a contradiction (or paradox, if you prefer) that does not contribute anything to the poem as a whole; it’s more that those last three lines actually narrow, because they try to explain, the dark, lovely and powerful metaphor in the first three. Indeed, metaphors are the building blocks of Oka’s poems, where the beauty and power of her work resides. She stacks them, juxtaposes them, explores them. In “soothsayer,” she describes resilience as something that “begins in the thighs, threads up//through the armpits and crouches under the jaws/like a smuggled jewel,” and in part three of “roads to a dance,” here she is describing a musician, “he was a back pocket/brew of molten lines/churned low under hat/& jazz sentinel eyes.”

There is violence in Oka’s poems—colonial, sexual, economic—and one of the joys of reading her work, if I can call it that, is watching her transform that violence into a meaning out of which beauty can grow. This is from “gentrify this!” Notice how she packs each line with a rhythm that moves the language towards the bigger thing it begins to name:

blister hands break night carve bold
out of frostbit bone grafting
life bigger than circumference of
beat cops property value city policy

In “prologue: exile/return/arrival,” she turns her metaphors to a different kind of political end, describing the violence wrought by the Dutch when they “drop[ped] anchor to take/Bali’s last standing kingdoms:”

The Dutch walk their bayonets
into the silence of the jugular and small intestine,
through the cups of the collarbone.
Their cuticles acquire bright ribbons of human tissue,
their beards rain with the dying spit of adolescent boys.

By the time they reach the palace, they are no longer men.
Unable to die, their shovels hit the ground
scraping enamel and brain matter for the first runway
to deliver industry, ammunition, anthropologists,
and hurl little girls with hooves stapled to their ribs
like so many stones at the sun.

The most intimate violence Oka writes about, however, is rape. I don’t want to make the mistake of attributing to her biography the specific details of any given poem, so I will say, simply, that “vulture” is visceral and terrifying to read and that “amulet,” which she dedicates to “sister survivors,” exhibits all the strengths and weaknesses of this book as a whole, pushing its incantatory, almost bardic form into plainspoken obviousness—“I write to learn with you/how to accept love on your own/terms and in your own time”—while at the same time giving such precise form to what it means to survive rape that it took my breath away:

there are no promises
after rape we choose
the distance and measure of our lives

For me, the emotional center of Nomad of Salt and Hard Water is “when you turn eighteen,” addressed presumably to her son. There is in this poem nothing superfluous, no pontificating, no plainspoken obviousness, just the seamless weaving together of all the meaning she has been trying to make throughout the book as she asks her son to

imagine a boy who became a father
before he was a man who raised himself
into a snare his own back twice opened
then closed in the structure of a dragon
imagine his silence like a thin gold chain
passed hand to hand in the acid almost
vomit of a ship’s human hull imagine
finding asylum in blocks of brick mouths
fists the pendulum of dead light on a string
as many pseudonyms as curbs to ring into
the local precinct’s crosshairs
imagine the blood cabling his forearms
in one frequency: Young and Dangerous….

“Nomad of Salt and Hard Water” is a book worth reading for its strengths as well as its weaknesses, which reveal a poet for whom poetry is a calling, not a profession. I am glad to know that a poet like Cynthia Dewi Oka is writing and that Dinah Press has made the commitment to publish writers like her.

Posted in Writing | Comments Off on Review of “Nomad of Salt and Hard Water,” by Cynthia Dewi Oka