The Absolute Basics of the US-China-Taiwan Relationship

This is A. J. Johnson’s 1865 map of China. Covers the region with particular attention to cities and waterways. China at the time this map was made was mostly closed country, however, a few ports were opened to western trade, these are noted in capital letters and include Tanchau, Kaifung, Waingan, Shanghai, Canton and Nanking (Nanjing) among others. Insets detail the “Island of Amoy” and Canton (Hong Kong). Features the Celtic style border common to Johnson’s atlas work from 1863 to 1869. Steel plate engraving prepared by A. J. Johnson for publication as plate no. 97 in the 1865 edition of his New Illustrated Atlas… This is the first edition of the Johnson’s Atlas to exclusively bear the A. J. Johnson imprint.

(A post by Ben Lehman, who many of you will recognize from “Alas” comments. Reprinted from Ben’s facebook, with Ben’s kind permission. The illustration, an 1985 1865 map of China and Taiwan, was chosen by Amp.)

PREAMBLE: I’m going to endeavor to try to keep this essay as viewpoint neutral as humanly possible. However, I should let you know what my biases are before I start talking. Taiwan is one of my favorite places in the world. I love it, and I love the people there. My highest hope is that they will be able to achieve prosperity and happiness, and will be able to enjoy their hard-fought and well-earned social and political freedoms. I wish this regardless of their current or future political identity.

VERY ABBREVIATED, SIMPLIFIED HISTORY: Up until the 1500s, Taiwan was mostly inhabited by Taiwanese aboriginal groups (who are not ethnically or linguistically Chinese) and the occasional Chinese fisherman or pirate gang along the coast. In the 1500s and 1600s there were several failed attempts at European colonization, first by the Portuguese and then by the Dutch and the Spanish, to provide a waypoint for ships to restock and repair on the long journey to Japan.

In 1644 when the Qing took control of the Mainland, a half-Japanese half-Chinese pirate named Koxinga declared Taiwan a rump dynasty of the Ming, complete with a young claimant to the Imperial Throne, with the intent on reclaiming the mainland. He consolidated power, expelled the Dutch, and generally made a huge nuisances of himself. When the Qing finally crushed this nascent state in 1683, they annexed the island, mostly in an attempt to prevent further pirates, Europeans, or political revolutionaries from taking up residence.

The Qing governed Taiwan as a frontier, and attempted to keep out ethnically Chinese settlers, fearing that the area was too distant and overseas to be controlled effectively. But the farmland in the western plains was excellent and there was good fishing, so Chinese settlers arrived and settled enthusiastically. This settlement was somewhat analogous to the American West — including the expulsion, conquest, and massacre of the aboriginal people, although the government — which was ruled by Manchus who didn’t trust the Chinese settlers — was somewhat less openly anti-aborigine and pro-Settler than in the US.

This state of affairs — an influx of Chinese settlers intermarrying with and displacing the native population, with wary government oversight — continued until the Qing lost the Sino-Japanese War in 1895. As part of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, the Qing signed over Taiwan and its outlying islands to the Japanese empire in perpetuity. The Japanese would govern Taiwan for the next 60 years.

The Japanese government of Taiwan was a different form of colonialism. They focused on assimilation — making the local, mostly Chinese population speak Japanese, take on Japanese names, wear Japanese clothes, and live a Japanese lifestyle. Meanwhile, they looted the island for its natural resources (mostly gold and timber) to help fund Imperial expansion.

BEGINNING OF THE MODERN STATUS QUO:
In the treaty of San Francisco that ended World War Two, Japan surrendered all of its imperial possessions, including Taiwan, to their own sovereign rule or to their original countries. Because China was regarded as one of the Allies, Taiwan was returned to Chinese sovereignty, and the Japanese withdrew, but Taiwan did not actually receive any government from the Republic of China (ROC), because the Republic of China was a bit busy fighting the Communists in the Chinese Civil War. When they finally lost the Chinese Civil War in 1949, they did not surrender. Rather, they “retreated to Taiwan.” In practice, this was a full-scale military invasion of the island. The invading ROC, a fascistic military dictatorship under Chiang Kai-shek and the Kuomintang (KMT) party, brutally suppressed the local inhabitant, who they saw as Japanized quislings and collaborators, as separatists, or as communist-sympathetic liberals. They established military rule on the island, and consolidated power and wealth in the hands of the KMT elite who had come from the Mainland in 1949.

