Dave Stevens and Nostalgia

Dan Nadel’s post “Dave Stevens and Nostalgia” is very interesting, although “Alas” readers hoping for a feminist critique of Stevens will be disappointed. (And really, what would there be to say that wasn’t incredibly obvious? There was nothing layered or subtle about Stevens’ objectification of women, so it just comes down to how bad you think objectification is.)

Stevens was a much-celebrated comic book artist best known for his retro-style drawings of pin-up women, and for creating “The Rocketeer.” I always assumed that Stevens never wanted to do anything but pretty-but-shallow retro drawings, but apparently he was unhappy with the limits of his work, but never found the drive/visions/opportunity to do more. ((Self-indulgent comment: As a cartoonist currently deep into doing a light-hearted fantasy adventure graphic novel, but who thinks he can do more someday, I find that kind of a depressing thought.))

There’s an interesting discussion of being someone drawing in a very retro (and time-intensive) pulp style decades after the time and market for it has evaporated:

Ironically, the guys that came after Wood and Kane and Toth, like Bernie Wrightson, Mike Kaluta, Barry Smith, and Jeff Jones, followed them right down the manhole, dabbling in independent publishing but basically choosing to be pulp artists at a time when the pulps no longer existed. They chose to be willfully anachronistic. That helped make their work popular to a generation of guys who’d been children (if that) when the ECs came out and were now 20-something fanboys eager for more of the same, but, with the exception of Smith, who really brought a new kind of ferocity to his mark-making, it also severely limited the work. There was nowhere for it to go except for further wallowing in nostalgia – it would never transcend its nostalgic origins. The idea was to just make the best version of Arthur Rackham or Joseph Clement Coll as possible. There’s nothing wrong with that, really—it’s just rather limited.

It’s not that nostalgia is necessarily limited; Seth’s work is full of nostalgia, but it’s also some of the most vibrant, fresh cartooning out there. But Seth’s vision, while nostalgic, isn’t limited to the desire to recreate  great works he read as a kid.

Nadel says at one point that Stevens had “the all-important illusion of technical proficiency (here defined as a late 19th century notion that conveniently ignores 20th century art history).” That really intrigues me, and I hope he develops that thought more in a later post.

Posted in Cartooning & comics | Comments Off on Dave Stevens and Nostalgia

The problem with Dollhouse is not that I don’t understand subtlety

the-problem-with-dollhouse-is-not-that-i-dont-understand-subtlety

Yesterday coffeeandink pointed to this amazing Dollhouse vid set to the tune of “It Depends on What You Pay” from The Fantasticks. It’s so spot on I can’t even describe. Go watch, if you’re inclined, but be aware that it could be triggery. C&I mentioned in her post that the vid author warned that it could be, while whoever posted it at Whedonesque warned that it might be offensive. Lordy. I should not have looked at the comments over there because, well, it’s Whedonesque. And yet.

Lots of varying reactions, but one of the opinions I’m seeing over and over is that people who hate the show and hate the rape and are just haters do not understand the subtlety going on in it. That we need to have the idea that the Dollhouse people are bad overstated or spoon-fed to us, etc. And to that I say: bullshit.

The problem here is not that I don’t appreciate subtlety and I don’t need a show to explicitly point an arrow at a character and scream, “This person is BAD OMG, hate hiiimmm!” After all, I watch Doctor Who, a show about the subtlest subtle asshole who ever subtled through time. I also love Dexter, another show one of the commenters brought up. In the latter, the wrongness of the main characters actions is perhaps a bit more obvious (he’s a serial killer, can’t get much more wrong than that) and with the former there are differing opinions on whether the show’s opinion is that the Doctor is a jerk. In both cases I watch and enjoy because I trust that the show’s creators/writers know what they’re on about. The bottom line is: I don’t trust Joss Whedon.

I don’t accept his feminist cred as a given. I don’t accept his talent/genius as a given. And that colors all of my reactions to Dollhouse — both the premise and the actual episodes I’ve watched.

Perhaps this is wrong and unfair of me. But consider this: I started watching Dexter knowing nothing about the show creators or writers or about the author of the book the show is based on. I didn’t know their stance on serial killers except to assume that it was similar to mine: serial killers (really any killers) are bad. And watching that show, I never once find myself thinking that serial killing would be okay if Dexter did it. Or even that killing is okay because he kills people who are criminals. And yet, with every season, I love the show and the character more and more. I find it awesome the way the show gets me to identify with and root for him without ever making me feel like everything he does is okay. That’s part of it — it’s not okay. And yet I am complicit. Crunchy!

