Today Is International No Diet Day. Also, buy Kate and Marianne's book.

I think INDD has the best origin story of any holiday. From Wikipedia:

The concept of INDD originated at 1992, when British Feminist Mary Evans Young decided to fight the diet industry and to raise awareness of the dangers in anorexia and other eating disorders. In order to do that, Evans Young addressed the local media saying “Fat Woman Bites Back”. When she was interviewed on television, she “reminded” the audience to celebrate the International No Diet Day on May 6. This specific date had no specific reason other than its proximity to the television interview.

Followed that interview, feminist groups around UK celebrated the INDD, and as the years went by, groups in other countries around the globe started to celebrate this day, especially in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India and Israel.

So whatever you do today, don’t diet. And maybe go enjoy a Chinese buffet.

Or celebrate the day by purchasing a copy of Kate Harding and Marianne Kirby‘s new book, Lessons From The Fat-O-Sphere: Quit Dieting And Declare A Truce With Your Body (currently the #1 bestseller at Powell’s). Kate’s been asking people to plug it for INDD, and I don’t have any hesitation about plugging it unread, because both those writers’ blogs kick ass.

Posted in Fat, fat and more fat | 18 Comments

Open thread, vow of silence edition

Post whatever you like, including links you like, to yourself or to someone else. If you love a link, set it free.

* * *

Kip emailed this to me, warning me that it was worth suffering through the introduction in order to see the video, which features (alleged) monks who have taken vows of silence, performing the Hallelujah Chorus. If you want to just skip the intro, skip to 1:30.

Posted in Buffy, Whedon, etc., Link farms | 19 Comments

X-Men Origins: Wolverine

x-men-origins-wolverine

Like any geek worth her salt, I saw the movie this past weekend. I try not to pay too much attention to casting, spoilers, or even trailers, so I was really surprised to see will.i.am in the movie. As the sole brother, I expected him to make me proud. All I can say is that he didn’t completely embarrass himself, but being pwned by Liev Shrieber is… well… not very gansta.

Anyway, if we’re just scoring on the manflesh, the movie gets an A, as demonstrated at the review here. However, if we’re scoring on portrayal of female characters, the movie gets a big old F, as discussed here.

I tried to enjoy the manflesh as much as possible.

Posted in Syndicated feeds | 24 Comments

Ableist Language – replacement suggestions from the Hand Mirror

Ampersand and I have periodically discussed the issue of ableist language. We’d both like to do better about purging some of the words that infest our vocabulary. In particular, the word “lame” has a tendency to creep into our statements, probably because it’s part of the sort of casual geek slang we both have a tendency to use.

We’ve made a pact — my husband is in on it, too — to try to note to each other when we slip and use the word without thinking.

Lately, I’ve been trying to come up with fun replacement words, particularly because I know that then I’ll be looking forward to opportunities to replace the ableist word with something fun. Cuz I’m a word dork.

My candidates (which don’t really work) are: Xander, as in “That’s so Xander,” and “I can’t believe you would say something so Xander,” because I really dislike Xander from Buffy: The Vampire Slayer. Obviously, that’s too in-jokey to pass real world muster.

My other candidate comes from the nerdy front: a friend of mine was recently reading some Victorian translations of medieval texts and coming across frequent usage of the term “brast,” which means burst or shatter, often with amusing faux-archaic add-ons, such as “to-brast,” e.g. “the spear went all to-brast.” Here’s an example of the term from Spenser: “Dreadfull furies which their chains have brast.” Another similar, out-of-usage word is “frush,” and its silly add-on “to-frush.” For instance from Shakespeare, “I like thine armor well; I’ll frush it and unlock the rivets all.”

None of these are particularly good replacements, even though they amuse me. But luckily Deborah at The Hand Mirror has an admirable list:

flimsy
inadequate
insufficient
unconvincing
weak
unsatisfactory
inept
pathetic
deficient
hollow
meagre
perfunctory

So, next time you have the urge to use inept ableist language, put aside your pathetic ableism, and be deficient no more. Don’t be Xander; don’t let your vocabulary go to-brast. Find another word.

