Open Thread and Link Farm, Hico Ujill Edition

  1. New Paper: Why “Intellectual Property” is a Misnomer – Niskanen Center
    Long and (to me, anyway, but I assume I’m not the only one) interesting read.
  2. Texas Museum Puts Donald Trump Wax Statue in Storage Because People Kept Punching It
  3. I did a “I’ll post one comic I love for every like this tweet gets” meme thing. The tweet ended up getting 171 likes, but I decided it would be okay for me to quit after listing just 100 comics I love. So here’s the list, if you’re curious. It touches on many different genres.
  4. Designer Creates Hilarious Travel Posters for America’s National Parks Based on Their 1-Star Reviews
    I’m not sure I’d say “hilarious,” but they’re amusing and also very pretty.
  5. What Happens When Republicans Simply Refuse to Certify Democratic Wins? | Washington Monthly
    Essentially, it’ll come down to what judges say. And if the judges are Trump appointed, we could be screwed.
  6. Man Builds a Working Electric Guitar from His Deceased Uncle’s Skeleton
  7. The War on Critical Race Theory | Boston Review
    “CRT functions for the right today primarily as an empty signifier for any talk of race and racism at all, a catch-all specter lumping together “multiculturalism,” “wokeism,” “anti-racism,” and “identity politics”—or indeed any suggestion that racial inequities in the United States are anything but fair outcomes…”
  8. The Tapeworm That Helps Ants Live Absurdly Long Lives – The Atlantic
    A parasite makes ordinary worker ants live years longer. The infected ants are fed and coddled and carried around by the non-infected ants and don’t have to do any work themselves.
  9. The strange journey of ‘cancel,’ from a Black-culture punchline to a White-grievance watchword – The Washington Post
    It’s more about the origins of the term – there’s not much about how it became a right-wing watchword. But what there is interesting.
  10. As a Rabbi Raised in South Africa, I Can’t Ignore Israel Is an Apartheid State
  11. Reflections on Growing Up Fat and Chinese-American — naafa
  12. Promoting Public Health in the Context of the “Obesity Epidemic”: False Starts and Promising New Directions
    A journal article provides an overview. It’s from 2015, but nothing’s changed since then. (I mean, regarding the issues the article discusses.)
  13. the demonisation of fatness – earth to venus
    A broad overview of a lot of fat acceptance issues, in the form of a blog post.
  14. Group that can’t find systemic voter fraud eager to help combat systemic voter fraud – The Washington Post
    A Heritage Foundation database often cited to show that voter fraud is a major problem… shows that voter fraud is an insignificant problem. The database contains just one case from the 2020 election, for example.
  15. Addressing The Claims In JK Rowling’s Justification For Transphobia | by Katy Montgomerie | Medium
    A detailed response to JKR’s famous anti-trans letter from last year.
  16. Voter suppression: A short history of the long conservative assault on Black voting power – CNNPolitics
  17. Open Letter on the History, Impact, and Future of the Filibuster | by Scholars for Reform | May, 2021 | Medium
    “…the Framers explicitly rejected a supermajority requirement for common legislation…. Today, the Framers’ vision of the function of the Senate has largely been inverted.”
  18. Photos by Alice Donovan Rouse and Lindsey Ross with Tim Mossholder.

Posted in Link farms | 22 Comments

“Placed into Abyss” Review at Locus Magazine

Karen Burnham reviews “Placed into Abyss” at Locus Magazine!
While normal family drama transpires in the background, Chris is tormented by memories of the abuse he suffered there, which he’s drawn into more deeply with every room he moves through. He will have to wrest control of time and space back to be able to escape. This story is so intense in terms of what Chris is experiencing that the science fictional moves Swirsky is making are almost subliminally in the background.
Read more of her review — she looks at short fiction from Samovar, Tor, and Strange Horizons!
Comments Off on “Placed into Abyss” Review at Locus Magazine

Cartoon: Women’s Sports Will Be DESTROYED!!!


