Poetic Propaganda

Crip Chick blogs:

I had the honor of joining radical women of color (many of who are your favorite bloggers, BrownFemiPower, Black Amazon, Little Light, Mamita Mala, Sudy, Nadia, and sooo many more) in putting together an amazing album that chronicles experiences around struggle, love, motherhood, redemption, healing and community. You can cop the CD in January, along with a zine and listening party curriculum, so be prepared! More details to come soon but stay on this— there are only 200 copies currently available.

[Hat Tip: brownfemipower]

Posted in Syndicated feeds | Comments Off on Poetic Propaganda

The Reason for the Season

(I’ve posted a version of this every year since 2005 over at my blog; it seemed like the day to share it.)

There is a reason that Mithras’ birthday was celebrated this time of year. A reason that Bacchus’ birthday, the Saturnalia, Jesus’ birthday, and the New Year come this time of year as well. For those of us living in the Northern Hemisphere, at 12:04 UT today (4:04 AM Pacific Standard Time) the Sun’s slow ebb reaches its nadir, and begins its slow return. For those of us who live in northern climes it is a not insignificant day; the sun will not rise today in Portland, Ore., until 7:48 AM and will have set by 4:30 PM, a meager eight hours and forty-two minutes of daylight. And Oregon is in the pink compared to, say, Stockholm, where the sunrise doesn’t come until 8:44 AM and sunset is already complete at 2:48 PM–just over six hours of daylight.

It is no wonder that millennia ago, our forebearers saw this day as especially meaningful — the moment at which the Sun began to make its triumphant return. Thus Mithras, the Sun God, was reborn on this day, to grow and prosper, rising until July, when he slowly began to wither and die. Thus the Son God, Jesus, has a story that, calendar be damned, fits well with the idea of Sol dying, and being resurrected. All of this has happened before, all of this will happen again, an infinite cycle, repeated infinitely — or as close to it as we humans can imagine.

And so today, we celebrate the day that is the progenitor of all our winter festivals, the Winter Solstice–and await again our planet’s rebirth into the light. Happy Solstice.

Posted in Whatever | 2 Comments

The Assault Of Dymond Milburn Was About Three Things

I was just coming to “Alas” to post about the horrific assault of Dymond Milburn, but I see Jeff is already there. But I wanted to add three quick points to Jeff’s comments.

1) The assault on Dymond Milburn is about racism.

It’s self-evident that Dymond was targeted for being female while outdoors; but what some blog posts I’ve read have missed is, she was also targeted for being black while outdoors. Renee writes:

Daily the social reduction of bodies of colour occurs. It is no accident that black girls are the ones that most likely to receive corporal punishment in the education systems that still allow it, just as it was no accident that two black girls were chosen to re-enact the middle passage. This little girl is the living example of the ways in which black women continue to suffer and yet we are not allowed to be angry.

2) As Jill points out, the assault on Dymond Milburn is about the wretched treatment of prostitutes by our society.

The police grabbed Dymond, they claim, because they believed she was a prostitute. What makes the story newsworthy, however, is that Dymond was a 12-year-old girl, not a prostitute. If she had been a prostitute, the abuse she received would be objected to by only a few far-out radicals. Prostitutes are raped and assaulted by cops all the time, and no one says boo.

3) The assault of Dymond Milburn was about a culture of police arrogance and abuse.

The fact that three cops acted together implies something very different than one cop acting alone and trying to hide his act. ((One of the three, Officer Gilbert Gomez, has since been promoted to vice Narcotics commander, a position which presumably affords him even more opportunities to get away with assaulting 12 year olds.)) But the really telling thing is this: “Three weeks later, according to the lawsuit, police went to Dymond’s school, where she was an honor student, and arrested her for assaulting a public servant.” Rather than trying to cover it up, or rather than punishing these three cops, the police force decided to enact retribution on the 12-year-old girl for resisting being dragged into a van by three strange men. And a prosecutor is aiding them in this. This isn’t bad apples; it’s a system.