Dexter earned my trust based on the strength of the episodes and writing. Joss Whedon has not yet earned my trust. Therefore, I don’t read all the good intentions into Dollhouse as other fans do. Even without trusting him at the outset, Joss still could have earned my trust by the way the premise was handled. He didn’t, he hasn’t, and I refuse to give it to him just because he created Buffy and Angel and Firefly. I don’t owe him anything.

So again, it’s not about my lack of appreciation of the subtle. I get subtlety. I just don’t don’t believe the show is as nuanced as fans want it to be. I didn’t assume it would be super nuanced and complex from the beginning. Did you?

Posted in Buffy, Whedon, etc., Syndicated feeds | 40 Comments

Here Comes Another Post About Mexico

Auguste is right — this really might be the dumbest cartoon ever in the history of the entire universe. And this is not just the universe where Chris Muir lives, but the one Bruce Tinsley lives in, too!

mexicocartoon.gif

I’m not sure what my favorite part of this little slice of wingnuttery is. I think it’s the implication that these are things unique to Mexico. I mean, it’s not like America lacks drug gangs, kidnappings, unemployment, poverty, or even swine flu. And I thought conservatives liked guns! I mean, it’s not like America is anti-gun. Indeed, most of the guns in Mexico are coming from the U.S.

I can only conclude that we’re also bad neighbors. And we’re still here, because…um…well, I don’t know really where either America or Mexico is supposed to go.

In other news, the wingnuts have started calling the flu outbreak in Mexico the “Mexican Flu,” because, you know, the wingnuts are a bunch of racist assholes.

[Postscript from Ampersand: The cartoon Jeff criticizes was written and drawn by Donna Barstow, whose work can be found on the web here and here.]

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Health Care and Related Issues, Immigration, Migrant Rights, etc, Latin America | 33 Comments

The Truth is Out There

The anti-choice activists have completely dispensed with reality, and have gone on to just making stuff up:

The Obama administration’s actions to respond to the outbreak of swine flu, including its declaration of a public health emergency, smacks of an attempt to cover up this week’s Senate vote on the confirmation of Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) as secretary of Health and Human Services, a prominent anti-abortion-rights activist told the Washington Independent.

“Some people think that declaring a state of emergency about the flu was a political thing to push the Sebelius nomination through,” Concerned Women for America President Wendy Wright told the website’s Dave Weigel.

Okay, it’s tempting to think that’s just a bit of isolated wingnuttery from the CWA, but apparently it isn’t:

Look likes like the swine-flu-response-equals-cover-up-for-Sebelius meme is working quickly through the right wing. Family Research Council President Tony Perkins weighed in via an e-mail sent to supporters Monday. “[L]iberals are already scheming how they can use the health scare to win the confirmation of pro-abortion extremist Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D-Kans.) as Secretary of Health and Human Services,” he writes

Just who are these liberals who confide the truth about their secret conspiracies to prominent national conservative leaders? Perkins leaves us hanging on that one.

That is surprising — when you’re that deep into tinfoil hat territory, it’s usually easiest just to start making more stuff up. I would blame George Soros, myself — he’s usually to blame.

At any rate, what the anti-choicers expect you to believe is that the United States only is concerned about a flu outbreak and possible epidemic in a country that sits on our southern border because it allows them to get Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, D-Kan., into the leadership of the Department of Health and Human Services approximately one week earlier than they otherwise could.

That’s a pretty lame conspiracy. Unless….

…Unless maybe, what they’re saying is that Barack HUSSEIN Obama secretly engineered the flu virus and started spreading it in Mexico, so that he could get Sebelius through to get mandatory, free, universal abortion going even sooner! Yes, it’s all so clear now. Wheels within wheels, man, wheels within wheels.

Posted in Abortion & reproductive rights, Health Care and Related Issues, Latin America | 13 Comments

Open thread: Elephant and dog edition

Use this thread to discuss whatever. Self-linking is as welcome as hot chocolate on a cold day.

* * *

Okay, the smarmy news guy is annoying (especially at the end, when he gets all Paul McCartney on us). But I nonetheless found this story irresistible.