Now, it’s worth noting here that, while both of these groups are ethnically Chinese, they are different Chinese ethnicities. The KMT elite were Mandarin and Cantonese speakers from the northern and southern cities. The local Chinese were Taiwanese speakers (a dialect of Fujianese) and from a very different culture, now shaped by 60 years of Japanese social engineering. So, though both these groups are Chinese, there is a legitimate and meaningful ethnic divide here. It’s not just political.

Meanwhile, on the Mainland, Mao Zedong, having effectively won the Chinese civil war, declares the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and proceeds to begin governing Mainland China and its outlying territories.

Now, it’s important to note that while there are two governments here, there are two governments of China. The Chinese Civil War never formally ended. The ROC never signed a surrender document. Chiang Kai-shek, delusionally believing that he’s going to successfully retake the mainland any day now, wants to avoid being having other states, particularly the US and other anti-communist states, recognize the PRC as a legitimate government of China, leaving him governing a rump, separate, state of Taiwan. So he declares the “One China Principle,” which is to say, there is one legitimate government of China, and you can recognize the ROC as legitimate or the PRC as legitimate but not both. Mao, likewise, wants to claim Taiwan as Chinese territory, not as a separate state, so issues the same ultimatum. The US and its allies, as well as the UN, recognize the ROC, but not the PRC. The USSR and its allies recognize the PRC. The PRC refuses recognition from several US-bloc countries, such as the UK, on the grounds that it would violate the One China principle.

This is the deal: Pick your Government of China, the other government is illegitimate and you can’t have anything to do with it.

So the ROC, run by the KMT as a one party state, is on Taiwan oppressing the hell out of people with US support, and the PRC, run by the CCP as a one party state, is on the Mainland oppressing the hell out of people, sometimes with the support of the USSR, sometimes going it alone. This is the status quo.

Things start to shift in the late 60s early 70s. Canada recognizes the PRC and its recognition is accepted. The UN shifts its recognition in 1971, functionally expelling the ROC and Taiwan from representation permanently. In 1972 Nixon goes to China and the US and the Mainland start an informal relationship. In 1975, Chiang Kai-shek dies and his son, Chiang Ching-kuo takes over. Chiang Ching-kuo begins to initiate dramatic social reforms, rolling back martial law, carrying out land reform, economic development programs, opening up elections to “non-party” candidates and KMT membership to local Taiwanese, and dramatically increasing freedom of the press.

And, with basically no notification, in 1979, the US recognizes the PRC, thus recognizing the legitimacy of the largest nation on the planet and gaining a badly needed anti-Soviet Communist ally.

Taiwan has lost its major patron. Because of the One China principle, the US cannot acknowledge it as a government at all. It’s basically fucked. The US comes to Taiwan with a deal, though: continue to carry out its social reforms with the end goal of liberal democracy, and the US will continue to support Taiwan through back channels. Taiwan agrees. So the US passes the Taiwan Relations Act, which does a few things:
* It allows the US to come to defense of the Taiwan if China-Taiwan (PRC-ROC) status quo is threatened.
* It allows private US arms manufacturers to sell weapons to Taiwan for use in self-defense.
* It establishes the American Institute in Taiwan, a non-governmental organization staffed by state department officials on leave, to be an informal embassy.

Meanwhile, in China, Mao dies and Deng Xiaoping takes control of the party and state. He initiates the Reform and Opening, a policy of economic and diplomatic liberalization without political or social liberalization. Included in this is a revision to Taiwan policy, which includes the idea of the Three Links (postal, commercial, and transport), that there should be some communications between the sides. This basically goes nowhere for 20 years.

And this is the beginning of the modern status quo.

FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS:
The ROC, on Taiwan, holds free and fair political elections for the first time in the 90s. The political parties rapidly form into two coalitions, the Pan-Blue coalition led by the KMT (which has renounced fascism and military government and reinvented itself as a centre-right party of business and the status quo) and Pan-Green coalition led by the Democratic Progressive Party, or DPP, an alliance of dissidents, democratic reformers, non-communist leftists, and independence and human rights activists. The KMT, led by the Taiwanese statesman Lee Teng-hui manages to hold onto power until the election of 2000, where the Pan-Blue coalition splits their vote between the KMT and independent James Soong, letting Chen Shui-bian of the DPP win the presidency in with a narrow plurality of the vote.