I’d really love to see these three men — and their commanders, and the prosecutor — fired and publicly humiliated. Unfortunately, probably the system will protect its own; and the abuses of blacks, of women, and of prostitutes (and of many other groups, as well) will continue.

Posted in Feminism, sexism, etc, In the news, Race, racism and related issues, Sex work, porn, etc | 13 Comments

Lights Start Flashin' Behind Me

Here’s a horrifying story from Galveston:

It was a little before 8 at night when the breaker went out at Emily Milburn’s home in Galveston. She was busy preparing her children for school the next day, so she asked her 12-year-old daughter, Dymond, to pop outside and turn the switch back on.
 
As Dymond headed toward the breaker, a blue van drove up and three men jumped out rushing toward her. One of them grabbed her saying, “You’re a prostitute. You’re coming with me.”

Dymond grabbed onto a tree and started screaming, “Daddy, Daddy, Daddy.” One of the men covered her mouth. Two of the men beat her about the face and throat.

Like I said, horrifying, right? Every parent’s worst nightmare, some thugs come steal your kid in the dark of night. So what did the Galveston police do about it?

As it turned out, the three men were plain-clothed Galveston police officers who had been called to the area regarding three white prostitutes soliciting a white man and a black drug dealer.

Oh.

Well, that changes things. Not, you know, the horribleness of the action by police, or the horrible abuse of civil rights this represents, or the terror the girl must have felt. No, what it changes is that the police could compound the damage by making things even worse:

Three weeks later, according to the lawsuit, police went to Dymond’s school, where she was an honor student, and arrested her for assaulting a public servant. Griffin says the allegations stem from when Dymond fought back against the three men who were trying to take her from her home. The case went to trial, but the judge declared it a mistrial on the first day, says Griffin. The new trial is set for February.

Awesome! What was the girl’s crime? Well, she and her father fought back against masked men who were abducting her. The men were cops, but didn’t identify themselves as such.

Ask yourself, if you saw a kid — any kid — getting abducted by three masked men, what would you do?

What would you want the kid to do?

And what kind of monsters think that’s criminal behavior?

Well, the Galveston police do, I guess.

The family is now suing, as they should. The police officers’ attorney says, “The father basically attacked police officers as they were trying to take the daughter into custody after she ran off.” Well, duh. Because neither he nor his daughter knew they were police officers. Also, the fact that the girl was 12, had committed no crime, and was standing in her own yard might be reasons she wouldn’t expect to be arrested, no?

At least the girl wasn’t hurt.

After the incident, Dymond was hospitalized and suffered black eyes as well as throat and ear drum injuries.

There are no words to describe the outrage that this should cause any human being. Lovely to know it was done under color of authority.

Posted in In the news | 12 Comments

2

On Election Day, the U.S. Senate race was the last for which I marked a vote. I’ve been a lukewarm Franken supporter, and if the race had been between him and former Sen. Dean Barkley, IP-Minn., I would have voted for Barkley. Indeed, I almost did.

But I’ve despised Norm Coleman ever since he went the full turncoat in 1998, not just bolting for the GOP, but embracing the most hateful elements of the party while he did so. In the Senate, he’s been a spineless weathervane, willing to buck the Bush Administration every single time it didn’t matter. Norm Coleman is a firm believer in Norm Coleman; everything else is kinda beside the point as far as he’s concerned. And while I’m not convinced Franken will be a great senator, I am convinced that Norm is a lousy one, even absent the serious ethical questions surrounding him.

I didn’t know it at the time, but that vote might just turn out to be important:

Democrat Al Franken picked up several hundred votes at Thursday’s state Canvassing Board meeting, all but erasing the narrow unofficial lead that Republican Sen. Norm Coleman has maintained for weeks. The DFLer seemed poised to move ahead today, at least temporarily, as the board rules on more challenged ballots.

Franken also appeared ready to beat back another challenge, as board members appeared skeptical about the Coleman team’s proposal for preventing ballots from being counted twice. Talking about instances when a ballot couldn’t be run through a voting machine, requiring a duplicate to be made, the Coleman campaign said the ballot should be counted only if an original could be matched with its copy.

