Reader Mail, Surveillance Edition

Last week’s comic about the domestic use of aerial drones drew a number of interesting comments from readers. Here are a couple emails I received:

From Ogden Utah, TC writes:

The Aerial Drone comic hits particularly close to home! Our illustrious Mayor, Matthew Godfrey, has been trying to push the city council to approve a freaking blimp for surveillance purposes in our town.  It’s really smart. I think he’s trying to cover some of his more sinister ideas by pushing this asinine idea out in front.  I’m pretty sure our criminals run much faster than the blimp can fly.

TPM has more on that here.

Reader Bruce P, who I’m guessing is writing from abroad, who is writing from New Jersey, says:

In the second frame you have “Soon businesses jump on the bandwagon.” Here in my local Rite of Shoppes and the APe, they already have. Next to various products on the shelves are little boxes that extol the virtues of kitty crunchies, toilet paper, etc. These have a small video screen and a speaker to spout their drivel. They are motion sensor activated and trip when one gets within 3 feet or so of them. Life imitates art or vice versa….. None the less it is spot on.

Wow, I hope that doesn’t catch on further.

Posted in Syndicated feeds | 1 Comment

A Chronic Pain Patients Bill Of Rights

I came across this, and thought it worth reproducing here.

A Chronic Pain Patients Bill Of Rights

1. I have the right to have my pain believed by health professionals, family, friends and others around me.

Patients:

The person in pain is the only one who knows how much pain he or she has. Patients, report and describe your pain as accurately as possible. Do not feel reluctant to be honest about your pain. Health Professionals/Medical Providers:

Health professionals, acknowledge that stoicism, reluctance to take drugs, cultural differences, feelings of resignation and other factors often inhibit patients from talking about their pain. You need to work together with your patients to identify and remove these obstacles so that pain can be accurately assessed and treated.

2. I have the right to have my pain controlled, no matter what its cause or how severe it may be.

Patients:

Pain must be understood, as well as believed. In recent years, major advances have been made in understanding pain and its effective treatment.

Health Professionals/Medical Providers:

Members of the health care team must seek all information and resources necessary to make patients as comfortable as possible. Failure to aggresivily treat pain on a timely basis is now thought to be the main cause of chronic pain.

3. I have the right to be treated with respect at all times. When I need medication for pain do not treat me as if I were a drug abuser.

Patients:

Health professionals, the public, law enforcement agents, and even people in pain often believe that using pain-relieving drugs will lead to addiction. Yet this almost never happens. The abuse of drugs is unrelated to the use of drugs for pain treatment. It is normal to want to be comfortable: it is a way of taking care of yourself.

Health Professionals/Medical Providers:

Many of us are fearful about pain medications because we don’t know the facts. Learn the facts about narcotics and other pain treatments. It is your responsibility to help patients and families understand that fears about addiction, sedation and other side-effects are understandable, but often exaggerated.

Most side-effects of pain medications are treatable. Treat them! Never use side effects as a reason to discontinue treatment for pain.

4. I have the right to have pain resulting from treatments and procedures prevented, or at least minimized.

Patients:

Many medical procedures and tests are very painful. Tell your health care team about the pain associated with any treatments, procedures or tests you may have to undergo.

Health Professionals/Medical Providers:

Don’t tell patients that pain from treatments is “unavoidable”, or that “it won’t last long.” That is arrogant and it trivializes your patient’s pain. Pain is suffering, no matter how long it lasts. Worrying about future painful treatment is also suffering. Make sure patients know what to expect when undergoing any procedure, and do every thing in your power to prevent or minimize procedure pain.

I’m sure this could be added to, as well.

Posted in Health Care and Related Issues | 7 Comments

The FBI Says Men Can’t Be Raped

Colorlines highlights this terrible quote from an FBI FAQ about the Uniform Crime Reporting system, the nation’s leading source of crime statistics. (Which is unfortunate, because the UCR is a lousy source of statistics.) The FAQ also discusses the National Incident-Based Reporting System, a newer crime data system also run by the FBI.

For UCR reporting purposes, can a male be raped?