Help me make more cartoon by supporting my Patreon! Patrons got to see this cartoon back in February.


Right-wingers have been complaining about trans women competing in women’s sports for decades. But when President Biden, not long after taking office, signed an executive order against anti-LGBTQ discrimination, conservatives fought it with a widespread attack trans women athletes.

This complaint can seem convincing to people who aren’t anti-trans themselves, but who don’t know much about the issues. The anti-trans attack, used again and again, is to show a clip or photo of an athletic competition in which a supposedly trans woman is competing and winning, with a caption saying that “biological” women or girls cannot win. And to many people, that looks like common sense.

But the out-of-context clips and photos are a lie. First of all, it’s not always the case that the athlete shown in the clips is trans! Sometimes it’s a cis woman who is large or muscular or has short hair. (The anti-trans movement is creating a culture of harassment and suspicion that harms all women – cis and trans – who aren’t sufficiently feminine-looking for anti-trans standards.)

More importantly, a single clip or photo can only show a moment, and that moment usually isn’t representative of the whole. I recently wrote a Twitter thread about a thirteen-second clip of a high school track event, in which two trans girls place first and second in a sprint. Anti-trans activists have been claiming this proves cis girls can’t compete against trans girls in athletics.

Except that some cis girls in that same clip actually beat the same trans girls in other races. One of the cis girls who lost that race – and whose parents sued to get the trans girls barred from competition – won against those same trans girls in the next two races, and went on to win the state title for high school girls sprinting. As the judge wrote when he threw out the lawsuit, the evidence shows that cis girls have been able to compete and win.

No one – not even the greatest athlete of all time – wins every time they compete. Anti-trans bigots use this fact to create a false narrative that cis women and girls can’t compete against trans women and girls. But that’s objectively false.

Although a few trans athletes have won occasional events, they haven’t dominated girl’s or women’s sports. And although they’ve been allowed to compete as women since 2004, in all that time not a single trans women athlete has been among the over ten thousand women who have made it into the Olympics. (It looks likely that a trans woman will make it to the upcoming Tokyo Olympics – but one out of over tens thousand hardly justifies the claim that cis women can’t compete.)

It’s true that, on average, male athletes get higher scores than female athletes – running faster, lifting heavier, and so on. People who don’t know better assume that this means that trans women will have a similar advantage over cis women. But we now have years of trans women competing with cis women in athletics to look at, and we know this hasn’t been the case. If trans women had the same athletic advantages men do, trans women would be dominating a lot of women’s sports. But trans women are like women, not like cis men, and cis women have been entirely able to compete.


Language is always a problem for me when I write cartoons about anti-trans bigots. Realistically, the two characters in this cartoon wouldn’t use the term “trans women”; they’d use more bigoted language, and they’d misgender.

It’s one of those times where I weigh being accurate, versus possibly causing unprepared trans readers to wince. I came down on the side of being unrealistic. My cartoons are already unrealistic in many ways (real people rarely speak as efficiently as characters in a cartoon do, for example), and I don’t think it harms the cartoon to be unrealistic in this way as well.


Updated on August 2 2021: Panel three has been modified to account for Laura Hubbard reaching the Olympics (where she got washed out early – although reaching the Olympics at all is an incredible accomplishment for any athlete).


TRANSCRIPT OF CARTOON

This cartoon has four panels.

PANEL 1

A bald man with a furrowed brow, wearing a shirt with a necktie, is sitting in what appears to be a radio recording booth; there’s a big microphone held up by a pro-looking microphone holder thingy (which is the technical term), a laptop open next to him and some notecards and a pencil on the desk in front of him, a coffee mug, and a wall clock behind him.  He isn’t yelling, but he looks a bit angry and intense.

A large caption says “2004.”

FURROW: Now that trans women can compete in the Olympics, no biological women will ever win! This will destroy women’s sports!

PANEL 2

We are looking at an iphone being held in someone’s hand. On the screen of the iphone, an angry woman, with a high hairdo and hoop earrings, is talking. A graphic at the bottom of her window says “FOX.” A chyron at the bottom says “Next: Is Obama Satan? Or does he just worship Satan?” Graphic boxes to the left and right of her head say “FEAR” and “PANIC.”