Also: Advertising photography, circa 1962. Then as now, the most common strategy seems to be: show happy thin white people possessing product, “good life”.

Also: The trailer for Charlyne Yi’s Paper Hearts, a semi-not-really documentary is astonishingly cute-looking (much discussion of this in the comments there). Via.

Posted in Link farms | 22 Comments

H1N1

Okay, there’s no need to panic, but the H1N1 outbreak in Mexico may well be cause for concern. But hopefully not too much of one:

So swine flu has come out of nowhere. It has unfortunately killed some people, and analysis shows it’s a brand-new virus with unknown potential to kill many more.

That doesn’t mean we can kiss civilization good-bye, or damn and blast the World Health Organization for not doing what we think it should. This strain of H1N1 is an interesting, and probably serious, new virus. The Mexicans seem to be doing the best they can, with limited resources and in a bad recession. We may end up thanking them for courageous decisions that cost them dearly.

But thanks or blame are both premature. We have only a handful of cases, and an even smaller number of deaths. In tracking H5N1, I’ve always thought: As long as we can count the dead, we’re OK. We can still count the dead, and mourn them.

We can also count the living, including eight kids in New York City. Every one of them is a promise that this may be less than a catastrophe…maybe even a wonderful anticlimax, where we all, around May 30, ask ourselves: “What were we so upset about?”

That’s the hope. And it’s important to keep things in perspective. So far, 81 people are dead, and roughly 1500 people are infected worldwide. Those numbers aren’t remotely close to pandemic levels. The fact that we’ve identified this outbreak this early gives us a chance to get it locked down and keep it from becoming a serious health concern. We hope.

Of course, because the outbreak started in Mexico, Michelle Malkin is sprinkling her bile into the discussion:

I’ve blogged for years about the spread of contagious diseases from around the world into the U.S. as a result of uncontrolled immigration. We’ve heard for years from reckless open-borders ideologues who continue to insist there’s nothing to worry about. And we’ve heard for years that calling any attention to the dangers of allowing untold numbers of people to pass across our borders and through our other ports of entry without proper medical screening — as required of every legal visitor/immigrant to this country — is RAAAACIST.

Sigh. As Crawford Kilian notes, “Cases outside Mexico have all been brought home by legitimate tourists who could afford travel to Mexico from places as remote as New Zealand and Israel.” This has absolutely nothing to do with immigration. I suppose we can quarantine Mexico completely — though frankly, the train’s out of the station here — but to what end?

It’s remarkably hateful that someone can look at what is, at best, a catastrophe that has killed dozens, and see only a tool to use against Mexican immigrants. There is a word for that kind of worldview, and yes, Michelle, it is racist, a word that describes you to a T.

As for those of us who view this public health crisis as a public health crisis, the smart things to do right now are the smart things to do all the time. Wash your hands, use a hand sanitizer, be conscious of illness and go to the doctor if you’re sick (unless, of course, you don’t have insurance — then feel free to spread it willy-nilly to everyone and their twin sister). And take a deep breath, because this probably is not the long-feared flu pandemic. Or so we hope.

Posted in Immigration, Migrant Rights, etc, In the news, Latin America | 15 Comments

Japanese Women Fight Back Against Domestic Violence

Found this good report on Al Jazeera English.

Posted in Families structures, divorce, etc, Feminism, sexism, etc, In the news | 6 Comments

Bea Arthur, 1922-2009

When it comes to comedy, Bea Arthur could bring it. Her career is a testament to that; few actors can boast a career that spans one decade, let alone seven. The woman was a fantastic talent, and she’ll be missed.

And of course, who could forget…

Requiescat in pace.

Posted in Whatever | 6 Comments

GO SEE SLEEP DEALER

Earlier this week, one of my radical writer friends alerted me to the existence of a little-known but award-winning Mexican sci-fi film called “Sleep Dealer”. So some of us went to see it this week — and I was blown away.

The story’s premise is simple. In the near future, the border between the US and Mexico is closed, fenced, and heavily armed. This doesn’t prevent US corporations from exploiting Mexican labor, however, as Mexico is now full of factories in which workers with cybernetic implants do “virtual labor” via a global network, connecting their minds to robots in faraway cities to do the same jobs in construction, nannying, orange picking, etc., that migrants and illegal immigrants used to do.

