Cartoon: The 24 Types of Libertarian

Click on the cartoon to see it bigger. (Much more legible that way.)

Script:

TITLE: The 24 Types of Libertarian
Balding white guy: no fair oversimplifying our simplistic philosophy!

Caption: NAIVE
Happy guy with goatee: if the government would DISAPPEAR, everyone would act SENSIBLY and we’d all be able to get ALONG!

Caption: PETULANT
Annoyed guy with necktie: libertarians don’t win elections because we’re too PURE and GOOD!

Caption: TOO SMART FOR SCIENCE
Guy with small face on large head: OBVIOUSLY, climate scientists made up global warming. because they’re SOCIALISTS.

Caption: ARROGANT
Smiling woman with “explaining hands”: CLEARLY you’ve never READ the evidence.

Caption: LEFT-WING
Woman in distance, yelling to be heard: I’m HERE! i EXIST! i’m against the goverment AND corporations! why does everyone always ignore me?

Caption: DENIAL-ICAN
Annoyed guy with shaved head and cigarette: just because i’ve voted republican every election for 20 years is no reason to call me a republican!

Caption: MORE LIBERTARIAN THAN THOU
Grinning man with goatee and ponytail: we should PRIVATIZE the police! people who can’t afford to pay the cops won’t have anything worth stealing, anyway.

Caption: TERRIFIED
Frightened, crouching man wearing combat fatigue pants: BIG GOVERNMENT is coming! thank GALT i’ve stockpiled so much AMMO!

Caption: TOO MUCH HEINLEIN
Black guy making big arm gestures: lazarus long said that all men are created UNEQUAL. it’s not MY fault i’m SMARTER than poor people!

Caption: THE ISLAND
Older man in colorful vest and button-up shirt, holding a piece of paper in one hand. An arrow caption pointed at the piece of paper says “social security check.” Two more arrow captions, pointed at the man, say “Public school grad” and “drives on public roads.”
Man: no one ever gave ME anything! so don’t force ME to give to others!

Caption: CREEPY
Man in shadows, wearing sunglasses: why should i have to go all the way to THAILAND to have sex with a child prostitute?

Caption: SELECTIVELY FRUGAL
Man with worry lines on forehead: the deficit is too HIGH to AFFORD anything for the poor! OR the environment! …but don’t let that stand in the way of my tax cut.

Caption: NEPOTIST
as the latest of a LONG line of wealthy pundits, i KNOW success is created by MERIT!

Caption: THE APOSTLE
Exalted guy with hands together as if praying: we just need to TRUST that the MAGIC of the MARKET will make everything work out! that’s why it’s MAGIC!

Caption: ATLAS
Manically grinning man with messy hair, sitting with his hands on his computer keyboard: someday me and my friends will QUIT updating our blogs and THE ECONOMY WILL COLLAPSE!

Caption: CONSISTENT
Intense, woodpecker-looking man: stocks were UP, so i said: CUT TAXES! then stocks went down, so i said: CUT TAXES! i just stubbed my toe! CUT TAXES!

Caption: THE HISTORIAN
Man with big glasses and big grin, reading book: I’ve read summaries of the federalist papers MANY times, so I KNOW the framers share my views about EVERYTHING!

Caption: GUNNER JOE
Man holding two handguns up: there are only TWO kinds of people in the world: GUN OWNERS and SHEEP! and sheep aren’t really people.

Caption: BIZARRELY HYPOCRITICAL
Man with arms crossed: government should stay OUT of our personal lives! except for women’s uteruses, where government BELONGS!

Caption: BRIEFLY TEMPTING
Balding man in hoodie: the war on drugs is RIDICULOUS! end police abuse! #%^@! the war!

Caption: WHITEY
Balding man in black vest and black tie: i DO think it’s a TERRIBLE affront to liberty if restaurants HAVE to serve blacks! how is THAT racist?

Caption: MISSIONARY
Man holding out copy of Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged,” with wide eyes and bags under his eyes:YOU MUST READ THIS!

Caption: CAVEAT EMPTOR
Cheerful man about to eat hot dog: no need for a nanny state! i can test my OWN food for botulism!

