Jackson Heights Poetry Festival’s 2012-2013 Season Begins September 4

In June, I took over as head of Jackson Heights Poetry Festival (JHPF), a literary organization located right here in Queens, NY. Since its inception, JHPF has sponsored poetry festivals, literary salons and the First Tuesdays reading series, which is held on the first Tuesday of the month from September through June at Terraza 7, a wonderful venue where you can also hear some of the most interesting music in the New York City area. For now, I will be focusing JHPF’s energy and resources exclusively on First Tuesdays, which begins on September 4th with a reading by Jackson Heights poet KC Trommer. (Check out her website.) For more information please go to the Jackson Heights Poetry Festival website. If you’re a poet in the New York area and you’ve got work to share or if you just want to have some poetry in your life, I hope you’ll join us.

Posted in Writing | Comments Off on Jackson Heights Poetry Festival’s 2012-2013 Season Begins September 4

A quick thought on Todd Akin

Although, really, a quick thought is far more than this guy deserves. I wish people got this much attention for saying something really smart (which isn’t to say that we shouldn’t take notice when people with power believe this shit).

This isn’t the first time I’ve heard the “women can’t get pregnant from rape” line, although it is the first time I’ve heard it anywhere besides an anonymous troll in a comment thread. I guess that says more about the types of media I pay attention to than what’s actually being said out there. I think it’s more likely than not that Akin genuinely believes that women’s bodies contain some mechanism that halts reproduction whenever she doesn’t want to be penetrated,* because if you believe that, then you can believe the following:

1. Pregnancy is, in almost every case, proof that the incident wasn’t actually rape. If she’s pregnant, then that indicates she wanted to have sex, even if she claims (or even seems to think) otherwise. The 32,101 rapes that result in pregnancy each year are, therefore, not “legitimate” rapes.

2. We don’t need to talk about abortion after “legitimate” rape, because it’s such a rare occurance that it functionally doesn’t exist. It’s like deciding policy for unicorn management–find me an actual unicorn and we’ll discuss the management of unicorns, but until then, it’s not really worth arguing about. Sure, one or two unicorns (or women pregnant from rape) might slip through the cracks and yes that does suck for them and I’m sorry, but don’t we have more realistic problems to tackle?

When I try to put myself into Akin’s frame of mind, what I get isn’t malicious cynicism–“Mwa ha ha, now I shall oppress ALL the women!”–but rather simple-minded relief. What a relief that an issue that so many people think is so complicated is actually so simple! Raped women can’t get pregnant–phew! If only everyone knew what Akin knows! We could put this whole debate to rest!

And, of course, this type of rhetoric lumps together all women as if race, class, citizenship status, etc. made no difference in one’s chances of getting raped. Among other things, it reinforces the two interlocking myths that women of color a) have too many children b) because they are promiscuous. Meanwhile, just to pull something up from the first Google search that comes to mind, stuff like this is happening.

* I’ll point out here that sperm can stay alive for a few days in a woman’s body, meaning that if an egg is released after the rape has ended, then conception can still happen. Also, as my husband pointed out, if an egg has already been released before its owner is raped, that egg can’t be sucked back into the ovary. That woman is fertile for the next day or two no matter what. I’d love to hear how exactly Akin’s doctor buds think a woman’s body “shut[s] that whole thing down.”

Posted in Abortion & reproductive rights, Conservative zaniness, right-wingers, etc. | 41 Comments

The troll on a break, drawn by Ken Koral

My friend Ken Koral, who does the excellent horror webcomic Eventy-Seven, did this hilarious drawing of the troll from Hereville.

Is that awesome or what?

Posted in Syndicated feeds | Comments Off on The troll on a break, drawn by Ken Koral

The Southern Poverty Law Center Is Not The Problem

Dana Milbank argues that it is irresponsible for the Southern Poverty Law Center to classify the Family Research Center as a “hate group.”

Milbank’s main argument, used twice, is that it’s wrong to include the KKK and the FRC on one list.

Milbank’s argument is intuitively appealing, but falls apart on second thought. There’s no logical reason that a list of groups engaging in specified behaviors can’t encompass both some mainstream groups and some non-mainstream groups. (Consider that a list of “sports teams” could include both a kid’s 4-square team and an NBA team, even though those two teams have many important differences).

Milbank writes as if to ever utter a harsh word is wrong and uncivil. But he’s mistaken. Some groups genuinely have demonstrated a pattern of hateful behavior, and it’s legitimate to call them out on it. Civility requires us to always treat the humans we are talking to with respect; it does not require us to never say anything that another person might find harsh or discomforting.