A large caption says “2013.”

TALLHAIR: If California allows trans girls on high school teams, they’ll dominate! Other girls will never be able to compete! This will destroy women’s sports!

PANEL 3

The same two characters are seated together at a round table, in what appears to be a coffee shop or diner; they both have cups of coffee on the table in front of them. He is again wearing a shirt and tie, but his tie is pulled down a bit and his top button is open. She’s wearing a more casual outfit, a open sweater over a striped shirt. They both look aggravated.

A large caption says “TODAY.”

TALLHAIR: It’s been years and trans girls still aren’t dominating high school sports!

FURROW: Only one trans woman has even reached the Olympics—and she lost! Other women beat them all the time!

PANEL 4

Same shot and scene. The tall-haired woman, even more frustrated, throws her hands in the air; the furrowed-brow man leans his head on his hands, looking dejected.

TALLHAIR: ‘Godammit, why aren’t women’s sports destroyed yet?

FURROW: I know. I’m disappointed too.

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Trans and Queer issues | 32 Comments

Check Out “Thirteen of the Secrets in My Purse” in Uncanny Magazine

Red purse sitting on dirt road surrounded by grass

One: My lipstick.

The shade is Heart’s Blood.

Morbid, if you ask me.

I wanted to know if it was really the color of heart’s blood so I bought beef heart and tried dabbing my lips.

Close enough.

I emailed to congratulate the lipstick company on their realism. They did not respond.

Read more.

Some purses contain pens, stray receipts, and lip balm. This one’s more exciting. This light-hearted, urban fantasy follows a woman, whose purse is full of secrets with a quest to champion. “Thirteen of the Secrets in My Purse” was published in the May/June issue of Uncanny Magazine.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Check Out “Thirteen of the Secrets in My Purse” in Uncanny Magazine

One: My lipstick.

The shade is Heart’s Blood.

Morbid, if you ask me.

I wanted to know if it was really the color of heart’s blood so I bought beef heart and tried dabbing my lips.

Close enough.

I emailed to congratulate the lipstick company on their realism. They did not respond.

Read more.

Some purses contain pens, stray receipts, and lip balm. This one’s more exciting. This light-hearted, urban fantasy follows a woman, whose purse is full of secrets with a quest to champion. “Thirteen of the Secrets in My Purse” was published in the May/June issue of Uncanny Magazine.

1 Comment

Cartoon – Irreproachable Taste


If you like these cartoons, please support them on Patreon! Every $2 or $1 pledge really helps. Patreon supporters saw this cartoon more than two months early.


Another collaboration with Becky Hawkins.

I particularly liked the way Becky, inspired by some photos of ceramic art galleries, colored the backgrounds. She also created a recognizable aesthetic that’s carried through on all three of the pieces seen on display – certainly not something I called for in my script! Seeing details like that, which I hadn’t even thought about, is a big pleasure of collaboration.


I wrote this cartoon over two years ago, the same day I wrote “The Five Stages of Finding Out Your Fave Is Trash.”  Although I liked both scripts, they cover similar ground, so I drew one and put the other in my “to be drawn someday” folder.


Coincidentally, the issue of enjoying art made by people who say or do terrible things, has been on my mind this week. And on my shelf.

Among the many nerdy little figurines decorating my room are a couple of Harry Potter figurines – one of Harry, and one of Hermione. I got these figures both because I like the characters (especially Hermione), and because I liked the artistry of whoever sculpted them – the choice to use a cartoony approach to create humor and energy.

I’m planning to get rid of them. Not because I’ve stopped admiring the sculpt, or because keeping them would mean I’m transphobic.

I’m getting rid of them because when the plague ends, I hope to go back to occasionally having friends and acquaintances over, and I worry that some guests – especially those that don’t know me well – might see the figures and wonder if that means I agree with J. K. Rowling’s anti-trans views.

