Hereville site redesign

I am so not a fan of web design! I mean, I love good web design when other people do it, but I’d rather not do it myself. I just don’t have the right kind of mind to understand how CSS works (although at least I’ve gotten over calling it “RSS”).

But I did it anyway! The old site had a design which really only made sense for a webcomic; since Hereville is now more of a print comic book, and the updates there (for the forseeable future, anyway) are going to be blog posts instead of more webcomic pages, it made sense to change the design.

This new design is a wordpress blog (easiest thing for me to work with!), and is based on the Simple Round theme — although I’ve made a couple of changes, as you can see.

Let me know what you think, and if you see anything broken. :-)

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Hereville | 3 Comments

Boom Goes the Dynamite

Humans are everywhere on this planet. We have cities on six continents and outposts on a seventh. We live from the frozen depths of Antarctica and Siberia to the damp, sticky tropics to the middle the desert — and everywhere in between.

On our long march of global conquest, we have bent nature to our will. We have learned to cultivate the land, to plant seeds and harvest crops, so that we are not dependent on finding berries and tubers and fruit. We have learned to breed animals together for specific traits, so our farm animals are docile and full of lean muscle, so that we are not dependent on hunting for meat. Through our actions, both intentional and inadvertent, we have caused the deaths of millions of species, and many more are threatened by anthropogenic climate change. Truly, humankind is a force to be reckoned with on this small, blue planet.

But while humans stand alone among animals in our ability to shape the planet, the planet itself is far more powerful than we can imagine. Bad weather can destroy crops, no matter how painstakingly tended. Cities that were built over centuries fall in hours before the onslaught of earthquakes, or flood, or hurricanes. Tsunamis can scour the lowlands of entire continents. When nature turns on us, we can only react, and hope.

There is an island located just south of the Arctic Circle, at the junction of the North American and Eurasian continental plates, atop the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. 320,000 people call this land home. They have historically made their living through fishing, though in the past few years they made the mistake of trying their hand at banking, right before the recent global banking crisis.

The island — Iceland — is where it is because lava is slowly bubbling up from the rift between the Eurasian and North American plates, slowly but surely building up the land with new rock. Because the island is volcanic, there are occasionally large eruptions. One of the biggest occurred in 1783, when the volcano Laki rumbled to life, spewing ash high into the stratosphere. The effects in Iceland were catastrophic — 50 percent of livestock died from a combination of fluoride poisoning and starvation, leading to a famine that killed 25 percent of the population.

But the effects of the eruption were not limited to Iceland. The ash cloud covered Europe, triggering storms and wreaking havoc, causing the “sand-summer” in England. This was followed by a bitterly cold winter in 1784, one whose effects were seen as far away as North America, where the Mississippi River froze at the Port of New Orleans. Weather patterns over the next several years were unpredictable, causing hardship in France that may have helped to precipitate the French Revolution.

Benjamin Franklin, then the United States Ambassador to France, gave his observations in a 1784 lecture:

During several of the summer months of the year 1783, when the effect of the sun’s rays to heat the earth in these northern regions should have been greater, there existed a constant fog over all Europe, and a great part of North America. This fog was of a permanent nature; it was dry, and the rays of the sun seemed to have little effect towards dissipating it, as they easily do a moist fog, arising from water. They were indeed rendered so faint in passing through it, that when collected in the focus of a burning glass they would scarce kindle brown paper. Of course, their summer effect in heating the Earth was exceedingly diminished. Hence the surface was early frozen. Hence the first snows remained on it unmelted, and received continual additions. Hence the air was more chilled, and the winds more severely cold. Hence perhaps the winter of 1783-4 was more severe than any that had happened for many years.

Yesterday, in Iceland, Eyjafjallajökull erupted for the second time this spring. It is not the largest volcano in Iceland, but it is already causing havoc; in Europe, air traffic has been severely disrupted, costing airlines roughly $200 million per day in lost revenue. But so far, that’s the worst of it.

So far.