Depending on whether you believe the Associated Press or the Star Tribune, Coleman’s lead is now between two and five. Not hundred. 2 and 5. Given that the Canvassing Board has almost four hundred more Coleman challenges to get through tomorrow, it is now almost certain that Franken will hold a lead going into the weekend.

To be fair, that lead will be fragile; there is the matter of reallocating votes from withdrawn challenges, and it’s possible those reallocated votes could pop Coleman back into the lead. But there’s a problem with that, too:

Al Franken and Sen. Norm Coleman each got good news and bad news Thursday, as one of the wildest elections in Minnesota history took yet another pair of startling turns.

The Minnesota Supreme Court said improperly rejected absentee ballots must be counted by the state Canvassing Board, something Coleman tried to prevent. But they won’t be counted immediately, and Coleman and Franken must agree on which ones are tallied.

That last line is a sticking point, but it’s one that presumably can be overcome; the Coleman camp, for example, is not simply going to be able to say, “Well, none of them,” which is what they tried to persuade the Supreme Court of. It’s now probable that Franken will find enough votes in the absentee stack to pull off a win. Not certain — it ain’t over ’til it’s over — but more likely than not.

It should be interesting to watch the Republicans — who’ve been saying for weeks that Norm has won and it’s all over — reverse themselves and demand the process play itself out. Out local GOP astroturfers at Minnesota Democrats Exposed ((I’m breaking my rule against linking to Mike and Mini-Mike because the Schadenfreude is too delicious.)) have already done so:

There are hundreds, if not thousands, of challenged ballots that have been withdrawn from both campaigns. We’re not certain if those ballots will be dedicated to Coleman, to Franken or to the Other pile. The Secretary of State’s Office is working to process the withdrawn ballots and redeclare the vote to the call made by the local election official during the recount.
What makes things tougher is that the campaigns are now restoring some challenges that they withdrew earlier. They’re doing this because they know that the board is acceptable to certain challenges. They are also withdrawing challenges that they know have no chance of being upheld.
As one colleague put it, the campaigns are playing 3 card monte and no one knows the real number.

Truly wonderful, the concern Ryan “Mini-Mike” Flynn shows for waiting until all the votes are in before anyone declares victory. It would be truly more wonderful if he and his master hadn’t spent the past month declaring Coleman the winner.

But that’s life when you’re a paid spinner. I’ve never said anything other than that we should count all the votes. And I still say that — certainly, if Al Franken pulls ahead tomorrow, that won’t mean he’s won. But it does mean that the constant drumbeat from the GOP to simply certify Norm’s win and move on was at best misguided — oh, heck, it wasn’t misguided, it was flatly an attempt to game the system, to declare victory at the two minute warning. Unfortunately, the game’s gone into overtime now; probably best if we all let the refs do their job.

Posted in Elections and politics | Comments Off on 2

A Recession Story

MLA (the Modern Language Association – where English professors go to party) just released a report on academic employment. Overall, the number of full-time jobs in academia has more or less stayed the same, while the number of part-time jobs has jumped due to increased student enrollment. The number of full-time jobs in English decreased by 10% in ten years. Across the board, part-time jobs are held mainly by women. Funny how the more white women and people of color attend and teach college, the less we pay the people working in the classroom.* What a coincidence. Isn’t that interesting.

A few weeks ago, I wrote about how I was giving up on academia and searching for a nonprofit job. I’ll be honest – I didn’t work that hard at the job search. I sent out maybe five resumes, had one interview. If I really set my mind to it, I could probably have found something in a few months. But due to the nature of part-time work, which forces you to constantly cycle through job after job (most of us TAs and adjuncts pick up side jobs like private tutoring whenever we find out that a section has been cut or an offer has fallen through), I’d already spent the past year and a half sending out resumes on a semi-regular basis, and I was tired. Plus, a funny thing happened when I emailed the department chair at my other campus to tell him I couldn’t keep the class I was teaching: he offered me another one.