The PRC, on Mainland China, flips the fuck out at this. Let’s look briefly at why.

Theoretically the Chinese Civil War between the CCP and the KMT is still unsettled. As long as the KMT is in charge on Taiwan, the CCP can claim that they are simply two sides of this ongoing struggle gone cold. But the DPP has no part of the Chinese Civil War. They’re not a rival China. The extremists in the party are even pro-Taiwan independence, and although Chen Shui-bian rejects that they have their suspicions about his sympathies. They build up missiles pointed at the island, they threaten to invade, it’s a huge deal. For decades, the belief has been that Taiwan and the Mainland are the same country, with two rival governments. Now, there’s a huge existential threat to that in the form of 1) election 2) of a non-KMT president 3) with separatist sympathies.

Secondarily, the KMT has emerged as the pro-China party, what with the business opportunities and the insistence on the status quo. The DPP has separatist leanings and favors a closer relationship with Japan, partly as a counterweight to China, and partly out of nostalgia for Japanese colonial rule. So, ironically, the CCP is happier with the party that they are at war with, rather than the party that refuses to acknowledge that there’s any reason for a war.

Despite this, during Chen Shui-bian’s tenure, China and Taiwan get a hell of a lot done through back-channel negotiation. They open mail and transit links, they open opportunities for investment and trade. Taiwanese owned and built factories in China bring high-tech manufacturing and jobs to the Mainland, and a shitload of money to Taiwan. After Chen Shui-bian leaves office in a cloud of scandal, the KMT president Ma Ying Jeou accelerates ties, arranging high level meetings with PRC officials and opening up real estate purchases on Taiwan to mainland elites. This makes him very popular with the Mainland government, but it (along with a lot of other mistakes) also alienates the populace of Taiwan.

Meanwhile, the US continues arms sales and military support for Taiwan without direct connection. While some ousted heads of state (say, the Dalai Lama) can get away with visiting the US “as a private individual” the President of of the ROC is not even allowed to stop their plane in the mainland US. “Refueling stops” of only a few hours are allowed in Alaska and Hawaii, but no government business is directly conducted and even then it is extremely touchy diplomatically. Nonetheless, we remain the primary guarantor of Taiwan’s security, independence, and democracy. Every time the PRC gets too aggressive towards Taiwan, we sail a carrier group through the Taiwan straight to get them to back down. China and the US are highly interdependent. China doesn’t want to pick a fight with us over Taiwan. We don’t want to pick a fight back.

In China, Xi Jinping, a demagogic, aggressive leader with strong callbacks to Mao, is selected as the head of the party and the president. He proceeds to ratchet up rhetoric towards Taiwan.

Ma Ying Jeou leaves office deeply unpopular, and in a wave election last year Taiwan elects Tsai Ing-wen, it’s first female president and second DPP president, along with, for the first time, a pan-Green majority in the legislature. China gets really, really on edge. Previously, the KMT legislature could block any moves towards independence. Now, they can’t. In practice, it’s unlikely that the DPP will try for independence — it’s fairly unpopular with the people of Taiwan and it’s unlikely that the US would defend them if they instigated a conflict — but try telling that to the Chinese Communist Party. But Tsai Ing-wen has refused to acknowledge several important pieces of previous negotiation (particularly the 1992 consensus which is “there is one China but both sides can decide for themselves what that means). So there’s been another ratcheting up of tension and rhetoric. (It’s worth noting that Tsai Ing-wen was the chair of the Mainland Affairs Council during the period of increased ties 2000-2004. It’s also worth noting that this doesn’t seem to have helped much.)

And now you have a president-elect of the US ignoring decades of diplomatic consensus from both Taiwan and the Mainland, in a situation that’s already tense, after having already threatened to not come to the aid of US allies and to withdraw US forces based in East Asia (which are the primary defense of Taiwan.) So. Here we are.

Hopefully this will provide some context to whatever happens next.