Caption: STONED
Words coming up from somewhere below the bottom of the panel: hee hee hee

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Conservative zaniness, right-wingers, etc., crossposted on TADA, Economics and the like, Libertarianism | 70 Comments

Fragments of Evolving Manhood: Do You Like Your Body 3 (Preliminary Notes On the Expendability of the Foreskin)

In 1834, Sylvester Graham—inventor of the cracker that continues to bear his name—published a book called A Lecture to Young Men, in which he warned that masturbation would transform a boy who practiced it regularly into:

a wretched transgressor [who] sinks into a miserable fatuity, and finally becomes a confirmed and degraded idiot, whose deeply sunken and vacant, glossy eye, and livid shrivelled [sic] countenance, and ulcerous, toothless gums, and fetid breath, and feeble broken voice, and emaciated and dwarfish and crooked body, and almost hairless head—covered perhaps with suppurating blisters and running sores—denote a premature old age, a blighted body—and a ruined soul! (Quoted in Kimmel)

Graham, who was one of the most popular and successful of the non-medical writers on this subject, believed the male body was simply not equipped to handle “the convulsive paroxysms attending venereal indulgence”—read: ejaculation—and so even married men, whose sexual activity with their wives was certainly beyond the moral reproach usually associated with masturbation, had to be very careful not to overindulge–which for Graham meant more than once a month. Otherwise, they risked

Languor, lassitude, muscular relaxation, general debility and heaviness, depression of spirits, loss of appetite, indigestion, faintness and sinking at the pit of the stomach, increased susceptibilities of the skin and lungs to all the atmospheric changes, feebleness of circulation, chilliness, head-ache, melancholy, hypochondria, hysterics, feebleness of all the senses, impaired vision, loss of sight, weakness of the lungs, nervous cough, pulmonary consumption, disorders of the liver and kidneys, urinary difficulties, disorders of the genital organs, weakness of the brain, loss of memory, epilepsy, insanity, apoplexy—and extreme feebleness and early death of offspring.… (Quoted in Kimmel)

Graham recommended dietary measures, specifically his crackers, to combat men’s temptation to pleasure. J. H. Kellogg, whose flakes were also originally developed and marketed as an anaphrodisiac, didn’t stop with food. In Plain Facts for Old and Young, published in 1888, Kellogg recommended a series of home remedies for masturbation, including bandaging a boy’s penis, covering it with a cage and tying the boy’s hands at night when he went to sleep. For particularly difficult cases, Kellogg recommended circumcision “without administering an anaesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if connected with the idea of punishment” (Quoted in Kimmel). Nor was Kellogg the only expert to suggest that pain was the best countermeasure to male masturbation. Other writers seemed to compete with each other to see who could come up with the cruelest form of intervention. Recommendations included applying leeches, punching a hole in the foreskin and inserting a metal ring, cutting the foreskin with jagged-edge scissors and applying a hot iron to a boy’s genitals.
Continue reading

Posted in Gender and the Body | 29 Comments

Quote: Close buttons in elevators

In most elevators, at least in any built or installed since the early nineties, the door-close button doesn’t work. It is there mainly to make you think it works. (It does work if, say, a fireman needs to take control. But you need a key, and a fire, to do that.) Once you know this, it can be illuminating to watch people compulsively press the door-close button. That the door eventually closes reinforces their belief in the button’s power. It’s a little like prayer. Elevator design is rooted in deception—to disguise not only the bare fact of the box hanging by ropes but also the tethering of tenants to a system over which they have no command.

Nick Paumgarten: Up and Then Down (Via and via.)

Posted in Mind-blowing Miscellania and other Neat Stuff | 12 Comments

A huge long list of comics recommendations for an 11-year-old girl, by Rachel Edidin

[My awesome friend Rachel Edidin tweeted that she had “Just sent someone a huge long list of comics recommendations for her 11-year-old daughter.” Of course, I immediately asked her if I could post the list here. Thanks, Rachel!

Also, I added links. Where Rachel recommended a series of books I linked to the first in the series. Or just to a random choice, if the series didn’t have any apparent order. –Amp]

The following is a list I compiled casually–mostly off the top of my head, which is my excuse for many of the no doubt numerous omissions (Sock Monkey! How could I have forgotten Sock Monkey?!)–for an acquaintance who asked me to recommend comics for her eleven-year-old daughter. As I mention below, I wasn’t shooting for a comprehensive list, nor even a super thorough one: the titles I mentioned are, for the most part, ones that I’ve read and enjoyed and that I feel comfortable recommending with little or no reservation to an eleven-year-old (and her parents). The list is also tailored somewhat to the interests of this particular eleven-year-old, who likes adventure and space but isn’t particularly interested in fairies, romance, or soap-opera angst.