The SPLC is, as far as I can tell, careful. They calmly criticize specific extreme behavior by a small number of groups, rather than painting all opposition with a broad brush. In short, the SPLC is not our problem.

The real problem is that American political rhetoric is now overflowing with casual, thoughtless demonization of political opponents. I hear it from both sides: People who disagree aren’t just wrong. Instead, everyone on the other side is evil and stupid and acting in bad faith. Our political discourse is consumed by wild fury, and the sneer has become our default expression.

In a recent interview, science fiction author David Brin talked about people being addicted to self-righteous indignation:

We’ve all been in indignant snits, self-righteous furies. You go into the bathroom during one of these snits, and you look in the mirror and you have to admit, this feels great! “I am so much smarter and better than my enemies! And they are so wrong, and I am so right!”

And if we were to recognize that self-righteous indignation is a bona fide drug high, and that yes, just like alcohol, some of us can engage in it on occasion — as a matter of fact, when I engage in it, I get into a real bender — but then say, “Enough.” If we were to acknowledge this as a drug addiction, then it might weaken all the horrible addicts out there who have taken over politics in America…

Read the comments following the political stories in newspapers and on youtube, and you’ll see dozens of examples of addicts getting their indignation high.

That’s the problem. And I don’t believe that scapegoating the SPLC does anything to solve that problem.

* * *

That’s the end of this post, but I also recommend reading JHW’s excellent comment on why he’s suspicious of “civility talk,” and this blog post: If We Don’t Call it ‘Hate,’ What Shall We Call It? A hat tip as well to David Blankenhorn’s post, for the link to Milbank’s op-ed.

Posted in Civility & norms of discourse, In the news | 17 Comments

Two great long-form political cartoons

I really like long-form political cartoons, which we don’t see much of, I think because it’s hard to find a market to sell them to.

But here are two great ones I came across this week: “Straw Feminists In The Closet,” by Kate Beaton, and “Supply Side Jesus,” by Al Franken (presumably before he became a senator) and Don Simpson.

Posted in Anti-feminists and their pals, Comics I Like, Economics and the like | 6 Comments

“Exhaustion” doesn’t mean “broke”

The Washington Post, justifying their claim that Social Security is “going broke,” writes:

Is “going broke” too strong? Well, let’s ask the experts — the trustees of the Social Security Trust Fund, who include President Obama’s Treasury, labor, and health and human services secretaries. In their annual report in April — delivered, as it happens, to Mr. Biden, in his capacity as Senate president — the trustees noted that the disability portion of the trust fund “becomes exhausted in 2016, so legislative action is needed as soon as possible.” The overall fund, combining retirement and disability, will “become exhausted and unable to pay scheduled benefits in full on a timely basis in 2033.”

It’s a shame the Post didn’t actually listen to the experts. From Reuters, back in April:

It’s rare to see a federal official publicly beg reporters to get a story right, but the commissioner of the Social Security Administration seemed ready to get down on his hands and knees at a Monday press briefing. Michael Astrue was cautioning journalists not to scare the public about the meaning of the word “exhaustion.”

“Please, please remember that exhaustion is an actuarial term of art and it does not mean there will be no money left to pay any benefits” he warned in issuing the trustees’ annual report on the financial health of the Social Security program.

“After 2033, even if Congress does nothing, there will still be sufficient assets (from payroll taxes) to pay about 75 percent of benefits. That’s not acceptable, but it’s still a fact that there will still be substantial assets there,” Astrue insisted.

Good job, Washington Post.

(Via).

Posted in Social Security | 1 Comment

Obama Admin’s “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” Program Begins

Some of the thousands of young immigrants who showed up Wednesday, Aug. 15, 2012, at Chicago’s Navy Pier for guidance with a new federal program that would help them avoid deportation, applaud during speeches by dignitaries. At least 13,000 people showed up for help in putting together identity documents and filling out the detailed forms on the first day that the federal government began accepting applications, which far exceeded what organizers could handle. The crowd was so large that workshop organizers had to turn some of them away.

From the Washington Post:

The Obama administration kicked off one of the most sweeping changes in immigration policy in decades Wednesday, accepting applications from young illegal immigrants for the temporary right to live and work openly in the United States without fear of deportation.