But Eyjafjallajökull has erupted three previous times in the past 1100 years. And each time — in 920, 1612, and 1821 — it was followed by an eruption of Katla, a larger volcano which is capable of spewing out far more ash, lava, and devastation. A repeat of 1783-84 is by no means assured if that happens — but it cannot be ruled out, and the consequences to a world economy just beginning to recover from a deep recession could be catastrophic.

If Katla blows, the effects could be more far-reaching and more destructive than the mere inconvenience we’ve seen so far. Of course, there is nothing we can do about it; we can only monitor the volcanoes, and react to the fallout. We are the most powerful of the animals. But the most powerful animal is but a nit on the surface of the globe.

Posted in Environmental issues, In the news, International issues | 3 Comments

Women's Status in Iraq, Before And After

Interesting article in The Media Line:

Houzan Mahmoud, the Organisation of Women’s Freedom in Iraq’s representative abroad, agreed that the comparison was problematic.

“Both situations are horrible,” she told The Media Line. “Just because we have a terrible situation at the moment doesn’t mean we need to glorify Saddam’s dictatorship.”

“During Saddam’s regime if you were not political you could lead a normal life, but for the majority of us who opposed the dictatorship, it was hell,” Mahmoud said. “You were either for the Ba’ath party under Saddam or you were subjected to torture, persecution and abuse. There was no freedom of speech, no freedom of association, women did not have the right to establish women’s organizations and he also started to bring socially conservative norms into the constitution. So I don’t really like arguments that imply that Saddam Hussein’s regime was great.”

“Now America has invited the most tribalist, misogynist, Islamist extremist groups to join the government,” she continued. “Warlords, ex-Ba’athists, you name it. It’s a government of corrupt pullets that has nothing to do with people’s aspirations for freedom or welfare and which hasn’t brought any normalcy.”

“As a result, there is a lot of gender-based violence at all levels,” Mahmoud concluded. “We have one or two million women who have been widowed and have no access to social benefits. There is widespread violence and the majority of people live under the poverty line, particularly women. There is trafficking of women and young girls for prostitution both internally and externally. Sharia law has been implemented through the constitution and the enforcement of social conservatism has been brought back into the society.”

So, basically, things have moved from sucks to sucks.

Curtsy: Muslimah Media Watch. (A must-read blog, btw.)

Posted in Feminism, sexism, etc, Iraq | 2 Comments

The Thinning of Amanda Waller

Rachel Edidin described Amanda Waller:

There is no one–no one–in the D.C. Universe more badass than Amanda Waller. She is smarter than Batman. She is tougher than Darkseid. And she is one of the most morally and humanly complex characters in fiction. She embodies a combination of deep compassion, profound ideals, and utter ruthlessness that female characters rarely get to touch–and she will fuck up your binaries and paradigms better than any other character in mainstream comics.

That was in a post about “Characters Who Break the Paradigm of Feminine Beauty in Comics.” As another person put it: “Batman wishes he was as hardcore as Amanda Waller.”

So — awesome character. And to make things even better, here’s what Amanda Waller looks like:

(Amanda Waller is the one on the right.)

Most fat characters in mainstream comic books are villains (The Kingpin, The Blob) or jokes (Bouncing Boy) or at best sidekicks of the protagonist (Franklin in Daredevil). There are very few positive fat characters in mainstream comics, and none I can think of who are as positive, as complex, as powerful, and as central to multiple storylines as Amanda Waller.

So it’s no surprise that a thin actress — Angela Bassett — has been cast to play Waller in the upcoming Green Lantern movie. Rumor is that she’ll reprise the role in at least one or two other upcoming DC-universe movies, if things go as planned.

And if the movie’s a hit, then there will probably be some pressure on the comic book to redesign their Amanda Waller to look more like Angela Bassett.

Really, I’m relieved they didn’t make the character white.

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Fat, fat and more fat, Media criticism | 25 Comments

Link Farm and Open Thread: They Become Subversive So Young Nowadays Edition

Say what you want shall be the whole of the law. ((Not really.))