I sat on the offer for a few days. Another class meant $1,300 a month instead of $650. It meant I could make rent and buy groceries. I emailed him to accept it, and then slumped in my chair and cried for an hour.
Continue reading

Posted in Class, poverty, labor, & related issues, Education, Feminism, sexism, etc, Race, racism and related issues | 21 Comments

Portland's Feminist Bookstore Needs Cash!

“In Other Words,” a feminist bookstore in Portland — one of the last non-profit feminist bookstores in the country, I suspect — is in financial trouble. They’ve been hit hard by the recession, so they’re doing a fundraiser, trying to raise $11,000 by the end of December. They’re not just a bookstore — they’re also a community center for many of Portland’s feminists.

The good news is, they’ve already raised $7,000, in the first five days of fundraising! So although it’s tough, there’s real hope they’ll make it. So go to their website! Donate! Purchase!

Posted in Feminism, sexism, etc | 2 Comments

First "Hereville" story is now completely online!

The first “Hereville” story (all 57 pages of it) is now available for online reading. The final page is posted here, and the first page is here.

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Hereville | 2 Comments

Smoking Makes You Fat

I never smoked. Oh, I puffed on probably three cigarettes over the course of my life, and in my callow youth I would occasionally light up a cigar. But I was always very leery of getting hooked. This was due in no small part to my dad, who was a smoker until about eight or nine years ago; during my childhood, he told me repeatedly that he didn’t want to smoke, but that he was addicted, and that he wished he’d never started. That left an impression on me, and since I didn’t want all of the health risks of smoking, like lung cancer and heart disease, I figured it was a bad idea to start.

Alas, not all kids are like me. Some actually start smoking, and some continue to smoke into adulthood. How to scare kids into not smoking is a perennial topic, never mind that we’ve pretty much won that battle. Now, Finnish researchers have a new weapon in the war on smoking: shame.

No, not shame of smoking — silly! No, the researchers suggest fat shaming! Because no matter the behavior, it’s always a good idea to threaten that it will make you fat in the end:

Telling teenage would-be smokers that lighting up may make them fat down the road may be a more effective deterrent than harping on the risks of heart disease and cancer from smoking, hints research published in the latest issue of the American Journal of Public Health.

Well, this must be a study of teens’ attitudes about smoking and fat, right? Of course not — the study doesn’t appear to say anything about whether telling teens they’ll gain weight if they smoke is a more effective deterrent than telling teens they’ll die of lung cancer. I suspect that’s because it isn’t a bigger deterrent.

But at least the study shows that there’s a serious weight gain involved, right?

In a study, Finnish researchers found that smoking during adolescence strongly predicted the development of abdominal obesity in adulthood, among both men and women.

In particular, they found that girls who smoked at least 10 cigarettes daily during adolescence had a 3.4-centimeter larger waistline as young adults, on average, than did girls who had never smoked.

3.4 whole centimeters? Shocking! That’s almost one and one-third inches! Why, ex-smokers must weigh five or six pounds more than non-smokers!

[…]

“And most interesting,” said Saarni, the apparent link between smoking during adolescence and being heavy later on was independent of the young person’s own body weight — meaning that those who were heavy smokers had greater waist circumference even within the same body mass index (BMI) levels as their non-smokers peers.

Oh, crikey, can we just stop now? Guess what — ex-smokers have a tendency to gain some weight. That’s due to a lot of things — nicotine is a mild stimulant, ex-smokers often eat a bit more to replace the behavior of sucking on a cigarette, whatever — but it’s not exactly a news flash. My dad gained some weight when he quit smoking; so what? He also avoided going down the path of my grandpa, who died of lung cancer. I think he made the right choice.

At any rate, ex-smokers tend to be slightly heavier than people who never smoked. Are there health risks involved in this? Or, you know, anything that anyone should be concerned about?

This research, Saarni added, “gives a tool” to highlight the risks of smoking to adolescents and young adults “by showing the unhealthy effect on the body shape.” This can be an important deterrent, “because usually young people find cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes or even cancer so distant risks that they have very little impact on ones smoking behavior.”

Yeah, because the kid who thinks she’s invulnerable to a heart attack is going to worry that smoking can make her weigh up to ten pounds more than she otherwise would.