An estimated 1.7 million young people who arrived in the United States illegally as children could qualify for the new Department of Homeland Security program, and thousands are expected to pay the $465 application fee for a “deferred action” permit that would protect them from deportation for at least two years. […]

“Even though DA [deferred action] is only a temporary immigration relief initiative, it represents the largest immigration benefit application process since the 1986 immigration reform law,” said [National Alliance of Latin American and Caribbean Communities] board member Patricia Montes. […]

The program is open to immigrants ages 15 to 31 who came to the country before they were 16 and have lived here continuously for at least the past five years. Among other restrictions, they must be free of serious criminal convictions, be enrolled in or have completed high school, or have served in the U.S. military. On Tuesday, officials confirmed that those enrolled in GED programs and certain training programs will also qualify, broadening the program’s potential reach.[…] The protected status has to be renewed every two years.[…]

Opponents and supporters alike agree that the two-year protections are likely to be renewed indefinitely, as has been the case with Haitian refugees and others who have gotten such status. While future administrations may stop granting the protections, they are unlikely to move to deport those already enrolled.

1) This is good news. I wish it were better – I wish Congress had passed The Dream Act, and for that matter I’d like to see some relief for undocumented immigrants other than the very narrow demographic slice targeted here. This isn’t amnesty, and there’s no pathway to citizenship. But this may be the best that can be done in the face of Republican opposition, and it’s good that it got done, and tens or maybe hundreds of thousands of people will be helped.

2) For most of his stay in office, Obama has been trying to court conservatives on immigration. Conservatives always say that once the government gets serious about enforcing current law, then they’ll talk immigration reform. Obama has set records for deportation, even though the unemployment crisis has meant that many fewer immigrants are coming here.

But trying to give in to or compromise with conservatives is pointless, because their best political interests are served by opposition to the Obama administration, not by compromise. It’s the same reason the NRA can’t take “yes” for an answer. And the reason that the huge number of deportations has had absolutely zero impact on the heartfelt conservative belief that the current laws are not being enforced.

But it’s nice to see Obama seemingly realize that compromise won’t happen (at least not with the current GOP), and act accordingly.

3) This is also political, of course. I think that immigration advocates have been pushing harder on the Democrats lately — and, possibly, they have more leverage with an election coming up.

Ezra Klein speculates that this will be good for Obama in the voting booth:

Estimates are that this will apply to almost two million illegal immigrants. And unlike most of what happens in an election year, this policy is actually changing their lives.[…]

These immigrants, of course, can’t vote. But they have friends, family, and are part of communities that can. And those communities, when faced with the choice between the presidential administration that did this, and the Republican Party that they’ve seen in recent years, might come to decide that this is a rather consequential election.

If so, then good; that is how politics are supposed to work.

On the other hand, Nate Silver argued that in the states that are most likely to decide a close Obama/Romney race, Latin@ voters are a relatively small factor. So it may not matter much for this election. But it could matter in the future.

* * *

The photo is by Sitthixay Ditthavong for AP. Their caption:

Some of the thousands of young immigrants who showed up Wednesday, Aug. 15, 2012, at Chicago’s Navy Pier for guidance with a new federal program that would help them avoid deportation, applaud during speeches by dignitaries. At least 13,000 people showed up for help in putting together identity documents and filling out the detailed forms on the first day that the federal government began accepting applications, which far exceeded what organizers could handle. The crowd was so large that workshop organizers had to turn some of them away.

Posted in Immigration, Migrant Rights, etc | 13 Comments

Open Thread Link Farm: Yo-Yo in Spaaaaaaace Edition

  1. Absentee ballots and undocumented citizenship A good post on the GOP’s likely-to-succeed attempts at voter suppression.
  2. Closing the Memory Hole: Remembering the Dance Marathons
  3. QUOTE: And if we were to recognize that self-righteous indignation is a bona fide drug high, and that yes, just like alcohol, some of us can engage in it on occasion — as a matter of fact, when I engage in it, I get into a real bender — but then say, “Enough.” —David Brin
  4. Regnerus study controversy guide
  5. Jimmy Fallon Sings The Reading Rainbow Theme Song in the Style of The Doors
  6. If you have a few bucks, please consider donating to the fund to rebuild the Joplin Mosque, which was destroyed by arson. “This is, of course, far from the only incident of its kind; to the contrary, in a trend largely ignored by the American media, hate crimes against American Muslims are at epidemic levels.”
  7. Reasons Given for Inaction of Men’s Rights Movements
  8. The Fiscal Cliff No One Is Talking About: Unemployment benefits will soon run out for many.
  9. Incredible New Sketchbook Illustrations from Mattias Adolfsson
  10. If poverty is caused by bad culture, what does that say about the conservative states?
  11. Jeannette wasn’t filled with hate. She simply didn’t know much about gays — just enough, in fact, to be completely wrong about us. … I didn’t find hate on that doorstep.”
  12. Exaggerating gender changes (stay at home dads are not the new normal)
  13. In the years since the collapse of 2008, the existence of mass unemployment has stopped being something the economic powers that be even pretend to regard as a crisis.”
  14. Nine takeaways on Romney’s tax plan.