No. The UCR Program defines forcible rape as “The carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will” (p. 19). In addition, “By definition, sexual attacks on males are excluded from the rape category and must be classified as assaults or other sex offenses depending on the nature of the crime and the extent of injury” (p. 20). An aggravated assault is a Part I offense and would be reported on the Return A form. (A simple assault is a Part II offense but also would be reported on the Return A form.) Sex offenses qualify as Part II offenses and would be reported on the appropriate Age, Sex, and Race of Persons Arrested form (pp. 96 and 142).

However, in the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), a sexual assault on a male by a female could be classified as a forcible rape, depending on the nature of the attack and the extent of the injury. For NIBRS reporting purposes, forcible rape is defined as “The carnal knowledge of a person, forcibly and/or against that person’s will; or not forcibly or against the person’s will where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of his/her temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity (or because of his/her youth)” (UCR Handbook, NIBRS edition, 1992, p. 21). In the NIBRS, at least one offender must be of a different sex than the victim for the event to be classified as a forcible rape. For example, a female can rape a male, or in the case of multiple offenders, a female and male can rape a male. However, a male cannot rape another male, or in the case of multiple offenders, two males cannot rape a male.

Some comments:

1) This is so fucking appalling. Men can be raped. A so-called “uniform” crime-counting system that refuses to acknowledge this fact is both anti-male and systematically designed to undercount rape.

2) I understand that they want to keep the way they measure crimes consistent to preserve compatibility with past data. But that’s a technical problem, and one that could be mitigated. Footnotes could be deployed. Scholars could still access female-victim-only data for purposes of comparing with past years.

It’s not an impossible problem. Just a problem that no one has considered important enough to solve.

3) Honestly, the UCR and NIBRS suck as a means of measuring rape anyway, because all they measure are rapes reported to police. But virtually all surveys indicate that the majority of rapes are never reported to police. It’s interesting that rapes reported to police go up or down over time, but it tells us next to nothing about how often rape occurs.

4) The good news is that the NIBRS will eventually grow to effectively replace the UCR, which means that at least some male rape victims — those raped by women — will be counted. Unfortunately, switching from the established UCR to the NIBRS reporting system costs money for the states, and most states are broke.

5) Speaking of NIBRS… WTF? At least the UCR has the excuse of being designed in the 1920s. The NIBRS was designed in the late 1980s. What possible excuse could there be for excluding same-sex rapes from their definition?

In September, a CNN article by Emma Lacey-Bordeaux addressed this issue. Senator Arlen Specter seemed to be taking the lead on addressing this issue in Congress; hopefully someone else will pick up the issue now that Specter’s no longer a Senator. Lacey-Bordeaux wrote:

Advocates question the rape statistics because, they note, the federal government is using a 1929 definition of the crime that excludes male victims, statutory rapes and those committed without force.

Using such an antiquated, narrow definition is a harmful disservice to countless victims, according to Carol Tracy, executive director of the Philadelphia-based Women’s Law Project. Specter agreed, saying the definition is not “inclusive like it should be.”

Men account for roughly 10 percent of victims in the United States, said Scott Berkowitz, head of the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network.

The adoption of broader rape statistics is critical to the recovery process for male victims, added Dr. Richard Gartner, a spokesman for the group Male Survivor.

Interestingly, the FBI’s man in charge of the UCR is quoted saying he’s open to changing the definitions.

Posted in crossposted on TADA, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues, Sexism hurts men | 14 Comments

Link Farm and Open Thread: Testing Elephants edition

Post what you will.
Self-linking is swell!