In short: Your mileage will vary.

The other major considerations that went into the list were accessibility–I wanted to include books she was likely to be able to find at her school or local public library–and content–no explicit sex or graphic violence, and a hashmark to indicate books I thought Mom might want to review before passing them along to her daughter (not just based on sex and violence–for example, I marked Tintin because I’d balk at giving it to a kid without a conversation or two about racism and colonialism; and The Rabbi’s Cat because I consider it to be generally a more grown-up book). I’ve deliberately erred on the side of caution in terms of content–I grew up with almost no restrictions on reading material, and at eleven I was cheerfully reading Marge Piercey, Angela Carter, and Tom Robbins, so I’m not entirely comfortable gauging what constitutes age-appropriate material. Here, for the most part, I’ve omitted books that I might recommend only to specific eleven-year-olds. I struggled over whether to include Street Angel and Sparks but ultimately decided to keep them on the list, mostly because of how deeply I identify with both books and how much I know I would have loved them as an eleven-year-old. Others of the titles on the list–most notably, The Rabbi’s Cat and some of the G. T. Labs books–might skew older for more academic reasons, but I’d consider them well within the capacity and interest of many smart eleven-year-olds.

You’ll also notice a dearth of licensed comics and adaptations (although I’ll be the first to admit that there are some splendid ones out there). There are a couple reasons for this. First, extensive established continuity is a major turn-off for me when I’m trying something out for the first time (this is the same reason the only ongoing superhero comics you’ll see on the list are ones whose early arcs can stand alone). Second, I’m a huge format nerd: I like the idea of introducing newcomers to comics that they will see first and foremost as *comics* rather than immediately associating them with works in other media.

* * *

* indicates how-to books about making comics.
# indicates books you should review before giving them to your dd. No explicit sex or super-graphic violence, but some adult themes. I’ve probably used this more liberally than is technically called for, but better safe than sorry.

In Print
Hereville, by Barry Deutsch (the hardcover will be out in fall)
American Born Chinese, by Gene Luen Yang (If her school library doesn’t have this, it’s worth writing a stern letter about. American Born Chinese is one of the best YA graphic novels ever written, and was the first YA comic to be picked as a National Book Award finalist.)
*Drawing Comics Is Easy (Except When It’s Hard), by Alexa Kitchen
Polly and the Pirates, by Ted Naifeh
Courtney Crumrin (series; four volumes so far), by Ted Naifeh
Usagi Yojimbo, by Stan Sakai
The Courageous Princess, by Rod Espinoza
Groo, by Sergio Aragonés
Supergirl: Cosmic Adventures in the 8th Grade, by Landry Q. Walker and Eric Jones
Banana Sunday, by Colleen Coover
#The Adventures of Tintin, by Hergé (you might want to skim some of these for content; they’re older and very much products of their era in terms of their handling of race, etc. That said, I grew up on them and turned out okay. Smiley )
Ultimate Spider-Man (vol. 1-3), by Brian Bendis et. al.
Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane, by Sean McKeever et. al.
#Street Angel, by Brian Maruca and Jim Rugg (definitely read this one first. It’s cartoony, but there are also some adult themes and violence)
#Castle Waiting, by Linda Medley (It’s been a long time since I’ve read this, so I don’t feel entirely comfortable vouching for the content) ((I read this recently, and loved it, and vouch for the content. –Amp.))
#Hopeless Savages, by Jen Van Meter (I haven’t read this in a while; it *might* be a bit mature. Review first.)
#Sparks, by Lawrence Marvit (I think I’m on my fourth or fifth copy of this; I keep giving them away. It’s one of my favorite comics. Might be slightly better suited to a slightly older reader, but I’d have loved it at eleven, so.)
#Runaways, by Brian K. Vaughn et. al.
#Persepolis, by Marjane Satrapi
#The Rabbi’s Cat, by Joann Sfar (Not really a YA book persay, but I would have devoured it as a kid. Gorgeous, fantastic)
Emily and the Intergalactic Lemonade Stand, by Ian Smith and Tyson Smith (Might skew a tad bit young, but it’s a LOT of fun)
Anything by Hope Larson
Anything by Raina Telgemeier
Anything by Jim Ottaviani / G.T. Labs (Particularly Two-Fisted Science and Dignifying Science)