To be clear, I’m not saying that enjoying Harry Potter books and films and figurines, makes anyone transphobic. And I’m not worried any of my guests would “cancel” me or even say anything aloud. I just value not making guests (in this case, especially trans guests) uncomfortable more than I value looking at these two figurines.


After I took the photo of the figurines for this post, I noticed that they’re displayed above some Tintin figurines, which I’m not getting rid of. The Tintin series, of course, has been rightly criticized for racism. So why aren’t I getting rid of those figurines?

Well, for whatever reason – perhaps because the series was created so long ago (Tintin began in 1929), and so there’s no live controversy keeping the problematic aspects of Tintin in the news –  Hergé isn’t as associated with racism as J. K. Rowling is with transphobia, so I don’t worry about those figures making guests uncomfortable.


This is an unusual strip for me because I’m not really condemning anyone in the strip. The main character is clumsy and hypocritical, yes, but in what I think is a human and understandable way.


I’m sorry you haven’t heard from me lately. I’ve been making slow progress on a few strips, but I’ve also been having what I think of as an “AHDD meltdown,” where I usually feel unable to get work done – even though I want to work, and I like working, and I feel better when I’m working.

I’m wondering if the combination of anxiety due to covid, and staying in my house due to covid and winter, is making my ADHD worse (or at least, making me less effective at dealing with it).

I’m just going to do my best and hope I’m able to be more productive going forward.


TRANSCRIPT OF CARTOON

This comic strip has four panels. There is an additional small fifth panel, the “kicker” panel, underneath the comic strip.

PANEL 1

This panel shows a man with a van dyke beard, a cable knit sweater, and a fisherman’s cap (although the man doesn’t look at all like a fisherman!) in a fancy art gallery. The gallery is displaying artistically wrinkled pottery; we can see two pieces on pedestals, and a third piece hung on a wall in the background. Soft spotlight lighting picks the art out.

The man is leaning his elbow on a pedestal, looking confident and happy as he lectures a small crowd of people in the gallery.

MAN: John Smyth is the biggest influence on my pottery. Whatever I know as a potter, I learned studying Smyth’s work.

PANEL 2

A longer shot as the man continues to smile and speak. However, he’s interrupted by a glasses-wearing person in the audience, who raises a finger.

MAN: No one potting today is as innovative and exciting as…

GLASSES: Did you see four women just came forward with #Metoo accusations against Smyth?

PANEL 3

The exact same shot as panel 2, but now the man is no longer confident; he is wide-eyed, his mouth has dropped open a bit, and he’s sweating. The audience looks at him, waiting for his response.

PANEL 4

A closer shot as the man puts a hand over his heart as he speaks to the crowd. His eyes are shut; he’s trying to look sincere.

MAN: I never liked Smyth’s work.

SMALL KICKER PANEL UNDER THE BOTTOM OFTHE COMIC STRIP

A blonde woman with nice earrings speaks directly to the viewer, looking just a bit angry.

WOMAN: I know nothing about Mr. Smyth or these allegations… but clearly this is yet another anti-male witch hunt!

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Feminism, sexism, etc, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | 90 Comments

Cartoon: Feminism Used To Be Good


If you like these cartoons, help me make more by supporting my Patreon! (Patrons got to see this cartoon three months early!)


Another collaboration with Becky Hawkins!


This one was inspired by a tweet – normally I’d link to the tweet, but in this case the twitter account isn’t public, so oh well. I did get ask for, and get, the tweeter’s blessing to do a cartoon.

The tweet said:

“Feminism used to be about righting inequality but now that’s solved and it’s just about giving women unfair advantages” – dudes nonstop since the 80s

I’d had that same sort of idea many times… the way that no matter what year you look at, anti-feminists are claiming that feminism used to be good.  But reading this tweet crystalized it into a cartoon idea for me.

