She genuinely wanted to know…

Coming from New Zealand where we have a public health system (with problems, but it exists), my reaction to a lot of the proposals has been: “Huh” or “that’s so fucked up” or “that’s making things better than they are now?”

I’m not an incrementalist, But I thought I understood why people did support the bill. I thought that the trade-off was about ensuring that people could get coverage. I thought the mandate (which seems to me like a rort for the insurance companies) was part of the policy because of the requirement that insurance companies cover people with pre-existing conditions. I thought the ability of people

But then I discovered that that although insurance companies have to cover people with pre-existing conditions, there will be no limit on how much extra they charge because of those pre-existing conditions.

If insurance companies can charge what they like for people with pre-existing conditions, and people have to buy health insurance. Isn’t that basically an penalty payment on having an impairment, a body, or a life, that the insurance company deems non-standard?

Posted in Whatever | 45 Comments

Disgusting

Before I begin this post, let me apologize for the editorial cartoon that I am posting in it. This post is about the cartoon, and so the image must be posted; that said, I am so disgusted by the image that I am uncomfortable putting it ahead of this disclaimer.

Quite simply, this political cartoon is vile. It is racist. It is sexist. It may be triggering. It is indefensible. And it is everything that is wrong with the right today. I am sorry I am showing it to you, but I think that it needs to be distributed. People need to actually see what passes for discussion on the right — and why the plaintive pleas that the tea party movement is totally not racist are, flatly, lies.

All right. Here is the image. If you do not wish to see it, please, click away now.

For the image viewing impaired, a description: Lady Liberty sits on a bed in the background, half-dressed, apparently having been raped. In the foreground, Barack Obama pulls a shirt on, and says, “Oh, shut up and stop your whining. You gave all the consent I’ll ever need Nov 2008. [sic] Get yourself cleaned up. I’ll be back — CapNTrade, Immigration, whatever. And I’ll bring ‘friends.'”

This political cartoon by Darleen Click appeared on the website Protein Wisdom — a long-standing cesspool of the right. Obama, of course, is depicted as a rapist, having defiled America by forcing health care on us — and now, he’s threatening to come back to gang-rape America some more.

The image is troubling on two fronts. First, portraying Obama as a rapist is playing on a trope as old as slavery — that African American men are lying in wait to defile good, white women. Lynching became acceptable in the South because it was done in “defense” of whites who wanted to keep their race “pure.” The myth of black sexual aggression and the poor white women who were forced to live in fear of it has been passed down from generation to generation — and it still endures to this day, though we’ve stopped lynching and instead moved on to telling women not to go out alone in the “bad” part of town.

There is, quite simply, no way to portray Obama as a rapist that does not play into this trope; just like drawing Obama as a chimpanzee, the image is ipso facto racist; nobody with the slightest understanding of the troubled history of American race relations would even consider drawing it without understanding that.

The fact that you and I understand this, of course, makes us the real racists; Click herself thinks she was totally justified. In a postscript to the cartoon, she lashes out at critics:

Oh I know I’m going to get called names on this. But I’m not going to play that game anymore. Like the sign at one of the TEA parties that said “it doesn’t matter what this sign says, you going to call it racist anyway.” When even the lawsuits now being brought by 30 plus state AG’s is considered racist, it is time to stop playing that game.

[…]

Heck, I want to shake them up. This is supposed to be a post-racial era? Then deal with the fact that the President of the United States is the head of a gang that just raped our American principles.

I made it a cartoon and not a photoshop and the “woman” is green. Deal, people.

This is not, of course, a post-racial era; only conservatives would think it was. But the idea that Liberty Enlightening the World is a racially neutral figure is absurd. And frankly, even if the Franco-American statue can somehow be depicted as non-white, it doesn’t change the fact that the trope of African American male sexual aggression is about the oppression of African American males ((Of course, it’s also about deep-seated white guilt over the rape of African American women; the history of that is well-documented, and includes American figures from Thomas Jefferson to Strom Thurmond.)) far more than the victims they purportedly choose.