  1. It continues to be Fat People Art Week!
  2. Help the DoJ Regulate Against Prison Rape
  3. 3 Interesting Infographics: Interracial Marriage, Surnames, and Slavery
  4. Maybe the Supreme Court won’t decide on Health Care Reform.
  5. BREAKING: Congressional Republicans Run a Prostitution Ring and Other Things You Didn’t Know
  6. Testing elephants (On “disaster pornography” and just what the word “pornography” means, anyway.)
  7. A letter from scientists to the new Congress on “The importance of science in addressing climate change”
  8. Womanist Musings: When Hijab is About Privilege
  9. The Civic Republican Roots of the Individual Mandate
  10. The financial witch hunt against LGBT soldiers discharged because of DADT
  11. California Prisoners Sentenced to Death by Water
  12. Why high deductibles don’t work for the sick
  13. Barack Obama: No Friend of Civil Liberties
  14. It’s Not Genocide If God Tells You To Do It
  15. Napolitano: In Two Years We’ve Deported More Than Ever Before. Appalling.
  16. A confab with the faithful (An atheist sits down for a talk with some Christians.)
  17. Why the word “marriage” matters
  18. Large-scale workplace arrests of illegal workers were hallmarks of the George W. Bush administration’s approach in its final years. But two years ago Obama decided to shift enforcement efforts to focus on employers who knowingly hire illegal workers…. Republican lawmakers called on the Obama administration to return to the era of workplace raids.”
  19. Why Conservatives Ought to Love the Postal Service.
  20. Some Thoughts On Multiracial Actors in TV Commercials
  21. Meet Senator Asshat, Representing North Douchington

Posted in crossposted on TADA, Link farms | 6 Comments

Bad Sketch of Part of a Fat Lady’s Face

I decided to try to participate in fat people art week. Unfortunately, I’m afraid my contribution isn’t very good. My only defense, besides the fact that I’m not an artist, is that I was using a track pad. Mrrf.

A jpg showing part of a poorly drawn, fat woman's face

I don’t know why she has blue hair. Maybe it’s because you gotta have blue hair.

Update:

And a track-pad attempt at a self-portrait. Behold the many ways in which it fails to look like the photo I was using as a basis:
Attempt at track-pad self-portrait
.

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Fat, fat and more fat | 1 Comment

Sketches of Fat Guys for Fat People Art Week

It’s Fat People Art Week! A few contributions….

I’m trying to learn how to paint in Photoshop, and I was playing with some more painterly approaches in the drawing below (although I still didn’t give up the crutch of line art!). Still a long way to go…

And here’s the exact same drawing, except I took the colors and just smudged the heck out of them:

Another fat guy drawing, this one finished in my more typical style:

And a third, this time playing around with cross-hatching:

Posted in Sketchblogging, Syndicated feeds | 2 Comments

The week isn’t ending

Last week was a week of feminist rage – this week was supposed to be something new. I wasn’t quite expecting a week of feminist revolt and joy, but I was hoping to rage about something else for a week.*

But no – The Rock were determined that my week of feminist rage should never end. To be fair he mention of “the Rock” in the news in itself is like a lighthouse warning that rocks of misogyny are ahead. They did after all used to have billboards which said “We gave you something to listen to while your girlfriend was talking” (printed on the t-shit of a woman while not showing her head – naturally).

But now they have started a competition to ‘win a wife’:

The winner of MediaWorks’ The Rock promotion will fly to the Ukraine for 12 nights, be given $2000 spending money, and be able to choose a bride from an agency.

There are really no words besides ‘gah’ and ‘argh’ and obviously their obnoxiousness is in part seeking an outraged reaction.

But what got me were the questions you have to answer to enter the competition. A large number of them ask about the various things contestants have done to ‘score’. And then:

All women are nuts, but what can you tell us about your craziest Ex that sets her apart from the other nut-jobs?

The internal contradictions of a masculinity which hates women but requires hetrosexuality are so stark that whenever I try and think about it my brain short circuits.

It’s like women are bogs of eternal stench with islands in the middle. And sex is catching a butterfly on one of those islands taking it home and pinning it on your wall for your mates (who are very judgemental about bog smells) to see.

It seems so ridiculous, so contrived, so obviously not connected to anything real or true that I find it hard to understand how this house of cards stands.

And it doesn’t quite stand. The Rock, and beer ads, enforce masculinity in ways that dance so close to parody – and a sturdy house wouldn’t need this sort of scaffolding. Our radical notion that women are people is a powerful counter-weapon.

* I have had lots of rage about the treatment of minimum wage workers both by the government and their employers. Tomorrow maybe.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The week isn’t ending

“Good evening, Mr. Chairman. My name is Zach Wahls and I was raised by two women.”