I think people who say this are, in part, just trying to claim feminist cred opportunistically in order to bolster their anti-feminist arguments. “I supported REAL feminism, ten years ago, but now it’s lost its way!” The implication is, they’re the real feminist and anything they say can’t possibly be tinged with sexism or anti-feminist bias.

But it’s also a reflection of feminism’s slow but real success in changing society. The work is seemingly endless, and there’s always more to be done. But some feminist changes have been so successful that they’re now just accepted even by most anti-feminists. Almost no one nowadays is angry that some married women keep their own names (or own their own property). When I was born, newspaper classifieds divided “help wanted” into male jobs and female jobs; no one even remembers that anymore. Basically nobody would argue for bringing the marital rape exception back. And so on.

It’s a contradiction: It’s a never-ending battle, but also, we’re winning.


Becky, of course, did an amazing job of setting the period well in every panel. (The art in this one is one of my favorites of all the political cartoons Becky and I have done together). Originally the cartoon was going to have captions (“now,” “the 1980s,” etc) but once the art was in I didn’t think the captions really added anything.

Another change: Originally the final panel was Adam and Eve, but… Well, I’ll just quote Becky.

Maybe I’m on Jewish Twitter too much but I want to overthink panel 4 and what are the advantages and what did feminism change and should they be getting kicked out of Eden and what does the apple meeeean.

I’m sure Becky wouldn’t have been the only one to overthink that panel, and it occurred to me that cavepeople would actually be a bit funnier.


TRANSCRIPT OF CARTOON

This cartoon has four panels.

PANEL ONE

We are looking at a smartphone being held by a hand. On the phone, a man is cheerfully talking to the camera (and presumably, to the person holding the phone). He’s wearing a t shirt that says “Make Orwell Fiction Again,” and on the wall behind him is a “V for Vendetta” poster with the Guy Fawkes mask pictured, and a poster showing a sad kitten face and the caption “FACTS don’t care about your FEELINGS.” In the upper right corner of the screen, there’s a smaller image of a woman’s face, presumably the person he’s talking to.

MAN: Feminism used to be about fixing inequality but now that’s solved and it’s just about giving women unfair advantages!

PANEL TWO

A group of protestors stands holding protest signs, mostly about apartheid and about President Reagan – “Musicians against apartheid,” “human rights now,” “Reagan sucks,” and “Divestment now” can be read. A big red brick building and trees in the background make this look like it’s probably a college campus in autumn. Centered on the panel, A man with glasses is talking to a woman (the woman is wearing a pink triangle button).  This panel is pretty much how I remember protests at Oberlin College in the 1980s.

MAN: Feminism used to be about fixing inequality…

PANEL THREE

A hillside in what looks like a public park on a warm, sunny day. In the background, we can see groups of young people sitting on the grass. In the foreground, we see a man and a woman dressed as hippies – her in long straight hair, loose floral dress, flower headband, and holding a tambourine, him with long hair and a full beard, wearing a necklace of large beads, and a vest, and holding a guitar.

MAN: But now that’s all solved…

PANEL FOUR

We are inside a cave, looking at two stereotypical cartoon cavepeople, one female and one male. They are holding big drumstick-looking pieces of meat and sitting around a small fire.

CAVEMAN: …and it’s just about giving women unfair advantages!


This cartoon on Patreon

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Feminism, sexism, etc | 1 Comment

Cartoon: Corporate Diversity Training


If you enjoy these cartoons, please support them on Patreon.


This cartoon is, I think, pretty self-explanatory.  I don’t have much to say about this issue, to be honest; I read a couple of articles about it and thought “hmm, might be a cartoon there.” Then I thought of the ending and it made me giggle, which is enough to put a cartoon into my “to be drawn” folder.

The most fun here was panel three. I think this is at least the third time I’ve a what-the-camera-sees-versus-the-reality gag – they’re pretty irresistible, in a year when zoom has suddenly become a regular fixture of my life. It’s also the sort of gag that I know many readers won’t notice, but it’ll be fun for readers who pay more attention to the pictures.