Online
Butterfly, by Dean Trippe and Jemma Salume
Lunchbox Funnies (all-ages webcomics network)
Rice Boy and Order of Tales, by Evan Dahm
Minus, by Ryan Armand

Books I Haven’t Read But Which Come Highly Recommended by Librarians, Teachers, and Other YA Comics Fans I Trust (no content markers, since I’m not personally familiar with the books)
Skim, by Mariko Tamaki and Jillian Tamaki
Rapunzel’s Revenge, by Shannon Hale, Dean Hale, and Nathan Hale
Bone, by Jeff Smith
*Adventures in Cartooning, by James Sturm et. al.
Sidekicks, by J. Torres et. al.
The War at Ellesmere, by Faith Erin Hicks
Zombies Calling, by Faith Erin Hicks
I Kill Giants, by Joe Kelly and J.M. Ken Nimura
Sardine In Outer Space, by Emmanuel Guibert and Joann Sfar

…And A Special One-Item List of Really Fantastic YA-Friendly Fantasy Graphic Novels I’m Editing Which Will Be Out in 2011:
The Last Dragon, by Jane Yolen and Rebecca Guay

Posted in Cartooning & comics | 19 Comments

Download "Eros, Philia, Agape" and "A Memory of Wind" To Your E-Reader For Free

If you have an e-reader of some variety, you might want to download Eros, Philia, Agape — the Hugo-nominated story by our own Mandolin (aka Rachel Swirsky) — and A Memory of Wind — the Nebula-nominated story, also by Mandolin — this month. That’s because both stories are available all this month for free.

A Memory of Wind: Kindle | Sony Ebook | B&N Nook

Eros, Philia, Agape: Kindle | Sony Ebook | B&N Nook

They are also available on the ipad.

For those of you who haven’t read them yet, I can tell you that both stories are excellent, and their nominations were entirely deserved.

These are only free for the rest of June; in July, these downloads will cost $1 each. So download them now, and tell your e-reader-owning friends, too.

By the way, if you don’t own an e-reader (Luddite!), you can also find the stories on Tor’s website: A Memory of Wind, and Eros, Philia, Agape.

Posted in About the Bloggers, Mandolin's fiction & poems | 5 Comments

Women and Men

So there’s an ad campaign out there that’s been slowly driving me…well, I’d say it’s driving me to drink, but actually, it’s doing quite the opposite. I guess it’s driving me to sobriety.

The ad campaign is in support of Miller Lite, and its message is simple. If you drink the wrong light beer, you may as well be a woman, and that’s bad. Especially as far as women are concerned.

See? If you’re drinking Bud Light, you’re just a skirt-wearing pansy. And who’s going to call you out for being less than a man? That’s right, the hot female bartender. Because people who wear skirts suck.

And don’t even get me started on back tattoos:

Or — God forbid — carry-alls:

You see? If you drink the wrong kind of beer, you’re just a weak, pathetic woman. And you know who hates women? Women.

Over at Manvertised, Peter Alilunas gets to the heart of the message these ads are conveying:

There is clearly a belief within marketing firms such as Draftfcb that the most efficient way to sell products to men is through a three-step process: 1) Aggressively gender-differentiate them; 2) Pounce on that constructed differentiation and make it an unforgivable cultural transgression to deny or ignore the code of “appropriate” masculinity offered by the product; 3) Create an aura of “safety” around the correct use of the product that will deliver the consumer from the anxiety.

Yet there’s a fourth element, too, which might be the most calculating and effective in the long-term Manvertising strategy: retain the tension by illustrating that it can never quite disappear. Note how the “punchline” of both commercials in the new campaign both end with the protagonist still somewhat unable to escape his gendered mistake. To me, this narrative move perfectly encapsulates how this genre is able to stay salient. Much as the immense body of scholarship on gender has shown, the “appropriate” masculinity is an unattainable mythology. It does not exist, and cannot, and any effort to obtain it will only result in the exposure of its slippery impossibility.

The brilliance of the genre is in the way it plays on this phenomenon, always locating “appropriate” masculinity just out of reach — always putting the protagonist’s friends in the role of anxious jesters, mocking the protagonist even after he has succumbed to conformity. We could easily shift the narrative lens to any of them (just as we could in any Manvertising commercial) and discover, immediately, the impossibility of their quest, too.