Posted in International issues | 10 Comments

Open Thread and Link Farm, Broken Mirror Edition

sunday-in-the-park-redux

  1. Former congressional staffers have written a practical how-to guide, based on Tea Party tactics, for getting your members of Congress to resist Trump.
  2. That viral graph about millennials’ declining support for democracy? It’s very misleading. – The Washington Post
  3. Radiant.
    A 12-panel comic about women who painted radium onto watch faces.
  4. Sometimes There Are More Important Goals Than Civility – The Atlantic
    I like this article, but I disagree with the author implicitly accepting the right-wing framing that to speak about racism (etc) is inherently uncivil.
  5. Prejudice, “Political Correctness,” and the Normalization of Donald Trump – Medium
    Really excellent discussion of “political correctness” from Julia Serano.
  6. The Myopic Empiricism of the Minimum Wage, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty
    I think this is the best argument against the evidence from the “minimum wages do increase unemployment” camp I’ve seen. I’m not persuaded by it, but it was interesting.
  7. The FBI Is Investigating Me Because I Tweeted A Joke About Fake News | The Huffington Post
  8. Texas Publishes ‘Objective’ Abortion Informational Brochure That Cites False Cancer Link
  9. The Next Battles Over Voting Rights – The Atlantic
  10. Men do not enjoy debauchery of stag dos, study finds | Life and style | The Guardian
  11. How Often Do Women Rape Men? – The Atlantic And also, a collection of reader responses, as readers tell their own stories.
  12. A webpage for providing help to male survivors of sexual assault.
  13. Austerity policies are supported by the finance world, not by most mainstream economists.
  14. Congress has spent 15 months “investigating” Planned Parenthood using McCarthy-like tactics – Vox
    And, very similarly:
  15. The House science committee is worse than the Benghazi committee – Vox
    Republicans using Congress’ powers to harass climate scientists. And now that they have unfettered power, it’s likely this will get worse.
  16. Student protestors call “Boys Don’t Cry” director a bitch.
    This is gross. Criticizing her work and process is fair; but meanness and harassment – and the use of misogynistic slurs – are not.
  17. The Feminist Message of the Dudes in Force Awakens | The Mary Sue
  18. Lawyer: Reno Boy Shot by School Cop Had Been Bullied, Beaten – ABC News
  19. Giving poor people cash gets them to spend more on good stuff and less on tobacco and alcohol — Quartz
  20. Donald Trump is right: Free trade is broken, but his “fix” would only make things worse. — Quartz
  21. The awful history of the minimum wage.
    I think the minimum wage is a good policy – but many of its original proponents were racists.
  22. Ode to the Unsayable by Keith Leonard | Tupelo Quarterly
    I liked this poem a lot.
  23. The Defense of Liberty Can’t Do Without Identity Politics – Niskanen Center
  24. Hate’s Insidious Face: UW-Milwaukee and the “Alt-Right” | Overpass Light Brigade
    Milo took the time to single out a trans student for public sneering and mockery, and act that was not only cruel but dangerous. (The student happened to be in the auditorium at the time; anything could have happened if she’d been recognized.) Major content warning on that link for transphobia, obviously. There’s a movement to revoke his speaking invitation next month in Seattle; I hope they succeed.
  25. I really like (and perhaps somewhat resemble) the “Wells For Boys” commercial from SNL.

Posted in Link farms | 42 Comments

A New Essay of Mine Has Been Published: “The Lines That Racism and Antisemitism Draw: Reflections on White Jewish Intersectionality”

The piece is up at Unlikely Stories. Here’s an excerpt:

I fully recognize that because of my skin color I benefit from the continued white male dominance of our society, whether I want to or not. Nonetheless, I can’t help but also know that while slavery was being practiced in the United States, my great and great-great and great-great-great grandparents were figuring out how to survive the pogroms of Eastern Europe and were subjected to many of the same kinds of discrimination and persecution that Black people have experienced in the U.S. My history, in other words—our history, yours and mine, and even that Jewish academic’s—is not the history of Anglo-European white people. Neither has my experience growing up in the United States been one of unadulterated white privilege. The boys who called me Heeb and threw rocks at me when I walked in the neighborhood; who burglarized my home and carved Kike into the wood of my bedroom door; who, with chains and a baseball bat, backed me up against a wall on a not-deserted street in the town where I grew up to scream at the top of their lungs about the oven they said they had waiting for me and my family in their basement; the people who walked by when that was happening and did nothing–every single one of them was white, almost certainly Christian, and not one of them saw my white skin as demanding even the mildest form of racial solidarity.

It’s not that I feel the need to say, “I may look white but…” every time the question of white privilege comes up, but I have become very conscious of how rarely the contingent nature of my access to that privilege is acknowledged. Ironically, the white supremacists from whom Donald Trump has drawn so much support know exactly what I am talking about. They have always linked whiteness to Christianness, excluding Jews from whiteness by definition.

