David Blankenhorn And The Meaning Of "Bigot"

I’ve read quite a bit today about David Blankenhorn’s lack of bigotry. Blankenhorn, best known for his opposition to same-sex marriage, argues that he can be anti gay marriage without being antigay.

Some of David’s friends — including Dale Carpenter and Jonathan Rauch, both prominent supporters of marriage equality (and gay themselves) — have taken pains to say that David is no bigot. Carpenter lays out the argument:

On the subject of same-sex marriage, I believe David is a man at war with himself. He has spoken publicly, in a forum of anti-SSM conservatives, of the equal dignity of homosexual love. Note the words dignity and love. This is not the language of liberal toleration of some hateful thing, like Nazis marching in Skokie […]

David doesn’t oppose gay marriage because he opposes gay people. He opposes it because he’s worried it would have unintended negative effects on marriage. […]

What I can’t say, as Frank Rich has now repeatedly suggested, is that David is an anti-gay bigot. I don’t see how anyone who has reviewed David’s writings, speeches, and California testimony, could honestly say such a thing.

I suspect that if I met David socially — which seems, put mildly, unlikely — I’d like him. He seems like a pleasant guy, and he’s interested in a lot of the same things that interest me. And he’s able to have friendly discussions about policy with people he strongly disagrees with, a trait I highly value.

Nonetheless, David’s preferred policy harms same-sex couples, harms their children, harms lesbian and gay kids, and makes lesbians, gay men, and their kids into second-class citizens. That David is personally a very nice guy doesn’t mitigate the harms of the policies he defends.

David is obviously not a simple hater of gays. He doesn’t wish gay people harm for the sake of harming gay people.

But is simple, direct hatred the only kind of bigotry that exists?

Decades ago, William F. Buckley argued that it was not; discussing antisemitism, he used the example of a man who genuinely loves his Jewish friends, but also supports his country club’s restricted (no Jews allowed) policy. The point is, even someone who is not personally antisemitic in the sense of rabidly hating all Jewish people, might be antisemitic in other ways — such as supporting an antisemitic policy.

David Blankenhorn doesn’t hate gay people, and that’s good. But he engages in antigay bigotry by supporting a bigoted and antigay policy. ((Yes, the same thing is true of Barak Obama.)) It’s not unfair to say so. What would be unfair is taking all discussion of bigotry off the table, when moral opposition to bigotry is one major reason to favor marriage equality.

* * *

Further reading: David Blankenhorn responds to Frank Rich; XXFactor; Equality Loudoun; Zack Ford.

Posted in Same-Sex Marriage | 100 Comments

Apply for the Jeremiah Fellowship!

So I just finished a wonderful leadership program run by the Progressive Jewish Alliance called the Jeremiah Fellowship. The Los Angeles and Bay Area programs are currently accepting applications for next year’s cohorts, and you should apply! Here’s a description from the site:

Access a dynamic network of organizers, activists, rabbis, visionaries and renowned scholars.

Empower yourself through in-depth training in professional and leadership skills.

Expand your knowledge of Jewish tradition, text and history to put ethics into action.

Develop tangible organizing and activism skills within a Jewish context.

Explore your city through the intersection of social justice, Jewish values, and leadership.

Join a lasting community of vibrant and engaged leaders.

The Jeremiah Fellowship is a 9 month program that runs from September through June. Fellows come together for two weekday evenings per month and several weekend experiences in the field, and participate in two weekend-long retreats. The program culminates with the Jeremiah Challenge, a self-directed and community-based action project.

Since the Fellowship’s launch in 2005 over 120 Jewish leaders have completed the program, emerging with in-depth leadership training and exposure to a dynamic network of organizers, activists, rabbis, artists, visionaries and renowned scholars. Through the program, Fellows explore the intersection of social justice, Jewish values and leadership.

During the 9 month course, Fellows come together to explore different models of putting ethics and values into action, for intimate conversations with major leaders in the local Jewish and social justice worlds, and for meaningful study of Jewish history and texts. Fellowship retreats during the year offer in-depth trainings in social justice organizing and leadership skills, and foster community-building among the participants.

