The Cornerstone

For all our nation’s many faults, there is one thing that our country got inarguably right, and that is freedom of religion. From the founding of the republic, religious tests for office have been banned, religious freedoms supported. The right to worship as one pleases, free from government coercion, is one of the cornerstone liberties of our nation, one equal to the freedom to speak and write as one pleases. By allowing all Americans to seek out God (or not) in the manner of their choosing, the Constitution has recognized that the freedom to profess one’s faith is, at its heart, one of the most important freedoms one can exercise.

A couple blocks from where the World Trade Center once stood, a Muslim organization wants to build a community center, which will include a mosque. This is not particularly noteworthy; America is full of churches and synagogues and temples and mosques, places for people of all different faiths to worship as they see fit. Mosques may be less common than churches, but they are places for the faithful to meet and seek God; America has always been a land where that is encouraged and supported.

But of course, those who destroyed the World Trade Center said they were acting in the name of Islam. And because some people are unable to separate the religion of terrorists with their religion in general, the idea that a mosque could be built within walking distance of the World Trade Center has been twisted into something it is not — a provocation.

The latest to advance this canard is former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who, tweeting in her typically malaprop-laden way, demanded that “peaceful Muslims” should “refudiate” the mosque, as if the mosque was not already being built by peaceful Muslims.

Whatever refudiate is supposed to mean, I hope that Muslims, Christians, Jews, atheists, Unitarians, agnostics, Hindus, and all Americans of good conscience reject Palin’s demand, and call it what it is: religious bigotry.

Some humans have twisted Islam to support killing. This is nothing new. Judaism, Christianity, and atheism alike have been twisted in support of violence, repression, and evil. But just the Centennial Olympic Park Bombing has not forced a moratorium on Christian churches in Atlanta, neither should the 9/11 attacks, however horrific, force a moratorium on mosques.

America by its very nature is supportive of people gathering where they choose, to worship or talk together as they wish, without government interference. A community center and mosque somewhat near Ground Zero is, in its own way, a very American thing. It is a place where people can express their own ideas, their own dreams, their own vision of God. It is, let me state, a vision I disagree with — I do not agree with most tenets of mainstream Islam. But that is neither here nor there. The freedom of Muslims to gather and worship is my freedom as a Unitarian to gather and worship, and your freedom as a Christian or Jew or Hindu or Buddhist to gather and worship — or your freedom as an atheist not to.

When political leaders start arguing that it is somehow wrong for Americans to gather together and worship as they choose, we lose something of that freedom. Thankfully, the people of New York City — the people who actually endured the most serious attacks in 2001 — seem to understand this far better than Sarah Palin, who was thousands of miles away at the time. And thankfully, my fellow Americans, who happen to be Muslim, will be able to worship as they see fit. As they well should.

Posted in Conservative zaniness, right-wingers, etc. | 1 Comment

On the Iroquois Lacrosse Team

If you haven’t heard (I hadn’t until Friday), the Iroquois lacrosse team has been barred from competing in the lacrosse world championship because the British government won’t accept their passports, which lack necessary security features. There’s a lot to unpack here, but I’ll just say two quick things and let you all discuss the rest in comments.

First off, in a world in which imperialism and colonialism lead to terrorism leads to heightened security, only wealthy and “acceptable” nations will enjoy reasonably unrestricted travel to and from their home countries (see article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights). See also the problem with Palestinian passports.

Secondly, as various news outlets have pointed out, the Iroquois created the sport that they are now barred from playing. Their sport is considered worthy of a world championship, but they themselves are not worthy of playing it – otherwise, the British government would be sympathetic enough to their situation to work toward a solution. I know this issue is complex, but could this be considered a form of cultural appropriation?

Posted in International issues | 5 Comments

Launch Pad, Day Six, Mike Brotherton Leaves Us with a Lecture

To read the rest of my launch pad posts, click here.

We spent the morning playing with images in an astronomy program that you can download for free if you, also, would like to spend your morning playing with images — SAOImage DS9.

Books:

Is Anyone Out There? by Frank Drake and Dava Sobel
The Space Environment: Implications for Spaceship Design by Alan C. Tribble

Distance measurements to other galaxies:

a) Cepheid method: using period/luminosity relationship for classical Cepheids. This is what’s classically done, but it’s hard to do outside the local group of galaxies.
b) More recently, we’ve been able to categorize Type Ia supernovae (collapse of accreting white dwarves in binary systems) to get distances to much more distant galaxies, but these don’t let you calculate within galaxies well.

These are standard candle methods. If you know the brightness of a standard candle, then you can calculate the distance. Continue reading

Posted in Whatever | 1 Comment

A Very Good Anti-Rape Ad from Scotland

It speaks for itself. It’s part of the Not Ever campaign.

Posted in Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | Comments Off on A Very Good Anti-Rape Ad from Scotland

Launch Pad, Day Five, Kevin Grazier on Extrasolar Planets

When we talked about planetary formation, we said Jovial planets were far out.

But when we started looking around the universe, the first planets we found were Jovial planets near stars. They’re called hot Jupiters. They’re puzzling. We don’t exactly know why they happen.