(via Shakesville)

Posted in Disabled Rights & Issues | 38 Comments

There are Three of Us, Yanno

there-are-three-of-us-yanno

Something I’ve been meaning to post/clear up for a while. Many regular readers know this, but for those who don’t: there are three women who regularly post on this site.  There’s me, the original Angry Black Woman, then there’s nojojojo/Nora and Karnythia.  For a long time N & K have been doing most of the heavy lifting around here, for which I’m eternally grateful. Too often I see their awesome posts attributed to myself.  Nope, not me!

Some of the fault lies with the last theme/template, which did not have the byline properly large and noticeable. I tried to fix that with the current theme. You may also notice that now posts have a little avatar associated with them.  That will also help, methinks.  The avatars may change periodically, but they will change on all posts, so you’ll always see whatever one is in play.

Here are the current avatars:

nojojojo ABW karnythia

The more you know!

Posted in Syndicated feeds | 1 Comment

Mountain Dew Throwback Tastes Pretty Good, Reports Blogger

throwbackdew.jpgHigh fructose corn syrup. Everyone reading this blog has consumed large amounts of it, whether you wanted to or not. It’s everywhere — in cereal, in juice, in salad dressing, in cookies…heck, I think it’s being pumped into the atmosphere now. America’s gift to America’s corn growers, HFCS isn’t necessarily as evil as it’s often portrayed, at least in and of itself. HCFS is mostly fructose (fruit sugar) and glucose (corn sugar), and the body processes those the same way it processes sucrose (table sugar). The real danger with HCFS is not in the substance itself, but in the vast subsidies that have gone to produce a glut of corn, driving down the price for corn products such as HCFS, and thus driving down the price for sweeteners. Corn syrup is ubiquitous precisely because it’s really cheap. It allows its use in products it otherwise might not show up in, at least not in the same kind of amount. And it makes sweet, sugary products less expensive, thus increasing the amount consumed.

The other problem with HCFS is not a danger per se — at least not to health. No, the problem with HCFS is that it is, in the opinion of many, an inferior sweetener to cane sugar. Products sweetened with HCFS taste somehow more artificial, somewhat “off,” compared to products sweetened with cane or beet sugar. It’s for this reason that people will brag of buying Coca-Cola made in Mexico or Pepsi made kosher for Passover — versions of the popular soft drinks manufactured with cane sugar, instead of HCFS.

Sensing an untapped market, Pepsi has gone out and issued two “throwback” versions of their flagship brands: Pepsi Throwback and Mountain Dew Throwback. Both have had their formulas tweaked beyond simply eliminating HFCS, to make them more like the original formulation. (One wonders if Coca-Cola will try this by adding cocaine into the formula. Probably not.) At any rate, I haven’t tried the Pepsi Throwback yet, but I picked up a twelve-pack of the Dew Throwback, primarily because it was on sale. I’m glad I did; the stuff is outstanding, vastly superior to the current formulation of Mountain Dew.

Why it’s superior is hard to explain. It’s at once smoother and less artificial than the current version of Mountain Dew (or, as it’s inexplicably been rechristened, “Mtn Dew”). The throwback formula lacks the orange juice that’s part of the current formulation, and that probably affects it a little. But I think the big thing is the sweetness, which seems more balanced, more evenly mixed. The sweetness in currently-formulated Mountain Dew seems to hit all at once, cloying and over-the-top, drowning out the flavors in the rest of the pop. The throwback version, contrawise, seems more balanced, more even. It’s less “zippy,” but it’s superior all the way through. Interestingly, the throwback formulation seems slightly less carbonated — which probably aids in drinkability. And the aftertaste is sweet and sugary in the best sense of the word, which is a vast improvement over Dew’s current aftertaste, which is best described as purely artificial.