Memo (Luis Fernando Peña) is an idealistic young man who lives on a milpa with his tradition-loving father and family. The milpa is struggling, however, because a corporation has dammed up the river and now charges the local citizens for every gallon of water. Memo’s father, who once militantly resisted the dam and still hates it, settles now for trying to inculcate his values into his son. But Memo isn’t listening. He dreams instead of escaping his boring, simple life — so he hacks into the global network to hear of distant cities he will never be allowed to visit in person. Unfortunately, this earns him the attention of the US military, and they send armed drones to destroy his house and kill his father, whom they assume is an “aqua-terrorist”.

Memo is thus forced to travel to Tijuana to earn money for his family, where he moves into a slum and ekes out a living working in one of the factories. The locals have dubbed the factories “sleep dealers”, because the workers often grow so exhausted during their 12-hour shifts — using unsafe equipment that gradually blinds and occasionally fries them — that they collapse. Here, though, Memo meets Luz (Leonor Varela), a young woman trying to survive in the city too. Luz is a writer, and to earn money she sells her memories on the global net. Meanwhile both of them are being investigated by Rudy (Jacob Vargas), the Mexican-American soldier who cybernetically controlled the drones that killed Memo’s father. Rudy’s agenda is unclear as he first purchases Luz’s memories of Memo, then crosses the border into Mexico, looking for them.

This synopsis fails to capture just how powerful the film is, however. The messages about globalization and the exploitation of the poor are more subtly done than I’m describing here; that’s just the part that captured my attention the most. But it’s just done so beautifully. When Memo arrives in Tijuana, he needs to have cybernetic implants installed before he can work in the sleep dealers. So he seeks out a “coyotek” — the futuristic equivalent of today’s coyotes, who smuggle (and often prey on) would-be illegal immigrants. When Rudy crosses the border, he speaks with a robotic sentry being cyber-controlled by a customer service representative who speaks with a distinct Indian accent. Memo’s father is murdered on live TV, via a lurid “America’s Most Wanted”-like show (complete with John Walsh lookalike), the host gleefully glamorizes the military strike as “blowing the hell out of the bad guys!” At every level the American appropriation of Mexico’s resources, from water right down to the people’s thoughts, is shown as simply an extrapolation of what’s already happening today, carried to a logical — and chilling — conclusion.

But what makes this message sink in is that it’s so deftly delivered. Since it’s science fiction, special effects matter, and the ones here are mostly CGI. Obviously low-budget, but still well-done. I barely noticed the CGI, though, because the actors are so fantastic — especially Peña, who’s a newcomer to US film (but a veteran in Mexico), and Varela, who’s had a number of parts in US sci-fi TV and film (Blade II, Stargate: Atlantis, Jeremiah). The cinematography is subtly effective — for example, though natural lighting is used in most scenes, the factory scenes are eerily lit with fluorescents and washed-out colors to emphasize the dehumanization of the workers. The movements of the workers as they go about their virtual labor evoke an “exotic” dance, implying a unity between workers in Mexico and those in Asia, Africa, and other parts of the “Third World”. The plot moves slowly and delicately when dealing with its weightiest messages, such as the parallelism between Memo (a Mexican yearning to see the US) and Rudy (a Mexican-American who goes back to Mexico). The bulk of the plot is given over to the relationship between Memo and Luz, as she struggles ethically with her need to exploit him for her own survival, even as she grows to love him. I have to admit I found her story more compelling than that of Memo, the doe-eyed idealist, though it’s Memo who (fortunately) grows up over the course of the story.

All of this is especially impressive given that it defies the standard message of science fiction, fantasy, and other speculative fiction (SF). The most popular fantasy novels are those in which a deposed king is rescued or hidden, and the heroes fight to defeat the evil usurper and put the king back on his throne. The most lauded science fiction stories (and TV shows, such as “Star Trek” and “Stargate”) are written from the perspective of the colonizer who lands on an alien world and masters or helps the natives, rather than the perspective of the natives — who may not need mastering, or want help. Truly progressive speculative fiction, in which these old paradigms are challenged and new ones postulated, is comparatively rare (and becoming more so). So I can’t help hoping that more sci fi like “Sleep Dealer” — emerging from a non-American perspective, capable of looking frankly at issues like racism and classism and imperialism — will eventually help to reboot the genre. This, IMO, is what speculative fiction should be.