I hope you’ll consider reading the whole thing.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, antiracism, Race, racism and related issues, Racism | 9 Comments

SuperButch page 3!

superbutch_tone-003-b

On time for three weeks in a row! Whoooo!

Posted in SuperButch | 2 Comments

Open Thread and Link Farm, Not About Trump Edition

gauld-hat

  1. The battle over the Dakota Access Pipeline, explained – Vox
  2. Donate to the Standing Rock Medic + Healer Council
  3. It’s time to kill the $100 bill – The Washington Post and, by the same author (Larry Summers), India just made a big mistake with its currency ban – The Washington Post. An interesting issue that I’ve never thought about before – high-value currency fosters crime, but getting rid of it has to be done the right way.
  4. Harry Potter and the Conscience of a Liberal – The Baffler
    A bit of a long read, but interesting, about the moderate-liberal Rowling versus how Harry Potter’s more radical fans interpret the Potter books.
  5. Was Lee Harvey Oswald Just a Bad Shot? | Mother Jones
    Like Kevin, I have no clue if this is a reasonable argument or not. Anyone know?
  6. Please don’t try to get screenings of The Red Pill cancelled :: We Hunted The Mammoth
  7. The inexplicably ubiquitous phenomenon of ‘woods porn’ | Dangerous Minds
  8. Sex, death and aliens: a feminist watches ‘Arrival’ | language: a feminist guide
    Spoiler alert! But interesting stuff.
  9. Self-Driving Trucks Are a Canary in the Coal Mine | Mother Jones
  10. Big Farms Are Getting Bigger And Most Small Farms Aren’t Really Farms At All | FiveThirtyEight
  11. Whimsical Storybook Beasts and Birds Illustrated by Vorja Sánchez
    Those illustrations near the bottom of the post, of people affectionately holding monsters, are gorgeous.
  12. Oregonians: Do you want pavement or gravel & dust? You decide. – BlueOregon
  13. Right-Wing Media Misquoted a Gay University Official and Tried to Get Him Fired – WATCH
  14. 5 Huge Driverless Car Problems (Besides The Obvious Ones)
    Will driverless cars kill radio?
  15. A Brilliant Version of Pink Floyd’s ‘Another Brick in the Wall’ Played on a Traditional Korean Gayageum
  16. The North Pole is an insane 36 degrees warmer than normal as winter descends – The Washington Post
  17. Clickclickclickclick is sort of brilliant. I won’t describe it, just go check it out. Have the sound on.
  18. Street photographer’s fantastic series of “then and now” photos
    I’m oddly fascinated by this genre of photos.
  19. NASA Team Claims ‘Impossible’ Space Engine Works — Get the Facts
    “The long-standing catch is that the EmDrive seemingly defies the laws of classical physics, so even if it’s doing what the team claims, scientists still aren’t sure how the thing actually works.”

Posted in Link farms | 31 Comments

SuperButch page 2!

Posted on time two weeks in a row! We’ll see how long we can keep that up. :-)

Posted in SuperButch | Comments Off on SuperButch page 2!

Open Thread and Link Farm, Trump Edition

2015-03-06-the-dailies

I’ve divided this link farm into two categories: “Trump” and “Not Trump.” The idea is, those of us who need a break from reading about Trump and the election can scroll down to the “Not Trump” section.

UPDATE: In response to Kai’s suggestion, I’ve moved the non-Trump links to their own post. This post has Trump and election related links.

Trump:

  1. What A Difference 2 Percentage Points Makes | FiveThirtyEight
  2. J.D. Vance, the False Prophet of Blue America | New Republic
  3. The GOP’s Attack on Voting Rights Was the Most Under-Covered Story of 2016 | The Nation
  4. Why did some white Obama voters for Trump?
  5. In record numbers, Latinos voted overwhelmingly against Trump. We did the research. – The Washington Post
    I’m not saying this is settled fact. But I do think it’s important to remember that exit polls, like every poll, can be in error.
  6. Political commentators, remember to turn your clocks back – The Washington Post
  7. Why social media is terrible for multiethnic democracies – Vox
    Can we possibly trust each other when we all spend so much time in an online bubble that demonizes those who disagree?
  8. Blaming political correctness for Trump is like blaming the civil rights movement for Jim Crow | Lindy West | Opinion | The Guardian
  9. The Debate Link: The Media Does Not Get To Blame Hillary Clinton for their Own Choices of Coverage
  10. Don’t let Donald Trump’s antics distract you from what’s really important – Vox“He’s paying fraud fines and collecting bribes — and distracting you with Hamilton tweets.”
  11. Why the Electoral College is the absolute worst, explained – Vox
  12. The hard question isn’t why Clinton lost — it’s why Trump won – Vox
  13. Protecting Reproductive Autonomy in the Age of Trump: A Call to Fellow White Feminists
  14. Trump Backs Away From Idea Of New Clinton Email Investigation, Prosecution
  15. Trump just announced he’d abandon the TPP on day one. This is what happens next. – The Washington Post
    Basically, there will still be a big international trade agreement – but it’ll be led by China and exclude the US.
  16. Trump Formally Picks Two Net Neutrality Opponents To Head FCC Transition | Techdirt
  17. Trump’s infrastructure plan is not a simple public-private partnership plan, and won’t lead to much new investment | Economic Policy Institute
  18. The Debate Link: Who Benefits from a National Popular Vote?
    Good post about (or against) the Electoral College.
  19. White Nationalists on Trump’s Attorney General pick: ‘It’s like Christmas’
  20. Advice on contacting your representatives from a former Congressional staffer / Boing Boing
Posted in Link farms | 20 Comments

Goodbye to SEK

sek

Scott Erik Kaufman, a writer at Salon and other outlets, and a blogger at Acephalous and Lawyers Guns and Money, has passed away.

I was never lucky enough to meet SEK, as I thought of him. But he was an incredibly smart writer who I’ve linked countless times over the years, both for his political writing and for his comics analysis. Plus, he was hilarious. The world is better because he passed through it.

A lot of people are memorializing Scott on Facebook. There’s also a fundraiser to help his family with medical bills.

Posted in In the news | Comments Off on Goodbye to SEK

On Twitter, White Men With Followers Can Change Racist Behavior

trolls

This researcher programmed bots to fight racism on Twitter. It worked. – The Washington Post

The Post’s headline isn’t quite accurate. For one thing, they weren’t really “bots” (which to me suggests a program operating somewhat autonomously); they were puppet accounts, controlled directly by the researcher, Kevin Munger. From the study’s abstract:

I employ an intervention designed to reduce the use of anti-black racist slurs by white men on Twitter. I collect a sample of Twitter users who have harassed other users and use accounts I control (“bots”) to sanction the harassers. By varying the identity of the bots between in-group (white man) and out-group (black man) and by varying the number of Twitter followers each bot has, I find that subjects who were sanctioned by a high-follower white male significantly reduced their use of a racist slur.

The “sanction” was a tweet saying “Hey man, just remember there are real people who are hurt when you harass them with that kind of language”. Using this tweet, the high-follower white male puppets – and only those puppets – could improve behavior. Tellingly, the same tween from low-follower black male puppets led to increased use of racial slurs.

Surprisingly, anonymous twitter users were the ones whose behavior improved. Non-anonymous users did not reduce their slur usage in response to being criticized. (I would have guessed the opposite.)

It’s a shame that he didn’t use actual bots, since that would be very useful if it worked. However, a bot might have a hard time distinguishing harassing tweets from other tweets (such as a person complaining about having been called a slur).

I guess for the sake of reducing variables, he didn’t test responses to female identities. I hope someone does in a follow up study. It wouldn’t surprise me if female identities, like black identities, were less effective at changing behavior, but I’d be interested to see the numbers.

Posted in Language Politics, Race, racism and related issues, Racism | 3 Comments

Intellectual Turing Test Results: Silver Medal

scooby-demonshark-05-unmasked

So in Ozy’s Intellectual Turing Test, in which anti-social justice folk tried to pass themselves off as social justice folk, and vice-versa, I’m pleased to report I came in second, with 75% of readers believing I was anti-SJ. (In the comments of that link, there’s a little debate between me and a few other folks about gamergate.)

You can read my second place anti-social-justice entry here, if you’re curious, and my pro-social-justice entry here. Curiously, I tied for “most likely to be fake” among the SJ entries by SJ writers, but that may have been because I was in a hurry and wrote too briefly.

Daniel’s winning anti-SJ entry, which 85% believed was genuine anti-SJ, is here. Toggle’s pro-SJ entry, which an amazing 95% of people took to be genuine pro-SJ, is here.

Posted in Mind-blowing Miscellania and other Neat Stuff | 16 Comments