Is the limited release of Mountain Dew Throwback going to dislodge Mountain Dew’s current formula? I doubt it, for economic reasons (as noted, HFCS is cheaper than sucrose). But if I were King of Earth, it would be made so — or at least added on as an alternative version, like Mountain Dew Voltage. Alas, it appears that Pepsi will discontinue both throwback formulas in June — just enough time for me to hoard a few thousand cases’ worth. Heck, despite my dislike of Pepsi, I may even have to try its throwback version. And I may need to find someone out there who can score me some Mexican Coca-Cola — because if sugar-sweetened Coke is as much better than American Coke as sugar-sweetened Mountain Dew is better than regular Dew, I must find out — because if so, I’ve wasted the twenty-odd years since Coke ditched sugar, and I don’t want to waste any more.

Posted in Whatever | 23 Comments

Margaret Goodman Historical Innovations: A Role-Playing Game

This is some introductory material for a role-playing game I’m running… I thought it might amuse “Alas” readers who play RPGs. Comments and suggested additions welcome.

Continue reading

Posted in Whatever | 24 Comments

The Real Victim

Mark Halpern identifies the biggest concern about Souter’s replacement:

Poor, Poor White Guy

Aw, poor white guys! We only make up seven of the nine Supreme Court Justices. Why, one of them’s a woman! And there’s even a black guy! What more do you people want?

(Via Josh)

Posted in Affirmative Action, Feminism, sexism, etc, Race, racism and related issues, Supreme Court Issues, The Obama Administration | 11 Comments

Haunted: A comparatively short dollhouse review

At this point, I think the character I feel most engaged with is Mellie. She doesn’t know what’s going on, she doesn’t know that she’s a doll that was programmed not to understand the word left-over. I want her to be happy and free, and she could never be either, let alone both at the same time.

I think they needed to show Paul raping November, and they definitely needed to make it that ugly. I’m glad that they showed that he had a choice, that he made a choice, but I think the story needed to turn him into what he hated, and I think it was that hatred for himself, not the dollhouse, that drove him.

What I found most powerful, about those scenes, was the speech Mellie gave

I like being with you, I love it actually. And you say everything is fine and so I’m going to stop asking if it is. If that means lying next to you while everything is not fine, then that’s what I’ll do. I’ll give you what you need, and let you take it from me. If you want to give back, give back, but it doesn’t have to mean anything.

I doubt Topher had to work hard when constructing that imprint. To find a woman who believes that love is one way, and her only role is to give. We’ve all been imprinted, after all.

The first time I watched the scenes with Topher/Sierra ((Dichen Lachman was, again, fantastic (although she could do with a little more to do). I particularly loved the way she talked about the ‘sleepies’, and the whole sequence was hilarious.)) I was filled with anxiety about where they were going to go. To me having sex with Sierra, knowing that she was forced into the Dollhouse, is a whole level of vileness. I didn’t necessarily mind the show going there; I like hating Topher, but until I knew what they were doing I was anxious.

But instead the story was infinitely more pathetic. Topher wasn’t looking for someone to have sex with, he was looking for someone to play Laser-force and eat cake with (some people never got enough 9 year old birthday parties). All the employees of the dollhouse seem so atomised, some to the point of complete derangement. The abuse they’re carrying out doesn’t make the happy, or fulfilled, or whole, it just gives them power. And power won’t eat birthday cake with you.

The parallels between Topher and Paul were emphasised by the way the scenes were paired together throughout the episode (in the beginning of the episode scenes with Paul directly followed scenes with Topher). By the end of the episode the white night has chosen to rescue. Whereas it becomes clear that the amoral dick doesn’t want to rape and active. Which doesn’t make him virtuous or even sympathetic, but it does make him interesting.