From Boing Boing:

Zach Wahls—a 19-year-old Iowa college student and the son of two mothers—is one of the many Iowans who thinks it’s wrong to grant special privileges to some families, and deny them to others, based solely on sexual orientation. In a passionate speech to the House Committee, he told legislators that their decision won’t change his family and their love for one another, but codifying discrimination will change Iowa—in ways that harm everyone.

Shakesville has a transcript. Here’s a bit of what Zach said:

I’m not really so different from any of your children. My family really isn’t so different from yours. After all, your family doesn’t derive its sense of worth from being told by the state, “You’re married—congratulations!” No, the sense of family comes from the commitment we make to each other, to work through the hard times so we can enjoy the good ones; it comes from the love that binds us. That’s what makes a family.

So what you’re voting here isn’t to change us. It’s not to change our families; it’s to change how the law views us, how the law treats us. You are voting for the first time, in the history of our state, to codify discrimination into our constitution—a constitution that, but for the proposed amendment, is the least amended constitution in the United States of America. You are telling Iowans that some among you are second-class citizens who do not have the right to marry the person you love.

So will this vote affect my family? Would it affect yours? Over the next two hours, I’m sure we’re going to hear plenty of testimony about how damaging having gay parents is on kids. But in my 19 years, not once have I ever been confronted by an individual who realized independently that I was raised by a gay couple.

And you know why? Because the sexual orientation of my parents has had zero effect on the content of my character.

Thank you very much.

I suspect many anti-SSM folks will latch on to Zach’s statement that the sense of family “comes from the love that binds us.” No, that’s not true, they’ll say; family comes only from coital sex. It’s shallow and self-centered to think that marriage and love are related, they’ll say (apparently SSM opponents don’t care at all whether or not they love the person they’re married to).

I think Zach — who, wisely, has not dedicated his life to attacking the legitimacy of other people’s families — understands a lot more about family than many SSM opponents do. There is more to marriage than love, but love isn’t irrelevant to marriage, and it’s not immature or self-centered for couples in love to want to become a family..

Posted in Same-Sex Marriage | Comments Off on “Good evening, Mr. Chairman. My name is Zach Wahls and I was raised by two women.”

Fragments of Evolving Manhood: Why I Am a Pro-Feminist Man

TRIGGER WARNING: The following text, or pages it links to, contains information about and/or descriptions of sexual assault/violence that may be triggering to survivors.

This is my first piece for The Takeback, a pro-feminist men’s blog for which I have begun to write. Personally, I would have preferred the word “feminist in the title to “pro-feminist,” but pro-feminist is what their style book calls for. In any event, I hope it will make you curious to see what else is being written over there.

***********************************

The first time the old man who lived in the apartment at the top of the staircase said hello to me, he stopped for a moment as we passed in the courtyard and smiled as if he’d known me my whole life. The second time, he did the same thing. By the third or fourth time, a ritual of greeting had grown between us. Whenever we saw each other, he would smile and say hello first; I would smile, say the same thing back, and then, for a long silent moment, he would fix me with his gaze while I stood there, too happily embarrassed to move, wishing when he walked away that I’d done something, anything, to prolong our conversation.

I think of him as “the old man” because of how young I was when I met him—I was thirteen—but he was probably not much older than the forty-nine-years-old I am now, if that old, and so he was the perfect age for me to see in him a possible surrogate father. My parents had separated when I was three; my stepfather had recently left us; and I was desperate for some kind of paternal attention and approval. So I was thrilled when the old man one day in late summer did not keep walking after our usual exchange, asking me instead, “When am I going to see you?”

I figured he was lonely, like Mrs. Schechtman had been when she lived in the apartment next to his, and the thought of visiting with him like I used to visit with her made me happy. “Soon!” I answered.