This is central to the ad campaign, as it sets up and preys on concerns about masculinity, and demands an extreme, impossible level of gender conformity — but at least it holds out hope that if you just order the right beer, you can get closer to “right.”

But I think it’s worth noting the other message of these ads, and that is simply that women suck. Wearing a skirt, carrying a purse, having a back tattoo — these are things women do, and therefore, by definition, they are lesser things than what men do.

And that’s what drives me crazy about these ads. As usual for ads that promote gender conformity, they don’t just offend one gender or the other; they offend both, obscenely.

Posted in Feminism, sexism, etc, Media criticism, Sexism hurts men | 21 Comments

The Jake Baker Case

Richard’s story in this post reminds me of is the Jake Baker case, in which a male student posted an explicit fantasy about raping and murdering a female classmate, and posted the story on Usenet, signing his own name. The story also named and described the student Baker fantasized about murdering.

After Baker’s story was noticed, the authorities searched his computer and found emails he was exchanging with a Canadian man he met online. In the emails, the two men were either planning to work together to carry out their rape/murder fantasies in real life, or (as Baker claimed) they were role-playing. Or, alternatively, Baker was role-playing but the man he was corresponding with was serious).

Baker was expelled from the university and charged with conspiracy to commit murder, but was found not guilty at trial. Several civil liberties organizations objected to Baker’s treatment, saying he had a free speech right to write his stories and exchange emails about fantasies.

I agreed with Baker’s expulsion.

1) Publicly posting a rape/murder fantasy about another student, including her name and description, isn’t behavior that colleges should tolerate. In a very real way, publishing the story was an attack on his fellow student.

2) It would have been unreasonable to expect the target of Baker’s fantasy to continue attending the same school as Baker; but if she and Baker can’t attend the same school, then Baker, as the one who created the situation, should be the one to go.

3) The University had to take a risk. If they expelled Jake Baker, they risked expelling a student who actually never would have physically harmed anyone, and was guilty mainly of having horrible fantasies. If they hadn’t expelled Jake Baker, they risked that eventually Baker’s fantasies would have turned into real-world attacks on female students. Given that choice, it’s better to risk expelling Baker than to risk not expelling Baker.

Since this case took place 15 years ago, it might seem strange to post about it now. It still feels relevant to me because the Jake Baker case was what convinced me to stop being a free speech absolutist.

Posted in Free speech, censorship, copyright law, etc., Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | 16 Comments

Octavia Butler, initiated into the Science Fiction Hall of Fame

Octavia Butler is being inducted into the science fiction hall of fame, an honor richly deserved by the author of Blood Child, Lilith’s Brood, and Parable of the Sower, not to mention her other rich and varied work.

The Carl Brandon society is hosting a celebration in her honor in Seattle:

CARL BRANDON SOCIETY CELEBRATES OCTAVIA E. BUTLER’S HALL OF FAME INDUCTION

On Saturday, June 26, the Carl Brandon Society is hosting a party in honor of Octavia E. Butler’s induction into the Science Fiction Hall of Fame. The celebration begins at 8 p.m. at the Lake Union Courtyard Marriott in Seattle. Light refreshments and a no-host bar will be provided.

Octavia E. Butler (1947 – 2006), winner of the MacArthur “Genius” Award and numerous others, was one of the first African American women to gain prominence as a science fiction writer. The Carl Brandon Society, a nonprofit organization, administers the Octavia E. Butler Memorial Scholarship Fund, and supports the representation of people of color in the fantastic genres through programs such as its literary awards and discussion groups. More information is available at www.carlbrandon.org.

I wish I could attend! Any of you who do, have fun.

If you haven’t read any of Octavia’s work, do yourself a favor and seek out her stories and her books. They are amazing.

Posted in Whatever | 8 Comments

Fragments of Evolving Manhood: Do You Like Your Body? – 2

At eleven, I am the youngest of eight boys lined up along one row of lockers in the otherwise empty men’s room at the swimming pool to which the day camp we are attending takes us every other day. Normally, I’d be changing with boys my own age, but a mix-up back at the camp grounds landed me on the bus with these guys, who are all twelve and thirteen. I turn my back to them to hide the erection that has taken hold of my body and which I am having difficulty fitting into my bathing suit. Despite my best efforts to remain inconspicuous, however, my movements attract their attention and one of them sneaks up behind me and looks over my shoulder. “Hey,” his voice rings out metallically, “look at the size of Newman’s boner!”