So the portrayal of Obama as the leader of a gang of rapists is offensive enough. What’s equally offensive, however, is something Click never even bothers to mention in her defensive diatribe — the fact that the cartoon is also offensive to anyone who’s been a victim of sexual assault.

I have, thankfully, never been a victim of sexual assault, but I’ve met my share of survivors, read their stories and done my best, as a compassionate human, to understand what the attacks have done to them, and to work as an ally to make sure that I stand against those who would minimize those attacks.

I cannot speak for anyone who’s suffered through the process of dealing with assault, but I’ve yet to see anyone who’s dealt first-hand with the issue see it as a metaphor to be drug out to describe political events. It’s far too personal for that. It’s like describing a zoning decision as a Holocaust — it’s just too big to be a metaphor.

Using something like health care reform to claim that Obama is raping America is simply ignoring what rape really is. Hell, George W. Bush tortured people and sought to extrajudicially wire-tap Americans — acts far less in keeping with the spirit of American democracy than adding health coverage — and I wouldn’t use the word rape to describe those actions, because damn it, I don’t have the right to.

Click doesn’t even note this, of course — she simply portrays America as a woman who’s been raped, and is going to be gang-raped, and can do nothing about it.

There is far more to pick apart in this cartoon than I can; SEK at Lawyers, Guns & Money noted that it’s deeply ironic that Obama is evidently planning to rape the Statue of Liberty with immigration reform, and I can’t disagree there. And I haven’t even commented on the drawing as an aesthetic piece; I believe it could best be described as “horrible.”

But compared to the graver sins of the piece — vile racism and blatant sexism — they pale. Darleen Click has managed to, in a short cartoon, prove once again that the tea party types are exactly who we thought they were.

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Health Care and Related Issues, Race, racism and related issues, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | 66 Comments

The Church of Fiscal Conservatism

Click on the cartoon to see it larger.

This one was co-written by Mandolin!

Description of cartoon:

Panel 1: An angry-looking cartoon donut yells at the reader. The hole in the donut forms the donut’s huge, yelling mouth; the donut also has cartoony-looking, angry eyes, and a big nose. The donut is holding two stone tablets Moses-style.
DONUT: HARK, o my children! It is I, your LORD AND GOD the DEFICIT! Incarnated in pastry raiment to decree MY HOLY COMMANDMENTS!
FOOTNOTE: Why a donut? Because it has a hole.

Panel 2: Donut, now without tablets, continues yelling.
DONUT: Thou shalt not have single payer health care. for though it would save money, I, the LORD YOUR DEFICIT, in my all-knowing wisdom, pronounce that we CAN’T AFFORD IT!

Panel 3: Donut gestures hugely, arms above head.
DONUT: Hear me, the LORD YOUR DEFICIT! We cannot afford it! Neither to restore HEALTH unto the sick, nor to give PROSPERITY to the foresaken. YEA, even though social spending would curtail recession and replenish coffers, still we CANNOT afford it!

Panel 4: Donut is now wearing a US Army officer’s hat, and holding a automatic rifle in one hand and a knife in the other.
DONUT: Yet I, THE DEFICIT, pronounce unto you that endless wars NEED NOT be paid for! Never let cost deter you from raining onto the ground the BLOOD of those who are REPELLENT unto you!

Panel 5: Extreme close-up of Donut’s face. The military cap is gone. Donut yells.
DONUT:Thou shalt EVERLASTINGLY support tax cuts, no matter the cost!
SO SAYETH THE DEFICIT!
And thou shalt NEVER raise taxes, no matter the need for revenue!
SO SAYETH THE DEFICIT!

Panel 6: The donut is shown very distant from the reader, at the top of a steep mountain. There are clouds behind the donut and a lightning bolt is coming from one of the clouds.
DONUT: OBEY these commandments, my children! free your hearts of skepticism, and compassion, and basic knowledge of economics. then thou shalt be pleasing unto me, YOUR LORD THE DEFICIT! AMEN!