Each year the fellowship focuses on three central areas of study. The areas of study are chosen based on the most relevant social justice issues facing the cities in which the Fellows reside. For example, the previous Fellowship included local perspectives on food justice, affordable housing and the California budget quagmire.

Participants emerge from the Fellowship with tangible community organizing and activism skills grounded in Jewish values, better equipped to pursue their own careers and studies in the social justice field. After the Fellowship, participants are invited to join the Alumni Network to stay engaged, informed and connected.

Also, read my fancy testimonial if you want!

Seriously, the guest speakers were amazing and the training was invaluable. Applications are due on the 30th, so get to it.

Posted in Jews and Judaism | Comments Off on Apply for the Jeremiah Fellowship!

UCI Suspends Muslim Student Union

I’m embarrassed that I didn’t hear about this until last night, especially since my husband attends the very campus in question. (In my defense, I was in the mountains for most of last week.) In response to Muslim students’ protest* of Israeli ambassador Michael Oren’s visit to campus, the UC Irvine Muslim Student Union has been suspended for one year.

Whether the students’ choice of direct action was wise is a debate of its own – and one that I’m not interested in having on this thread – but the university needs to realize the deeper ramifications of its decision. It’s almost impossible to imagine a Jewish or Christian group being punished this way for the actions of Jewish or Christian students; I’m assuming that the Muslim protesters were members of the MSU, but it must be noted that they didn’t act on behalf of the organization. The message the university is sending, whether it means to or not, isn’t that some forms of protest are unacceptable. The message it’s sending is that Islam is not as legitimate as other religions at UCI.

The MSU is appealing the decision; check their website for updates.

Via the Debate Link.

ETA: According to the LA Times, the office of student housing claims that the MSU organized the protest with plans to deny it later. At this point the evidence seems shaky, though.

*David Schraub points out the following in the comments:

The MSU was not suspended for “protesting” Ambassador Oren’s appearance. They were suspended for disrupting the appearance — trying to make it impossible for Ambassador Oren to present at all via, in essence, continually shouting him down. Particularly since there are many out there who suspect that any protest or critique against Israelis or Israeli policies will be met with “muzzling”, this is not a trivial distinction, and is extremely important to make it. Students should be absolutely free to protest, but universities have every right to prevent actual disruption of educational events.

Posted in Free speech, censorship, copyright law, etc., Palestine & Israel | 26 Comments

How's That Working Out For You?

Hey, Sun, do you still stand by this analysis?

All right, to be fair, the Three Lions are tied for second in Group C with the USA. Like the Yanks, England has drawn both their matches. But the two sides have to feel very different tonight. Team USA came back from two goals down to tie Slovenia, the group leader, and by rights should be leading the group tonight — they scored a third goal that was nullified on a phantom foul.  England, meanwhile, played to a sloppy 0-0 tie with Algeria, who had lost to Slovenia 0-1 in the opener.

So to advance to the knockout round, America has to win over the consensus worst team in the group, while England has to beat a squad that’s shown some life. What’s more, Team USA has to feel good about the way they played in the second half today, while England, which came into the tourney ranked eighth in the world, has to be wondering what’s happened since the fifth minute in game one.

Ultimately, the US is in great shape to make it to the sudden death round, and once there, to maybe steal a game or two, make it to the quarters or — who knows — maybe the semis. That was their hope in the first place, anything more is gravy. England was a team that had the idea of winning the cup — and right now, you have to see them as no more than even money to get out of their pool.

All can be made right if England wins next week. But if they find a way to fail to get out of their group while the Yanks do? Expect a great deal of wailing and gnashing of teeth to come from London — and a great deal of Schadenfreude from Cardiff, Belfast, and Edinburgh — not to mention Washington, Algiers, and Ljubljana.

Posted in Sports | 16 Comments

Brief Debate about Nuclear Power

Posted in Environmental issues | 5 Comments

Cartoon: Who To Blame?

Click on the image to see it bigger.