  1. Sans Everything has an interesting post collecting examples of homophobic caricature in classic comic strips. Robert Boyd responds with a collection of classic “Popeye” cartoons showing the sailor cheerfully — even eagerly — cross-dressing.
  2. A four-part Youtube video demonstrates “10 Rules For Dealing With Police.
  3. In the comments on Reappropriate, Jenn and I debate Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity initiative.
  4. If America had $100 and 100 people…
  5. Tom at the SCOTUSblog called it months ago: the next Supreme Court Justice will be Elena Kagen. He makes a good case…
  6. Also at SCOTUSblog, Lyle argues that no matter who replaces Stevens, Kennedy is going to be drawn to the left by his desire to have more control over who writes opinions; but he’ll be drawn to the right by the lack of Stevens (who he has a good relationship with). On the whole, the Court is likely to move to the right, it seems to me.
  7. You’re Not a Rape Victim Unless Police Say So. Reading this story will infuriate you. And be sure to read this commentary on the story at Yes Means Yes, as well.
  8. Huckabee Compares Gays To Drug Users, Says They’re Unfit To Adopt Kids. And remember, he’s renowned for being the nice Christian conservative.
  9. Caro’s post on Chris Ware, and Matthias Wivel’s response, and the comments, are all interesting, although at times the discussion made my head spin.
  10. “…dieting has replaced sex as a means of trying to control women. It is as if we have gone from legs closed to lips closed.”
  11. Most of us are simultaneously homophobic and not homophobic.
  12. If I were Maggie Gallagher or Brian Brown or Martin Ssempa or Pope Benedict, I can’t think of anything that would scare me more than the gentle joy of two high school girls holding hands, swaying to the music at their prom, or two boys dancing and laughing with the family at a wedding.”
  13. Mark Thoma is giving up on policymakers. We could make unemployment less bad, and we could make it much shorter in duration; but we won’t, because unemployed people have no sway in D.C..
  14. For instance, we could create incentives for employers to reduce hours for their workforce, rather than laying workers off. But that idea — a proven, workable idea that keeps unemployment down — is basically too radical to even be discussed in D.C..
  15. “…poor legal conditions for women in a given society are not necessarily a product of anti-women values in that society.” (Via.)
  16. The difference is, the liberal fringe isn’t running the Democratic party.
  17. Can comic books be scary?
  18. There’s No Such Thing as a Golden Age of Lost Liberty. And see also, Still Not Golden.
  19. Has American Really Become Economically Unfree?
  20. MSM and mainstream American culture just doesn’t know where to look and/or how to talk about or take seriously evangelical culture if it’s not through the culture war or political polarization lens.” Nearly the best-selling novel in America is self-published (!) and most “Alas” readers have never heard of it.
  21. Drunk History is awesome. Volume 3 is my favorite, both for the hiccuping and for the welcome absence of vomit.
Posted in Link farms | 32 Comments

Quick thought on "The Beast Below" (spoilers)

Regarding the big hugging scene near the end: Yes, the big whale is like the Doctor. That’s a neat parallel. Yes, as you said, the big whale is like the Doctor. Thanks. Big whale, Doctor, the same. Thank you. You can stop explaining now. I understand. Whale, Doc, same. Shut up now, please.

In general, I liked this episode; it had some nice creepy imagery. Plus, the revelation at the end combined a nice optimism about aliens, with some wonderfully negative cynicism about the human race.

Posted in Popular (and unpopular) culture | 5 Comments

Nobese Oblige

The woman on the right is Melody Barnes, the chair of the White House’s Childhood Obesity Task Force. On the left, of course, is Michelle Obama, the most recognizable face of the anti-child-obesity movement.

Looking at these two women, I feel confident they’re intimately familiar with the lives of obese children; that they are sensitive to all the crucial issues involved; and that their enormous experience with the lives of fat kids has left them well-suited to create a program that will avoid stigmatizing and harming fat kids.

I look forward to the White House’s program to help girls and women, to be led by Joe Biden; the program to help disadvantaged children of color, organized by Larry Summers; and the program to help LGBT youth, chaired by Rick Warren.

(Related.)