Currently our detection techniques are wildly biased toward big planets, and planets close to stars. As we improve our detection criteria, we are able to look for smaller, further planets.

Continue reading

Posted in Whatever | 1 Comment

Launch Pad, Day Five, Mike Brotherton on resources about exoplanets

This is one of the fastest changing fields, so you can’t stay up to date from text books.

Mike’s online resources on exoplanets, including videos and video lectures

There’s also a website with a list of all the different kinds of planets we’ve found, including (but not limited to) earth-like planets.

There are two more links Mike likes for cataloging planets and their properties:

exoplanets.org, basic catalog information, and sortable.

Also, the Extrasolar Planet Encyclopedia.

A text book will be out of date in a couple years, but these websites will stay up to date.

Also, there’s Lynette Cook’s space art of extrasolar planets. We see artist renderings because the way we detect the planets is with eclipses and little wiggles, which are great news stories, but hard to visualize.

Posted in Whatever | Comments Off on Launch Pad, Day Five, Mike Brotherton on resources about exoplanets

Launch Pad, Day Five: Kevin R. Grazier on Fermi and Drake

The Fermi paradox starts with discussions at the manhattan project. One day when extra-terrestrials came up, Fermi asked, “Where are they?” Continue reading

Posted in Whatever | Comments Off on Launch Pad, Day Five: Kevin R. Grazier on Fermi and Drake

Launch Pad, Day Five: Mike Brotherton on Summing Up Stars, and Moving on to Galaxies

To see the rest of my Launch Pad posts, click here.

OK, let’s get back to the destruction of the Earth. Continue reading

Posted in Whatever | 1 Comment

Follow-ups: Check-ins During Sex, and a critique of "24 Authoritarians"

A few links relevant to some recent posts:

I posted a compare-and-contrast between a feminist and feminist-critical view of checking for consent during sex. Sometimes “Alas” guest poster — and writer of one of the examples from my post — Clarisse Thorn posted an example of a “hot vanilla sex scene” including check-ins from the novel The Russian Concubine. Crank up the AC and go check it out.

Figleaf, another of my favorite sex bloggers, kindly links to my post and discusses the issues it brought up. If you’re not reading Figleaf’s blog, you really should be.

And in the comments of his/her blog Vagabond Scholar, Batocchio writes a great rebuttal to Davi’s “The 24 Types of Authoritarian” remix of my “24 Libertarians” cartoon. I hope Batocchio will forgive my quoting at length:

Like I said, it’s not bad, but judging it also depends on how seriously one takes the original and the revamp. It’s not really a “rebuttal,” since as Tristero’s put it, pretty much everything good about libertarianism already exists in liberalism, and liberals oppose both authoritarianism and the more idiotic strains of libertarianism. Many of the revamped panels express views already satirized in the original – and the revamped panels often don’t address the issues raised in the original. For instance, what is the libertarian solution for unsafe or poisonous food, products, pollution, etc.? (Raised by the “Caveat Emptor” panel in the original.) The “Nanny Stater” revamp attacks an outright ban on smoking, which doesn’t exist in America, while not addressing warning labels or secondhand smoke. What is the libertarian solution for exploitation and/or discrimination by “private” entities – or is there none? (Raised in part by the “Whitey” panel in the original, and the question Rand Paul didn’t want to answer.) Do you believe that taxation is theft, as the revamp suggests in several panels, or only taxation that relates to social spending, basic prosperity and public goods/works? (Raised by “The Island” in the original, among others.)

Some self-described libertarians, such as Glenn Reynolds, are authoritarians, and many others are pretty garden variety conservatives who like to be seen as independents, and independent thinkers. Others exist who are more sincere. Many adore Ayn Rand, some accept part of her views, and a small number reject her. (Then there’s the breakdown on Glenn Beck and Jonah Goldberg.) The more thoughtful view Hayek as a useful gadfly in small doses, even he got many important issues “stunningly wrong” (but was nonetheless more liberal than many of his devotees). If you have an essay/post describing your world view/political philosophy, feel free to link it and I’ll try to check it out. But Michael Tomasky does a pretty good job of explaining the limited value – and the extreme limitations – of libertarianism as it’s usually practiced. There’s also Belle Waring’s classic “If Wishes Were Horses, Beggars Would Ride — A Pony!” and “Libertarian Paradise” video. Thanks for stopping by.

Posted in Cartooning & comics, crossposted on TADA, Sex | 3 Comments

Launch Pad, Day Four (posted late), Kevin R. Grazier on Science in Science Fiction

To see the rest of my Launch Pad posts, click here.

Man, I didn’t realize how long these were. I pasted the last one into word to check something and it was and a half pages long.

The back of the envelope calculation–scribbling down approximations in an equation and working it out to see if your guessed answer puts you in the right general range of where you should be. He cites an example from Battlestar Gallactica where he did some rough math to check to see whether someone would survive a hole being blasted into her ship. We’re working out the math, I guess, but the point is more that this kind of rough calculation can serve the purposes of fiction where we don’t really need specific numbers to see if something we want to do is possible. Continue reading

Posted in Whatever | 3 Comments