I drew panel three gradually – I’d work a while on one of the other panels, then take a break and draw some more trash somewhere in panel 3, over and over until the panel seemed to have enough trash in it to work.  I told Frank “I’m so sorry, dude” when I sent it to him to color, but Frank said he loves coloring things like that. I love that Frank caught my Charlie Brown reference without me pointing it out to him and went along with it in his colors.


Something about the way this strip is written really reminds me of Doonesbury.  I’ve fallen out of the habit of reading it, but being the funniest comic strip with the most distinctive approach to writing for decades is quite an accomplishment, and I still admire Doonesbury a lot.


TRANSCRIPT OF CARTOON

This cartoon has four panels, showing a zoom conversation between someone who looks like a successful middle aged executive (vest, tie, bald on top, drapery in the background) and someone who looks much younger, with a light yellow polo shirt and deferential body language. Behind him we can see a neat, uncluttered room with a plant on a bookcase and some sort of framed certificate or degree on the wall.

PANEL 1

We are looking at a laptop, open; on the laptop’s screen, we see a zoom-style conversation with two people, who I’ll call the executive and yellowshirt. The executive is holding up a finger as he gives out an assignment, and looks demanding. Yellowshirt is holding up a hand as he tries to explain something.

EXECUTIVE: This company needs to say it’s done something to become more diverse.

YELLOWSHIRT: Sir, I’ve been reading the research on this.

PANEL 2 

A medium shot of Yellowshirt, now raising both palms as he warms to his subject.

YELLOWSHIRT: Quickie “diversity seminars” don’t help, and can even make things worse because of the resentment factor. We won’t become really diverse until we commit to changing how we recruit and mentor, starting from the top.

PANEL 3

A long shot of Yellowshirt. We can now see that the room outside the view of his webcam is actually incredibly sloppy; there’s an open pizza box, a pile of laundry, a half eaten apple. a sock hanging off a bookshelf, an empty soda can on its side, and other sorts of junk. Yellowshirt, arms spread, is looking enthusiastic as he warms to the subject.

YELLOWSHIRT: It’ll take years of hard work. We’d have to change our company culture. But if we do it, we can make our company more diverse and more profitable.

PANEL 4

Back to the split-screen showing both the executive and Yellowshirt. The executive is leaning forward, towards the camera, and is holding a flat hand out in a “cutting you off now” gesture. Yellowshirt is face-palming.

EXECUTIVE: Listen to my words. We need to say we’ve done something. To SAY it.

YELLOWSHIRT: I’ll schedule a diversity seminar right away, sir.

Posted in Cartooning & comics | 7 Comments

Cartoon: Triheads vs Squareheads


This cartoon is a collaboration between myself (script and lettering), Becky Hawkins (classroom scenes), and Naomi Rubin (Triheads vs Squareheads scenes).


If you like these cartoons, help me make more (and help me pay my swell collaborators!) by supporting my Patreon. Thanks!


I’ve known Naomi Rubin for many years. She’s a wonderful cartoonist and one of the best people I know, and I’ve always wanted to do a strip with her – but although she’s helped me as an advisor on countless strips, the right strip for her to draw never seemed to come up.

When I wrote this strip, I knew I wanted the two worlds of the strip, the storybook world and the classroom world, to be drawn in different styles. Having it actually drawn by two different cartoonists seemed fun to me, and then the idea of asking Naomi and my most-frequent collaborator Becky Hawkins to draw it appeared in my brain, shiny and bright and beautiful, and I gasped and fell to my knees and tears appeared in my eyes and my housemate Charles said “what’s wrong” and my other housemate Sydney said “oh geez, Barry’s being drama again, ignore him.”

(I’m always amazed that people support this patreon. But I’m especially amazed after writing a paragraph like the preceding.)

Anyway, Becky and Naomi were up for the collaboration; they chose to have Naomi draw the storybook while Becky drew the real world. After Naomi showed me her pencils, I loved them but thought they were looking crowded, so I made what had been a tall strip an even taller strip so the art would have more breathing room.

I’m very happy with how this strip came out. And also very happy that I’ve finally done a cartoon with Naomi.


