[The text below is copied from the “Feminists Fighting Transphobia” blog. I’ve signed the statement. –Amp]
A Statement of Trans-Inclusive Feminism and Womanism
We, the undersigned trans* and cis scholars, writers, artists, and educators, want to publicly and openly affirm our commitment to a trans*-inclusive feminism and womanism.
There has been a noticeable increase in transphobic feminist activity this summer: the forthcoming book by Sheila Jeffreys from Routledge; the hostile and threatening anonymous letter sent to Dallas Denny after she and Dr. Jamison Green wrote to Routledge regarding their concerns about that book; and the recent widely circulated statement entitled “Forbidden Discourse: The Silencing of Feminist Critique of ‘Gender,’” signed by a number of prominent, and we regret to say, misguided, feminists have been particularly noticeable. And all this is taking place in the climate of virulent mainstream transphobia that has emerged following the coverage of Chelsea Manning’s trial and subsequent statement regarding her gender identity, and the recent murders of young trans women of color, including Islan Nettles and Domonique Newburn, the latest targets in a long history of violence against trans women of color. Given these events, it is important that we speak out in support of feminism and womanism that support trans* people.
We are committed to recognizing and respecting the complex construction of sexual/gender identity; to recognizing trans* women as women and including them in all women’s spaces; to recognizing trans* men as men and rejecting accounts of manhood that exclude them; to recognizing the existence of genderqueer, non-binary identifying people and accepting their humanity; to rigorous, thoughtful, nuanced research and analysis of gender, sex, and sexuality that accept trans* people as authorities on their own experiences and understands that the legitimacy of their lives is not up for debate; and to fighting the twin ideologies of transphobia and patriarchy in all their guises.
Transphobic feminism ignores the identification of many trans* and genderqueer people as feminists or womanists and many cis feminists/womanists with their trans* sisters, brothers, friends, and lovers; it is feminism that has too often rejected them, and not the reverse. It ignores the historical pressures placed by the medical profession on trans* people to conform to rigid gender stereotypes in order to be “gifted” the medical aid to which they as human beings are entitled. By positing “woman” as a coherent, stable identity whose boundaries they are authorized to police, transphobic feminists reject the insights of intersectional analysis, subordinating all other identities to womanhood and all other oppressions to patriarchy. They are refusing to acknowledge their own power and privilege.
We recognize that transphobic feminists have used violence and threats of violence against trans* people and their partners and we condemn such behavior. We recognize that transphobic rhetoric has deeply harmful effects on trans* people’s real lives; witness CeCe MacDonald’s imprisonment in a facility for men. We further recognize the particular harm transphobia causes to trans* people of color when it combines with racism, and the violence it encourages.
When feminists exclude trans* women from women’s shelters, trans* women are left vulnerable to the worst kinds of violent, abusive misogyny, whether in men’s shelters, on the streets, or in abusive homes. When feminists demand that trans* women be excluded from women’s bathrooms and that genderqueer people choose a binary-marked bathroom, they make participation in the public sphere near-impossible, collaborate with a rigidity of gender identities that feminism has historically fought against, and erect yet another barrier to employment. When feminists teach transphobia, they drive trans* students away from education and the opportunities it provides.
We also reject the notion that trans* activists’ critiques of transphobic bigotry “silence” anybody. Criticism is not the same as silencing. We recognize that the recent emphasis on the so-called violent rhetoric and threats that transphobic feminists claim are coming from trans* women online ignores the 40+ – year history of violent and eliminationist rhetoric directed by prominent feminists against trans* women, trans* men, and genderqueer people. It ignores the deliberate strategy of certain well-known anti-trans* feminists of engaging in gleeful and persistent harassment, baiting, and provocation of trans* people, particularly trans* women, in the hope of inciting angry responses, which are then utilized to paint a false portrayal of trans* women as oppressors and cis feminist women as victims. It ignores the public outing of trans* women that certain transphobic feminists have engaged in regardless of the damage it does to women’s lives and the danger in which it puts them. And it relies upon the pernicious rhetoric of collective guilt, using any example of such violent rhetoric, no matter the source — and, just as much, the justified anger of any one trans* woman — to condemn all trans* women, and to justify their continued exclusion and the continued denial of their civil rights.
Whether we are cis, trans*, binary-identified, or genderqueer, we will not let feminist or womanist discourse regress or stagnate; we will push forward in our understandings of gender, sex, and sexuality across disciplines. While we respect the great achievements and hard battles fought by activists in the 1960s and 1970s, we know that those activists are not infallible and that progress cannot stop with them if we hope to remain intellectually honest, moral, and politically effective. Most importantly, we recognize that theories are not more important than real people’s real lives; we reject any theory of gender, sex, or sexuality that calls on us to sacrifice the needs of any subjugated or marginalized group. People are more important than theory.
We are committed to making our classrooms, our writing, and our research inclusive of trans* people’s lives.
1) Love the comic.
2) I signed it too.
3) Really bummed, though, to see that Marge Piercy signed after her recent collaboration on this rather nausea-inducing piece.
Well, if Piercy signing this statement means that she’s changed her views in the last few weeks, that would be a wonderful thing. I was really heartbroken to see that she’d signed that earlier piece.
Am I missing something? Marge Piercy’s name isn’t on any of the lists of signatories that appear on the feministsfightingtransphobia blog. Where am I supposed to look?
I’m torn between my desire to support this by signing, and my feeling that I haven’t yet earned the right to call myself a feminist.
I think that if Marge Piercy had changed her mind and decided to sign the Statement of Trans-Inclusive Feminism and Womanism, I would have heard about it.
So, no, I really think she hasn’t, and that you will not find her among the 401 published signatories to date (about 300 of them in the last 48 hours). Or the 100-200 more who (from what I understand) have asked to sign on since last night, and whose names will appear whenever the moderators have time to go through them and post them.
Eytan, Marge Piercy’s name is shown here as a signatory to the letter.
Grace
Grace – I’m aware she’s a signatory to that letter. What I’m confused about is that Elusis’s post, and Amp’s response to it, imply that she’s also a signatory to the statement of trans-inclusive feminism that Amp quotes above. As far as I can tell, she is not.
Eytan,
Ah, sorry. I misunderstood. I think we’ll have wait for Elusis to clarify, because I can’t find Piercy’s name anywhere other than where I cited.
Grace
I think Elusis probably mis-spoke (typed), or I misunderstood.
Dammit, Marge Piercy!
Apologies, yes, I’m failing to be clear. Marge Piercy signed the original piece to which the inclusive letter is in part responding. Which was my ugh.
“I’m torn between my desire to support this by signing, and my feeling that I haven’t yet earned the right to call myself a feminist.”
Being a feminist is not required to support equal rights for trans people. Plenty of nonfeminists, and even anti-feminists, support trans rights too.
Well, sure. I didn’t mean to imply otherwise. But this is, specifically, a statement of trans-inclusive [b]feminism[/b], and I feel that the people who sign it should be ones that support the whole message, not just the pro-trans part.
That said, I do support the full message. Hence my dilemma about whether I should have signed it.
Eytan, I don’t think it’s too late to sign it if you want to. And it’s just my opinion, but I don’t see anything wrong with signing it. In short, and with respect, I wonder if you’re over-thinking this.