Like a pack of dogs that has been thrown a single piece of meat, the group surrounds me in a tight circle, while I stand there not moving, body pointing me into the air above the middle of the room, wishing I could vanish, that it would vanish, but no matter how much I will it, the damned thing will not go down.

“What are you, a homo!?”

“Other guys’ dicks must turn him on!”

“Wanna suck mine, queer!?”

The taunts continue for what seems like hours, though it is probably only a few minutes, and then the head counselor comes in and ushers us all out to the pool. I can’t believe he didn’t hear what the other boys were saying, but he acts as if he didn’t, barely looking at me as he shows me where the boys in my group have spread their towels.

Later that evening, while I’m getting ready for bed, I stand naked before the full-length mirror inside my door and tuck my penis out of sight between my legs. I’m not trying to imagine myself as a girl, but I am intrigued by the possibility of a body that does not have erections.

///

When I was a teenager, I read in Penthouse magazine a letter–I think it was in Xavier Hollander’s “Happy Hooker” column–in which a woman described how she and a friend took revenge on a man who’d tried to rape the friend. The writer of the letter arranged to meet the man at a disco, invited him to her apartment, and seduced him into being tied, spread-eagled, to her bed. Then the woman’s friend, who’d been waiting in another room, came in, and the two women teased the man sexually until he was begging them for release. In response, the women took out a razor and shaving cream, telling him that, if he ejaculated while they rubbed his penis, they would shave all the hair from his body. The letter went on to describe in great detail first the man’s pleading with them not to do it and then his efforts to keep himself from coming while the women took turns masturbating him. Finally, of course, he came, and the women shaved him, threatening to slice off his testicles if he didn’t lay still.

Now, of course, I understand not only that the letter might have been, that it most probably was, a complete fabrication, even that it might even have been written by a man, but also, assuming for the sake of argument that the events it relates actually happened, the fact that is was published in Penthouse means that its sole purpose was to feed, to shape and even to create the desires and fantasies of the boys and men like me who read the magazine. At the time, though, I read the letter naively, assuming it to be true–why, after all, would someone publish a letter that wasn’t?–and so it was clear to me that it described a rape. The woman who ostensibly wrote it didn’t present what she and her friend did to the man as anything else—except to make clear that it was motivated by revenge—and she never implied that he enjoyed it. Nonetheless, my sexual imagination was drawn to the story. For months, for years afterward, I fantasized about women tying me to a bed and creating in my flesh an arousal so all-encompassing that I too would be willing to beg for release. Yet no matter how hard I tried to imagine a conclusion other than the one in the letter, I always ended up the victim of some version of the revenge the writer and her friend took, and what I remember most about this now is how fully this ending short-circuited the fantasy, and when I say “fully short-circuited,” I mean fully and completely. If I was masturbating, I found it very hard to continue; if I was simply daydreaming, I’d have to stop and think of something else, not because I felt and was trying to avoid, or deny, the guilty, shameful pleasure that often accompanies “forbidden fantasies,” but rather because I was scared. I simply did not trust the women I imagined not to turn into the women described in the letter. More than that, though, I identified with their victim’s experience of having the pleasures of his body turned against him, and the knowledge that I could be shamed just as he had been shamed taught me only one thing: my body was always the potential weapon of my own defeat.

///

We’re sitting in a circle in a remedial composition class that I’m teaching. The students are reading aloud and commenting on fables they’ve written over the weekend. The prose is awkward and ungrammatical, though I am impressed with the imaginative effort some of my students have made. There’s a modernized version of Little Red Riding Hood, set in an upper class neighborhood with the most sought-after senior boy in the local high school taking the part of the wolf. There’s also a gender-reversed Sleeping Beauty, in which Princess Charming turns out to be the homeless woman who sleeps in the park. I’m about to move on to the next part of the lesson when Walter, who’d announced when we began that he wasn’t going to read what he’d written, asks whether I’d like to hear his story. Of course I say yes.

Walter’s narrative takes place in the future and involves a very powerful drug dealer whose organization has been infiltrated by a top female narcotics agent posing as a prostitute. When the dealer’s lover, who also works for him as a prostitute, learns that the operation has been compromised, she tells him immediately. Armed with this information, the dealer exposes the spy and has her tortured slowly and painfully to death. To express his gratitude, he takes his lover to bed, giving her, in Walter’s words, “the literal fuck of her life, pounding away until she was no longer breathing.” The story ends with a description of the lavish funeral the dealer gives her.