As children (at least in America), we encounter many stories which paint racism as being two groups who are really just the same but are hung up on some trivial difference in their appearances and so hate each other. Even if one group is more powerful than the other at the story’s start, by the end we’re told that both sides are equally to blame, and all that’s required is for everyone to stop focusing on silly differences and just be nice to one another.

Examples include Dr Seuss’ story “The Sneetches” (in which the society is organized around who does or doesn’t have a green star on their navel), The “Let That Be Your Last Battlefield” episode of Star Trek (in which aliens with faces divided in half, black and white, are at war because one group has black-left white-right, while the other group has black-right white-left), and the song “Savages” in Disney’s Pocahontas, which blames the Native Americans just as much as the armed invaders.

(Wow, has that movie aged badly).

I had noticed this, but not really put it together until I read a couple of viral tweets by the writer Christina Holland, back in August. Ms Holland wrote:

I think a big problem with kids’ allegories for racism is it’s like “the green people and the purple people hated each other just for being the other color, isn’t that silly?” and not “the purple people kidnapped the green people and treated them like livestock for 100s of years”

A lot of grownups learned about it more or less like that and that’s why they think “just ignore color” or “stop having hate in your heart” or “we need examples of opposite-color people being friends” will fix things, because it would, if it was the first kind of situation.

The thought really stuck with me, and I began mulling over how to illustrate it in a cartoon. I hope you like the result. (And if you’re on Twitter, please go follow Christina Holland!)

P.S. If you’ve never seen Lindsay Ellis’ video about Disney’s Pocohontas, it’s really worth a watch.


TRANSCRIPT OF CARTOON

This cartoon has six panels. Each panel shows a schoolteacher reading from an illustrated children’s book; in some panels, we also see images from the book.

PANEL 1

This panel shows a teacher, who is white, reading aloud from a book. Above her, we can see the illustration from the page she’s reading. The illustration shows a bunch of cartoon people, some of whom have triangle-shaped heads, some of whom have rectangular heads. They are smiling and shaking hands and putting arms on each others backs in a companionable manner. In front of them, two children – one with a rectangular head, one with a triangular head – kick a ball around in the grass.

TEACHER: “And when they saw Jumball Trihead and Bigapie Squarehead playing happily together, the grown-ups realized it was silly to hate each other just because they looked different!”

TEACHER: “And that’s how they all stopped being racist!”

TEACHER: Any questions?

PANEL 2

The “camera” zooms out a little, and we can see that there are small children seated on the floor listening to the teacher. One small girl, who is Black, has gotten up and is handing the Teacher a book. The teacher accepts it cheerfully.

IMANI: Miss Martin? My mommy wrote more about the triheads and bigheads. She said it’s a “corrected version.”

TEACHER: Oh, it’s about the same characters! How marvelous! Thank you, Imani.

PANEL 3

The teacher, with a concerned and slightly frightened expression, is reading aloud from the new book. Above her, we see an illustration from the book: A Trihead, speaking straight out to the reader with an angry expression, slams a fist into a palm. Behind him, in silhouette, several Squareheads are trudging along, bowed and weary, chained together chain-gang style.

TEACHER: It says, “The story you’ve heard about the triheads and squareheads is lies. Here’s what really happened.”

TEACHER: “The Triheads kidnapped the Squareheads and enslaved them for hundreds of years.”

TEACHER: “Oh dear.”

PANEL 4

We see the children listening with wide-eyed, somewhat stunned expressions.

Above them, we see an illustration from the book. Two Squareheads lean against a gray wall, as if preparing to be frisked. A Trihead wearing a police or prison guard uniform glares at them. They all seem to be in a barred area. In front of the bars, another Trihead sits at a desk, reading a copy of “The Bell Curve.”

TEACHER: “It took a whole war to free the enslaved squareheads. But even after the war, triheads used laws, violence, and prisons to crush squareheads.”

TEACHER: “This was racism. It was too big and structural to be fixed by Jumball and Bigapie playing together.”