There is a caption at the bottom of the entire cartoon, which says, “The Church of Fiscal Conservatism.”

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Economics and the like | 4 Comments

Terrorism

I don’t know how this can be viewed as anything less than a failed assassination attempt:

Law enforcement authorities are investigating the discovery of a cut propane gas line at the Virginia home of Rep. Tom Perriello’s (D-Va.) brother, whose address was targeted by tea party activists angry at the congressman’s vote for the health care bill.

An aide to the congressman confirmed to POLITICO that a line to a propane tank behind his brother’s home near Charlottesville had been sliced.

The address was listed by teabaggers angry at Perriello for voting for health care reform; the address was said to be that of the Congressman himself, rather than his brother.

Again, this has to be viewed flatly as terrorism and political violence. Fortunately, nobody was hurt, and I am no expert on whether anyone was put in serious jeopardy by this. But you don’t slice a propane line without some understanding that you’re venting a flammable gas into the air. I think it’s clear that the person who did this knew their actions could cause injury, or worse — and not just to Rep. Perriello himself, but to anyone who happened to trip across the line.

This is what comes from months of claiming that health care reform is tantamount to Stalinism. When health care reform is seen as literally a communist plot to destroy America, there will be people who decide that violence is a justifiable response. Those on the right who spent the past year demonizing Democrats own this attack. I hope — likely in vain — that they will recognize this, and speak out strongly against violence. I misdoubt, however, that they will continue to use violence in their very rhetoric. They’ve given us no reason to expect better of them.

Posted in Elections and politics, Health Care and Related Issues | 24 Comments

Open Thread: Lincoln and the Three Bears edition

Post to this post to post what you wanna post, when you wanna post it. Posting self-posts is postacular.

The illustration, by the way, is by Alex Solis. I’ve just begun to look through his online gallery, but what I’ve seen so far is freaking great.

Posted in Link farms | 6 Comments

Black women rockers

black-women-rockers

To be blunt…I love rock music. Rock is portrayed as pretty darn white and male. Hence the inspiration for this post.

Lot of featured artistes located via this discussion at Quirky Black Girl which also has some gorgeous MP3’s in the thread.

Felony Melody from the band Objex – Eat This


Carol Thomas

Continue reading

Posted in Site and Admin Stuff, Syndicated feeds | 8 Comments

Unfinished Business

Photo of the grave of former Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass. A handwritten note from his son, Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I., reads, “Dad, the unfinished business is done.”

Posted in Health Care and Related Issues | 1 Comment

America: We Like Having Things Rammed Down Our Throats

Well, health care reform is now law, and the new socialist hellscape is our home, at least until the brave Republicans and their vast majority of the American people sweep Democrats from office. Which they’ll certainly do, because if there’s one thing we all know, it’s that Americans hate getting health care. Every poll shows it, you know….

Knock knock

Who’s there? Why, it’s USA Today/Gallup! And they’ve got a new poll! Well, let’s see how badly the Democrats fare in this one.

Americans by 9 percentage points have a favorable view of the health care overhaul that President Obama signed into law Tuesday, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds, a notable turnaround from surveys before the vote that showed a plurality against it.

By 49%-40% those surveyed say it was “a good thing” rather than a bad one that Congress passed the bill. Half describe their reaction in positive terms, as “enthusiastic” or “pleased,” while about four in 10 describe it in negative ways, as “disappointed” or “angry.”

Wait a second.

That’s impossible. The Republicans have been very clear that this bill is being rammed down the collective throats of America by Barack Obama.

Well, at least 49% is still just a plurality. Most Americans probably still somehow can be said to oppose health care reform, right?

The largest single group, 48%, calls the bill “a good first step” that should be followed by more action on health care. An additional 4% also have a favorable view, saying the bill makes the most important changes needed in the nation’s health care system.