Script:

PANELS 1 & 2. The Federal Reserve, depicted as a professorial-looking man (bow tie, pipe), cheerily talking to a balding, working-class looking dude in an undershirt. Working class dude is listening without much expression.
FEDERAL RESERVE: hi! i’m the federal reserve! i practically run the economy! i COULD use my powers to lower unemployment, but INVESTORS don’t want that. in fact, whenever unemployment gets LOW, i make it go UP. because that’s what wall street wants. i purposely create unemployment!
PANELS 3 & 4 The Federal Reserve is gone, and in his place is The Banking Industry, depicted as a balding man in a vest, tie and jacket, and with dollar bills floating in the air around him. Banking Industry is even more cheerful than Federal Reserve was. Working class dude continues listening expressionlessly.
BANKING INDUSTRY: hey there! I’m the banking industry. i pack the government with my friends, and gamble wildly until i destroy the entire economy. after that, i’ll get bailed out with YOUR tax dollars. then i’ll foreclose on the horribly inequitable mortgage i sold you and take your home!
PANEL 5: Man wearing Uncle Sam hat has now replaced Banking Industry. Uncle Sam waves cheerily. Working Class Dude continues to listen expressionlessly.
UNCLE SAM: greetings! i’m your goverment!
PANEL 6: Uncle Sam leans in and whispers. Working Class Dude continues to listen expressionlessly.
UNCLE SAM: i make little GESTURES towards reform, but in the end i always take the banks’ side! because they totally OWN me!
PANELS 7 & 8: An Immigrant Dude replaces Uncle Sam, and speaks cheerfully. Immigrant Dude looks exactly like Working Class Dude, except his skin is a little darker. Working Class Dude continues to listen expressionlessly.
IMMIGRANT DUDE: hello! i’m an immigrant. i just want to work hard to feed my family.
PANEL 9: Working Class Dude yells very loudly and angrily; Immigrant Dude winces back in surprise.
WORKING CLASS DUDE: QUIT RUINING MY LIFE, YOU SELFISH BASTARD!!

Posted in Cartooning & comics, Immigration, Migrant Rights, etc | 12 Comments

Girls suck at video games

Posted without comment:

Girls suck at video games / Les filles sont nulles aux jeux vidéo from Stéphanie Mercier on Vimeo.


Please do not comment unless you accept the basic dignity, equality, and inherent worth of all people.

Posted in Gender and the Economy | 81 Comments

Constructive Ways Of Administering The Cluebat

constructive-ways-of-administering-the-cluebat

The next time you’re in a situation where a person says something racist and then says “But I’m not racist why would you say I’m racist?” don’t even bother trying to talk them down from the failtree. Just point them at this clip from VH1′s Bad Girl’s Club and walk away for a little while. If they don’t see where they’re going wrong after watching this classic, yet unbelievably insane trainwreck of human interaction, you might not be able to reach them just now.

Hat Tip To Blame: sparkeymonster

Constructive Ways Of Administering The Cluebat — Originally posted at The Angry Black Woman

Posted in Syndicated feeds | 3 Comments

Call for Papers: Investigating the Scope of Persian/Iranian Literatures

42nd Annual Convention, Northeast Modern Language Association (NeMLA)

April 7-10, 2011
New Brunswick, NJ – Hyatt New Brunswick
Host Institution: Rutgers University
Keynote Speaker: Junot Diaz

This panel welcomes papers on any aspect of Persian/Iranian literature, of any time period, defined to include not only work written in Iran and works in translation, but also work written in Persian by Iranian writers in exile, in English by Iranian American writers, in French (Marjane Satrapi) and/or in any other language in which people of Iranian descent choose to write. Please submit 250-300 word proposals to Richard Jeffrey Newman at richard.newman@ncc.edu

Deadline: September 30, 2010

Please include with your abstract:
Name and Affiliation
Email address
Postal address
Telephone number
A/V requirements (if any; $10 handling fee with registration)

The 42nd Annual Convention will feature approximately 360 sessions, as well as pre-conference workshops, dynamic speakers and cultural events. Details and the complete Call for Papers for the 2011 Convention will be posted in June: www.nemla.org.