So go see “Sleep Dealer”, and help make it a hit.

Posted in Syndicated feeds | 11 Comments

Hindrocket Wrong About Something Again

Oh, Blogger Formerly Known as Hindrocket, why can’t I quit you? You say the wingnuttiest stuff imaginable — it’s so precious! And you’re able to get worked up so easily — it’s adorable!

Take today, for example. You got really, really upset when you were in an airport and were evidently forced at gunpoint to watch CNN:

That’s where I spent an hour or more at a gate this afternoon, listening unwillingly to CNN’s coverage of the “torture” issue. That’s pretty much all they talked about; they were nearly rubbing their hands together with glee. The premise of CNN’s coverage was that those nasty Bush officials surely ought to be prosecuted and imprisoned for waterboarding poor Khalid Sheikh Mohammed; the only question is whether they will somehow wriggle out of it.

Yeah! Stupid CNN, thinking that it was bad of the Bush Administration to commit war crimes. After all, KSM is a bad guy! And we got such great information from it — why, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confessed to pretty much everything imaginable! Okay, some of it was probably stuff he didn’t actually do, but that’s the purpose of torture: to get people to confess to things they didn’t do, so there, morans!

Not that we torture, of course. Except, of course, for Barack Obama, who is torturing U.S. troops zOMG11!!!!!!onethousandonehundredeleven!!

As I listened to an hour of almost non-stop wailing about waterboarding, I couldn’t help wondering how many people have been waterboarded by U.S. authorities during the first three months of the Obama administration. Some hundreds, I would think–surely far more than the three terrorists over whom such tears are now being shed. Those “victims” don’t count, apparently, inasmuch as they are only U.S. military personnel.

Yes, folks, Barack HUSSEIN Obama is torturing our troops, probably personally. It’s all part of his secret plot to sell us to the Swedes who will come in and make us all drive Volvos and eat lutefisk and shop at IKEA and then they’ll surrender to the Muslims! Will nobody stop this monster? Why won’t someone think of the troops?

And, hey, they volunteered.

Well, that’s no reason to — wait, what?

But if waterboarding is “torture,” then it’s illegal. So why is the U.S. military still using it as a training device, last we knew? If we’re going to start prosecuting people, don’t we have to prosecute the many civilian and military leaders who have for decades inflicted waterboarding, or condoned the use of waterboarding, on our servicemen?

Uh…huh.

Let me draw an analogy. If I walk up to some unsuspecting person and poke a hole in their ear with a sharp object, that would be illegal. I’d be guilty of assault (at the very least). I’d go to jail. If, however, a person comes to my jewelry shop and asks me to pierce their ears, and I do so, I am not, in fact, guilty of a crime.

Or if I lie down on a bed, and suddenly someone knocks me out and cuts me open and starts pulling parts of me out, they’re obviously a very sick criminal. Unless I’m in a hospital and they’re removing my gall bladder — then they’re trained medical professionals doing their job.

Or if I meet a girl at a bar, and shove her into my car and force myself on her, then I’m a rapist and I’m going away to prison. But if I invite her to my house and she says yes, and we have a night of consenual sex, then nobody’s guilty of a damn thing, other than getting some good lovin’.

You see, John, the fact that soldiers volunteer for SERE is not beside the point — it is the point. There are all sorts of activities that are perfectly legal when people consent to them them, and completely illegal when they don’t.

Waterboarding? That’s in that category. When our soldiers experience waterboarding in order to learn how to deal with it should they be captured — that’s a learning experience, one that is useful, if frightening. (Indeed, very useful — no doubt, U.S. soldiers are today more at risk of torture than they were in 2001. Thanks, Dubya.)

But if we waterboard a prisoner, one we have in custody — if we inflict pain and trauma on a person against that person’s will — that is a war crime. That is illegal, and deeply immoral. If the U.S. government is still engaged in waterboarding prisoners, then Barack Obama will be no less guilty than George W. Bush — and I would support his impeachment if that turned out to be so.

But if the Obama administration is guilty of teaching soldiers how to deal with torture, then that just proves they understand the world America lives in. Unlike you, John Hinderaker. Unlike you.

Posted in Conservative zaniness, right-wingers, etc., In the news, International issues | 8 Comments