PANEL 5

A close-up of the teacher, who now looks very frightened but keeps on reading aloud. Above her, we see an illustration from the book. A Trihead is lying on the grass, head leaning against a tree, crying a spout of tears from each eye. Next to the Trihead, a standing Squarehead rolls their eyes, arms folded. And next to the Squarehead, a second Trihead is talking to the Squarehead with an accusatory expression, while pointing at the crying Trihead.

TEACHER: “Whenever a Squarehead complained about all the racism, Triheads yelled “How dare you accuse me of racism! Stop imagining things!”

PANEL 6

A shot of the classroom, no illustration. The teacher is turning towards Imani and asking her a question.  The teacher looks worried. Imani, now sitting cross-legged on the floor, replies with an “I don’t know” shrug.

TEACHER: “Another hundred years later…”

TEACHER: Imani, when does this story end?

IMANI: Mommy says we don’t know yet.

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Race, racism and related issues | 23 Comments

Cartoon: Teaching Cops To Be Healers


This cartoon is a collaboration with Kevin Moore.


Help me make more of these cartoons (and to pay collaborators like Kevin and Becky!) by supporting my Patreon! Even a $1 or $2 pledge really matters.


I get a lot of suggestions for cartoons, and I take almost none of them. But once in a rare while…

Back in August, patron Brian Balk wrote:

Hey Barry, I hope you’re well. I’m just writing to share a cartoon idea I had, of police officers using CPR training dummies to practice choke holds.

I wrote Brian back saying, essentially, “maybe.” But the idea kept coming back to me, and I mentally played with structuring the gag a few different ways. When one of the ideas made me chuckle, I wrote a script for it and put it in my “to be drawn someday” folder.

I offered it to Kevin Moore to draw – his slightly grotesque style seemed to fit well with these slightly grotesque characters – and, happily, Kev said yes.


TRANSCRIPT OF CARTOON

This cartoon has four panels. In addition, there’s a tiny fifth “kicker” panel under the comic strip.

PANEL 1

A middle-aged politician-looking dude wearing a suit and tie, and with thick hair neatly parted in the middle, is standing behind a podium with microphones on it. Behind him, we can see a building with a large sign above the entrance saying “City Hall.” Let’s call this guy “Mayor.”

MAYOR: The protesters say the police cannot be reformed – that police culture is beyond saving. That we must abolish and start over.

PANEL 2

A couple of hands are holding a tablet; on the tablet, the mayor, raising a finger and with a very serious expression, continues speaking.

MAYOR: The protestors are wrong! Nothing’s wrong with police culture. We don’t need major reform, just some slight adjustments!

PANEL 3

Another panel showing the mayor at the podium. This is a wider shot, and we can see that the “City Hall” building behind him is just a flat image on a backdrop.  In front of him is a large professional looking video camera, and next to the camera a man with a mustache is grinning and giving the mayor a “thumbs up” signal. The mayor is grinning and pumping one fist victoriously in the air.

MAYOR: For example, the city just purchased new CPR dummies for police to train on. We will show people that police can be heroes and healers!

PANEL 4

We’re in a new location – a large empty room with wood-paneled floors (or vinyl with a wood pattern, more likely), like some gymnasiums have. There are three men here, all wearing blue police tees and shorts. The nearest cop is holding a CPR dummy in a chokehold. Next to him, another cop, wearing a helmet and visor, is raising a nightstick to hit the CPR dummy with. In the background, a third cop is watching and taking notes in a little notepad.

FIRST COP: Okay, let’s train! I’ve got the dummy in a choke hold… Harry, you beat it with your nightstick.

HARRY: Can’t I shoot it instead?

SMALL KICKER PANEL UNDER THE BOTTOM OF THE STRIP

The third cop from panel 4 – the one who was taking notes – is asking the mayor a question. The mayor looks at the cop with a somewhat distressed expression.

COP: Do CPR dummies come in Black?

Posted in Cartooning & comics | 1 Comment