Not too long afterwards, I was on my way out of our building to meet my friends. The old man happened to be walking down the staircase leading from his apartment to the front door, which we reached at the same time. As I went to turn the knob, he held the door shut with his left forearm, maneuvering me with his right till I stood face first in the corner near the mailboxes where the door frame met the wall. Covering my body with his own, he ran his hands beneath my shirt and up the legs of my shorts; he groped my chest and belly, squeezed my butt, cupped my crotch, and he kept whispering hoarsely into my ear, over and over again, “When am I going to see you?”

I had no words for what he was doing, no training such as young children get now in how to scream no! to scare off an attacker. All I could do was stand there till he was finished; and when he was finished, I ran. I don’t remember how far or how long or in which direction, but I ran as if I could leave my skin behind, as if running would turn me into another person. When I stopped running, in the small park across the street from the Lutheran Church, I sat a long time with the knowledge that my running had undone nothing, that my body was still the body he’d touched.

Even if I’d wanted to tell someone—and I didn’t—I was sure no one would believe me, so I pretended nothing had happened. When the old man passed me the next day and said hello, I said hello back the way I always did, forcing myself not to see the ironic twist he added to his smile. After a couple of more times, our hellos began to feel normal again, and I told myself that maybe it hadn’t happened. Maybe he was just a lonely old man who liked to say hello, and as long as he stayed on his side of that hello, I felt—or, to be more accurate, I convinced myself that I was—safe.

Some weeks later, as I sat with my friends in front of our building, the old man came home from food shopping and asked me to help him upstairs with the bags in his shopping cart. I wanted to say no, but I couldn’t. To do so would almost certainly have raised questions for my friends about why I was being so rude, and the last thing I wanted to do was explain myself to them. So I took the bag he pointed to and followed him up to his apartment, where he opened the door and motioned me in ahead of him. The bag was heavy, so I stepped inside, thinking I’d leave it by the door and get out as quickly as I could, but he was too fast for me. As soon as the door shut behind him, he pushed the shopping cart to the side, took the bag from my arms and dropped it to the floor. The cans at the bottom landed with a crash that shook the whole apartment. Snaking his arms around my waist, he undid my belt and unzipped my pants, pushing them down so they fell around my ankles. All I could do was stand there, frozen to the spot where my feet had stopped moving. He took me by the hand and led me to the couch against the wall. He sat down. Looking up at me with a wide smile—I have the distinct memory that he’d taken out his two front teeth—his eyes, at what I imagine must have been the fear in mine, grew tender. “You’ve never had a blowjob before, have you?” When I shook my head no, his voice filled with concern. “But don’t you want me to love you?”

In the silence with which I responded, he took my penis in his hands—I remember thinking his fingers were like a cage—and he told me how good it was, how beautiful and big, and then his own pants were down, and I was sitting on the couch, and his penis, large and purple, hung in front of my face. His voice came from somewhere above me, urging me to play with it, at least to touch it, and I don’t remember if I did—no, at this point, my memory goes white, like the blank space in a video of which a portion has been erased, though I can still feel his hands on the back of my head. Then I see myself walking to the door, unlocking it, closing it behind me, and somehow I am next in my bed, curled in the fetal position, where I stay until my mother calls me for dinner. Continue reading

Posted in Feminism, sexism, etc, Men and masculinity, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues, Sex | 12 Comments

This Week’s Cartoon: “Year of the Mombies”

comic about the Protect Life ActWhile much of the news media was rightly focused on Egypt last week, your friendly GOP-led House of Representatives was busy introducing a truly heinous bill called the “Protect Life Act.” This bill would allow emergency room doctors to let a pregnant woman die rather than perform an abortion to save her life.

This isn’t the pipe dream of some lone Bible-Belt crackpot from Upper Butt Scratch. The “Protect Life Act” is co-sponsored by one hundred Representatives, among them such right-wing luminaries as Paul Ryan and Ron Paul, whose libertarianism conveniently ends where ladyparts begin.

You know, we fight these battles year after year, and instead of seeing reason gradually prevail, we have a situation where the opposition only grows more radical and monstrous. It’s only a matter of time before these people are really running the show, and I shudder to think about what will happen.

On a cheerier note, look for one of my cartoons in the current issue of Ms. Magazine!

Posted in Syndicated feeds | 5 Comments