When Walter finishes reading, he looks around the circle with a sarcastic and self-satisfied grin. The rest of the class is silent, no one except me willing to meet his eyes, and I’m hoping that one of his peers will be the first to speak, condemning what he’s written not in the voice of authority—which my voice would inevitably be—but in the voice of his own community. A minute passes before I realize that his classmates don’t intend to respond, and so I call on a few students by name, male and female, to see if I can draw them out. The men all say that the story is “sick,” while the women tell me they think it’s not even worth responding to. Yet it has to be responded to, and so I ask Walter if he really believes that fucking a woman to death could be an expression of gratitude.

“Of course,” he says, “For the woman it’s the ultimate fulfillment, and for the man it’s the ultimate proof.”

“Of what?”

“Of manhood,” he responds, “Women would take tickets and stand in line to be with a man powerful enough to fuck them like that.” He says these words with a conviction I at first can’t think how to argue with, but then I wonder aloud if he would include his girlfriend or his future wife in that line of women.

“I’m not talking,” he says, “about doing this to someone I love. I’m talking about the pieces of trash you can pick up at the local bar, the sluts who give it away, the hookers who do it for money, women who are asking for it.”

“Why,” I ask, “do they deserve to be murdered?”

“They’re whores,” he responds, “No one cares about them.”

I take a different tack, asking him if he’s ever killed anything other than an insect. When he says no, I ask him if he realizes that he’s talking about using his own body, his penis specifically, as a murder weapon and that the murder he says he would like to commit is not simply one in which his victim dies in his arms, but is also one in which he would feel against his own flesh the internal process of her dying.

“Yes, I do,” he says.

Trying again, I go back to what he said about not wanting to fuck to death a woman he loves and ask if he makes a distinction between the sex he would have for pleasure with that woman and the power he says he would like to experience of using sex to kill. Walter looks at me with a mixture of pity and contempt. “Power,” he says, “is pleasure.”

Class ends. As I’m putting my papers in my briefcase, Walter steps up to my desk. “Now that everyone else is gone,” he says, his voice full of conspiratorial camaraderie, “be honest. Wouldn’t it feel great to take some slut to a hotel and then meet your buddies later and tell them you’d killed her with your dick?”

“No,” is all I can think to say.

“Sure, maybe now that you’re older and you can’t get it up like you used to–I was in my thirties–but when you were younger, when you were an undergraduate, wasn’t fucking something you did so you could share it with your buddies, and impress them, and wouldn’t they have worshipped you if you told them you’d fucked someone to death?”

I decide that monosyllabic answers are the best way to deal with this line of questioning. “No,” I tell him again.

Walter waits a few seconds for me to say more. When I don’t, he mutters something under his breath of which I think I hear the words pathetic and excuse. Then he walks out, and it’s the last I see or hear of him until I get my final roster with a W for withdrawal next to his name. Of course there are many reasons why he might have had to withdraw from the class, but it’s hard for me not to think he did so because I wasn’t “man enough” to be his teacher.

///

In an episode of the long-and-deservedly-defunct TV series She-Wolf Of London, a very old man is brought into the hospital dying of unknown causes. The doctor on duty believes the old man is either senile or insane because he keeps insisting he is actually twenty-seven years old and that he was turned into an old man by a woman. As the doctor leaves, he orders a nurse to give the old man a sedative. Once the nurse and the old man are alone, however, she unzips her uniform to reveal black-lace lingerie, and the old man recognizes her as the woman who has aged him—one of what the viewers will later learn is a group of succubae who have opened an escort service in England’s capital city. As the old man looks on in helpless terror, the succubus begins to climb into the hospital bed where he is laying. As she does so, she reminds him in the voice of a predator enjoying the powerlessness of its prey that all he has to do is not want her and he will be able to live. All he has to do, in other words, is not have an erection and she will not be able to fuck him to death.

Cross-posted on It’s All Connected.

Posted in Gender and the Body, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | 38 Comments

Anti WLS Cartoon in progress: comments, please?

Which version do you think is best? And any other comments are welcome. Except for weight-loss advocacy or WLS advocacy — take that somewhere else, please.

(I’m especially interested in comments and suggestions from other fat-positive and anti-WLS folks.)

VERSION A:

VERSION B:

VERSION C:

Thanks!

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Fat, fat and more fat | 45 Comments