I mean, really, is this going to sell? “If you start smoking, you’re at risk for cancer and heart disease, and you’ll die early — oh, and if you quit, you might gain a few pounds.”

That won’t work. What I just did was convince my hypothetical teen smoker never to quit smoking, because, you know, he might gain a few pounds, which is terrible because there is nothing worse than being fat. Because, you know, there just isn’t. It’s enough to make me want to start smoking.

Posted in Fat, fat and more fat | 15 Comments

Recount-a-Lu-La, She’s My Baby

Minnesota’s never-ending Senate race is continuing to never end. While the Canvassing Board did get through all of Al Franken’s challenges today, Norm Coleman’s thousand-odd challenges remain. And the legal action is getting fast and furious. Where are we? Let’s recap:

  • Norm Coleman has increased his lead over Franken to 362 votes. That’s not shocking; most of the challenges Franken issued were challenges to Coleman votes, and so Franken challenges that were overruled ended up being added to the vote total.
  • That’s important, because Coleman has significantly more challenges than Franken does — over twice as many. If Coleman’s challenges are similar in nature to Frankens, and if they’re rejected in similar percentages to Franken’s, then Franken could pick up about 400 votes.
  • Of course, those are mighty big ifs. And even a small variance could leave Franken shy a few votes.
  • The good news for Franken is that there are more votes out there. There are a number of absentee ballots, perhaps as many as 1500 statewide, that were improperly rejected on election day. State statutes provide for reasons one can reject them (i.e., the outer envelope wasn’t signed, or the signatures don’t match), but some were rejected for other reasons (i.e., the signature wasn’t dated; while a space exists to do so, it’s not required to be on the ballot by statute). While one wouldn’t expect these to yield 200-odd votes for Franken, they probably lean his way by enough to push him over the top, maybe.
  • Because of this, the Coleman campaign went to court today to stop these ballots from counting. Their argument was that the statute is vague, and that for these ballots to be counted they would have to be counted after the vote is certified, via court challenged. This got a skeptical response from the Justices of the State Supreme Court; they seemed more likely to back Coleman’s fall-back position of setting up a single, state-wide standard for handling the votes.
  • Until the Minnesota Supreme Court rules, however, these votes are in limbo. Associate Justice Alan Page, presiding in the absence of Chief Justice Eric Magnuson, said a ruling would be “forthcoming,” but was not more specific.
  • Yes, that Alan Page.
  • Page was presiding because Magnuson and Associate Justice Barry Anderson are a part of the State Canvassing Board, and therefore can’t rule impartially on challenges to them. That makes the court a bit more Democratic-friendly. Magnuson and Barry Anderson are Pawlenty appointees, as are Justices Lorie Skjerven Gildea and Christopher Dietzen. Justice Helen Meyer was appointed by Gov. Jesse Ventura, IP-Minn., and my personal favorite member of the court, Justice Paul Anderson, was appointed by moderate Republican Gov. Arne Carlson. Page is the only Democrat on the court, having won his race for an open seat in 1992.
  • The Coleman campaign also advanced the issue of duplicate ballots, which are sometimes filled out in cases where an absentee ballot arrives damaged. The Coleman campaign says that there may have been as many as 150 ballots cast where both the original and duplicate ballots were added to the count. The Canvassing Board seemed sympathetic to the complaint — after all, it’s as reasonable to not want ballots double-counted as it’s reasonable to want all ballots counted — but they weren’t sure they could provide a remedy. They’ll issue a ruling tomorrow morning, which could spark still more lawsuits.

Dizzy yet? Me too. And we’ve still got at least two more days of ballot challenge decisions, plus lawsuits, lawsuits, and more lawsuits. Will it ever end? Well, consider this — in 1962, the last statewide general election recount in Minnesota, DFLer Karl Rolvaag ousted Republican Gov. Elmer Anderson by 91 votes out of 1.3 million cast.

That election wasn’t decided until March of 1963.

It could be a long and bumpy ride.

Posted in Elections and politics | 2 Comments