Posted in Fat, fat and more fat | 25 Comments

Sometimes the world does not suck

sometimes-the-world-does-not-suck

I tend to write posts when I am pissed. Now this is great motivation, but unrelenting gloom and doom tends to leave me ridiculously depressed, and pessimistic about the fate of the world. So this is a post for good news, my readers. Because sometimes the world does not suck!

The first same-sex wedding in Washington DC

what is happening in this world that makes you think that the world is cool after all? Leave in comments.

And now a word from our sponsor…


Your ad could be here, right now.

Sometimes the world does not suck

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff, Syndicated feeds | 3 Comments

Asking For It

So! Ever been to a beach? Ever worn a revealing swimsuit? Well congratulations! You didn’t know it, but you were asking to be raped. Oh, you may not have thought so, but you’re not a CNN Headline News anchor, so what do you know?

Yes, Jane Velez-Mitchell declared today that the proper response to a number of rapes at Daytona Beach during Spring Break was to blame the victims, not that she was blaming the victims:

Host Jane Velez-Mitchell’s response? Word for word: “Listen, I don’t like to blame the victim, BUT…” As she goes on to – seriously – say, “If you’re scantily-clad, wearing nothing but a skimpy bikini, I mean…You’re making yourself vulnerable.”

Well, sure! I mean, okay, you’re at a beach, it’s hot, you’re going swimming, you may want to therefore wear a swimsuit. But that’s not an option, ladies! If you’re not wearing a burqini, it’s pretty much all your fault if someone sexually assaults you. And even then, one of Velez-Mitchell’s guests would wonder:

Final verdict from ex-frat boy dude: “Listen, we can’t stop rapists from committing rape. But we can reduce the number of rapes that occur by women not walking around scantily-clad and drinking so much on Spring Break.”

Um…yeah. I see a problem there. It’s the “we can’t stop rapists from committing rape” thing. Because…we can. We have.

Have we managed to do this by forcing women to wear ill-fitting sweatsuits while swimming? No. We’ve done this by saying, clearly, that rape is wrong, that rapists are scum, and that when someone is raped, it is not his or her fault — it is the rapist’s fault.

It is true, rapists will rape. But not because they saw a scantily-clad woman in a bikini on Spring Break. No, rapists will rape because they want to abuse their victims. Which is why, every day, rapists rape women who aren’t dressed provocatively, who aren’t walking alone in a dark alley late at night, who aren’t conventionally attractive, or young, or any of the things that supposedly put women at risk.

Rapists target their victims and victimize them. The women and men who are victims of rapists are guilty of nothing. Like a mugging victim, they were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong person, and they are blameless for their attack.

No, the fault of rape lies solely with rapists. They are the ones who should be the focus of our ire. Women can’t help but exist. But everyone can choose not to rape.

Posted in Media criticism, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | 9 Comments

Cutting Government Spending Is Tyranny!

The Economist polled Americans about the deficit, government spending, and the like. Overwhelmingly, Americans prefer cutting government spending in order to balance the deficit (62%), compared to only 5% for raising taxes and 24% who favored doing both.

But there’s a big difference between general and specifics. According to this poll, only 5% favor raising taxes, but 62% 59% favor raising taxes on households making over $250,000 a year.

Similarly, the huge majority in favor of cutting government programs dissolves once Americans were asked which programs should have funding cut:

So a strong majority agrees on cutting foreign aid — but, alas, foreign aid makes up less than 1% of the federal budget. That’s like cutting the household grocery bill by cutting out half a candy bar every other month.

Conservatives favor cutting government programs to balance the deficit. But (and this is the conundrum part) conservatives also claim that for Congress to make policy that most Americans disagree with is virtually tyranny.

Since passing any policy that doesn’t poll well is tyranny — and cutting (say) Social Security polls far less well than the Affordable Care Act — what deficit-cutting measures can conservatives favor?

Other than raising taxes on households with incomes over $250,000, that is.

(Hat tip: Mr Drum).

Update: This graph from Annie Lowrey plots both what Americans say should be cut, and what percentage of the federal budget is spent in each area.

Posted in Conservative zaniness, right-wingers, etc., Economics and the like | 44 Comments