Sure, “math” says that 48% + 4% = 52%, which in elite media circles is a “majority.” But that’s only true outside of Texas. In Texas, they would have made sure only to ask white men who were Republicans, and I’m sure lots of them oppose any reform at all.

Well, at least Americans are outraged by the process, and angry at the Democrats for demon pass and Slaughter and stuff. I mean, right?

No one gets overwhelmingly positive ratings on the issue, but Obama fares the best: 46% say his work has been excellent or good; 31% call it poor. Congressional Democrats get an even split: 32% call their efforts good or excellent; 33% poor.

The standing of congressional Republicans is more negative. While 26% rate their work on health care as good or excellent, a larger group, 34%, say it has been poor.

This is not at all what Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and John Boehner said would happen. Not at all.

Posted in Elections and politics, Health Care and Related Issues | 2 Comments

Republicans Laying Groundwork For Future Obstructionism?

Yesterday, Chris Bowers at Open Left noted:

The Senate Banking Committee just passed Chris Dodd’s financial reform bill 13-10, in an entirely party-line vote. The vote happened about 20 minutes after the mark-up began.

Pretty remarkable. Republicans have typically used a strategy of hundreds of weakening amendments to delay bills as long as possible at every stage of the process, including every committee hearing. In so doing, they have succeeded in getting hundreds of amendments adopted to these bills, and even in delaying bills by weeks or months (cough, Baucus, cough).

But not today. The bill just sailed through untouched. Bizarre.

My guess is that some number of Republicans privately felt a little silly saying that a Health Care Reform bill that they themselves wrote a lot of, is an extremist and utterly partisan document. So to avoid that, they decided to contribute nothing at all to the financial reform bill.

Of course, it doesn’t really matter much for the policy, because Dodd pre-compromised the bill. From what I’ve read, it’s not like the financial reforms are bad; they just don’t go one-tenth as far as they need to go.

Posted in Elections and politics | Comments Off on Republicans Laying Groundwork For Future Obstructionism?

Thank You, Madam Speaker

I’m hoping to write some on the historic enactment of health care reform in the coming days; I just got done with my first week of chemotherapy, round two, and so I’m a bit wiped out at the moment.

There are many politicians to thank for getting this done, but one stands out above all others. No, not Barack Obama, though he has now permanently shaken off any accusation that he’s another Jimmy Carter — and though he is now inarguably the most consequential Democratic president since Lyndon Johnson.

No, the politician who deserves the thanks and support of Democrats is Rep. Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro Pelosi, D-Calif., the 60th and current Speaker of the House of Representatives. If not for Pelosi’s firm resolve in the wake of Scott Brown’s election, it is entirely possible that action on health care may have stalled, that the White House may have backed down and offered a politically palatable mishmash of minor proposals and moved on.

Pelosi didn’t want to back down, though, and she used her muscle as Speaker to get the bill through, finding 219 Democrats willing to support an imperfect Senate bill. This was no easy task; this was as impressive as anything Johnson did as Senate Majority Leader. This was the stuff of legend.

According to many reports, there were 68 wavering Democrats coming down the stretch. When presented with the names of the Democrats, Pelosi didn’t divvy them up among her leadership group. She simply said, “I’ll take all 68.” Certainly, she didn’t get all 68. But she got enough of them to get this bill over the line. She made hard deals and massaged egos and acceded to a legally meaningless but symbolically difficult executive order on the Hyde Amendment because that’s what it took to get health care for tens of millions of Americans. That’s a Speaker’s job, and Nancy Pelosi has wielded her gavel more effectively than any in my lifetime, even more effectively than the legendary Tip O’Neill.

Quite simply, Pelosi’s work here has to place her up with the likes of Sam Rayburn — as one of the greatest Speakers of all time. She would have been memorable simply as the first woman to hold the office. She will now be remembered as that, and far more.

Posted in Elections and politics, Health Care and Related Issues | 9 Comments