From Jordon at Confined Space:
Now, which of these two rule-breakings are more likely to be repeated, do you suppose?
@Megalodon: Yes, but god forbid that we judge Charlie Kirk on his extremely lengthy record of public speech on practically…
I've revised the cartoon a little - made it more explicitly about opposing genocide in Gaza, and erased the star…
conservatives are happy to judge women, queer people, immigrants and the poor based on nothing but conspiracy theories and internet…
conservatives are happy to judge women, queer people, immigrants and the poor based on nothing but conspiracy theories and internet…
We're human. We judge everything on incomplete information. I judge each and every comment I read. I judge people I…
>Now, which of these two rule-breakings are more likely to be repeated, do you suppose?
Neither. And both.
I’d guess that the exact wardrobe malfunction scenario will not occur again. And I’d guess that the exact circumstances of Mr. Umansky’s death will not occur again either.
But I expect that CBS makes money selling sex, and saves money cutting corners, and I expect that CBS will continue to do both to varying degrees.
What’s to keep CBS from doing the wardrobe malfunction thing again? Some people were offended, but I have to suspect that there will be more people watching halftime shows in the future, which should help CBS sell ads. So, absent some gov’t fine, it’s unclear to me what would keep CBS from doing it again.
In contrast, what’s to keep CBS from continuing to cut safety corners? A big fat civil lawsuit that will likely cost more than $550,000.
Since I suspect that the FCC expected that it was imposing the sole sanction for the wardrobe malfunction, whereas OSHA did not expect to be imposing the sole sanction for Mr. Umansky’s death, I don’t regard the fines as an apt basis for comparison.
The only problem is that, because of workers compensation laws, employees can’t sue their employers, so aside from ABC’s workers comp rates possibly going up a slight bit, the OSHA fine may very well be the entire sanction.
The point here is that OSHA fines are ridiculously low and don’t, in and of themselves, deter much of anything. $550,000, on the other hand, sounds like a pretty good chunk of change, for a fairly silly “crime” and far exceeds any OSHA fines handed down in years — no matter how many workers were killed, and no matter how neglegently.