I do have theory I want to share with the world, so I can say ‘I told you so’ if I’m right. I think there are many signs that Topher didn’t just construct a friend, he imprinted Sierra with himself (which just ups the pathetic level). I’ve wondered why Alpha would have been imprinted with the skills to construct imprints, in order to use them in a composite. I think that Alpha was Sierra last year, or the year before, and had been imprinted as Topher to help Topher celebrate his birthday. That’s why he can do remote wipes.

You may notice that I haven’t yet talked about the main plot of this story. There’s a reason for that. The idea of Dollhouse having the capacity to provide eternal life was a fascinating one. But in this episode I felt that they squandered it on un-engaging characters and incredibly cliched jokes (‘she was nothing like mother’). While I appreciated the thematic unity around connection and isolation, it didn’t make the story of the very rich dead woman interesting to watch.

I remain uninterested in the problems of rich people. Particularly as clichéd problems as ‘I’m not sure if my much younger and poorer boyfriend married me for love’ and ‘I never showed any love to my children and now they resent me for it’ (clearly not just a rich person’s problem, but I find the story much less interesting when the origin of the distance is an abundance of money).

I could maintain interest in monsters of the week stories on Buffy (sometimes I’m not going to stand up and defend ‘go fish’), because they always involved with or related to to the characters that I knew. I think actual procedurals, the stories that make an episode of House, or the interminable cop shows, require a different sort of story-telling, one that the people of Mutant Enemy aren’t necessarily very good at. The episodes where we dealt with the woes of a one off character, were never the strongest episodes of Buffy, Angel or Firefly (Inca Mummy Girl, She, or The Message, for examples). How to introduce, make us care about, and resolve a person’s story in 25 minutes or so, is a really big challenge. The Dollhouse one shots I’ve enjoyed so far, I’ve enjoyed because there’s been some glitch in the imprint and we’ve seen Echo or Caroline underneath (The Target, Stage Fright and the Grey Hour). If they can’t do that each week (and they probably can’t) they need to work on making the stories great.

Posted in Buffy, Whedon, etc. | 9 Comments

Naomi Klein on BDS

I’ve taken a long time to write about this because I wanted to make sure I had my thoughts on it sorted out. This article by Naomi Klein finally brought me around to the BDS (boycott, divest, sanction) campaign against Israel. (Note: as you can probably tell, I’m very new to BDS, so this post is directed at other people who are new to it, too. I realize that many readers have been working on this for a long time.) This passage was what turned the lightbulb on for me:

Why single out Israel when the United States, Britain and other Western countries do the same things in Iraq and Afghanistan? Boycott is not a dogma; it is a tactic. The reason the BDS strategy should be tried against Israel is practical: in a country so small and trade-dependent, it could actually work. (Emphasis hers.)

The problem, up until I read the article, was that most of the calls for boycotts I read were the dogmatic kind. Boycott Israeli academics! Boycott Israeli artists! Boycott non-Israeli Jewish business owners! Why? Because we hate them, that’s why! Because Zionism is racism! Even the ones that didn’t come off as dogmatic – or that made passing references to tactics – failed to address Jews’ concerns about anti-Semitism, and that turned me off to them. Was that irrational of me? Yeah, sometimes. But Jews have good reason to be wary.

I know, of course, that BDS will continue to attract anti-Semites, and I still fear that anti-Semitism will drown out pragmatism. I don’t know how to solve that problem – but we can address it by emphasizing, as Klein does, that it’s a tactic, not a dogma. We’re doing it because it works. We’re doing it out of love (for Israelis, too!). And, as Klein says, we’re targeting “the Israeli economy but not Israelis.” Strategy, not punishment.

Do check out the whole article – she responded very effectively to almost every concern that I had.

The Global BDS Movement’s website is here.

Thoughts? (When you comment, please remember that this is a very sensitive and complicated subject. Rude or hostile comments will be deleted.)

(Cross-posted at Alas, A Blog.)

Posted in Anti-Semitism, International issues, Palestine & Israel | 68 Comments