Posted in Link farms | 22 Comments

Guard at Family Research Council Shot and Injured

This is horrifying. From The Washington Post:

A security guard at the Family Research Council was shot and wounded Wednesday morning after a scuffle with a man who expressed disagreement with the group’s conservative views in the lobby of the group’s headquarters in downtown Washington, authorities said. […]

The guard and others wrestled the man to the ground, disarmed him and waited for police, she said. The guard was then taken to the hospital and is in stable condition, the chief said. FBI officials said the guard was shot in the arm. […]

A law enforcement official said at one point in the scuffle, the shooter expressed views that differed from those of the Family Research Council. The official also said the shooter was carrying a bag that had a Chick-Fil-A bag inside.

My three comments:

1) I’m so happy the guard, Leo Johnson, was not killed. “Happy” is too weak a word. I know all of us will be hoping (atheists) or praying (theists) for Leo Johnson’s swift recovery.

2) At this moment it looks as if the shooter, 28-year-old Floyd Corkins, was motivated by his opposition to FRC’s anti-gay politics. It’s very disturbing to me to think of how much my own views probably overlap with Corkins’.

3) This reminds me of the importance of not demonizing those who disagree with us, not even on issues we’re the most passionate about.

Lately, I’ve been thinking that that is really the reason to practice civil debate; not to change minds or score points, but so that all of us have a context in which we have to address those we disagree with, and sometimes those we are furious at, with the respect due to them as fellow human beings.

Posted in In the news | 5 Comments

Why It’s Important To Cut That Creeper Guy From Your Social Group

Why It's Important To Cut That Creeper Guy From Your Social Group

I read a post on “My friend group has a case of the Creepy Dude. How do we clear that up?” over on Captain Awkward with growing horror and recognition. It combines two letters asking for advice about dudes in social groups who act inappropriately to the point where sexual assaults have occurred or are very likely to occur, yet the SOs and male friends of the letter writers refuse to step up, back up their partners, and team up to cut these dudes out of the social groups.

There’s so much good stuff about solving these problems in that post that I don’t even want to quote because you really do need to read it all

The post is particularly apropos right now since the issue of sexual harassment at conventions and conferences is getting much attention due to recent happenings at ReaderCon (a literary science fiction/fantasy focused convention) which led to some other cons (both genre and not) reiterating, bolstering or creating anti-harassment policies. This is good news and an unexpectedly good outcome for the whole ReaderCon thing. 

Not everyone is happy about the outcome, as this post and subsequent comments show. When I read the Captain Awkward post it struck me how the situation those two women find themselves in where a creeper guy is excused by members of the group who haven’t ever been the targets of his harassment and thus don’t see what the big deal is (plus, he’s fun to hang out with and has the best table for gaming, GOD WHY CAN’T YOU STOP BEING A BITCH?) tracks so closely to the shit coming from the convention crowd who defend the ReaderCon harasser and any number of other dudes who harass.

Though the people you deal with at conventions may not be your regular social group, it’s just as important to deal with the creeper guys there (and in a similar fashion) as it is to deal with them where you live. Beyond having good anti-harassment policies at the executive level of the convention, you and your friends or peer group should have an anti-harassment policy amongst yourselves. No matter how much that creeper guy is cool or fun to hang out with, no matter if he’s an editor or an agent or a SMOF or someone else you feel you should know and be nice to for career purposes, that person should not be allowed to creep on, touch, and harass your friends (or anyone else). 

When you go to conventions, have each other’s backs. Keep track of the dudes who are too often noted for being creepy and close ranks to shut them out. Guys, don’t let your female friends be the only ones looking out for each other like this (because we often are, even if you don’t know it).

And if that creeper does something out of line and you know about it, give the harassed person your unconditional support and make sure they know that if they choose to report it, you will back them up. Some people aren’t comfortable coming forward, but if there’s a way you can do so on their behalf (with their permission), please do so. It helps, it really does.

Any time you have someone’s back in cases like this you’re fighting back against rape culture, which allows these kinds of creeper guys to get away with their behavior. 

Why It’s Important To Cut That Creeper Guy From Your Social Group — Originally posted at The Angry Black Woman

Posted in Syndicated feeds | 44 Comments