Interested participants may submit abstracts to more than one NeMLA session; however panelists can only present one paper (panel or seminar). Convention participants may present a paper at a panel and also present at a creative session or participate in a roundtable. Do not accept a slot if you may cancel to present on another session

Posted in Iran, literature, Whatever | Comments Off on Call for Papers: Investigating the Scope of Persian/Iranian Literatures

Hating on the WNBA is Sexist

I actually think the WNBA is doing pretty good for a relatively new product. The NBA wasn’t drawing tens of thousands of fans in its early years, players weren’t making a bazillion dollars a year. The WNBA is doing things right — expanding slowly but steadily, paying its players wages that are sustainable, and carefully advancing into the future. Granted, it would be nice if the same could be said for the Minnesota Lynx, but alas, they appear to be subject to the same vagaries of fate that their brother organization is.

So the WNBA is currently America’s sixth-largest professional league? That’s not that bad, really. They may not be making money, but they’ve got a good base of support, and they’re tied to the NBA, which gives them a solid base of financial support for the long term. (Indeed, the NBA wisely is using the WNBA as a loss leader, figuring that drawing new fans to women’s basketball will bring new fans to men’s basketball.) Their attendance isn’t growing yet, but it’s a steady 8,000 a game, despite the league playing in the summer opposite baseball and during a period when families are busy.

No, the WNBA is doing pretty well in its 14th year of operation, and every indication is that it will continue to do well for some time. But of course, the WNBA is basketball played by dumb ol’ girls, and so rather than note its success and treat it like the country’s sixth-largest major league, sports pages and newscasts continue to treat it as an oddity, something to shoehorn in on page C13 underneath the minor league baseball scores, or to mention in passing before tossing it back to the main anchor. And when it’s mentioned by (overwhelmingly male) sports columnists, it’s to talk about why women’s basketball is hated by everyone, which would seem odd, given that thousands of people go to each game. What’s more, it’s not good enough to say that it’s hated by everyone — they go forward and say it will always be hated by everyone, which seems to fly in the face of everything we’ve seen with women’s sports in the past forty years.

That’s why this brilliant takedown of just such a column is a must-read for anyone who’s ever been in the stands for a sporting event played by women. The column is by Alex C., a man (gasp) who actually toured every WNBA home venue in the country (double gasp) and actually likes the sport (bring me my fainting couch!). And he nails precisely why columns like this keep getting written:

So, now the inevitable question. Why? If the WNBA will indeed never succeed, why do professional writers, like Mr. Pearlman, continue to write such things? One would think if they were one of those who doesn’t care about the WNBA, (becasue nobody does) they would not even write about it, because, well, they (should have) no idea it exists.

I have one theory, and it might sound a bit far fetched, but stay with me.

The Answer? Fear. Fear of the unfamiliar.

When a guy like [Jeff] Pearlman sees a female athlete in the same place (i.e. the basketball court) previously occupied by their male counterparts, childhood sports heroes, or person of worship, there is a sense of fear being felt. Fear that a woman could actually compete and possess skills at a level only held by men for so long. What else could possibly motivate a professional writer to write about something that supposedly they care nothing about, and have no interest in? Money? No, there are plenty of sports out there to cover. Fame? Write about something that they admit no one cares about?

Nope.

Only one thing I can think of, knee-jerk fear, leading to irrational thinking, and thus taking the form of negative content in an attempt to disguise their prejudices as legitimate sports writing.

Nail. Head. Hit.

The hatred of the WNBA is all about keeping women and men in their place. Men are athletes. Women are not. And “everyone” knows that. “Everyone” agrees on that. “Everyone” will always agree with that.

But of course, not everyone agrees with that. When the US women won the 1999 Women’s World Cup, the Rose Bowl was full. NCAA women’s basketball draws well, both in person and on television. And yes, the WNBA still plays to half-empty arenas — but as anyone who watched a Timberwolves game can tell you, that doesn’t differentiate the leagues from each other.

Women’s participation in athletics has skyrocketed since Title IX was passed into law, to the point where it’s unusual for a girl growing up not to play some sports. The WNBA is the sixth-largest pro league right now. But it wouldn’t have existed save as a curiosity a generation ago, and a generation from now, it could draw as well as hockey — even as well as the NBA. That may scare some people. But that’s just too bad.

Posted in Feminism, sexism, etc, Sports | 29 Comments